BREAKING!! AG Bill Barr Says 'No!' to Transgenders in Women's Sports! | |
Too Dark Park™ Two User ID: 76303377 United States 06/19/2020 03:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Good. Keep those freaks away. Bless my fuck "It’s in my interest, in ours perhaps, or maybe the interests of the greater good, for me to smoke a joint, and calm down.” — Hunter S. Thompson "I've got the spirit, but lose the feeling!" :rockon: |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79037635 United States 06/19/2020 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 78689057 United States 06/19/2020 03:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This should apply nationally and globally. MTF transgenders are not, I repeat emphatically, NOT females and never will be females. They are pretenders usurping the rights of females to compete in sports against other females. Let them form their own leagues of transgenders if they don't want to compete against males, just like females had to. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59012273 Any normal person knows this, which is why Dems think it's okay. |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 78689057 United States 06/19/2020 03:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | about time.. because they are still guys. surgery and hormones do not change the DNA. Quoting: ALL IS ONE IS ALL No, they do not. But soon there will be an RNA vaccine to help with that :) mRNA maybe but not a vaccine.. mRNA is not a vaccine. That's what I was referring to, and that's what they're working on for Coronavirus as well. "Translate Bio and BioNTech are collaborating with big pharma companies to advance mRNA vaccines for coronavirus. BioNTech has partnered with Pfizer (NYSE:PFE), and expects its vaccine candidate to enter clinical trials at the end of April. The companies were already working together on an mRNA vaccine for influenza. Sanofi and Translate Bio were also partners prior to the coronavirus program, working on mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases; they recently said they would extend the agreement to develop a coronavirus vaccine. Sanofi and Translate Bio may have a candidate ready for clinical trials by the end of the year, BioPharma Dive reported, citing a Sanofi spokesman." [link to www.fool.com (secure)] |
Lynx7 User ID: 79042063 United States 06/19/2020 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
InTheGLPHood User ID: 78257525 United States 06/19/2020 04:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Secretizer User ID: 78467371 United States 06/19/2020 05:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
oniongrass User ID: 15354380 United States 06/19/2020 05:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | im almost wonder if they should have allowed it Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77181668 get the women against the progressive movement once and for all Barr's argument seems strained to me. I don't think he's going to win. The logic of the recent SCOTUS decision is that anyone has equal rights to compete or work as a woman (incl. women's sports etc.) or as a man, and one's birth sex should not affect that. There's not much logic left after that. Women's this and that should be open to biological males. Barr has to try to construct an argument consistent with this logic, and I don't think such an argument exists. . DON'T VAX, PROPHYLAX! ____________ There is no anger in Me: If one offers Me thorns and thistles, I will march to battle against him, And set all of them on fire. But if he holds fast to My refuge, He makes Me his friend; He makes Me his friend. (Isaiah 27:4-5) |
ac User ID: 78993267 United States 06/19/2020 05:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
3643297 User ID: 76832232 United States 06/19/2020 05:57 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | im almost wonder if they should have allowed it Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77181668 get the women against the progressive movement once and for all Too many injuries have already happened. It needs to be stopped. Last Edited by 936432979 on 06/19/2020 05:59 PM |
RepublicofTexas User ID: 37012710 United States 06/19/2020 05:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Are you listening pink vagina hat wearers? We are not going to allow young women to be pushed out of their sports by men too weak to compete with other men. Quoting: ac 78993267 So you only want equality, diversity and inclusion except when it's on your turf? Make America Strong Again Make America Sexy Again I'm fukken this monkey, you just shut up and hold the tail." |
Captain KC Jones User ID: 73566700 United States 06/19/2020 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | about time.. because they are still guys. surgery and hormones do not change the DNA. Quoting: ALL IS ONE IS ALL No, they do not. But soon there will be an RNA vaccine to help with that :) So, OP, what is this RNA cellular insertion to which you allude other than as a viral treatment?? This has absolutely nothing to do with the etiology of transsexualism. Absolutely nothing! I have scarcely seen so many uninformed posts on a thread which has, unfortunately, simply degenerated into another anti Trann*e thread. Last Edited by Captain KC Jones on 06/19/2020 07:02 PM |
