Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,158 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 597,827
Pageviews Today: 963,945Threads Today: 386Posts Today: 6,330
10:11 AM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE MESSAGE
Subject NEW: New York Post staff didn’t believe the Hunter Biden conspiracy story — but they published it anyway: report
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
The New York Post’s own journalists say they are skeptical of the paper’s stories about Hunter Biden, including the man who wrote most of the “smoking gun” story and would not put his name on it.

On Wednesday morning, the Post dropped what it clearly hoped would be a bombshell — an exclusive report based on copies of emails and photos that had supposedly belonged to Hunter, the son of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden. The Post said the files were recovered from a computer that belonged to Hunter and was dropped off at a computer-repair shop near the Biden family’s home in Wilmington, Delaware, last spring. From there the files eventually made their way to the Post via Trump consigliere Rudy Giuliani. The Post has not said publicly whether it authenticated the files.

“I think it was very flimsy,” one Post reporter told Intelligencer.

Another journalist at the paper was even more blunt.

“It’s not something that meets my journalistic standards,” they said, adding that the piece “should not have been published.”

Indeed, reporter Bruce Golding wrote most of the first several stories and refused to put his name on them. Golding did not respond to a request for comment.

Some Post reporters also suspected the involvement of Col Allan, a veteran of Rupert Murdoch’s media empire who has long guided the Post’s political reporting and is seen by Post insiders as Murdoch’s representative in the newsroom.

Giuliani told the Times he sent the purported Biden files to the Post because “either nobody else would take it, or if they took it, they would spend all the time they could to try to contradict it before they put it out.”

Post reporters who spoke to Intelligencer were not surprised then that the paper published the story, even if they wish that it hadn’t.

“That the Post would go pro-Trump before the election and in the months leading up to it was kind of something I’ve been bracing for and that a lot of the other not-right-wing Post reporters have been bracing for,” the first Post reporter told Intelligencer. “So in a way, it’s not really surprising.”


[link to nymag.com (secure)]
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP