Asteroid 2020 SW will fly by closer than some satellites this week

Cool!

cool.

Does the US military watch these satellites closely?

If there's a collision, where it could happen?

nothing is going to happen. another one for the hall of fails.

no asteroid doom

Cool, if it has a bunch of debris with it it could take out a satellite, and then start a chain reaction with satellites destroying each other, just like the movie "Gravity."

6 meters wide.

this is it folks.

the real one.

6's everywhere.

obviously, it's going to hit the moon.

i say this because in the animation, it clearly doesn't alter it's course due to passing the moon's gravity.

therefore, this is hiding the moon impact probability.

Don't worry, it's nothing but a delivery service for some aliens in their mother ship.

They're probably delivering some Blechcoianian Pizza from substation Yacochin 9.

Wouldn't a strong magnetosphere either burn up most asteroids that enter our atmosphere or send them bouncing into space compared to a weak one meaning more asteroids get to earth's surface with a weak magnetosphere.

I'm thinking of Apollo 13's re-entry window.

You re right, it will kill a worm in australia.

Go read before you appear even more stupid than you obviously are, and that's significant.

You work for NASA...many don't know...

For enquiring minds...go to youtube...Eric Catfish Briggs...

It will smash into a satellite...that debris will hit other satellites which sets up a chain reaction that takes out all satellites in orbit (except the moon).

DOOM!!!

Or Angry Catfish Briggs...
[link to m.youtube.com (secure)] beautiful black man

Ah ha...very ineresting extra words added to my post...hmm...

Those last 3 obviously innocuous words that absolutely don't belong there...and you once again confirm to me that Eric is absolutely correct...

So the 3 extra words...added by YouTube...or?...hmm...

I also see that the YouTube link does not work...very, VERY interesting...I wont post again on this thread...
Those that are watching the moon...etc...should already know...

Would this be a good comparison as to what would happen if it did happen to hit?
[link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Way less than 50%
"Due to its high velocity and shallow angle of atmospheric entry, the object exploded in an air burst over Chelyabinsk Oblast, at a height of around 29.7 km (18.5 mi; 97,000 ft).[7][8] The explosion generated a bright flash, producing a hot cloud of dust and gas that penetrated to 26.2 km (16.3 mi), and many surviving small fragmentary meteorites, as well as a large shock wave."

How do you have the patience for the people on this website ?

Dear God please let this destroy China!

to put in my active threads.

As quoted in this article “NASA dismisses this as an internet hoax”..

Of course we know better than to listen to them who are exposed liars.

The image you are showing is from 2015 (old hat) many of these second sun sightings are called Nibiru. There is only one Nibiru, so they cannot all be it.

We actually have 7-8 main bodies inbound. The effect you are seeing such as in this picture, is due to a refraction of light. It’s a unique effect that historically has been isolated to one region at a time. So it’s not like this was visible to all on the planet on this said day.

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk (secure)]

The common internet debunk will be that these are lens flares caused by a camera. Or even that it was filmed through glass. Sometimes this is the case, but Clearly many are not Lens flares or filmed through glass.

There are ways to test this that many have proved. I’ve seen many examples with reflections of the said object off of water or other surfaces.

This guy has also captured this object behind clouds.



Do your own research and don’t rely on others to think for you :)

I've experienced filter flares in my personal photography. They move with the camera. Why doesn't this "filter flare" move with the movement of the camera?

[link to luminous-landscape.com (secure)]

Filter flare commonly occurs directly opposite the optical axis (i.e., center of the frame) from an excessively bright light source.

So they can see something 6 meters wide but cant provide a high rwsolution photo of the moon??

If it is a lens flare, why is it reflected in the water?

BTW I don't believe in a "second sun" either but my question is still valid.