Use your brian... moran! User ID: 78940322 United States 06/19/2020 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | FINALLY! Quoting: Inquire Within DOJ just put out a press release in support of only having women (biological) allowed to play on women's sporting team, and not men/transgenders. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Friday, June 19, 2020 The Department of Justice Files Statement of Interest Defending the Constitutionality of Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act The Department of Justice today filed a statement of interest in Idaho federal court defending Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act against a challenge under the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. “Allowing biological males to compete in all-female sports is fundamentally unfair to female athletes” said Attorney General William P. Barr. “Under the Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause allows Idaho to recognize the physiological differences between the biological sexes in athletics. Because of these differences, the Fairness Act’s limiting of certain athletic teams to biological females provides equal protection. This limitation is based on the same exact interest that allows the creation of sex-specific athletic teams in the first place — namely, the goal of ensuring that biological females have equal athletic opportunities. Single-sex athletics is rooted in the reality of biological differences between the sexes and should stay rooted in objective biological fact.” On March 30, 2020, Idaho enacted the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act (Fairness Act), Idaho Code Ann. § 33-6202 et seq., which goes into effect in July 2020. Idaho’s Fairness Act contains two main provisions. First, covered athletic teams “shall be expressly designated as one (1) of the following based on biological sex: (a) Males, men, or boys; (b) Females, women, or girls; or (c) Coed or mixed.” Idaho Code Ann. § 33-6203(1). Second, “[a]thletic teams or sports designated for females, women, or girls shall not be open to students of the male sex.” Id. § 33-6203(2). The Fairness Act does not contain a comparable limitation for biological females who wish to participate on a team designated for biological males. In enacting the Fairness Act, Idaho determined that “[h]aving separate sex specific teams furthers efforts to promote sex equality. Sex-specific teams accomplish this by providing opportunities for female athletes to demonstrate their skill, strength, and athletic abilities while also providing them with opportunities to obtain recognition and accolades, college scholarships, and the numerous other long-term benefits that flow from success in athletic endeavors.” Id. § 33-6202(12). In support of this conclusion, the Fairness Act cites authority establishing that inherent physiological differences between men and women generally include a difference in “strength, speed, and endurance” that results in “different athletic capabilities,” which generally give men a significant advantage in head-to-head competition. Id. § 33-6202(1)-(10). In its statement of interest, the United States explains that the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution does not require States to abandon their efforts to provide biological women with equal opportunity to compete for, and enjoy the life-long benefits that flow from, participation in school athletics in order to accommodate the team preferences of transgender athletes. Put differently, the Constitution does not require Idaho to provide the special treatment plaintiffs request, under which biological males are allowed to compete against biological females if and only if the biological males are transgender. Attachment(s): Download Statement of Interest (PDF) [link to www.justice.gov (secure)] Topic(s): Civil Rights Component(s): Civil Rights Division Office of the Attorney General Press Release Number: 20-563 Updated June 19, 2020 [link to www.justice.gov (secure)] Quoted in FULL above, as permitted by copyright law for any US government-created documents. I don't need to read all of it to support it. If you were born with a d!ck you're a male...if you were born with a v4gin4, you're female(I have a confused child & know what I speak of) & no amount of arguing or attacking people who think differently than you will help your cause. Fuck what the flag by my name says, I'm from Texas! Wake up & smell reality. I have to much blood in my caffeine stream! "Oh look--another basement dwelling loser who ain't had pussy since pussy had him." Beans.N.Rice “The thing about smart mother fuckers is that sometimes, they sound like crazy mother fuckers to stupid mother fuckers...” Robert Kirkman |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78537041 United States 06/19/2020 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | FINALLY! Quoting: Inquire Within DOJ just put out a press release in support of only having women (biological) allowed to play on women's sporting team, and not men/transgenders. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Friday, June 19, 2020 The Department of Justice Files Statement of Interest Defending the Constitutionality of Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act The Department of Justice today filed a statement of interest in Idaho federal court defending Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act against a challenge under the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. “Allowing biological males to compete in all-female sports is fundamentally unfair to female athletes” said Attorney General William P. Barr. “Under the Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause allows Idaho to recognize the physiological differences between the biological sexes in athletics. Because of these differences, the Fairness Act’s limiting of certain athletic teams to biological females provides equal protection. This limitation is based on the same exact interest that allows the creation of sex-specific athletic teams in the first place — namely, the goal of ensuring that biological females have equal athletic opportunities. Single-sex athletics is rooted in the reality of biological differences between the sexes and should stay rooted in objective biological fact.” On March 30, 2020, Idaho enacted the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act (Fairness Act), Idaho Code Ann. § 33-6202 et seq., which goes into effect in July 2020. Idaho’s Fairness Act contains two main provisions. First, covered athletic teams “shall be expressly designated as one (1) of the following based on biological sex: (a) Males, men, or boys; (b) Females, women, or girls; or (c) Coed or mixed.” Idaho Code Ann. § 33-6203(1). Second, “[a]thletic teams or sports designated for females, women, or girls shall not be open to students of the male sex.” Id. § 33-6203(2). The Fairness Act does not contain a comparable limitation for biological females who wish to participate on a team designated for biological males. In enacting the Fairness Act, Idaho determined that “[h]aving separate sex specific teams furthers efforts to promote sex equality. Sex-specific teams accomplish this by providing opportunities for female athletes to demonstrate their skill, strength, and athletic abilities while also providing them with opportunities to obtain recognition and accolades, college scholarships, and the numerous other long-term benefits that flow from success in athletic endeavors.” Id. § 33-6202(12). In support of this conclusion, the Fairness Act cites authority establishing that inherent physiological differences between men and women generally include a difference in “strength, speed, and endurance” that results in “different athletic capabilities,” which generally give men a significant advantage in head-to-head competition. Id. § 33-6202(1)-(10). In its statement of interest, the United States explains that the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution does not require States to abandon their efforts to provide biological women with equal opportunity to compete for, and enjoy the life-long benefits that flow from, participation in school athletics in order to accommodate the team preferences of transgender athletes. Put differently, the Constitution does not require Idaho to provide the special treatment plaintiffs request, under which biological males are allowed to compete against biological females if and only if the biological males are transgender. Attachment(s): Download Statement of Interest (PDF) [link to www.justice.gov (secure)] Topic(s): Civil Rights Component(s): Civil Rights Division Office of the Attorney General Press Release Number: 20-563 Updated June 19, 2020 [link to www.justice.gov (secure)] Quoted in FULL above, as permitted by copyright law for any US government-created documents. I'm sure Roberts will find some word in the English language to redefine in order to defeat common sense. |
sssssteve User ID: 79049375 United States 06/19/2020 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | FINALLY! Quoting: Inquire Within DOJ just put out a press release in support of only having women (biological) allowed to play on women's sporting team, and not men/transgenders. Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Friday, June 19, 2020 The Department of Justice Files Statement of Interest Defending the Constitutionality of Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act The Department of Justice today filed a statement of interest in Idaho federal court defending Idaho’s Fairness in Women’s Sports Act against a challenge under the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. “Allowing biological males to compete in all-female sports is fundamentally unfair to female athletes” said Attorney General William P. Barr. “Under the Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause allows Idaho to recognize the physiological differences between the biological sexes in athletics. Because of these differences, the Fairness Act’s limiting of certain athletic teams to biological females provides equal protection. This limitation is based on the same exact interest that allows the creation of sex-specific athletic teams in the first place — namely, the goal of ensuring that biological females have equal athletic opportunities. Single-sex athletics is rooted in the reality of biological differences between the sexes and should stay rooted in objective biological fact.” On March 30, 2020, Idaho enacted the Fairness in Women’s Sports Act (Fairness Act), Idaho Code Ann. § 33-6202 et seq., which goes into effect in July 2020. Idaho’s Fairness Act contains two main provisions. First, covered athletic teams “shall be expressly designated as one (1) of the following based on biological sex: (a) Males, men, or boys; (b) Females, women, or girls; or (c) Coed or mixed.” Idaho Code Ann. § 33-6203(1). Second, “[a]thletic teams or sports designated for females, women, or girls shall not be open to students of the male sex.” Id. § 33-6203(2). The Fairness Act does not contain a comparable limitation for biological females who wish to participate on a team designated for biological males. In enacting the Fairness Act, Idaho determined that “[h]aving separate sex specific teams furthers efforts to promote sex equality. Sex-specific teams accomplish this by providing opportunities for female athletes to demonstrate their skill, strength, and athletic abilities while also providing them with opportunities to obtain recognition and accolades, college scholarships, and the numerous other long-term benefits that flow from success in athletic endeavors.” Id. § 33-6202(12). In support of this conclusion, the Fairness Act cites authority establishing that inherent physiological differences between men and women generally include a difference in “strength, speed, and endurance” that results in “different athletic capabilities,” which generally give men a significant advantage in head-to-head competition. Id. § 33-6202(1)-(10). In its statement of interest, the United States explains that the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution does not require States to abandon their efforts to provide biological women with equal opportunity to compete for, and enjoy the life-long benefits that flow from, participation in school athletics in order to accommodate the team preferences of transgender athletes. Put differently, the Constitution does not require Idaho to provide the special treatment plaintiffs request, under which biological males are allowed to compete against biological females if and only if the biological males are transgender. Attachment(s): Download Statement of Interest (PDF) [link to www.justice.gov (secure)] Topic(s): Civil Rights Component(s): Civil Rights Division Office of the Attorney General Press Release Number: 20-563 Updated June 19, 2020 [link to www.justice.gov (secure)] Quoted in FULL above, as permitted by copyright law for any US government-created documents. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75658817 United States 06/19/2020 07:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 51031768 United States 06/19/2020 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5957191 United Kingdom 06/19/2020 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
twizzler22 User ID: 78641166 United States 06/19/2020 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 33659422 United States 06/19/2020 07:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Blue State Rebel User ID: 73724632 United States 06/19/2020 07:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | let the progressives take it all the way so they learn they are nothing but a bunch of idiot marxists/communists. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77181668 during the russian revolution, the original leaders were all murdered once the revolutionaries got into power, thats what will happen, progressives are a bunch of useful idiots, and once their masters get into power they will murder all opposition, even the opposition that helped them to power You have to remember, that once they got into power, the Marxists were in power for 70 years or so. You don't want that to happen here. We have to stop this ASAP and not let it get any further. |
Blue State Rebel User ID: 73724632 United States 06/19/2020 07:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78259396 United States 06/19/2020 07:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78445863 United States 06/19/2020 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | im almost wonder if they should have allowed it Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77181668 get the women against the progressive movement once and for all It's still going to get the women against the progressives. The LGBTQ will complain and then women will either have to agree with them or be against them. Having trans in women's sports is like sticking a female in with a bunch of males and giving a gold medal to the one who gets pregnant first. Sexes are different. |
Blue State Rebel User ID: 73724632 United States 06/19/2020 07:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | im almost wonder if they should have allowed it Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77181668 get the women against the progressive movement once and for all Barr's argument seems strained to me. I don't think he's going to win. The logic of the recent SCOTUS decision is that anyone has equal rights to compete or work as a woman (incl. women's sports etc.) or as a man, and one's birth sex should not affect that. There's not much logic left after that. Women's this and that should be open to biological males. Barr has to try to construct an argument consistent with this logic, and I don't think such an argument exists. An argument consistent with that cannot exist because there is no logic to allowing men who are pretending to be women and who have significant natural biological advantages inherently, to play women's sports. There is no logic to argue here. The only logic is reality.....that if this continues biological women will never be able to win or compete successfully in their own sports, and they won't win the awards and scholarships that go with those sports. THAT IS REALITY. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77342954 United States 06/19/2020 07:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74294274 United States 06/19/2020 07:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75658817 United States 06/19/2020 07:51 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Don’t get too excited—will end up with the supremes and Roberts will side with the libs. Our country is toast. Quoting: twizzler22 Boi they haven’t gotten a taste, a bite of the resistance. Is not a toast if you are willing to stand ground. This clowns never have heard the angry blast of a gun directed to them. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 67193667 United States 06/19/2020 07:52 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Well then the Government will have to fund and create an entire athletic division since the Supreme court has ruled that Transgender people are protected under the 1964 civil rights act, that you cannot discriminate based of of sex (aka Gender) So...... If the government is willing to fund boys athletics and girls athletics and there is indeed a difference, then transgender athletics will have to have it's own funding and provide scholarships and opportunities equal to binary gender sports alignments. Bottom line protected means that the transgender athlete will have to be considered in any arguement now as legitimate and needing equal opportunities to compete. The same opportunities as biological males and biological females. They will need equal opportunity at scholorships etc. This is going to be one mixed up cluster of events soon. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79050513 Canada 06/19/2020 07:53 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |