BLOCKCHAIN PROOF -- Trump Just Told Us All The Rumors Are True -- THRESHOLD CRYPTOGRAPY

nice work!

No, this is something entirely different. Sorry.

Good afternoon Joe

Title needs fixed please. "Threshold"

OOPs!


Thanks, I reckon I got in a hurry towards the end.



Last Edited by Nawt Meh Prezdunt on 11/09/2020 06:20 PM

Huge. Is this watermark proof?

Last Edited by miscer1992 on 11/09/2020 06:20 PM

Absolutely!

Interesting. But can somebody explain how exactly this would help with paper ballots? Or even electronic ballots?

It seems that it serves an entirely different purpose than separating valid votes from fraudulent votes. Unless I'm missing something, which is entirely possible, so, honest questions. I'm not trying to be a smartass, I genuinely don't get it.

I think so ... I'm really not sure but the tweet was way too cryptic to be something simple.

Additionally "Threshold Identification" seems to be some sort of medical term or a term used in scientific experimentation most commonly used with antibody treatments but I hadn't had time to make any sense of that aspect of it.

:damnedbig:

Last Edited by A R K on 11/09/2020 06:28 PM

It has something to do with quantum computing. I'm digging into it now but I haven't found a precise statement that says what I think I'm reading.

It's not a watermark, like you would think. It's an implement that can only be read through a quantum computer and has something to do with changing it's molecular state using semiconductors.

The reading I'm doing is way over my head and one of the analogies read, "It's like explaining gravity defying cars to the Flintstones".

Lmao. Yes, exactly my issue. Way over my head. Guess, I'll have to wait and see.

The postal service has a patent on this. They marked mail out ballots only.


This is Trumps insurance policy IMO.

OP. I read your threads over the last year. You are legit. You always post good stuff.

We may never hear about it beyond rumor if they don't need to use it.

The "watermark" is like a QR code I think. The Blockchain and threshold cryptography probably has to do with reading the water marks.

It's a two-tiered defense system.

The way I read it it sounded more like a modern day codebook.

You'd give everybody reporting to a singular person a key that encrypted the information then the singular guy at the top was the only guy who could decrypt it so it didn't matter if it got intercepted.

Thing is is that I'm pretty certain we've had that capability for awhile now. So I don't have any idea.

I get the watermark stuff, this just seemed more for encryption/decryption but maybe there's a way of using it I'm not sure about.

Maybe putting a quantum encrypted watermark that says something specific that way if it's intercepted and duplicated it would still be identifiable? I guess that could be theoretically possible.

It gets better. I'm still researching it and trying to find the "smoking gun" but remember the rumors that a radioactive isotope was used? Come to find out back in 2008 the US unveiled an ARAM (I think) system that could find a radioactive isotope the size of a grain of salt moving at 45 mph.

No wonder they keep finding the tossed out Trump ballots.

Would certainly explain a lot. The press conference with Giuliani comes to mind for one.

Or how about the seven military Trump ballots found? Seven? The ballots would have to have GPS to notice seven pieces of paper in a dumpster.

This is going to make one helluva movie in a couple of years.

I remember reading about public key cryptography some years back.


it was something I forgot about.... and it may be in play here.

there was a book about an Irish person who played a role in its development. If I find it, I will link to it here.

From what I've been able to find it's all technology that is way over my head

won't find her tonight, but the intricacies of the development of public key encryption are suggested here:

[link to eprint.iacr.org (secure)]

it is quite over mine too, which made the book about her contribution so great to read.... lots of explanations of the concepts involved.

it really is fascinating.... locksmithing too

I haven't been following this too close. I heard it's using blockchain. So think of Blockchain as an Excel Spreadsheet, that gets verified with everyone else's Excel Spreadsheet so it can't be changed, only added to, and only if everyone agrees (All verification points). It makes it very hard to hack! Very! So technically, depending on this "Watermark", if you have an identifier for each, using blockchain, you can theoretically track when it left the printer, and assuming a computer/scanner has updated it along the way via USPS or Ballot scanning, you will know its general location. Assuming no other tech was added.

I assume, what they are saying with the watermarks is...If the Dems tried to just print off a whole bunch and add them to the pile of valid mail in votes, they will be easily detected and thrown out! Blockchain will tell them the movements after printing.

Don’t the states print their own ballots? How would this mark end up on all of the ballots? This only makes sense if one site prints up all the ballots which I don’t think is the case.