Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71408469 United States 09/18/2020 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. The government should be forgiving property taxes for those with tenants who are delinquent. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79393767 Property taxes are bullshit anyway. Do you really own the property if they can take it away from you after you paid it off because you simply didn't pay their tax? It is a ridiculous concept to me. You are still renting property from the government even after paying off your mortgage. Actually, the Federal Reserve is the lien holder, the Government is just the Agent collecting the interest on the debt owed on the property. That is why the Government Courts (under color of law and contractual law) can hear cases, seize property and kill you in the process should you resist, since you are a domestic enemy for using Federal Reserve DEBT as money. Look up the "TRADING WITH THE ENEMY ACT" |
Dusty_Patriot User ID: 38352165 United States 09/18/2020 06:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
tomk User ID: 77068237 United States 09/18/2020 06:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. Is it unconstitutional for a municipality to take over a school gym or whatever in order to house people during an emergency, like say a Tornado or some such? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68356672 Precedents abound! Most are state or federaly funded institutions..private property is not Real estate isn't private property. All real estate is pledged as collateral on the national debt. If it was property you wouldn't pay a tax on it and government couldn't tell you what you can and can't do with it. There is some shoddy shilling going on in this forum tonight. Your assertion is flat out wrong. All real estate is NOT pledged as collateral on the national debt. And even if it was, that wouldn't negate the distinction between public and private property. It's like Lee Iaccoca said, "Grow a brain cell, think for yourself, or die and go away." peacelove.me |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77428388 United States 09/18/2020 06:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79128512 United States 09/18/2020 06:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
splinterhead User ID: 74470288 United States 09/18/2020 06:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
tomk User ID: 77068237 United States 09/18/2020 06:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79393898 Read the comment you posted, the one I replied to, RUSSIAN TROLL Now get dead, COMRADE Better dead than red, and Putin is the leader of the communist party in Russia. ISN'T HE? Isnt it true Russia is still communist? When is the last time you bought a tv or a car made in Russia? Hy do you suppose that is? . Thats why maga hats are communist flag red. My God, you are stupid. Communism collapsed in Russia in 1991 and with freedom, the Communist Party was outlawed, so NO Putin is not only not a communist, he certainly isn't the leader of the communist party. Also, I can't let the "bone spurs" comment go. Biden had a deferment also, exactly the same as President Trump. So your double standard is hypocritical. And did you tell him to "get dead"? WTF is wrong with you? You can't win an argument so you break out in a murderous rage? Oh yes, and your TV set may have been manufactured in Russia, "In mid 2007 Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc. announced plans to assemble plasma televisions in Russia's Kaliningrad region. Samsung would start assembly at the Telebalt plant in July 2007 and LG would start at the Rolsen plant in August. Local production of plasma televisions would cut the retail price by between 10 percent and 20 percent from the current 30,000 rubles ($1,160)." Link: [link to www.globalsecurity.org (secure)] Communist Party of the Russian Federation From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia J General Secretary Gennady Zyuganov Deputy Secretary Ivan Melnikov Parliamentary Leader Gennady Zyuganov Founded 14 February 1993; 27 years ago Preceded by CPRSFSR CPSU Headquarters 16th building, Ol'khovskaya Ulitsa Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia 105066 Newspaper Pravda (more than 30 regional editions) Youth wing Leninist Young Communist League Membership (2015) 160,000[1] Ideology Communism[2][3] Marxism–Leninism[3] Soviet nationalism[4] Political position Left-wing[2][5] to far-left[6][7][8] Continental affiliation UCP – CPSU International affiliation IMCWP ICS (Defunct) Colours Red Slogan "Russia! Labor! Democracy! Socialism!" Anthem "The Internationale" Seats in the State Duma 43 / 450 Seats in the Federation Council 3 / 170 Governors 2 / 85 Seats in the Regional Parliaments 449 / 3,928 The Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF; Russian: Коммунистическая Партия Российской Федерации; КПРФ; Kommunisticheskaya Partiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii, KPRF) is a communist political party in Russia that adheres to Marxist–Leninist philosophy.[3] The party is often viewed as the immediate successor of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), which was banned in 1991 by then–Russian President Boris Yeltsin after a failed coup attempt. It is the second-largest political party in the Russian Federation after United Russia. The youth organisation of the party is the Leninist Young Communist League. The party is administered by a Central Committee. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is a Russian politician and a former officer of the KGB who has ... While there, he was required to joined the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and remained a member until it ceased to exist in it's Soviet era state and was restructured. There is NO REASON TO THINK Putin has renounced his communist ideology, toher than his word. . You expect me to take you seriously and you quote Wikipedia? You're new to this forum aren't you? And because Putin was required to join the Communist party and he abandoned it the second it was legal to do so, there is no reason (except in your pathetic excuse for a mind) to think he ever held a communist ideology. The fact that today Russia is a capitalist country also undermines your bizarre claim that its President secretly holds a communist ideology. You also have no excuse for poor spelling. The text editor puts a red squiggle underneath words it doesn't recognize. All you have to do is right click and it will give you the correct spelling. It's like Lee Iaccoca said, "Grow a brain cell, think for yourself, or die and go away." peacelove.me |
Grove Street User ID: 78870678 United States 09/18/2020 06:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. I have said here many times Quoting: beeches if the government wants to help keep renters in their housing it should be sending rent payments DIRECTLY to the landlords. the money is not the renters'. it is owed for the roof over their heads. if they don't agree, they can leave. Their butts are in the property, the money is the landlord's. agreed..i understand the argument that the china virus isnt americans fault and lockdowns arent.. so if thats the case send the coverage in rent and mortgages to appropriate parties to pay bills until unconstitutional lockdowns are over. Grove And this is why we can't have nice things. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79372866 United States 09/18/2020 06:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. I have said here many times Quoting: beeches if the government wants to help keep renters in their housing it should be sending rent payments DIRECTLY to the landlords. the money is not the renters'. it is owed for the roof over their heads. if they don't agree, they can leave. Their butts are in the property, the money is the landlord's. Ok, then the government is helping the landlords pay off the mortgage. When the mortgage is paid for, the landlord should send some money back to the government since it is free money at that point. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77428388 United States 09/18/2020 06:55 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. I have said here many times Quoting: beeches if the government wants to help keep renters in their housing it should be sending rent payments DIRECTLY to the landlords. the money is not the renters'. it is owed for the roof over their heads. if they don't agree, they can leave. Their butts are in the property, the money is the landlord's. Ok, then the government is helping the landlords pay off the mortgage. When the mortgage is paid for, the landlord should send some money back to the government since it is free money at that point. Holy shit you're stupid. The landlord is due the amount specified in the lease or verbal agreement for each and every mother fucking month. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79372866 United States 09/18/2020 07:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. We need an economy that makes people who contribute to society wealthy. All this real estate, stock market, banking, insider profiteering, war profiteering, tech, etc is mostly not all that beneficial to the common man or future generations. It is basically kicking the can down the road, finding ways to get people to spend money they don't have, living beyond means out of someone elses pocket, etc. It is all a big fucking mess. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79393767 Usury, rentier income, stock investments and the like take from the productive and give to the unproductive. Our country can exist with wall street and the usury class, but cannot exist without the productive workers on mainstreet. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71408469 United States 09/18/2020 07:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. Is it unconstitutional for a municipality to take over a school gym or whatever in order to house people during an emergency, like say a Tornado or some such? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68356672 Precedents abound! Most are state or federaly funded institutions..private property is not Real estate isn't private property. All real estate is pledged as collateral on the national debt. If it was property you wouldn't pay a tax on it and government couldn't tell you what you can and can't do with it. There is some shoddy shilling going on in this forum tonight. Your assertion is flat out wrong. All real estate is NOT pledged as collateral on the national debt. And even if it was, that wouldn't negate the distinction between public and private property. Right from the whores' mouth: Federal Reserve notes represent a first lien on all the assets of the Federal Reserve Banks, and on the collateral specifically held against them. Federal Reserve notes are not redeemable in gold, silver or any other commodity, and receive no backing by anything This has been the case since 1933. The notes have no value for themselves, but for what they will buy. In another sense, because they are legal tender, Federal Reserve notes are "backed" by all the goods and services in the economy. That is a direct quote from [link to www.treasury.gov (secure)] ALL property (property is part of "all goods and services"" in the US is collateral on the Public Debt, unless you can show me and Allodial Title or a Land Patent (which I seriously doubt you can) you own NO PROPERTY. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77428388 United States 09/18/2020 07:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. BTW, the freeloaders' comments here are why the founders only wanted landowners to vote. You leeches have no vested interest, a complete disregard for the constitution and natural law and are a bunch of entitled, ignorant savages who graze on the backs of the providers. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79372866 United States 09/18/2020 07:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. Nobody cares about landlords. If they had enough money to get a building up, they'll be alright. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79065578 You ever see how much they make? They make more than enough. Stop worrying about the wealthy. No poor people own buildings lol God you're stupid! Not all landlords are wealthy. Some landlords buy a house for a retirement fund and the rent just pays the mortgage and the costs of maintenance. If they don't get rent the mortgage doesn't get paid. Thats not the landlords I have lived under. I have lived under one for 10 years in the same house he lived in and never spent a dam penny on the place. he owned it free and clear along with 3 other houses along side it. He was quick to raise the rent to keep up with market prices every year. He went on several vacations a year and had a new car every other year. And was retired. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79393898 United States 09/18/2020 07:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. ... Quoting: tomk My God, you are stupid. Communism collapsed in Russia in 1991 and with freedom, the Communist Party was outlawed, so NO Putin is not only not a communist, he certainly isn't the leader of the communist party. Also, I can't let the "bone spurs" comment go. Biden had a deferment also, exactly the same as President Trump. So your double standard is hypocritical. And did you tell him to "get dead"? WTF is wrong with you? You can't win an argument so you break out in a murderous rage? Oh yes, and your TV set may have been manufactured in Russia, "In mid 2007 Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc. announced plans to assemble plasma televisions in Russia's Kaliningrad region. Samsung would start assembly at the Telebalt plant in July 2007 and LG would start at the Rolsen plant in August. Local production of plasma televisions would cut the retail price by between 10 percent and 20 percent from the current 30,000 rubles ($1,160)." Link: [link to www.globalsecurity.org (secure)] Communist Party of the Russian Federation From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia J General Secretary Gennady Zyuganov Deputy Secretary Ivan Melnikov Parliamentary Leader Gennady Zyuganov Founded 14 February 1993; 27 years ago Preceded by CPRSFSR CPSU Headquarters 16th building, Ol'khovskaya Ulitsa Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia 105066 Newspaper Pravda (more than 30 regional editions) Youth wing Leninist Young Communist League Membership (2015) 160,000[1] Ideology Communism[2][3] Marxism–Leninism[3] Soviet nationalism[4] Political position Left-wing[2][5] to far-left[6][7][8] Continental affiliation UCP – CPSU International affiliation IMCWP ICS (Defunct) Colours Red Slogan "Russia! Labor! Democracy! Socialism!" Anthem "The Internationale" Seats in the State Duma 43 / 450 Seats in the Federation Council 3 / 170 Governors 2 / 85 Seats in the Regional Parliaments 449 / 3,928 The Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CPRF; Russian: Коммунистическая Партия Российской Федерации; КПРФ; Kommunisticheskaya Partiya Rossiyskoy Federatsii, KPRF) is a communist political party in Russia that adheres to Marxist–Leninist philosophy.[3] The party is often viewed as the immediate successor of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU), which was banned in 1991 by then–Russian President Boris Yeltsin after a failed coup attempt. It is the second-largest political party in the Russian Federation after United Russia. The youth organisation of the party is the Leninist Young Communist League. The party is administered by a Central Committee. Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin is a Russian politician and a former officer of the KGB who has ... While there, he was required to joined the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and remained a member until it ceased to exist in it's Soviet era state and was restructured. There is NO REASON TO THINK Putin has renounced his communist ideology, toher than his word. . You expect me to take you seriously and you quote Wikipedia? You're new to this forum aren't you? And because Putin was required to join the Communist party and he abandoned it the second it was legal to do so, there is no reason (except in your pathetic excuse for a mind) to think he ever held a communist ideology. The fact that today Russia is a capitalist country also undermines your bizarre claim that its President secretly holds a communist ideology. You also have no excuse for poor spelling. The text editor puts a red squiggle underneath words it doesn't recognize. All you have to do is right click and it will give you the correct spelling. BUSTED Since when do American patriots defend a Russian totalitarian dick-tater who threatens our destruction on an almost daily basis? Since never,thats when, COMRADE. You can call Putin whatever you want, but looking at present day Russia I'd say it's just a scaled down version of the Soviet Union with the same political process in play and the same people in power. