Isn’t this admissible in a court of law?? | |
Zovalex User ID: 77432258 ![]() 11/08/2020 09:39 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Context is everything. Biden is a stinking pile of shit, but we can’t extract just one sentence from a speech and levy allegations. That’s precisely what the Libtards have been doing with Trump for 4+ years now. I can show in the Bible where it clearly states, “There is no God”, but when we look at the context in which that statement is made, it states: “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God’.” Context is everything. What was this shitbag saying before and after that statement? . Last Edited by Zovalex on 11/08/2020 10:12 PM “Mental slavery is the worst form of slavery. It gives you the illusion of freedom, makes you trust, love, and defend your oppressor, while making an enemy of those who are trying to free you or open your eyes.” -Fiyah “None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free.” -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe “You have been programmed to resist the very person that is here to set you free, from the prison of your Mind... You are not free... everything you are has been manufactured by Minds that have not your best interest. You are imprisoned by beliefs and not reality. Religions are mental programs to imprison your Mind.” -SOL |
Justice4all User ID: 72965131 ![]() 11/08/2020 09:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | When a party opponent says something incriminating it's admissible as a "statement against interest." It is admissible but as with all evidence, the other side will try to keep it out, and if it comes in, try explain it away. Here, it's going to be that he just misspoke. Knowing Biden, that is sort of believable. But it would be up to the trier of fact to decide. |