Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,277 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,133,412
Pageviews Today: 1,892,930Threads Today: 784Posts Today: 13,615
06:25 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 293349
United States
11/01/2007 11:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
If there's a case that reflects the importance of The Health Freedom Protection Act (H.R. 2117, sponsored by Ron Paul), this is it:

Mother Jailed, Put On Trial for Curing Her Son of Melanoma October 3, 2007

An unholy alliance of California Child Protective Services (CPS) with a hostile doctor and judge is attempting to railroad Laurie Jessop, framed as a threat to her son and the establishment for finding a way to cure him of malignant melanoma. She is now on trial, under a gag order, since she had gone to the press. When she was arrested, she was put in maximum security, solitary confinement, in the Orange County, CA jail. They claim that everything about. her says anti-Establishment, so she was told, as she was considered a threat in starting a riot.

On the morning of Sept. 12, Gary Null read on KPFK, a Pacifica station in Los Angeles, an e-mail from Ron Miller, who had met Ms. Jessop at the Cancer Control Society annual convention during the Labor Day weekend. They had discussed this persecution by Big Brother in the guise of saving her son from this evil mother who has failed to protect him! She disobeyed doctor’s orders and found a natural way to cure her son. These forces arrayed against her and insisted he must have the cancer removed surgically and attacked with the standard chemical fare. The cancer is gone, but nobody in authority will accept that because her doctor doesn’t believe that’s possible.

The initial biopsy of the mole was done in February. Their regular doctor was on leave when test results came in. A nurse informed them of the bad news. On May 8, Chad Jessop had a follow up appointment with a medical group doctor, by the name of Dr. Masciana, who insisted he needed surgery to excise the site within a week, or he could die any day now! This doctor is a general practitioner, not an oncologist or qualified to do cancer diagnosis or surgery. Chad and his mom decided to pursue holistic treatment for him. Incensed, the doctor reported her to Child Protective Services on the grounds of gross negligent child endangerment. She yelled at Laurie “all of you Jehovah’s Witnesses are all the same,” never mind Laurie and Chad are not Jehovah’s witnesses. Dr. Masciana also told Laurie, with her son present, that his death was imminent. At the close of the appointment, Dr. Masciana informed Laurie that she was referring the case to Social Services. In further investigation, Child Protective Social Services is a misnamed government agency whose employees get paid bonuses every time they take children away from their parents.

That evening Laurie called an attorney who advised her that she had 48 hours or less before Social Services showed up. If she could not prove she was following doctor’s orders, they’d take her son. Since Dr. Masciana had created such a traumatic experience for Chad, he feared the doctors and threatened to run away. In honoring Chad’s wishes for continued holistic care, Laurie took her son to San Diego to continue holistic care using a number of various alternative treatments such as: ozone, hyperbaric oxygen chamber, hydrogen peroxide, energy work, Rife, nutritional supplements, and deep emotional work. Laurie also used “black salve” that she purchased from Canada to remove the mole tissue. Black salve was developed by Native American Indians more than 200 years ago, and used in the treatment of skin lesions, cancers, warts, and moles. Figures our FDA banned it, because it works.

When Chad insisted on hitting the road to continue alternative therapies and getting further diagnostics, that left a question as to where Laurie’s daughter Crystal would go. A close friend of the family and Crystal’s best friend agreed, and this felt like a perfect fit under the circumstances, so Laurie legally signed Crystal over to the family and gave them all the necessary medical insurance information. On May 22, the local sheriff and CPS had taken her daughter out of class, interrogating her mercilessly, telling her lies about her mother, trying to force her to reveal where Laurie and Chad had gone, and then forced her to go on a police joy ride and show them where they reside. All of this was done against her will and carried on for six hours!

