Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,716 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 606,619
Pageviews Today: 1,557,186Threads Today: 821Posts Today: 14,003
07:15 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

U.S. Judge Urges Supreme Court to End U.S. Police State It Imposes

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77963234
United States
08/24/2020 12:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
U.S. Judge Urges Supreme Court to End U.S. Police State It Imposes
President Trump - please understand that the time is NOW to end "QUALIFIED IMMUNITY" for any cop in America who commits muder while on the job. If you do this you will win the election. Read full story at the link below.

"This article reports important news-events that are not being reported in America’s mainstream news-media and that are crucial for understanding both the murder of George Floyd and the current U.S. Presidential contest:

A black U.S. District Court Judge in Mississippi — one of America’s most bigoted-against-Blacks states — issued on August 4th a 72-page decision, Jamison v. McClendon, containing a plea for the U.S. Supreme Court to discontinue its imposition of police legal immunity when police are being accused of — while on the job — having violated Constitutionally guaranteed rights of American citizens (such as by shooting or killing innocent persons — such as George Floyd). Legally immune police is what defines a police state; and, so, this was a black judge’s request for the U.S. Supreme Court to end the existing police state it imposes in America — to end a police state that this judge attributed to (and which he documented to have been produced by) choices that the U.S. Supreme Court itself had made, and that only they therefore can possibly reverse.

His basic point was that nothing which allows a public official to violate the U.S. Constitution is Constitutional, and that therefore these U.S. Supreme Court decisions themselves violate the U.S. Constitution, and should therefore be reversed by the U.S. Supreme Court, which created this situation of legal immunity for police misconduct.

The decision by this judge, Carlton W. Reeves, asserted: “The Constitution says everyone is entitled to equal protection of the law — even at the hands of law enforcement. Over the decades, however, judges [at the U.S. Supreme Court] have invented a legal doctrine to protect law enforcement officers from having to face any consequences for wrongdoing. The doctrine is called ‘qualified immunity.’ In real life it operates like absolute immunity.” Because of U.S. Supreme Court rulings, he had to — in the particular case at hand that he was ruling on — grant a police officer’s “qualified immunity” from prosecution, regardless of what is Constitutional, or even justice in any meaningful sense. Implicitly, he is saying, in this ruling, that because of the existing legal tradition of stare decisis or adhering to existing juridical tradition — and especially of doing so when the prior rulings come from a higher court, most especially from the U.S. Supreme Court — he is required, in the present case, to issue a ruling that violates the U.S. Constitution itself. And so, he did that, he admits. This is an exceptionally bold ruling, far beyond what is normal. Basically, he says that in order for him not to be reversed on appeal, he had to rule against the U.S. Constitution, in the particular case that he was ruling on. He was pleading with the U.S. Supreme Court to end this, so that judges in the lower courts will be able to enforce — instead of compelled to violate — the Constitution."

[link to theduran.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 77963234
United States
08/24/2020 12:27 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: U.S. Judge Urges Supreme Court to End U.S. Police State It Imposes
This is important legal doctrine so please read this
S.O.S.

User ID: 79096710
United States
08/24/2020 12:31 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: U.S. Judge Urges Supreme Court to End U.S. Police State It Imposes
Viva Frei!!!!



******* GOVERNMENT FLAT EARTH DOCUMENTS ******* Question: Why do "globers" look up when they are trying to prove what they are standing on is a globe? Shouldn't we be looking out over the horizon or even down at the very thing we stand on???? And this is biblical.

Here are some of the govt. (CIA, NASA, Military, University) documents used in Pastor Dean's message “Government Documents Admit Flat Earth:” [link to youtu.be (secure)]

Russia 1948 Shape of the earth unknown.. [link to www.cia.gov (secure)] || Russian Light Study “Brightness of the firmament” [link to www.cia.gov (secure)] || Government Definition of Geoid [link to www.ngs.noaa.gov (secure)] || page 168: equations of flat-earth trigonometry. [link to www.irig106.org] || page 8: The Earth is flat and nonrotating. [link to www.navair.navy.mil]

General Equations of Motion for Damaged Asymmetric Aircraft Page 1: “...equations of motions must properly reflect the underlying physics.” page 2:
"In this paper, the rigid body equations of motion over a flat non-rotating earth are developed...” [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)]

