Someone told me the challenger astronauts are still alive and using their real names.

Like I said, I will post the source code and you will get to explain where I biased it, where's the magic code that says "don't recognize Challenger astronauts when they're older but recognize them when they're younger and recognize everyone else regardless of whether they're decades older or not." Yes, it is proof, unbiased objective evidence that you can't refute.

How easy is it to show everyone a source code while using another?

And you forgot the stars are only 2 miles up being held up by cables.

The problem that I see is that you already refuted the claim and said because your program proves it but you're not done with your program? How could it not be done if you're already using it to refute the claim?

For scientific accuracy you will need controls. A person from their younger years and when they are older if you want to match people who are aged. You'll need to know for a fact who it is and have the program analyze many people who look similar and to make a determination who it is and see if the program is correct or why it's not and fine tune it to, to, to what, make it choose who you want it to choose? And then when your program for sure chooses the people who you want it to choose out of a lineup then it won't matter if it fails in choosing the right person who are not the target of the program!

You see your bias is forcing an outcome UNLESS you are using people and pictures NOT of the astronauts and then when the program seems to correctly identify the people THEN have it analyze the pictures of the astronauts and see what the program determines.

Another control is having two recent pictures of someone and having the program analyze pictures of many other people who look similar and find out if the program chooses the wrong match.

But as long as your program denies a match of the astronauts then you should be happy with it, even if it denies a match of me from a younger me?

Where did I say I wasn't done with the program? The program works fine, but I'm not done making a video about it. Video != program.

Which I used. You didn't read my posts.

You literally didn't read my fucking posts. I already addressed this.

No.

What is the name of the software you are using and did you use any other software or just one?

They don't WANT the truth, they just want to believe in horse shit. You can't challenge their mind, it is their ego you are challenging, to show them they are wrong makes them sad. So they would rather deny it.

minor facial surgical alterations are why your software isnt matching

Really not that hard

You think they didnt think of that?

either the software is flawed or the astronauts had minor plastic surgery done on their face to fool the software

Nope. You can't have it both ways. The program recognizes people even if they look significantly older. You can't claim they're the same people just because you eyeball it and at the same time deny facial recognition software that says they're different people. Can't have it both ways dipshit.

That's called a religious belief. That's called dogma. That is not a rational belief, that is literally a religious belief. You started with a conclusion and you're working backwards to find any excuse you can to fit your preconceived notion. Take your disgusting religious belief and shove it straight up your fucking ass. There is no reasoning with you, You have literally admitted you will ignore the evidence and only accept the conclusion that they're the same people. If my software says otherwise then my software must be flawed because you say so.

Alterations being missed by the human eye but picked up by software

Dont get mad because your little experiment is a big fail and people like me have a brain

You think you are smarter than these people running a world wide conspiracy?

lol you mad

It's called, imadeitmyselfanditsmorereliablethanwhatiseeotherglpersusing. I debunked this thread with it:
Thread: BREAKING NEWS!!! Facial recognition fails on Joe Biden's face!!!! (Not a joke - & a GLP exclusive!!!) (Page 6)

I haven't seen any evidence but im curious what the exact differences that your software found

I think I'm smarter than you. That much is clear. You're claiming it's thrown off by tiny alterations that you can't even see by eye but it's able to detect the same people over decades of time despite dramatic aging. Can't have it both ways dipshit.

You proved yourself to be an irrational idiot. A religious fucking nutjob and an embarrassment to every single person on this website. And that's saying a lot.

Last Edited by Astromut on 09/15/2020 03:15 PM

but you're totally NOT a dancer?

lol so mad

well as of now you haven't posted a shred of evidence and you are just claiming your software found differences

I await your video with evidence

religion is believing we went to the moon or mars based on some pictures

Suck on it.

Go fuck yourself.

Suck on what?

Why your software only?

Use a neutral facial recognition tech then maybe i will believe

all i see are some grainy black and white pics and a white dot that could be anything

What exactly is that supposed to prove?

My software is neutral. If you wish to prove otherwise then you're going to have to show where I faked it in the source code.