BUILDING 7 WAS NOT HIT FELL AT FREE FALL SPEED INTO ITS OWN FOOT PRINT | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76809044 United States 09/11/2020 12:36 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76809044 the impact of 2 planes and the fuel took down the twin towers. You need to watch the videos and do some reseach. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to pulverize steel and concrete into dust....sorry physics dont support your statement you obviously have never done any forging of steel. steel bends quite nicely at temperatures will below the melting point. which would bend and compromise the structural integrity of those upper floors enough to cause the break-up and Pancaking that started from the area of the planes' impacts and Pancaked downwards from there. the Controlled Demolition of Bdg. 7 is an entirely different ball of wax. the explosion occurred at the bottom, which started the Pancaking at the bottom, taking down Bdg. 7 from there. let it go. yer tilting at windmills. you'll do better to search for the girl in the polka dot dress at the Robert Kennedy assassination. If the official narrative is true, than all buildings should be one floor, two at most, and tall buildings are all declared deathtraps and torn down. don't destroy this brilliant argument with absurdity. |
Bad Pattern User ID: 79040234 United States 09/11/2020 12:39 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh God, this thread yet again? You guys must really get excited every year when 9/11 rolls around. OK...lets pretend for a moment you are right, it was a "controlled demolition"..to what end? What sinister purpose do YOU assign to this "controlled demolition"? Dazzle all of us with your theories.... I’ve got no theories for you... but here’s some fact dots for you to connect... hopefully you’ll see the pattern....: On September 10, 2001, then U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld disclosed that his department was unable to account for roughly $2.3 trillion worth of transactions. The next day, the U.S. sustained the terrorist attacks that changed the world, and this startling revelation was forgotten. The War on Waste: [link to www.cbsnews.com (secure)] Last Edited by Bad Pattern on 09/11/2020 12:39 PM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76189764 United States 09/11/2020 12:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Mukk1234 You need to watch the videos and do some reseach. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to pulverize steel and concrete into dust....sorry physics dont support your statement you obviously have never done any forging of steel. steel bends quite nicely at temperatures will below the melting point. which would bend and compromise the structural integrity of those upper floors enough to cause the break-up and Pancaking that started from the area of the planes' impacts and Pancaked downwards from there. the Controlled Demolition of Bdg. 7 is an entirely different ball of wax. the explosion occurred at the bottom, which started the Pancaking at the bottom, taking down Bdg. 7 from there. let it go. yer tilting at windmills. you'll do better to search for the girl in the polka dot dress at the Robert Kennedy assassination. If the official narrative is true, than all buildings should be one floor, two at most, and tall buildings are all declared deathtraps and torn down. don't destroy this brilliant argument with absurdity. This pancake theory makes no sense. Even if the temps at the top melted it and they bent and fell like that, it wouldn't continue in a perfect straight free fall below like that. The steel below was not near the same temps as the hot steel at the top and when it reached the floors below it would meet resistance and either stop or fall to the side, leaving the bottom of the building standing. There is absolutely no way it falls the way it did from fires. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 72578351 United States 09/11/2020 12:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh God, this thread yet again? You guys must really get excited every year when 9/11 rolls around. OK...lets pretend for a moment you are right, it was a "controlled demolition"..to what end? What sinister purpose do YOU assign to this "controlled demolition"? Dazzle all of us with your theories.... Trillion$ of rea$on$ So, demolition of Building SEVEN led to trillions of dollars? For who? Lets try to stick to the premise of the thread here, that assertion that building seven was destroyed by "controlled demolition". It is believed that building 7 had the contract agreements, or judgement, of the case of the "Dragon Family vs The Federal Reserve" in which the "Dragon Family" alleges that the FedRes swindled them out of oodles of physical gold in exchange for 60 year Treasury Bonds that turned out to be worthless. The Federal Reserve was supposed to safeguard the gold or use it to improve life in 3rd world countries but that never came to pass. The Federal Reserve was taken to International Court in The Hague in which judgement was in favor of the Dragon Family and the FedRes was ordered to return the gold by September 12, 2001 but we all know what happened the day before. The physical gold was alleged to be under Towers 1 & 2 whilst the documents related to the gold/bond exchange & court case etc were to be housed in Building 7. It's curious to see how Donald Rumsfeld went on TV on the 10th to report several trillion dollars having been disappeared into thin air just before the attacks on the 11th and before the gold return deadline on the 12th. |
Bad Pattern User ID: 79040234 United States 09/11/2020 12:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | If y’all visit the YT site for the above video, do NOT click on the site listed in the description that’s : building what dot org... it’s a total ChiCom clickbait malware site disguised as an ecig site, all in Mandarin writing. God Bless |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79103398 United States 09/11/2020 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | What are the odds that these buildings would all do exactly the same thing even though they were "damaged" at different places? Quoting: Fluxster Like the guy above said, heat could definitely weaken steel. it's all bullshit. No fucking way all three buildings fall like that, sections of the damaged building would fall to the sides at the very least and quite possibly the structure could buckle to one side and an upper section fall to the side. No fucking way all three buildings collapse straight down in free fall. No fucking way. And yes I have a bit of knowledge on the subjects of physics, mechanics, and structural engineering. Buildings want to collapse. That is all I can figure. They are made to demolish themselves. Incredible. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76852521 United States 09/11/2020 12:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Bad Pattern User ID: 79040234 United States 09/11/2020 12:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76809044 you obviously have never done any forging of steel. steel bends quite nicely at temperatures will below the melting point. which would bend and compromise the structural integrity of those upper floors enough to cause the break-up and Pancaking that started from the area of the planes' impacts and Pancaked downwards from there. the Controlled Demolition of Bdg. 7 is an entirely different ball of wax. the explosion occurred at the bottom, which started the Pancaking at the bottom, taking down Bdg. 7 from there. let it go. yer tilting at windmills. you'll do better to search for the girl in the polka dot dress at the Robert Kennedy assassination. If the official narrative is true, than all buildings should be one floor, two at most, and tall buildings are all declared deathtraps and torn down. don't destroy this brilliant argument with absurdity. This pancake theory makes no sense. Even if the temps at the top melted it and they bent and fell like that, it wouldn't continue in a perfect straight free fall below like that. The steel below was not near the same temps as the hot steel at the top and when it reached the floors below it would meet resistance and either stop or fall to the side, leaving the bottom of the building standing. There is absolutely no way it falls the way it did from fires. If the story about the added “foam insulation” prior to the attacks is true... occums razor would lean toward that the so called “insulation” had secret flammable ingredients... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76809044 United States 09/11/2020 12:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76809044 you obviously have never done any forging of steel. steel bends quite nicely at temperatures will below the melting point. which would bend and compromise the structural integrity of those upper floors enough to cause the break-up and Pancaking that started from the area of the planes' impacts and Pancaked downwards from there. the Controlled Demolition of Bdg. 7 is an entirely different ball of wax. the explosion occurred at the bottom, which started the Pancaking at the bottom, taking down Bdg. 7 from there. let it go. yer tilting at windmills. you'll do better to search for the girl in the polka dot dress at the Robert Kennedy assassination. If the official narrative is true, than all buildings should be one floor, two at most, and tall buildings are all declared deathtraps and torn down. don't destroy this brilliant argument with absurdity. This pancake theory makes no sense. Even if the temps at the top melted it and they bent and fell like that, it wouldn't continue in a perfect straight free fall below like that. The steel below was not near the same temps as the hot steel at the top and when it reached the floors below it would meet resistance and either stop or fall to the side, leaving the bottom of the building standing. There is absolutely no way it falls the way it did from fires. there was no melting. the steel was yellow hot, and with 100s of tons per square foot pressure on that one floor that was burning, key structural members started bending and then the cooler brittle steel and welds and bolts start breaking, and then it started pancaking when section above collapsing onto that burning floor, and then everything started pancaking. That's called Pancaking. