Flat Earth is the DUMBEST SHIT EVER

Dude... SHOVE your talking points...

AND... SHOW US the CURVATURE...

RIGHT HERE.

X

I'm not a flat earther, but why don't you answer my questions first, and then I'll have a crack at yours?

1. When gravity on a round earth tells us that vertical surfaces should all radiate from the centre, tilting away from each other at a rate of 1 degree for every 111km at sea level (the math). Why then are vertical objects always parallel, as far as we can see?

2. Why don't we see things "drop" 3 meters below the horizon for every 5km of horizontal distance (the math), when mirages and observational height are accounted for? (Get a telescope and test this yourself on a clear day... the stated curve of the Earth doesn't fit observation).

Dude... When do you GET to the part where you actually MAKE A CONTRIBUTION to the DISCUSSION?

EVERYONE here is expected to SHOW their work.

Ad hominem might back you FEEL SUPERIOR but just bounces off like so much nonsense.

I can't speak for anyone else, but this HUMAN CONTROL mechanism of the COMPULSION to belong to the GROUP THINK...

This FEAR on NON-CONFORMITY is simply laughable.

Cuz the REALITY of the situation is SEEKERS go WHERE THE DATA takes you. (And 'data' is pronounced like the NAME OF THE ANDROID).

What's that?

You've ALREADY timed out!

Of course, I do have a tendency to...

Carry on!

Ummm, because I'm not asking for anyone to change their cosmology, which is ultimately what flat earthers demand of everyone.
Further, those are valid questions coming from someone who is trying to understand how this flat earth model really works. The model is problematic at best, in my view.
Also, flat earthers(who ardently wish for everyone else to change their way of processing reality), have the burden of proof, not the other way around.
AND, I have yet to come across a flat-earther who can give answers to these questions that are more than conjecture.

That said:
1. Because you can't see very far
2. Refraction.

HTH

Oh you want another accredited source??

[link to phys.org (secure)]

ALSO HERE'S A PICTURE OF DIFFERENT POLYHEDRONS - OR CUBICAL SHAPES THAT HAVE VARYING NUMBERS OF SYMMETRICAL SIDES

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

AND YEAH I CAN KEEP GOING AND MAKING YOU LOOK DUMB - AT LEAST TO THOSE OF WHO ACKNOWLEDGE ALL THE FACTS NOT JUST THE ONES WHICH SUIT OUR PERSONAL NARRATIVE.

It's spelled " definition " too , not defenition.

explains the plandemic also.

Show me the dome, dumbass!

GODS WAYS ARE ABOVE YOUR WAYS

The answer to all your questions can be answered by God himself

If you have thr guts to ask him

All cubes are polyhedrons, but not all polyhedrons are cubes.

This is basic elementary school geometry, which is one of the many things you have failed at.


Now go scream and shout and wave your hands some more about an article you found but lack even the most basic intellectual ability to understand.

Ah yes, the age old god works in mysterious ways whenever things get confusing.
And no, I'm not afraid of your cheap ass GAWD.
Still doesn't answer anything.
And neither do the flat-earthers I've come across.

THANK YOU FOR CONFIRMING WHAT SCIENCE SAYS IN YOUR MOROSE ATTEMPT TO AGAIN DODGE AND DEFLECT THE STATED FACTS

ALL CUBES ARE INDEED POLYHEDRONS

THAT MEANS A CUBICAL CAN BE MORE THAN ONLY A 6 SIDED BLOCK

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

Wow! Thanks.

Does the author provide ANY EMPIRICAL/HISTORICAL... support for the multi-ring model.

I had seen static maps organized around the multi-ring with some simple essentially 2D representations of up to 3 SUNS but was unable to SUBSTANTIATE the PROVENANCE.

The earliest variants of the multi-ring, I didn't give much credence to as it appeared there was some replications of some of the 'outer continents'

I'm usually NOT much of a fan of people pushing a MARKETING GLOSSY presentation... But ALWAYS peruse IN SEARCH of the GRAIN of TRUTH.

What did you think of it... What are YOUR thoughts?

I've been beating on the drum pretty hard...

Thank you for bringing us a possible Chapter 2.

There's also a couple of Tuti-Frutti channels on YT dealing with some SERIOUSLY FAR OUT concepts of the Moon. Mega fascinating.

Thanks again.

:)

Can't find the word cubical there...
Keep searching.

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

You wouldn't see it even if it was staring at you in the face because you CHOOSE NOT TOO which is why you have to rely on petty semantics and tangents , pun intended

So pathetically desperate to not even acknowledge that your delusional view of 'reality' is wrong - this is called disassociation phenomenon in psychology

Get YOUR OWN sandwich Skippy.

