‘Moon Rock’ Given To Holland By Neil Armstrong And Buzz Aldrin Is Fake

Jeez Lance, you don't say - we all got told that nearly 10 years ago.


You spend too much time in your circle-jerk of Qtards - you need to keep up with the rest of the truth movement and stop posting old news as if it is new news.

AH, I didn't link it back to the Telegraph post...oh well, any Qlue how many new people come here daily?

I think whenever the moon rocks have been analyzed, none of them are found to be real.

Guess why?

Debunked old as fuck bull shit.

Because every moon rock ever given out has been cataloged and tracked... lots of fake moon rocks out there. Like 80% of them.

lol

you didn't go to the moon = no moon rocks = 100% fake moon rocks.

Nobody went to the moon. cal rockets can not produce thrust in the vacuum of space.

Sure thing. That's why you can see the reflector on it with a telescope.

show me.

if you can see the reflector clear enough you can probably see the flag right?, but you can't see no flag or no tire tracks near the reflector that means they flew a reflector at the moon to land on it's own.

Tell the truth or it will ruin you. You're already 2 generations away from the lie, so tell the truth.

Amen, brother. The Moon program was designed as a race to bankrupt the Russians (along with the arms race). And it succeeded in that respect. But we've never been to the moon. Not in that tin can.

Moon trips never happened, fakeX CGI nasa.

We watched an interesting scene in the miniseries, "The Crown" tonight in which Prince Phillip was all excited to meet Aldrin, Armstrong & Collins upon their triumphant "return from the moon" and how unimpressed he was with them, as it turns out. I think it was, in some small way, the series producers sort of tongue in cheek slap at the whole apollo thing, without saying too much. I am not into the royal family at all but have found the series quite entertaining.

[citation needed]


You think that because you are a disinfo victim.

Numerous papers on moon rocks have been published by thousands of geologists.
None of them doubted the extra-terrestrial nature of the rocks.

Of course they only analysed rocks with KNOW provenance, not rocks found in a dead guys drawer.
The Drees Rock is not in the catalogue, so it is not an Apollo rock.




If just finding some NASA images on the internet is already beyond your skill set, what makes you think you are qualified to comment on space history?



Even if your interpretation is correct why would that be relevant?

Opinions not supported by evidence are useless.

Would be perfectly in character for an upper-class twit like Edinburgh to tut-tut the achievements of people who actual work for a living, BTW.


Last Edited by Halcyon Dayz, FCD on 06/28/2020 03:18 PM