CDC creates 'Green Zones' to separate those who willingly take the vaccine from those who won't.

While the staff brings the virus in and infects them all in one go.

Stupid idea if you ask me.

Must be another 5th graders science project they stole. lol

Does it specify who is high risk?

The elderly and infirmed or anyone with health issues?

Here's the cdc link.

Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings

[link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]

<snip>

The shielding approach aims to reduce the number of severe COVID-19 cases by limiting contact between individuals at higher risk of developing severe disease (“high-risk”) and the general population (“low-risk”). High-risk individuals would be temporarily relocated to safe or “green zones” established at the household, neighborhood, camp/sector or community level depending on the context and setting.

They would have minimal contact with family members and other low-risk residents.

Last Edited by Tangy on 11/22/2020 02:28 PM

Yeah, I'm certain those in the Jooish community as well as the Japanese can give detailed accounts of how that will work.

I'm willing to die on that hill, CDC, and not only will I not play your little fantasy games, I refuse to acknowledge the existence.

I give you no authority.

I am guessing the website OP tried to post is banned because they misconstrue things to sound as if it is happening now, and only give the worse case scenarios. lol

Notice OPs text removes HOUSEHOLD. Also claims ZERO contact with family.

Here's a link to the CDC website that explain it:

Interim Operational Considerations for Implementing the Shielding Approach to Prevent COVID-19 Infections in Humanitarian Settings
[link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]


Operational Considerations for Community Isolation Centers for COVID-19 in Low-Resource Settings
[link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]

"CICs may be implemented at any time, regardless of the level of community transmission, based on guidance from public health officials, and may be scaled up or down as needed."

Last Edited by ARCLIGHT01 on 11/22/2020 02:31 PM

I just read the whole damn thing, as well as the high risk categories, and it’s all ages, covers just about every conceivable ailment from the worst to the least. This is a list of broad range, they can put anyone they want in these “camps”.

Actually everyone I love and know has at least one or more of them, from cancer to allergies, any heart issue, diabetics, it’s overreach beyond the pale.

This sounds like the way Hitler had them separate for the gas chamber, it’s really scary. We are living in true nightmare days if this is what they plan to do. Actually the separation of families sounds a lot like communist tactics, same script.

Anyone with enough brains to figure out how their bamboozling us with bullshit case numbers vs actual sickies.

Summary

The shielding approach is an ambitious undertaking, which may prove effective in preventing COVID-19 infection among high-risk populations if well managed. While the premise is based on mitigation strategies used in the United Kingdom there is no empirical evidence whether this approach will increase, decrease or have no effect on morbidity and mortality during the COVID-19 epidemic in various humanitarian settings.

This document highlights a) risks and challenges of implementing this approach, b) need for additional resources in areas with limited or reduced capacity, c) indefinite timeline, and d) possible short-term and long-term adverse consequences.

Public health not only focuses on the eradication of disease but addresses the entire spectrum of health and wellbeing. Populations displaced, due to natural disasters or war and, conflict are already fragile and have experienced increased mental, physical and/or emotional trauma.

While the shielding approach is not meant to be coercive, it may appear forced or be misunderstood in humanitarian settings. As with many community interventions meant to decrease COVID-19 morbidity and mortality, compliance and behavior change are the primary rate-limiting steps and may be driven by social and emotional factors. These changes are difficult in developed, stable settings; thus, they may be particularly challenging in humanitarian settings which bring their own set of multi-faceted challenges that need to be taken into account.

Household-level shielding seems to be the most feasible and dignified as it allows for the least disruption to family structure and lifestyle, critical components to maintaining compliance. However, it is most susceptible to the introduction of a virus due to necessary movement or interaction outside the green zone, less oversight, and often large household sizes.

It may be less feasible in settings where family shelters are small and do not have multiple compartments. In humanitarian settings, small village, sector/block, or camp-level shielding may allow for greater adherence to proposed protocol, but at the expense of longer-term social impacts triggered by separation from friends and family, feelings of isolation, and stigmatization.

Most importantly, accidental introduction of the virus into a green zone may result in rapid transmission and increased morbidity and mortality as observed in assisted care facilities in the US.26The shielding approach is intended to alleviate stress on the healthcare system and circumvent the negative economic consequences of long-term containment measures and lockdowns by protecting the most vulnerable.

Implementation of this approach will involve careful planning, additional resources, strict adherence and strong multi-sector coordination, requiring agencies to consider the potential repercussion among populations that have collectively experienced physical and psychological trauma which makes them more vulnerable to adverse psychosocial consequences.

In addition, thoughtful consideration of the potential benefit versus the social and financial cost of implementation will be needed in humanitarian settings.

Camp for fat, diabetics, those with asthma and anyone over age 70

Most coronavirus cases are spread by people without symptoms, CDC now says

It's one of the main reasons mask use is so important, the CDC said.

[link to www.cnn.com (secure)]

This is the reason you should always wear your mask even outdoors

Lol

The CDC is full of shit. There was just a study that came out from China claiming there is no asymptomatic spread.

Fuck mask wearing. Any snot-nosed bylaw officer trying to enforce one on me will get an earful.

Anyone who questions the narrative is high risk...

Anyone who questions the narrative is spreading the virus of antiauthoritarianism.

China already has one of the most oppressive, tyrannic governments in the World with their social crediting score of its citizens

Corona was needed to implement the same thing across the world, and in the meantime they're used as scapegoats for the plandemic

win-win for the deep state

Trump is on the scamdemic otherwise he wouldn't declare a National Emergency under which the NWO is being ushered in

goats

people will have high risk family members removed from society and into camps until their entire families vaccinate.?

Fucking idiot

I had an old fat bitch who is "high risk" but loves to eat candy bars tell me that the public should cater to her and everyone should be on lockdown for her health.

So I'm all for that fat bitch being put into isolation so those of us who want to take an informed risk can live our lives.

CDC stands for Center for Death Creation

Welcome to the femahood! Our new green sustainable living community.

This has nothing to do with who has/hasn't taken a vaccine.

The NAZI's used similar excuses, to get sickly people into their custody so they could kill them. NAZI-ism, is a militant form of the Progressive movement.

You can find it on the CDC website. It's going to be China all over again.

Nope. Not even a little bit.

It's the *** NOVEL **** Corona virus as the original was described in 1935 as the common cold! Please refer to it appropriately

Undersecretary to the CDC office of Dr. A Fauci MD

This is phase two of the CCP’s preparation for its invasion of the United States. Reduce the population, put them in camps. Enabled by the Democratic part who is owned by the CCP.

It worked so well in New York Nursing Homes