*** Co Operation FishBowl ugh***

Is there some kind of meaning in the word highjump?

Are you guys hearing the buzzing of an insect?

Have a nice FLAT EARTH day!

Flat Earth created by God in Heaven

Round Earth is a distortion of that fact

Hollow Earth distortion

Alien distortion

Bigfoot distortion

Joe Biden distortion

I already understood you think "cubical shape" is a synonym of Polyhedron or platonic solid.
But OK.. I give up.
Hope you live a happy life in your flat earth made of cubical shapes...
Bye

There wouldn't be a operation fishbowl or highjump

If the earth was round

Keep projecting.

Just because you're too stupid to understand WHAT SCIENCE NOW SAYS doesn't make me retarded.

WHAT PART ABOUT THIS DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND??

Researchers now find a fundamental truth in that premise. Studying the shapes and fragmentation patterns of a variety of rocks, they found that the average of all their forms is a cube.

[link to www.sciencedaily.com (secure)]

Damn you globe tards are so brainwashed and hypnotized you can't even CONTEMPLATE a different version.

Pathetic.

FLAT EARTHers, typically, AREN'T selling.

There ARE no DEMANDS.

What a FAILED sense of EGO.

It is WHAT IT IS.

It is a FAIT ACCOMPLI.

It was ALL covered in the 31 PAGE FLAT EARTH EXTRAVANGANZA.

We ALWAYS SHOW our work.

EXACTLY which part of REALITY confuses you?

You never even tried but keep arguing with your only belief , science. Or are you going to argue with that now? What good is all your knowledge and so called "wisdom" if you can't even trust it or have to rely on selective comprehension to validate??

The difference is I don't put my faith in something that can change.

AND WHAT ABOUT THIS DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? THEY FOUND. ON AVERAGE. AT THE MOLECULAR LEVEL. IT'S MADE UP OF CUBES.


Researchers now find a fundamental truth in that premise. Studying the shapes and fragmentation patterns of a variety of rocks, they found that the average of all their forms is a cube.

[link to www.sciencedaily.com (secure)]

No. You are!

Perfect example of more dodge , deflection, refusal to acknowledge REALITY with attempts at discrediting using suspicion and paranoia.

Just like the devil does when presented with the TRUTH.

I see the curvature every day as the sun rises and sets and as the moon and stars rise and set thankyou.. I AM NOT STUPID.

The Round Earthers explain this by emphatically stating: "ITS A MIRAGE!!" Good grief. They worship at the altar of science, then spout "mirage" as a scientific explanation of contrary, observable evidence..

Observation 1: Chicago skyline seen from other side of Lake Michigan which is 58 miles away. Based on "Round" Earth theory, they calculate earth curvature in feet at 8" x D2/12" (mileage Squared). Thus, the Chicago skyline should be 8" x (58x58)/12= 2242 feet BELOW your observable horizon. This is just under 1/2 mile of curvature drop and eliminates the possibility of ANY Chicago skyscraper from being observed from the eastern side of Lake Michigan.

However, indoctrinated news reporters, (needing something "science-based" to explain how the Chicago skyline is observable across a near 60 mile expanse) have settled in on "ITS JUST A MIRAGE."

And here's where it gets really amusing...Mirage's are mirror images of the original, yet this poor weather guy just goes with it..

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]


Then we get this weather women who understands how mirages work advising viewers that they might see a mirage of Chicago's skyline inverted and hanging updside down in the sky. Here best quote is at the 1:14 mark: "Anyway, all of this science occurs and it flips it..." Beyond laughable

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]


So...You round earthers can hold tight to your "science" but please be sure to ALWAYS remind us that it is "just a mirage."


Observation 2:
Each month, we are able to observe a FULL MOON during the daylight hours. Since "Round" earthers believe the moon is an orbiting rock that only reflects the sunlight that hits its surface, please contemplate how the sunlight (that would be behind the moon during daylight hours) is able to wrap around the moon, hit its earth-facing surface, and project a Full moon to us.

Spoiler alert, it isn't possible. The ONLY way the moon can reflect light from 100% of its surface is when it is on the night-side of the Earth, and sunlight passing by the earth hits the moon and reflects it back to our surface for observation.

TRUST what your eyes are showing you. That is part of the scientific evidence. Why you elect to deny your senses is just "part of the mirage" in the round earth theory.

The Truth will set you free.
Dad

Yep

Science is a fraud

Based on the senses which are subjuct to the prince and power of the air

Satan