They applied “Black Salve” directly to the area in question, thus giving Chad a holistic version of a large border excision. It took about two and a half weeks for the wound to heal. When it was healed Laurie took Chad to a Del Mar dermatologist for a biopsy. The test results were negative of any signs of melanoma! The next two weeks were concentrated on once again healing the tissue to get another biopsy. Upon the wound site being healed, a melanoma specialist did a punch biopsy and a complete lab analysis on Friday, June 15. Again, no sign of cancer could be found in the biopsy and the blood work was in healthy ranges with no distinguishing markers that would otherwise be present in a patient that would have advanced stage four melanoma, as had been previously reported! Was it a miracle, or an activated immune system in a healthy young man, with some useful help, that healed the melanoma?

The following Monday, June 18th, Laurie and Chad turned themselves in to the San Diego Social Services office, with all of their documentation. They were detained for 4 hours, then told that arrest warrants for Laurie and Chad were issued from Orange County. Chad was locked up at the Palenskie Center in San Diego for one night. He had 2 guards watching him around the clock, since he was considered a flight risk. When Laurie went to visit Chad they could not have any privacy, as both guards listened to every word that was said. Laurie spent over nine thousand bucks in San Diego for the treatments done over the five week period of time, and has all the receipts as proof. A new social worker, David Harper, was put on the case. He picked Chad up in San Diego transporting him to Orangewood Children’s Home in Orange County for the next two weeks, where he got fed spaghetti and meat balls, food not fitting one healing from cancer. One aspect of Chad’s treatment was a healthy diet of living foods, but Ms. Jessop’s requests of this social worker that Chad get proper food fell on deaf ears. He did tell her she was allowed to see her daughter graduate from Junior High School. She told him nobody could keep her away without a court order, and that she would be there! The social worker informed Laurie that he completed the paper work to lift the warrant order on her.

After her daughter’s graduation, on June 21st Laurie went to make academic arrangements for her son, having missed five weeks of school. Laurie showed the documentation to the principal and vice principal. The Vice Principal knew Chad well, as Chad did his Eagle Scout project for him at the high school. Chad is now an advanced Eagle Scout. No matter, the VP called police to arrest Laurie at the school and haul her off to the county jail. The arresting deputy harassed her. When Laurie protested, the officer told her she didn’t have to like her or be nice to her. After arriving at the county jail, her first telephone call had been to the social worker, David Harper, although he did nothing to get her out of jail, nor was he willing to help correct the record. Laurie was physically abused, they spread her legs twisting her knee, when she complained they called out “Resisting…Resisting” then they pushed her violently to a cell wall (behind the cameras) causing her to twist her neck, shoulder and arm. After being worked over, they took away her jacket, shoes, socks, and toilet paper, and locked her up. Her holding cell was extremely cold and she was deliberately denied toilet paper. She asked for toilet paper, only to be answered it must have been taken for good reason and she was not getting any. She was denied toilet paper from approximately 3:30pm until 11:00pm. One has to wonder, what was she going to do with the toilet paper, hang herself? By 11:00 pm Laurie got taken to be assessed. She asked “is this a madhouse run by animals, who is running this place?” Laurie told this officer her story for half an hour. He let her talk, then said he sees all kinds of characters, his job is to ascertain threats. He told her she has the fire, the spirit and the power to overturn the system and create a riot. He informed her she’d be put in solitary confinement, but she might get a roommate, probably a drug offender. She was forced to take a chest X-ray against her will, without any explanation and ridicule from the officers. Laurie and her two children have never been in any type of trouble with the law, but were treated like hardened criminals. She was shocked to learn women taking showers have no privacy, that male guards are watching. The next night she got a 58-year old roommate charged with kidnapping her children from her husband 20 years ago, after being extradited from Tennessee on outdated bogus charges tagged with 200 thousand bail. It would appear that Orange County is desperately trying to maintain job security at the expense of the innocent!

Laurie was released on the streets of Santa Ana after midnight, in an unsafe area of Southern California for a woman, after five days of incarceration. Upon Laurie’s arrest, officers impounded her van and turned it upside down looking for drugs. She had to pay over 300 dollars in impound fees to get the van back.

