Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,444 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 433,880
Pageviews Today: 659,770Threads Today: 246Posts Today: 3,285
07:38 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject Flat Earth is the DUMBEST SHIT EVER
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
If the universe were one flat plane, then everything on it could exhibit only two dimensions, as well. Which explains the appeal to Bolshies.

Even sillier, see Ptolemy's support for a geocentric solar system—the planets orbit alright, then are made to perform loops, spins and unexplained twirls like ballroom dancers on roller skates.



popcorn
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79497702


Why discredit ideas rather an answer observational questions?

1. When gravity on a round earth tells us that vertical surfaces should all radiate from the centre, tilting away from each other at a rate of 1 degree for every 111km at sea level (the math). Why then are vertical objects always parallel, as far as we can see?

2. Why don't we see things "drop" 3 meters below the horizon for every 5km of horizontal distance (the math), when mirages and observational height are accounted for? (Get a telescope and test this yourself on a clear day... the stated curve of the Earth doesn't fit observation).
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79496395


"tilting away from each other at a rate of 1 degree for every 111km at sea level (the math). Why then are vertical objects always parallel, as far as we can see?

Yeah that's exactly how Erostosthenes calculated the circumference of the earth in like 4 bc.


 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77376498


Very good.

Key word here is "calculated". He created a representational (mathematical) model, based on the "shadows" of vertical objects (he created a mathematical model based the assumption of spheres and their interactions, then called it as a globe... he never proved spheres through observation), before we had the ability to see significant distances (powerful telescopes) and use "observation" to verify their mathematics.

Their "model" does not fit direct observation of the earth.

Nice try though using ancient mathematics... we've come a way since then, and still haven't provided an accurate "model" of the earth. There are literally hundreds of geodetic's used in spatial sciences... none accurate.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP