REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN MESSAGE
|
Subject
|
DEBUNK THIS: Google trends of various elections: Is google more accurate than polls? (It has predicted the winner in all the last 4 elections)
|
Poster Handle
|
JADR+ |
Post Content
|
(Update: It seems you can use this to detect electoral fraud) The method that works is:1) Last names - not full names - (or whatever is a simplest shortest way to identify the candidate . E.G: Beto is better than O'Rourke - Mccain is better than John or John Mccain) 2) Date range starts from beginning of campaign to 1 week after the election. 3) Always Filter by geographical area where election takes place (Country, state, county etc..) You do that, 9 out 10 times - the results match reality.Note: the predictive system starts to breaks down when there are less than 500,000 voters, or when the election is too tight (candidates within 3% of each other.)
2004 election [ link to trends.google.com (secure)] 2008 election: [ link to trends.google.com (secure)] 2012 election: [ link to trends.google.com (secure)] 2016 election: [ link to trends.google.com (secure)] 2020 election: (past 90 days) [ link to trends.google.com (secure)]
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|