Social Services approved the foster families that Laurie had arranged for Chad and Crystal. Now Laurie is on trial, forbidden to speak under a gag order, by the very judge that had issued the bench warrant for her arrest, because she refused to go along with orthodox medicine. The dermatologist, appointed by Social Services, testified in court that the melanoma is playing hide and go seek, that they’d have to subject Chad to unnecessary and dangerous further biopsies and medical procedures to find where it migrated to. The dermatologist further stated that the melanoma had become even more deadly, claiming it has now traveled to different organs. The prescription for surgery is a large border excision to the skullbone. Chad says he is old enough to defend this country’s freedoms, but he is denied that same freedom of choice when it comes to his own health and he is also under gag order. Ms. Jessop intends to sue anyone who touches her son against their wishes. All Chad’s blood tests are consistent with a healthy 17 year old 6′2″ young man. They refuse to tolerate anyone trying to clear their conscience at his expense. Laurie says her record stands, she will not back down, and she wants parents to know they do not have to be intimidated by this system! The judge has stated twice that she doesn’t want Chad to die while she is on the bench; which sounds like she has bias in the case! Surgery and chemotherapy had been intended for the following week. The doctor is still of the mind Chad could die any day now. When giving testimony, the dermatologist was asked if he could perform surgery on Chad, knowing that Chad would not cooperate with any Western medical butchery. His answer was emphatic No, he could not perform an operation on anyone against their will.

What Big Brother has been doing to Ms. Jessop and her children is unconscionable, beyond outrageous, a gross miscarriage of justice and an abuse of authority. Many families have been torn apart by lesser abuses of CPS and modern medicine. The Jessop family is very united and strong in their convictions, very aware of their constitutional rights, and will not give up to our corrupt system. Being a single parent for the last 11 years, Laurie has done herself proud raising her children and is extremely close to both of them. Laurie and her children have stood the test and this hellish ordeal has brought them closer together as a family. She said at the press conference, “I am a mama bear and no one is messing with my cubs!”

Laurie’s deadbeat ex-husband, Marcus, has never voluntarily paid for child support or any of the children’s medical bills, even though he is legally bound to pay for half according to their divorce agreement. She has had to drag him into court to get a judgment and garnish his wages in order to collect on past due medical bills. It so happens Marcus is in agreement with the state, he wants his son, (having had no contact for the last 10 years) to be butchered and drugged to eliminate this incredible cancer, that refuses to carry out its death sentence and is too clever to show up on tests. Marcus is in court with his own public defender, pushing for this even though he has no legal or physical custody, not even any visitation rights. If he was in agreement with Laurie’s medical beliefs, this court probably wouldn’t allow him in the courtroom. Our tax dollars, hard at work!

In the state of Virginia, a brilliant 17 year old young man went through a very similar ordeal, but won his battle with CPS. Once his case was over, he was instrumental in passing a new law in the state of Virginia. Abraham’s Law, that gives a minor the right to make their own medical decisions when they are bright and understand their choices. Laurie wants to get her story out and push through a similar bill in California, called “Chad’s Law,” so that other families do not have to go through the abusive nature of a department that is supposed to be protecting our children. As “Roy of Hollywood” stated on KPFK recently, who is protecting us from the Child Protective Social Services Department? Pushing through a bill like this may be very expensive, but once Laurie makes up her mind that she is doing something, she is all steel, determined, and will persevere to find a way to make this happen. If you can help her in any way, please contact me via e-mail.