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79393898 United States 09/18/2020 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. Nobody cares about landlords. If they had enough money to get a building up, they'll be alright. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79065578 You ever see how much they make? They make more than enough. Stop worrying about the wealthy. No poor people own buildings lol God you're stupid! Not all landlords are wealthy. Some landlords buy a house for a retirement fund and the rent just pays the mortgage and the costs of maintenance. If they don't get rent the mortgage doesn't get paid. Thats not the landlords I have lived under. I have lived under one for 10 years in the same house he lived in and never spent a dam penny on the place. he owned it free and clear along with 3 other houses along side it. He was quick to raise the rent to keep up with market prices every year. He went on several vacations a year and had a new car every other year. And was retired. In other words he fed off of the producers. A leach. |
splinterhead User ID: 74470288 United States 09/18/2020 07:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. Nobody cares about landlords. If they had enough money to get a building up, they'll be alright. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79065578 You ever see how much they make? They make more than enough. Stop worrying about the wealthy. No poor people own buildings lol God you're stupid! Not all landlords are wealthy. Some landlords buy a house for a retirement fund and the rent just pays the mortgage and the costs of maintenance. If they don't get rent the mortgage doesn't get paid. Thats not the landlords I have lived under. I have lived under one for 10 years in the same house he lived in and never spent a dam penny on the place. he owned it free and clear along with 3 other houses along side it. He was quick to raise the rent to keep up with market prices every year. He went on several vacations a year and had a new car every other year. And was retired. Jealous much.i used to work for the landlord when I was short on rent.nobody forced you to live there. The entitlement mentality is showing. smokey |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77750782 Netherlands 09/18/2020 07:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. Is it unconstitutional for a municipality to take over a school gym or whatever in order to house people during an emergency, like say a Tornado or some such? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68356672 Precedents abound! Most are state or federaly funded institutions..private property is not Real estate isn't private property. All real estate is pledged as collateral on the national debt. If it was property you wouldn't pay a tax on it and government couldn't tell you what you can and can't do with it. There is some shoddy shilling going on in this forum tonight. Your assertion is flat out wrong. All real estate is NOT pledged as collateral on the national debt. And even if it was, that wouldn't negate the distinction between public and private property. Stop paying property tax, you will find out who really owns your house. Same here in Holland, they will take it from you. Income tax, car taxes, all the same. Anything of value you use is not really yours to keep unconditionally. Only money, bitcoin, gold etc are relatively safe. But they also can shave off value at your cost by manipulating the place or through inflation. We are at the mercy of the elite no matter which way you look at it. it is a golden cage without doors. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79393898 United States 09/18/2020 07:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. BTW, the freeloaders' comments here are why the founders only wanted landowners to vote. You leeches have no vested interest, a complete disregard for the constitution and natural law and are a bunch of entitled, ignorant savages who graze on the backs of the providers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77428388 There is no such thing as a landowner in this country. Look at your deed , if you have one. It lists you as the TENANT, in all capital letters. If you fail to pay your rent to the government in the form of property taxes, the police come and either remove you or shoot you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79393898 United States 09/18/2020 07:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. Real estate isn't private property. All real estate is pledged as collateral on the national debt. If it was property you wouldn't pay a tax on it and government couldn't tell you what you can and can't do with it. There is some shoddy shilling going on in this forum tonight. Your assertion is flat out wrong. All real estate is NOT pledged as collateral on the national debt. And even if it was, that wouldn't negate the distinction between public and private property. Stop paying property tax, you will find out who really owns your house. Same here in Holland, they will take it from you. Income tax, car taxes, all the same. Anything of value you use is not really yours to keep unconditionally. Only money, bitcoin, gold etc are relatively safe. But they also can shave off value at your cost by manipulating the place or through inflation. We are at the mercy of the elite no matter which way you look at it. it is a golden cage without doors. Unless we revolt |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77428388 United States 09/18/2020 07:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. Nobody cares about landlords. If they had enough money to get a building up, they'll be alright. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79065578 You ever see how much they make? They make more than enough. Stop worrying about the wealthy. No poor people own buildings lol God you're stupid! Not all landlords are wealthy. Some landlords buy a house for a retirement fund and the rent just pays the mortgage and the costs of maintenance. If they don't get rent the mortgage doesn't get paid. Thats not the landlords I have lived under. I have lived under one for 10 years in the same house he lived in and never spent a dam penny on the place. he owned it free and clear along with 3 other houses along side it. He was quick to raise the rent to keep up with market prices every year. He went on several vacations a year and had a new car every other year. And was retired. BTW, the freeloaders' comments here are why the founders only wanted landowners to vote. You leeches have no vested interest, a complete disregard for the constitution and natural law and are a bunch of entitled, ignorant savages who graze on the backs of the providers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77428388 There is no such thing as a landowner in this country. Look at your deed , if you have one. It lists you as the TENANT, in all capital letters. If you fail to pay your rent to the government in the form of property taxes, the police come and either remove you or shoot you. Agreed, 'landowners' get to maintain the property and pay taxes. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79393991 United States 09/18/2020 07:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. BTW, the freeloaders' comments here are why the founders only wanted landowners to vote. You leeches have no vested interest, a complete disregard for the constitution and natural law and are a bunch of entitled, ignorant savages who graze on the backs of the providers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77428388 There is no such thing as a landowner in this country. Look at your deed , if you have one. It lists you as the TENANT, in all capital letters. If you fail to pay your rent to the government in the form of property taxes, the police come and either remove you or shoot you. End of thread. NEXT! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79393898 United States 09/18/2020 07:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. Nobody cares about landlords. If they had enough money to get a building up, they'll be alright. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79065578 You ever see how much they make? They make more than enough. Stop worrying about the wealthy. No poor people own buildings lol God you're stupid! Not all landlords are wealthy. Some landlords buy a house for a retirement fund and the rent just pays the mortgage and the costs of maintenance. If they don't get rent the mortgage doesn't get paid. Thats not the landlords I have lived under. I have lived under one for 10 years in the same house he lived in and never spent a dam penny on the place. he owned it free and clear along with 3 other houses along side it. He was quick to raise the rent to keep up with market prices every year. He went on several vacations a year and had a new car every other year. And was retired. BTW, the freeloaders' comments here are why the founders only wanted landowners to vote. You leeches have no vested interest, a complete disregard for the constitution and natural law and are a bunch of entitled, ignorant savages who graze on the backs of the providers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77428388 There is no such thing as a landowner in this country. Look at your deed , if you have one. It lists you as the TENANT, in all capital letters. If you fail to pay your rent to the government in the form of property taxes, the police come and either remove you or shoot you. Agreed, 'landowners' get to maintain the property and pay taxes. And if lucky, make a profit at the same time But capitalism has a fundamental flaw in that regard (among many others), and that is there has to be more losers than winners for someone to make a profit and that profit is STOLEN GOODS. The saying goes time is money, past time the people who put in the time get the money PEACE |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 45306041 United States 09/18/2020 07:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. I'm not a landlord, and I'm not rich by any means (I lost my job in Covid in May and just now finally got hired back....so I'm running very low on money...)