Judge Napolitano: Governments ‘Do Not Have The Authority’ To Mandate Mask-Wearing

Tell them to remove the mask to talk to you.
The business has to be ADA compliant.

Discriminating against the hearing impaired is a HUGE no no.
If they deny you entry after informing them you have a law suit.

That's the spammiest site ever.

.

Why would anyone need an order to wear a mask? It's only logical to protect yourself. stupid fuk

Just think

Just think it was only a few months ago you didn't even know this word a word , and now look at you , you throw it around like the smartie pants you now are . You've have come a long way , your so smart now ..

with State of Emergency and Martial Law Governments have
lots of special powers, goofball.

That's fine, I won't shop there.

Anyone who says a contrary word about your God (Trump) is name forever not mentioned, you sheep are so brainwashed it's amazing to witness actually.

Also how is it that Trump literally has almost everyone that has ever had anything to do with him never say a good word about him again?

JUST KEEP LYING.


First off, I CHOSE to wear SHOES and a SHIRT when I leave me house. It's DRESS CODE, not a HEALTH CODE and MANY STORES DO NOT CARE if you have shoes or a shirt on, most coastal stores DO NOT REQUIRE IT.



Second: FUCKING LIAR asymptomatic people DO NOT SPREAD IT so says SCIENCE
[link to www.cnn.com (secure)]



FUCKTARDS.

Yeah right. Judge Napolitano. Let’s look at some of his other legal opinions.

Thread: Fox News Judge Napolitano this morning: Trump's Ukraine call 'manifested both criminal and impeachable behavior'

Thread: Judge Napolitano: Evidence of Trump's High Crimes & Misdemeanors is "ample and uncontradicted"

Thread: Judge Napolitano: Enough Evidence 'to Justify About Three or Four Articles of Impeachment.'

[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

Thread: Fox News’ Judge Andrew Napolitano: "What Trump Has Admitted to Is a Crime"


Thread: Judge Napolitano: Trump has unleashed a torrent of hatred. "When the hate speech comes from a shameless president, we have a problem."

he should stick to Mafia Baby Christenings.

NO shirt, No shoes is RACIST AS HELL after passage of the Civil Rights Act, businesses could no longer turn away customers for the color of their skin.

But they could turn them away for something else.

See, it’s no secret that in the 1960s, shoes were a sign of wealth. Not everybody could afford them, and if you couldn’t afford shoes, you didn’t wear shoes. Here’s the thing, it’s also not a secret that historically (and currently) minority communities are much poorer.

So it was really NO SHOES, but many blacks in the south wore overalls without shirts.


SO yea, LET US USE A RACIST SLOGAN for wearing MASK.

Don't you morons understand that what the government can require and what a private business can require are 2 different things? Go invest in a 6th grade civics book for god's sake.

Here's a simple example for you mentally challenged wackjobs: A restaurant cannot require you to wear a mask, period. However, if they say that all who wish to be seated must wear a mask, and you refuse, they have every legal right to kick your tired virus infected ass out. It is EXACTLY like no shirt no shoes no service.

To further simplify: you don't have to wear a mask and they don't have to serve you.
As for the government, that's a different question. It may very well be constitutional but that question has yet to be answered. Regardless, every state has laws against intentionally spreading infectious diseases. This may come into play down the road.

The business has a choice to require or not. I will respect their wishes or choose to go somewhere else. That is freedom and private ownership.

But threatening a businesses livelihood through "color of law" mandates is unconstitutional. Flat out, period, end of story.

But they set the precedent by forcing a baker to bake a dick cake for some gays due to "discrimination". And they push the "public safety" angle to make it seem legal and moral.

[link to twitter.com (secure)]

Problem is, while retail managers most likely know [at least the common sense ones] that oxygen deprivation is whats causing the antibodies...the ORDER to enforce mask by the private business come from the top [their manager]...so they cave to save their job...and the CEO is in on the agenda to collapse society...kinda of like all media has one agenda, well all private businesses that are big or considerable size, are all using the same playbook against LOGIC... [NWO Agenda, collapse society thru HOAXES]... most thinking people are on the same page to fight back...but what can be done, when CEOs are enforcing that rule down the chain...

And they don't...

The public only THINKS it's mandatory because the news and gossip says it is...

News and gossip are HEARSAY.

In every state's executive order which you can find on their dot-gov website, THERE IS AN EXEMPTION OR LOOPHOLE REGARDING THE WEARING OF THE MASK.


Look it up, you'll see.

It doesn't matter what you read on the news or what it say in a government pamphlet to your place of business saying everyone has to wear a mask.

THE EXECUTIVE ORDER IS WHAT COUNTS.


AND THE EXECUTIVE ORDER DOES NOT SAY IT'S MANDATORY.

PERIOD.

And only in the murals at the airport, right?

Thread: Judge Napolitano: Trump has unleashed a torrent of hatred. "When the hate speech comes from a shameless president, we have a problem."


I have known President Trump personally since 1986. The private Trump I have known is funny, charming and embracing. That is not the public Trump of today. When he loudly called for four members of Congress – women of color who oppose nearly all his initiatives and who have questioned his fitness for office – to go back to the places from which they came, he unleashed a torrent of hatred.

The "Go back" trope was used by white racists toward African-Americans for 100 years, from Reconstruction to the civil rights era, suggesting repulsively that they should go "back" to Africa; never mind their American births. It was uttered by the establishment at my grandfathers and many others who came here from southern Europe as children in the early days of the last century.

"Go back" is a rejection of the nation as a melting pot; a condemnation of one of America's founding values – E Pluribus Unum (Out of many, one). It implicates a racial or nativist superiority: We were here before you; this is our land, not yours; get out. Nativist hatred is an implication of moral or even legal superiority that has no constitutional justification in American government.

Don't get me wrong. Even though hate speech – speech that expresses hatred for people, as opposed to hatred for ideas – stings and hurts, it is constitutionally protected. The remedy for hate speech is not to silence the hater but to shame him. And the most effective way to do that is with more speech.

What about communist dictatorships? Do they have the right to make us wear masks? The CEOs of the largest monopolies are ruling us like dictators.

Faucci who is from Big Pharma with a long list of conflicts of interest is barking commands at "normal people" and then he hides in his closet and has nothign to say to the rioters and the gay pride paraders.

Unless you have medical issues or are over 60 years of age, you should go on with your lives and completely ignore Faucci, Big Parma, Bill Gates promoting his vaccines and the liberal media. Do whatever you want.

Right and why did he hire fauci to lockdown the government and bailout wallstreet?

Why is jarvanka in charge of contact tracing?

You keep thinking that your under common law. Your just another slave to the system and remaining ignorant of the law is hazardous to health.

Yep me too