Orthodox medicine is unwilling to admit it does not know everything, and it hates competition. Its methods of treating cancer are not the only ways that can work. Ms. Jessop believed she could find another way, and her son, given a diagnosis of imminent death, is now free of cancer. Never mind, the doctor is sure it’s still there, so Big Brother intends to make an example of her as an unfit mother for disobeying her doctor, putting her son in mortal danger. That’s not happening, but truth often doesn’t matter to Big Brother, as is apparent in most government policy. If Chad were actually endangered by not getting conventional treatment, the authorities might have a leg to stand on, but in this case, it’s not his mother putting him in jeopardy, it’s the system! The doctor has egg on her face, because she was sure Chad would die quickly without aggressive conventional treatment, and she has been proven wrong! Instead of learning from her error, she wants to make Ms. Jessop and her son pay for showing her up!

I’m helping her get her story out. One newspaper did a story, but in general, very little has been reported so far. I tried to find the story online, but no luck. A press conference was held on Sept. 6th, just before court. Two of the major TV news stations and one of the largest AM radio all news stations showed up. KFWB radio ran the story immediately that day. As soon as court started the judge announced that there was a gag order on this case and threatened jail time and contempt of court to anyone (including the minor in question), that spoke to the press or anyone else for that matter. One of the TV news stations didn’t want to run the story without interviewing Chad and getting his viewpoints. The judge denied a continuance six different times, ignoring all six times valid reasons for the requests. The judge also denied Laurie the right to hire her own attorney! She retained a law firm with her own money, but the judge insisted she has to keep her Public Defender, presumably as a public servant easier to control than a private attorney not so dependent on the system.

If anyone reading this wants to help get the story out, feel free to blog away. I could give out phone numbers for Ms. Jessop or Mr. Miller if you send me a note at [email protected] This blog is angryscientist.wordpress.com. Laurie can’t risk violating the gag order, but she’d appreciate your prayers and support in her very difficult time of fighting our corrupt system in order to keep her family together. Thanks for taking the time to read this long story. Now that you know what sort of injustice masquerades as protecting children, you can do something to help wake up sleepwalking friends and neighbors, trusting “The System” to know what’s best for the children, and adults too.

This sentence of misspelled names is to assist searchers to have a better chance to find this information: Lori Jessop; Lori Jessup; Laurie Jessup; Chad Jessup; L. Jessop; L. Jessup; Lauri Jessup; Lauri Jessop; Laura Jessup; Laura Jessop.

[link to angryscientist.wordpress.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 98008
United States
11/01/2007 11:34 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
Is anyone really surprised??? This is going to become the norm.. God forbid I ever get cancer...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 54326
United States
11/01/2007 11:37 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
That's what happens when you practice medicine without a license. She should be a lesson to all you tinfoil health food, holistic nuts.
Redheaded Stepchild

User ID: 319539
United States
11/01/2007 11:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
Our children belong to the State. This woman is being made an example to the rest of us...we are not to resist the State. If we do, TPTB will destroy us. This is proof.
"Until you are willing to organize your friends and neighbors and literally shut down cities - drive at 5mph through the streets of major cities on the freeway and stop commerce, refuse to show up for work, refuse to borrow and spend more than you make, show up in Washington DC with a million of your neighbors and literally shut down The Capitol you WILL be bent over the table on a daily basis." Karl Denninger

Don't blame me; I voted for Ron Paul.


Silence is consent.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 241684
Netherlands
11/01/2007 11:55 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
That's what happens when you practice medicine without a license. She should be a lesson to all you tinfoil health food, holistic nuts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54326


LoL @ Troll
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 320352
United States
11/01/2007 12:18 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
That's what happens when you practice medicine without a license. She should be a lesson to all you tinfoil health food, holistic nuts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54326


In this case, I would have asked for a second opinion as to wheather or not this was an accurate diagnosis. I don't believe that he had a cancer that would have killed him in a week. Errors are filling our system with wrong diagnosis. With cancer, if you are told that you have it, you will die from fright, or because you are supposed to. A second biopsy should always be performed. The Dr. had no bedside manner, and should be sued for malpractise.
mercury2

User ID: 320353
Norway
11/01/2007 12:23 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
I have been saying for a while now, this is my official prediction, mark my words, they are going to make it
ILLEGAL to be SICK. That's my prediction.

If they're forcing people to have medical treatment against their will NOW, wait til we have "universal healthcare"! Whee! Can't you see six strong guys holding me down and drugging me to get me to have a PAP smear and mammogram?
Evil Twin

User ID: 12207
United States
11/01/2007 12:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
I have been saying for a while now, this is my official prediction, mark my words, they are going to make it
ILLEGAL to be SICK. That's my prediction.

If they're forcing people to have medical treatment against their will NOW, wait til we have "universal healthcare"! Whee! Can't you see six strong guys holding me down and drugging me to get me to have a PAP smear and mammogram?
 Quoting: mercury2

ohyeah

Mandatory "health" care looks mighty appealling, doesn't it?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 225190
United States
11/01/2007 01:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
STAY AWAY FROM THESE FUCKING EGO MANIAC DOCTORS!!!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 320369
United States
11/01/2007 01:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
That's what happens when you practice medicine without a license. She should be a lesson to all you tinfoil health food, holistic nuts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54326

Asshole.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 319911
United States
11/01/2007 01:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
This woman is a grave threat to the financial well being of all Medical Doctors and Pharmaceutical Industry stakeholders.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 314738
United States
11/01/2007 01:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
THAT WAS A VERY GOOD THREAD.I WILL SURELY PASS IT ON.THIS JUST MAKES ME WANT TO SCREAM.GOV NEEDS TO LEAVE US THE HECK ALONE.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 314738
United States
11/01/2007 01:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
AND ALL THIS TIME I THOUGHT THAT OUR MEN ARE DYING FOR OUR FREEDOMS.
Evil Twin

User ID: 12207
United States
11/01/2007 01:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
Just found this article on the ineffectiveness of chemotherapy.


In 1971 Richard Nixon announced the War on Cancer, and promised a cure by the 1977 bicentennial. In each of the 25 plus years since, more Americans have died of cancer than the year before. The failure of chemotherapy to control cancer has become apparent even to the oncology establishment. Scientific American featured a recent cover story entitled: "The War on Cancer -- It's Being Lost." In it, eminent epidemiologist John C. Bailar III, MD, PhD, Chairman of the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics at McGill University cited the relentless increase in cancer deaths in the face of growing use of toxic chemotherapy. He concluded that scientists must look in new directions if they are ever to make progress against this unremitting killer.

Adding its voice, the prestigious British medical journal The Lancet, decrying the failure of conventional therapy to stop the rise in breast cancer deaths, noted the discrepancy between public perception and reality. "If one were to believe all the media hype, the triumphalism of the [medical] profession in published research, and the almost weekly miracle breakthroughs trumpeted by the cancer charities, one might be surprised that women are dying at all from this cancer" it observed. Noting that conventional therapies -- chemotherapy, radiation and surgery -- had been pushed to their limits with dismal results, the editorial called on researchers to "challenge dogma and redirect research efforts along more fruitful lines."

John Cairns, professor of microbiology at Harvard University, published a devastating 1985 critique in Scientific American. "Aside from certain rare cancers, it is not possible to detect any sudden changes in the death rates for any of the major cancers that could be credited to chemotherapy. Whether any of the common cancers can be cured by chemotherapy has yet to be established." In fact, chemotherapy is curative in very few cancers -- testicular, Hodgkin's, choriocarcinoma, childhood leukemia. In most common solid tumors -- lung, colon, breast, etc. -- chemotherapy is NOT curative.