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 20115485 United States 09/11/2020 12:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Blue State Rebel User ID: 73724632 United States 09/11/2020 12:56 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Justmeok User ID: 76148484 United States 09/11/2020 01:00 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Chemical Breath If the official narrative is true, than all buildings should be one floor, two at most, and tall buildings are all declared deathtraps and torn down. don't destroy this brilliant argument with absurdity. This pancake theory makes no sense. Even if the temps at the top melted it and they bent and fell like that, it wouldn't continue in a perfect straight free fall below like that. The steel below was not near the same temps as the hot steel at the top and when it reached the floors below it would meet resistance and either stop or fall to the side, leaving the bottom of the building standing. There is absolutely no way it falls the way it did from fires. there was no melting. the steel was yellow hot, and with 100s of tons per square foot pressure on that one floor that was burning, key structural members started bending and then the cooler brittle steel and welds and bolts start breaking, and then it started pancaking when section above collapsing onto that burning floor, and then everything started pancaking. That's called Pancaking. Yes, there was molten iron microspheres throughout the WTC dust, the reaction product of the nanothermite incendiary that brought the towers down. [link to www.ae911truth.org (secure)] Justme |
Blue State Rebel User ID: 73724632 United States 09/11/2020 01:03 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I don't always like to fixate over "facts" because we don't always have access to the best info. A lot is hidden from us or destroyed. I frequently prefer to look at concepts or the "common sense" of things - is this REALLY how this event would have been done or how these participants would have accomplished it? Very telling in this case. Why would 19 Muslim terrorists sworn to fight the US & with histories supporting this (allegedly) attack a target at 8:46 AM BEFORE THE WORKING DAY EVEN STARTS? In attacking at that time they only killed about 3000 people. If they had waited until...say...after lunch...with workers and visitors to the Towers they might have killed as many as 50,000. (that's been estimated). Certainly many multiples of 3,000. Terrorists would NOT pick a large target at a time with MINIMAL CASUALTIES. BUT MILITARY/INTELLIGENCE PEOPLE WOULD. That is WHY they picked 8:46 AM BEFORE THE WORKING DAY STARTED. To have the smallest number of civilian casualties for this INSIDE JOB. Our own people in charge would not kill 3,000 Americans? OF COURSE THEY WOULD. They've killed many many many times that in foreign wars. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77909000 Japan 09/11/2020 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Chemical Breath If the official narrative is true, than all buildings should be one floor, two at most, and tall buildings are all declared deathtraps and torn down. don't destroy this brilliant argument with absurdity. This pancake theory makes no sense. Even if the temps at the top melted it and they bent and fell like that, it wouldn't continue in a perfect straight free fall below like that. The steel below was not near the same temps as the hot steel at the top and when it reached the floors below it would meet resistance and either stop or fall to the side, leaving the bottom of the building standing. There is absolutely no way it falls the way it did from fires. there was no melting. the steel was yellow hot, and with 100s of tons per square foot pressure on that one floor that was burning, key structural members started bending and then the cooler brittle steel and welds and bolts start breaking, and then it started pancaking when section above collapsing onto that burning floor, and then everything started pancaking. That's called Pancaking. You need glasses, |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79338252 United States 09/11/2020 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79103398 United States 09/11/2020 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's a very recent interview with Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 911 truth. I think a lot of it is about Building 7 and that it was not brought down by fire. BUILDING 7 IS THE SMOKING GUN. Quoting: Blue State Rebel I feel like 3000 trained architects know more than AC's. And they are all saying the event was controlled. So yeah. After watching that, I believe that the presence of nanothermite in massive quantities of the dust at the WTC site means the buildings were brought down using nanothermite. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79338252 United States 09/11/2020 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] A&E for 911 Truth have been pushing their lame explanations for years while sucking money from the foolish sheep who believe that 911 was an inside job. Sad really, and a form of sedition. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78279564 United States 09/11/2020 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's a very recent interview with Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 911 truth. I think a lot of it is about Building 7 and that it was not brought down by fire. BUILDING 7 IS THE SMOKING GUN. Quoting: Blue State Rebel Once upon a time, freshman year curriculum for all engineering disciplines included calculus, physics, chemistry, structural analysis, thermodynamics and properties/strengths of materials. Anyone who didn't flunk those courses can use what they learned to understand why the official story is impossible... unless they are afraid to admit it. I've had many discussions about the official story with engineers and the basic agreement is the official story is not possible based on what they learned in school. Whatever sort of fools (probably mostly bots) come here talking NIST report obviously haven't read it or they would know how full of holes it is from an engineering perspective. Criminals can create fake reports just like they can counterfeit currency. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74923625 Belgium 09/11/2020 01:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Mukk1234 (OP) User ID: 78064889 United States 09/11/2020 01:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79338252 United States 09/11/2020 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's a very recent interview with Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 911 truth. I think a lot of it is about Building 7 and that it was not brought down by fire. BUILDING 7 IS THE SMOKING GUN. Quoting: Blue State Rebel Once upon a time, freshman year curriculum for all engineering disciplines included calculus, physics, chemistry, structural analysis, thermodynamics and properties/strengths of materials. Anyone who didn't flunk those courses can use what they learned to understand why the official story is impossible... unless they are afraid to admit it. I've had many discussions about the official story with engineers and the basic agreement is the official story is not possible based on what they learned in school. Whatever sort of fools (probably mostly bots) come here talking NIST report obviously haven't read it or they would know how full of holes it is from an engineering perspective. Criminals can create fake reports just like they can counterfeit currency. So what exactly do you disagree with the NIST Report as to why B7 collapse. After reading it , it make complete sense compared to the nano-thermate control demo nonsense. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79319983 Denmark 09/11/2020 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76894351 United States 09/11/2020 01:58 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76809044 you obviously have never done any forging of steel. steel bends quite nicely at temperatures will below the melting point. which would bend and compromise the structural integrity of those upper floors enough to cause the break-up and Pancaking that started from the area of the planes' impacts and Pancaked downwards from there. the Controlled Demolition of Bdg. 7 is an entirely different ball of wax. the explosion occurred at the bottom, which started the Pancaking at the bottom, taking down Bdg. 7 from there. let it go. yer tilting at windmills. you'll do better to search for the girl in the polka dot dress at the Robert Kennedy assassination. If the official narrative is true, than all buildings should be one floor, two at most, and tall buildings are all declared deathtraps and torn down. don't destroy this brilliant argument with absurdity. This pancake theory makes no sense. Even if the temps at the top melted it and they bent and fell like that, it wouldn't continue in a perfect straight free fall below like that. The steel below was not near the same temps as the hot steel at the top and when it reached the floors below it would meet resistance and either stop or fall to the side, leaving the bottom of the building standing. There is absolutely no way it falls the way it did from fires. The idea that the pancake theory makes no sense, is especially obvious once you realize that none of these buildings actually failed in a pancake style of collapse. These 911 shills get dumber each and every year. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79103398 United States 09/11/2020 02:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shills gaslight. It is all they have. The architect in that video gives clear reasons why none of the buildings could have fallen as they did. He talks about the massive amount of steel PROJECTED up to 600 feet away on the North Tower, which means the steel wasnt crushing the building, and how the concrete was pulverized into mist. He shows the damn squibs blowing out as it comes down, FAR below where the building is falling apart. It is obvious it was blown apart from inside. And he shows proof of nano thermite throughout all the wreckage. Steel beams with their ends evaporated. Shills gaslight. That is all they can do. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76894351 United States 09/11/2020 02:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shills gaslight. It is all they have. Quoting: Chemical Breath The architect in that video gives clear reasons why none of the buildings could not have fallen as they did. He talks about the massive amount of steel PROJECTED up to 600 feet away on the North Tower, which means the steel wasnt crushing the building, and how the concrete was pulverized into mist. He shows the damn squibs blowing out as it cones down, FAR below where the building is falling apart. It is obvious it was blown apart from inside. And he shows proof of nano thermite throughout all the wreckage. Steel beams with their ends evaporated. Shills gaslight. That is all they can do. Yep. Plus everyone knows that it's pointless and moot now, America is about to come down even faster than WT7 did. 9/11 was our warning, and America did next to nothing with it. |
Festus Hoggbottom User ID: 78382070 United States 09/11/2020 02:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh God, this thread yet again? You guys must really get excited every year when 9/11 rolls around. OK...lets pretend for a moment you are right, it was a "controlled demolition"..to what end? What sinister purpose do YOU assign to this "controlled demolition"? Dazzle all of us with your theories.... Seriously?! Isn't it obvious? The War on Terror is a fucking blank check. A non-specific war with non-specific objectives against a non-specific enemy in a non-specific theater using non-specific tactics and assets in non-specific ways. What's not to gain by such an action if you're a warhawk? Throw in the Patriot Act and these freaks are jizzing in their pants from power OD. Last Edited by Festus J. Hoggbottom, III on 09/11/2020 02:26 PM I did it. I did it on purpose. And I'll do it again. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79338252 United States 09/11/2020 02:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Shills gaslight. It is all they have. Quoting: Chemical Breath The architect in that video gives clear reasons why none of the buildings could not have fallen as they did. He talks about the massive amount of steel PROJECTED up to 600 feet away on the North Tower, which means the steel wasnt crushing the building, and how the concrete was pulverized into mist. He shows the damn squibs blowing out as it cones down, FAR below where the building is falling apart. It is obvious it was blown apart from inside. And he shows proof of nano thermite throughout all the wreckage. Steel beams with their ends evaporated. Shills gaslight. That is all they can do. [link to www.metabunk.org (secure)] A&E for 911truth are con men taking money from "Truthers" for years. No different that a magicians trick of making you look the other way so that you believe his trick is real. If you believe in Gage and his gang of con-men then you deserve to have your money taken from you for not having a BS meter working when someone wants you to believe in utter BS. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79360159 United States 09/11/2020 02:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Oh God, this thread yet again? You guys must really get excited every year when 9/11 rolls around. OK...lets pretend for a moment you are right, it was a "controlled demolition"..to what end? What sinister purpose do YOU assign to this "controlled demolition"? Dazzle all of us with your theories.... You obviously are unaware what was supposed to be in that building. All of 9/11 was to cover up what was stolen from there. All of it. Wrap your head around that... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79338252 United States 09/11/2020 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Here's a very recent interview with Richard Gage of Architects & Engineers for 911 truth. I think a lot of it is about Building 7 and that it was not brought down by fire. BUILDING 7 IS THE SMOKING GUN. Quoting: Blue State Rebel Once upon a time, freshman year curriculum for all engineering disciplines included calculus, physics, chemistry, structural analysis, thermodynamics and properties/strengths of materials. Anyone who didn't flunk those courses can use what they learned to understand why the official story is impossible... unless they are afraid to admit it. I've had many discussions about the official story with engineers and the basic agreement is the official story is not possible based on what they learned in school. Whatever sort of fools (probably mostly bots) come here talking NIST report obviously haven't read it or they would know how full of holes it is from an engineering perspective. Criminals can create fake reports just like they can counterfeit currency. So what exactly do you disagree with the NIST Report as to why B7 collapse. After reading it , it make complete sense compared to the nano-thermate control demo nonsense. Still waiting for an answer. Sound more like crickets to me. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79234421 United States 09/11/2020 02:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |