SCOTUS nominee for forced vaccinations and extended lockdown.

I'm a conservative and I was very disappointed today to learn that Amy is for forced vaccines.

In 2020, Judge Barret sided on behalf of J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois — giving him supreme authority to lock down the state for as long as he pleases. Judge Barrett gave in to the authoritarian left by hiding behind a 1905 ruling in Jacobsen v. Massachusetts. This ruling gave local Massachusetts authorities free reign to vaccinate and re-vaccinate every adult in their jurisdiction and fine those who did not comply.

Jacobsen v. Massachusetts (1905): “The board of health of a city or town if, in its opinion, it is necessary for the public health or safety shall require and enforce the vaccination and re-vaccination of all the inhabitants thereof and shall provide them with the means of free vaccination. Whoever, being over twenty-one years of age and not under guardianship, refuses or neglects to comply with such requirement shall forfeit five dollars.”

Barrett is prone to side with the state in all matters of public health hysteria, disregarding individual liberty, medical privacy, informed consent and human rights. She concurred with the majority in Illinois Republican Party et al. v. J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois and agreed to hold down the people of Illinois through indefinite, illegal lockdowns and economic restrictions. If nominated, Barret would continue to allow Democrats to rip up the Constitution under the guise of safety and protecting the “greater good.” If nominated, Barrett would ultimately rule in favor of compulsory vaccination, giving government the power to force experimental covid-19 injections, faulty flu vaccines, and all other pharmaceutical products that are promoted as one-size-fits-all “public health” solutions.

[link to www.naturalnews.com (secure)]

I don't know. Someone please prove me wrong and make me feel better. Please!

.

However, she appears to be solid on gun rights judging by her dissent in Kanter v Barr (gun rights for non violent felons case) arguing that the gun rights of non-violent felons should be restored.

You know the MSM would be all over this if so.

It seems he might have added to the swamp instead of draining.

Not my favorite pick at all.

I heard he wanted to pick the other lady that started with an L but was pressured into picking her.

You know the MSM would be all over this if so.

The issue is states rights
What ruling do you expect from a Federalist?

If you dont want a governor who forces vax....you get a different governor.
Power to the people.

Trump is the msm !

We are fuked u less the trump tards wake up from their gay flavored slumber . They still have hearts in their eyes for a conman

Well she wasnt wearing a mask alongside the president when she made that entrance to the podium. I hope she changes her stance soon when the dems give her a complete grilling

State Level Issues ...Blue City Mayor issues.//

You just have to live with vaccines, BLM riots, Lock downs.. business looting

Yeah - MAGA

Winning

are there any individuals liberty loving freedom people out there.?

are do they all have to belong to some sort of club, religious or political?

I'm a conservative and I was very disappointed today to learn that Amy is for forced vaccines.

In 2020, Judge Barret sided on behalf of J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois — giving him supreme authority to lock down the state for as long as he pleases. Judge Barrett gave in to the authoritarian left by hiding behind a 1905 ruling in Jacobsen v. Massachusetts. This ruling gave local Massachusetts authorities free reign to vaccinate and re-vaccinate every adult in their jurisdiction and fine those who did not comply.

Jacobsen v. Massachusetts (1905): “The board of health of a city or town if, in its opinion, it is necessary for the public health or safety shall require and enforce the vaccination and re-vaccination of all the inhabitants thereof and shall provide them with the means of free vaccination. Whoever, being over twenty-one years of age and not under guardianship, refuses or neglects to comply with such requirement shall forfeit five dollars.”

Barrett is prone to side with the state in all matters of public health hysteria, disregarding individual liberty, medical privacy, informed consent and human rights. She concurred with the majority in Illinois Republican Party et al. v. J.B. Pritzker, Governor of Illinois and agreed to hold down the people of Illinois through indefinite, illegal lockdowns and economic restrictions. If nominated, Barret would continue to allow Democrats to rip up the Constitution under the guise of safety and protecting the “greater good.” If nominated, Barrett would ultimately rule in favor of compulsory vaccination, giving government the power to force experimental covid-19 injections, faulty flu vaccines, and all other pharmaceutical products that are promoted as one-size-fits-all “public health” solutions.

[link to www.naturalnews.com (secure)]

Totally. He really drove that point home when he started giving billions of tax dollars to Gates vaccine companies, and then saying he would deploy the military to distribute it.

That's right when I knew he was anti-vax.

Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.

I can't possibly take this site seriously.

Natural News is a science-based natural health advocacy organization led by activist-turned-scientist Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.

I can't possibly take this site seriously.