In an article entitled "Chemotherapy: Snake-Oil Remedy?" that appeared in the Los Angeles Times of 1/9/87, Dr. Martin F. Shapiro explained that while "some oncologists inform their patients of the lack of evidence that treatments work...others may well be misled by scientific papers that express unwarranted optimism about chemotherapy. Still others respond to an economic incentive. Physicians can earn much more money running active chemotherapy practices than they can providing solace and relief.. to dying patients and their families." Dr. Shapiro is hardly alone. Alan C. Nixon, PhD, Past President of the American Chemical Society wrote that "As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good."
In 1986, McGill Cancer Center scientists sent a questionnaire to 118 doctors who treated non-small-cell lung cancer. More than 3/4 of them recruited patients and carried out trials of toxic drugs for lung cancer. They were asked to imagine that they themselves had cancer, and were asked which of six current trials they themselves would choose. 64 of the 79 respondents would not consent to be in a trial containing cisplatin, a common chemotherapy drug. Fifty eight found all the trials unacceptable. Their reason? The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable degree of toxicity.

Famed German biostatistician Ulrich Abel PhD also found in a similar 1989 study that "the personal views of many oncologists seem to be in striking contrast to communications intended for the public." Breast cancer activist Rose Kushner wrote that by 1981 "indiscriminate, automatic adjuvant chemotherapy was replacing the Halsted radical mastectomy as therapeutic overkill in the United States." Thomas Nealon MD, Professor of Surgery at NYU School of Medicine, concluded in 1990 that "The treatment of this tumor now has slipped from too much surgery to too much adjuvant therapy."

Why so much use of chemotherapy if it does so little good? Well for one thing, drug companies provide huge economic incentives In 1990, $3.53 billion was spent on chemotherapy. By 1994 that figure had more than doubled to $7.51 billion. This relentless increase in chemo use was accompanied by a relentless increase in cancer deaths. Oncologist Albert Braverman MD wrote in 1991 that "no disseminated neoplasm (cancer) incurable in 1975 is curable today...Many medical oncologists recommend chemotherapy for virtually any tumor, with a hopefulness undiscouraged by almost invariable failure.

There are more and more reports by establishment oncologists doubting the value of chemotherapy, even to the point of rejecting it outright. One of these, cancer biostatistician Dr. Ulrich Abel, of Heidelberg, Germany, issued a monograph titled Chemotherapy of Advanced Epithelial Cancer in 1990. Epithelial cancers comprise the most common forms of adenocarcinoma: lung, breast, prostate, colon, etc. After ten years as a statistician in clinical oncology, Abel became increasingly uneasy. "A sober and unprejudiced analysis of the literature," he wrote, "has rarely revealed any therapeutic success by the regimens in question in treating advanced epithelial cancer." While chemotherapy is being used more and more extensively, more than a million people die worldwide of these cancers annually - and a majority have received some form of chemotherapy before dying. Abel further concluded, after polling hundreds of cancer doctors, "The personal view of many oncologists seems to be in striking contrast to communications intended for the public." Abel cited studies that have shown "that many oncologists would not take chemotherapy themselves if they had cancer." (The Cancer Chronicles, December, 1990.)
"Even though toxic drugs often do effect a response, such as a partial or complete shrinkage of the tumor, this reduction does not prolong expected survival," Abel finds. "Sometimes, in fact, the cancer returns more aggressively than before, since the chemo fosters the growth of resistant cell lines." Besides, the chemo has severely damaged the body's own defenses, the immune system and often the kidneys as well as the liver.
In an especially dramatic table, Dr. Abel displays the results of chemotherapy in patients with various types of cancers, as the improvement of survival rates, compared to untreated patients. This table shows:

-In colorectal cancer: no evidence survival is improved.
-Gastric cancer: no clear evidence.
-Pancreatic cancer: Study completely negative. Longer survival in control (untreated) group.
-Bladder: no clinical trial done.
-Breast cancer: No direct evidence that chemotherapy prolongs survival; its use is "ethically questionable."
-Ovarian cancer: no direct evidence.
-Cervix and uterus: No improved survival.
-Head and neck: no survival benefit but occasional shrinkage of tumors.


The Nov. 17, 1994 Wall Street Journal, in a front page article on political pressure being exerted for insurance companies to pay for bone marrow transplants in advanced breast cancer, experts give a totally negative report on this approach. The procedure, called ABMT (Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant) involves temporarily removing some of the patient's bone marrow, applying a potentially lethal dose of chemotherapy, then returning the marrow to the patient's body. The cost of this procedure is in excess of $100,000.00.
The University of Colorado's Dr. Jones, continues the Journal, claims that, with conventional chemotherapy, not more than 2% of patients with spreading breast cancer get a positive response. A non-profit independent technology assessment agency, the Emergency Care Research Institute (ECRI), says that for the average woman with the most advanced form of breast cancer, the high dose ABMT procedure is not only worthless, but also likely to shorten her life. This report by the ECRI is based on an analysis of 40 studies of ABMT and similar procedures involving a total of 1,017 patients, and 61 studies covering 4,852 patients who had conventional chemotherapy Dr. Nelson Erlick, the project's lead analyst, concluded that "many patients are led to believe that this (ABMT) is a successful therapy. We found no evidence whatsoever that it provides any benefit."

[link to blacksalveinfo.com]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 21159
Canada
11/01/2007 01:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
That's what happens when you practice medicine without a license. She should be a lesson to all you tinfoil health food, holistic nuts.

Asshole.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 320369


QFT. Exactly what authority says We must have a license to practice medicine? Bullshit legal statutes that the vast, vast majority of Canadians/Americans/etc have not even signed a lawfully valid contract to follow/uphold, nor taken any type of oath to follow/uphold? The entire North American justice system is founded upon the UCC, governing LAWFULLY VALID CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENTS that must exist between two competent and consenting adults for any type of actual authority to be able to come from legal rules that statutes represent. Have You signed such a contract or taken such an oath? If You have, great, You know what You can do and can't by the rules You have agreed to follow, but don't be surprised that some of Us do Our own thing in recognizing the bullshit that being involved in NA statutes entails and Our God-gifted ability to choose freely Our own alliances that are a more accurate reflection of Who We Are.

And how tired must the cops be to have to continue to 'serve justice' by following the orders of such incompetent nimwits as the People involved in this case (obviously, not all, but certainly some of them)? The boy is healed of cancer and they throw Him and His mother in jail ffs. Yeah, I know, it's 'karma balancing out so the rest of Humanity gets a few more whiffs of the stench emanating from certain societal sectors'.

Godspeed NESARA or some equivalent announcement/disclosure, enough is enough is already.

Namaste. hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 180437
United States
11/01/2007 02:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
WOW... This is incredibly disturbing!

My brother died from Melanoma thanks to the "system" and I will never trust any of them again! I offered alternatives but the doctors instilled so much fear into him about how dire and 'dangerous' alternatives were that he did not try my options and did as they asked and subsequently died.

My anger runs deep and tears at my soul.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 180437
United States
11/01/2007 02:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
That's what happens when you practice medicine without a license. She should be a lesson to all you tinfoil health food, holistic nuts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54326


Go ahead and get Melanoma for yourself.... You'll be singing a VERY DIFFERENT tune when it's YOUR life on the block.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 320363
United States
11/01/2007 02:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
[link to sunwatt.mystarband.net]

some info.
native herb healer
User ID: 320410
United States
11/01/2007 03:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
The mother made a serious mistake in taking her son to a doctor in the first place. Had she and her son both kept their mouths shut, they could have quietly cured his illness and nothing would be known. The only risk would be in school and mandatory PE, where other students would have the opportunity to get a look at anything strange on his skin. California made homeschooling illegal because they were embarrassed that the homeschooled students did so much better on tests than those in the school system. Again, had she been thinking straight, she'd have known from the beginning what she faced.
Sinanju
User ID: 310032
United States
11/01/2007 03:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
"California made homeschooling illegal"

>>Seriously?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 229229
United States
11/01/2007 03:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
That's what happens when you practice medicine without a license. She should be a lesson to all you tinfoil health food, holistic nuts.


In this case, I would have asked for a second opinion as to wheather or not this was an accurate diagnosis. I don't believe that he had a cancer that would have killed him in a week. Errors are filling our system with wrong diagnosis. With cancer, if you are told that you have it, you will die from fright, or because you are supposed to. A second biopsy should always be performed. The Dr. had no bedside manner, and should be sued for malpractise.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 320352


Agreed. She should go on the offense.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 320377
United States
11/01/2007 03:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
Never get health care from the AMA (american murder ass.) unless you are very welled armed and have backup.
native herb healer
User ID: 274846
United States
11/01/2007 03:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
"California made homeschooling illegal"

>>Seriously?
 Quoting: Sinanju 310032


Yes, they did. I don't have any links ready but it was widely covered on the kind of sites that would mention that problem. Google should turn the issue up for you. Homeschooling is not legal in every state; it would have done that poor woman some good to think ahead and check. However, had she had that much sense, she'd not have been having kids with a 'deadbeat.'
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 320422
United States
11/01/2007 03:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
Why do you think medical practitioning is referred to as a "practice"?

We are all guinea pigs for their amusements.

Why is laetrile banned? It works, does it not? The problem is that it is easily extracted from apricot and apple seeds (according to my research).

Tidbit: The WATCHMEN movie is being produced - do you think the PowerLess-That-Be will change the script in regards to Moloch (Moloch was given cancer by Adrian Veidt/Ozymandias) using laetrile, and Rorschach actually allowing him to continue to use the medication (see WATCHMEN, Books 2-5)?

It will be interesting if this is eliminated altogether from the screenplay.

At any rate...hospitals have gone over-budget on machines which do nothing but waste energy and lives, and the administrators can't admit that they were wrong to believe in quackery (quackery in my definition being CRAP THAT DOESN'T WORK).

This case is very important. Please tell everyone you know, and let's find some kind Native Americans to show all of us how to truly safeguard our lives.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 320422
United States
11/01/2007 03:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
"California made homeschooling illegal"

>>Seriously?
 Quoting: Sinanju 310032

Remember the kids who recently won the national Spelling Bee? They were all home-schooled.
Anonymous Coward (OP)
User ID: 293349
United States
11/01/2007 04:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
bump

for health freedom

Also, I don't live in CA but here's more info. on homeschooling issues for CA, [link to hslda.org]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 304152
United Kingdom
11/01/2007 04:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
Is anyone really surprised??? This is going to become the norm.. God forbid I ever get cancer...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 98008



Are you living under your parents roof? Because apparently, unless you're a minor, you can do whatever you want regarding treating your own cancer.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 284299
United States
11/01/2007 04:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
That's what happens when you practice medicine without a license. She should be a lesson to all you tinfoil health food, holistic nuts.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 54326



How about you do humanity a favor and commit suicide.
Sinanju
User ID: 310032
United States
11/01/2007 04:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
"Remember the kids who recently won the national Spelling Bee? They were all home-schooled."

>>Oh, I remember... I just cannot believe that imperial indoctrination into socialism is worth the dumbing-down of our best and brightest.

But then again, it IS California.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 304152
United Kingdom
11/01/2007 04:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
This needs to be on billboards across the nation:


"Alan C. Nixon, PhD, Past President of the American Chemical Society wrote that

"As a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to me that physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does much, much more harm than good."

In 1986, McGill Cancer Center scientists sent a questionnaire to 118 doctors who treated non-small-cell lung cancer.
More than 3/4 of them recruited patients and carried out trials of toxic drugs for lung cancer. They were asked to imagine that they themselves had cancer, and were asked which of six current trials they themselves would choose.

64 of the 79 respondents would not consent to be in a trial containing cisplatin, a common chemotherapy drug.

Fifty eight found all the trials unacceptable. Their reason? The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable degree of toxicity."





(found in Evil Twin's post)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74266
United States
11/01/2007 04:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Mother Jailed for Curing Son's Melanoma!
[link to www.healthfreedomusa.com]





GLP