Approximate Optimal Guidance for the Advanced Launch System On page one this document does mention a spherical rotating earth but then states that “...these schemes” (based on a spherical rotating earth) 1) “...are difficult to prove” and 2) “...not suggested to be used as a basis for an online real-time guidance law.” Page 32 goes on to say: "Lastly, the equations of motion for the zeroth-order problem of flight in a vacuum over a flat Earth are presented." [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)] || SR-71 Page 8 “...nonrotating Earth...” [link to www.nasa.gov (secure)] || page 14: (2) A flat, nonrotating earth [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)] || page 8: the missile position in space is computed relative to a flat nonrotating earth. [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)] || page 108: aircraft flying over flat, nonrotating earth page:12 "aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over flat nonrotating earth" [link to www.nasa.gov (secure)] || NASA Technical Paper 2835 September 1988 Page 1 Summary: Flat nonrotating earth Last page 126: "The nonlinear equations of motion used are six-degree-of-freedom equations with a stationary atmosphere and flat, nonrotating earth" [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)]

Determination of Angles of Attack and Sideslip from Radar Data and a Roll Stabilized Platform NASA March 1972 page 2: "The method is limited, however, to application where a flat, nonrotating earth" [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)] || An Aircraft Model for the AIAA Controls Design Challenge NASA 1991 page 11: "The nonlinear equations of motion used in this model are general six-degree-of-freedom equations representing the flight dynamics of a rigid aircraft flying in a stationary atmosphere over a flat, nonrotating earth" [link to www.nasa.gov (secure)] || Investigation of Aircraft Landing in Variable Wind Fields NASA 1973 page14 pdf or 6 on actual report: a) The earth is flat and non-rotating. [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)] || A Mathematical Model of the CH-53 Helicopter NASA page 17: “The helicopter equations of motion are given in body axes with respect to a flat, nonrotating Earth.” [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)] || Atmospheric Oscillations Georgia Tech April 1965 Prepared for NASA page 13: A model frequently used is that of a flat, nonrotating earth. [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)] || Stability and Control Estimation Flight Test Results for the SR-71 Aircraft With Externally Mounted Experiments NASA June 2002 page 18-19: “These equations assume a rigid vehicle and a flat, nonrotating Earth.” [link to www.nasa.gov (secure)] || Flight Testing a VSTOL Aircraft NASA 1988 page 9 pdf or 4-5 on actual doc: “For aircraft problems, the state and measurement models together represent the kinematics of a rigid body for describing motion over a flat, nonrotating Earth...” [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)] || Time to Climb page2: “In our minimum time-to-climb problem, the aircraft is modeled as a point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a vertical plane on a non-rotating, flat earth. [link to ntrs.nasa.gov (secure)]

page 9: “...input to a flat earth” [link to www.arl.army.mil] (original found here) [link to www.researchgate.net (secure)]

BUY XRP NOW!!!!!

Buy as much as you can! Trump will use it to save the world economy... watch and see!!!! Don't believe it?!?! In DAVOS they told the Central Bankers to be able to support XRP... go to Page 17... search XRP [link to www3.weforum.org] How do you like them apples???? ||| For those that have or are dealing with cancer in your life or a loved one. A story of faith, hope, love and most of all forgiveness. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

If you believe in the Globe model you BETTER NOT CLICK THE FIRST LINK.... I'm warning you!!!!! DON"T DO IT.... No... STOP!!!!! You will be forever lost as a Flat Earther!!!!!! [link to youtu.be (secure)] ||
[link to www.youtube.com (secure)] || [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] || And if you bring up Erostothenes then how do you like them apples???? LOL [link to www.youtube.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78044620
United States
08/24/2020 12:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: U.S. Judge Urges Supreme Court to End U.S. Police State It Imposes
about a hundred years too late!
its not just blacks!
the whole thing is a scam.
there is no law and i can prove it.
not a terrorist,just using logic and reason.something the legal system in usa cant comprehend.
sit me down in front of the nation and ill unleash fury upon law.in the truest court,the court of public opinion.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 77963234
United States
08/24/2020 01:15 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: U.S. Judge Urges Supreme Court to End U.S. Police State It Imposes
bump
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79245512
United States
08/24/2020 01:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: U.S. Judge Urges Supreme Court to End U.S. Police State It Imposes
[link to www.webdc.com]

"The most stunning statistic, however, is that the total number of deaths caused by conventional medicine is an astounding 783,936 per year. It is now evident that the American medical system is the leading cause of death and injury in the US. (By contrast, the number of deaths attributable to heart disease in 2001 was 699,697, while the number of deaths attributable to cancer was 553,251.5)"


As you can see above, Medical Doctors accidentally kill almost 800 thousand people each year.
Doesn't it seem logical that this is more important of an issue to correct?





GLP