DEBUNK THIS: Google trends of various elections: Is google more accurate than polls? (It has predicted the winner in all the last 4 elections)

Then explain why this predicts every single elections over the last 16 years?

wow

I know by the tens of thousands that showed up in Michigan for the boat parade, biden is gonna lose Michigan and governor twitmer is gonna go bye bye.

Last Edited by Slowly awakening on 08/24/2020 07:37 AM

Indeed!!!

You see .. trump has derailed the system by getting his enemies to engage in his free campaign advertising 24/7

Stupid machines are easily trolled.

Same goes for stupid lefties.

Also .. rather than call us stupid -

Prove to us empirically that this method does not work.

So, I misread the Kobach/Kelly governor's race, but it got me thinking to another big governor's race here that was controversial and that was the 2014 governor's race between Sam Brownback (R) (highly disliked in the state for his educational policies) against Paul Davis (D). It does look like this doesn't hold true for this race:

[link to trends.google.com (secure)]

Davis has a huge bar compared with Brownback, who did end up winning re-election.

OK.. now you're right - you found an exception:

Last Edited by JADR+ on 08/24/2020 08:24 AM

The 2nd entry (red) is Paul Davis (loser) and the blue is Sam Brownback (winner). I triple checked by hovering over the bar before posting so I wouldn't have to do the this time.

Last Edited by TrustNoOneKS on 08/24/2020 08:17 AM

2020 is not like any previous election year.
"interest" is not necessarily a positive.
The latest trend has them equal.

Last Edited by Monty Python on 08/24/2020 08:25 AM

if you filter by news - you get an other picture

[link to trends.google.com (secure)]

Ok.. so why is this?

What was the major factor that influenced Brownback's win?

He was highly unpopular - he must been popular with some people to win - or else he cheated?

Last Edited by JADR+ on 08/24/2020 08:36 AM

I’m sure Google has seen And/or analyzed this phenomenon. Probably shit themselves over it too.

It also explains why there is such a push to eliminate any internet articles that favor Trump AND the push to keep the niece’s book (negative) at the top of searches.

Thing is, Trump figured out a long time ago - all publicity is good.

Show us - equal at a point in time maybe - that does not count. You look at overall dominance.

What were they searching tho?

I guess if the searches were more negative than positive then it can turn the other way.

See my post above. Totally explains why they’re all over Trump with negative news every day

wishful thinking.

The one that everyone hated won.

"Same Brownback booed"

Seems logical that google is more accurate i mean they have alot of data and the tools to get through it alot faster.

Kansas is a red state. Brownback only won by a 3.7% margin. Davis took only 7 counties where 5 of them have universities. I really don't think Brownback cheated. I knew it was going to be a very tight race, so I made sure to vote that year. That is also why I was curious how it would come out with this experiment.

[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

[link to sunlightfoundation.com (secure)]

Kansas officials rebuff lawsuit seeking voting machine records

"Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, R, has asked a judge in Wichita to block the release of voting machine paper tapes from the November 2014 election, according to a report by the Associated Press."

I'm not sure if you can figure out what they were searching with this tool. But if you want to argue negative versus positive I can tell you that all the news around Brownback during that election cycle were definitely negative.

Hold on to this data.

It could be very telling after the demonrats pull their voter fraud b.s. to try and steal the election.

I SAY VOTER FRAUD!!!!




Last Edited by JADR+ on 08/24/2020 09:05 AM

Also from the article:

"Clarkson emphasized that the results don’t definitively prove fraud, though the results of her analysis are what statisticians would likely see if someone had tampered with the voting machines. She stated that there could be other explanations for the patterns. For that reason, she would like to perform an audit."

Thank you for that - you found a counter example .. and it turns out it was under suspicion of voter fraud, and the judge blocked the release of the paper trails ... which would have proven if there had been voter fraud.

Clear case of voter fraud as far as I'm concerned.

California would be vast majority Trump except for election fraud. And this year I really hope to see a intense scrutiny and secure votes. Because Dems are behind both covid and the riots. They're so fucking evil its unbelievable what we're living through.

So, then I take it you accept her analysis that there was vote fraud in the 2016 presidential election:

If you are relying on this lady to absolutely prove that vote fraud occurred in getting Brownback elected, then you must also now rely on this lady in claiming that vote fraud occurred in getting Trump elected. Nice job there!

Nope:

[link to trends.google.com (secure)]

Trump had a large advance on Hillary.

The fact that Hillary won the popular vote is suspicious according to google data.

In the 2016 election - it looks like Hillary Cheated, and still lost.

Last Edited by JADR+ on 08/24/2020 09:34 AM

Google is controlled and has been censoring my searches for months now. DO NOT TRUST ANYTHING GOOGLE TRENDS HAVE TO SAY DO TO THEIR MANIPULATION OF OUTCOME.

When the data matches reality the majority of the time- the data is trustworthy.