Trump's Next Supreme Court Nominee - Amy Coney Barrett

Yeaha..I agree...I think she is friends with someone in the President's family..

It seems like a probable choice. She has good odds.

Leftist Slate's Mark Joseph Stern says "Barrett’s view of the law is fundamentally cruel."

The Top Contender for RBG’s Seat Has a Fundamentally Cruel Vision of the Law
Here’s what we can expect if Trump fills the late justice’s seat.

"Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s death presents Donald Trump with an opportunity to transform the United States far beyond most Americans’ comprehension. Replacing the justice with a conservative would mark the single most consequential act of his presidency. It would doom policies and precedents that have come to form a cornerstone of American law. It’s not hard to foresee what the court could accomplish if Justice Brett Kavanaugh becomes the swing vote.

The consensus among legal and political analysis is that Judge Amy Coney Barrett, whom Trump placed on a federal appeals court in 2017, is the leading candidate to fill Ginsburg’s seat. Barrett gained fame during her confirmation hearing after Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein made inappropriate comments about the judge’s devout Catholic faith. She is a hardcore conservative, but that description doesn’t quite capture how radically her jurisprudence differs from Ginsburg’s. The late justice viewed the Bill of Rights and civil rights acts as generous guarantees of human dignity that must be read expansively to achieve their purpose. By contrast, Barrett’s view of the law is fundamentally cruel. During her three years on the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, Barrett has either written or joined a remarkable number of opinions that harm unpopular and powerless individuals who rely on the judiciary to safeguard their rights..."

 
 
Thread: Potential Supreme Court Justice Amy Barrett Discusses Why She May Have to Recuse Herself for Important Rulings Due to Her Faith

Thread: IMAGE: Potential Supreme Court Justice Amy Barrett
 

Last Edited by dr0id on 09/19/2020 12:45 PM

BUT BUT BUT She raped me at a over nighter slumber party when we were 13




YUP I see it now.

she won't be confirmed. choose her if you want to fail and have to start over.

1. neither jesus, nor his pope will determine whether you do you job.

2. the adopted children thing is just weird.

Pick a real person.

i'm expecting the woman judge to hire exclusively male staff

a person that strongly identifies as a practicing catholic being nominated to the Supreme Court is problematic.

her haitian voodoo babies...well that ain't happening.

lets be clear,they are all corrupt and will always choose to lick boots,its where they make their money.
fuck the law!

Amy Barrett...from New Orleans...is clearly a Zombie.

she's using her own biological children as food for her Haitian Changelings.

that's what you want on the Supreme Court?

Go fuck yourselves!

In #Barrett tenure on the bench, she hasn't found a prosecutor she doesn't side with, a corporation she doesn't prefer, or a government action she doesn't approve of. Bad rulings on takings, free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of association, discrimination, and misconduct. As quoted from Robert Barnes of Barnes Law.... also this as well / For those "conservatives" championing #Barrett, she also sided w/ Illinois Democratic lockdown Governor against churches, against freedom of association, and against freedom of expression. [link to politico.com (secure)] Another blowhard bullshit offering from Trump...... start holding this guy accountable for some of this.

I hope so. She's a pro-life Catholic too.

Oof that's going to hurt during the hearings.

I think she is risky.

If its true she would always side with the Pope's views, then she is not a viable candidate. That fucking guy is about as liberal as they come. I definitely wouldn't let him, or any liberal around my kids.

I'd go with the Cuban, they hate communism and Trump gets racial points for not picking an evil white person.

Actually, I'd go with the most squeaky clean constitutionals I could find regardless of race or gender. Its crazy we are picking a SCOTUS judge based on gender qualifications.

Any alpha male type now is doomed, they all did something questionable back in the ole college days.... A nerdy broad who made it to any judge position probably didn't get too crazy.

Jim Jordan.

Barrett is CNNs pick

Amy Coney Barrett: Don't expect Roe to Go



[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]