....but I think the govt should be required to pay the the rent if they are not allowed to evict the tenants. A LOT of landlords rent out to tenants as their ONLY way of making money. If they can't evict and bring ini new tenants, they are going to end up losing their homes. So if you think about it, now they will be losing their jobs, too. And if they can't collect rent or evict, they will have no way to pay the mortgage, so then the bank will foreclose, and then who will own the home? The banks, or the squatters/holdover tenants or the bank? Good luck with the bank kicking out the holdover tenants. You have to wonder if the virus was the Chinese's way of collapsing capitalism and bringing communism to America. Seriously. Because capitalism is great and all until people are no longer allowed to buy, sell, and trade....and then it all collapses. . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74167961 United States 09/18/2020 07:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. You do understand that if tenants don’t have to pay and the landlord can’t collect rent but still must maintain the property for the tenant then eventually the landlord will not rent his building. Why would he? Then rents will go up because there will be fewer owners willing to be overruled by the government. Unintended consequences. Always when government butts in. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79372866 United States 09/18/2020 07:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. lots of free shit army troops today.nobody owes you a thing .get off your lazy ass and pay the rent or Go live in a van down by the river.why should I pay to take care of you? Quoting: splinterhead If you had a fucking real job you wouldnt be on this website 18 hours a day This IS your job, COMRADE. I'm retired bitch ha ha Your no longer productive. As worthless as a homeless living in a tent. |
splinterhead User ID: 74470288 United States 09/18/2020 07:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77428388 United States 09/18/2020 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78798311 God you're stupid! Not all landlords are wealthy. Some landlords buy a house for a retirement fund and the rent just pays the mortgage and the costs of maintenance. If they don't get rent the mortgage doesn't get paid. Thats not the landlords I have lived under. I have lived under one for 10 years in the same house he lived in and never spent a dam penny on the place. he owned it free and clear along with 3 other houses along side it. He was quick to raise the rent to keep up with market prices every year. He went on several vacations a year and had a new car every other year. And was retired. BTW, the freeloaders' comments here are why the founders only wanted landowners to vote. You leeches have no vested interest, a complete disregard for the constitution and natural law and are a bunch of entitled, ignorant savages who graze on the backs of the providers. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77428388 There is no such thing as a landowner in this country. Look at your deed , if you have one. It lists you as the TENANT, in all capital letters. If you fail to pay your rent to the government in the form of property taxes, the police come and either remove you or shoot you. Agreed, 'landowners' get to maintain the property and pay taxes. And if lucky, make a profit at the same time But capitalism has a fundamental flaw in that regard (among many others), and that is there has to be more losers than winners for someone to make a profit and that profit is STOLEN GOODS. The saying goes time is money, past time the people who put in the time get the money PEACE GOD help us. You surely can't be that ignorant, are you? It's not a fixed sized pie! Now, pay your rent! Peace. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74224494 United States 09/18/2020 07:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. What is more important... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79376311 A landlord adding to his wealth or A homeless tennant dying in the streets how about morally? Seriously fuck you liberal idiot. Liberal doesn't mean what you think it does. It is the same as conservative. ALL of our founders were liberal and the founding documents of this country profoundly liberal A "conservative" is one who wished to preserve the ideas the nation was founded on, LIBERTY. If it comes down to it, to me I see no problem with renters not paying rent at this time. I don't think the landlords who buy properties THEY CANNOT AFFORD with mortgages and rent them out to pay off the mortgage AND make a profit are necessarily a high priority at this juncture in history. Fuck them, hard and repeatedly like they did the poor bastards who could get a mortgage. The term is Classical Liberal like the founding fathers. NEO Liberal and NEO Conservatives are both BIG Government tax and spenders |
splinterhead User ID: 74470288 United States 09/18/2020 07:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: Is it unconstitutional to force landlords to house tenants without rent compensation? IE can't evict for non-payment. lots of free shit army troops today.nobody owes you a thing .get off your lazy ass and pay the rent or Go live in a van down by the river.why should I pay to take care of you? Quoting: splinterhead If you had a fucking real job you wouldnt be on this website 18 hours a day This IS your job, COMRADE. I'm retired bitch ha ha Your no longer productive. As worthless as a homeless living in a tent. ha that one must of hit some feelers smokey |