HUGE!!! Johns Hopkins DELETES Recent Article That Revealed Data EXPOSING The COVID Death Count Scam....

Two reasons for that - claiming regular deaths were covid.

(1) The $$$ Scumgress makes available to hospitals for labeling it such - $10K per covid death

(2) The evil elite pushing an agenda.

Johns Hopkins DELETES Recent Article That Revealed Data EXPOSING COVID Death Count Scam.

Remember when the nation went on lockdown to ensure that hospitals didn't get overwhelmed, flatten the curve theory based on pseudoscience projections. Remember when the secretary of state said this was all a live excersize?

Well what happened besides us being stuck with empty hospitals because the government decided that elective procedures were non-essential element to protecting Americans during a pandemic?

As a result instead of having hospitals overwhelmed, what we saw were 1.4 million healthcare workers go unemployed; looks like the dancing skits from Tik Tok weren't producing enough revenue for hospitals to keep staff employed while the hospitals were empty.

And remember when I shared how the death totals this year where lower than last year and the year before as of September, thanks to Sarah Huckabee's tweet?

Well someone did some research on the matter and discovered that while we've had hundreds of thousands of socalled "covid-19" deaths, (this despite the fact that the CDC has yet to isolate the virus from one single so-called case) we have also seen a dramatic decrease in with the stats of other death related causes. Why of course how else could the CDC get those numbers otherwise, unless they hijacked other causes with doctored death certificate, certificates doctors where being coached on how to doctor. This article was taken down because there is a purge of truth and liberty by the elite looking to dismantle our economy and freedom for a Technofascist Transhumanist agenda. Here's the link and snipet from the article that was saved.

When Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease inWhen Briand looked at the 2020 data during that seasonal period, COVID-19-related deaths exceeded deaths from heart diseases. This was highly unusual since heart disease has always prevailed as the leading cause of deaths. However, when taking a closer look at the death numbers, she noted something strange. As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes. deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.

“If [the COVID-19 death toll] was not misleading at all, what we should have observed is an increased number of heart attacks and increased COVID-19 numbers. But a decreased number of heart attacks and all the other death causes doesn’t give us a choice but to point to some misclassification,” Briand replied.

[link to webcache.googleusercontent.com (secure)]

Brand even broke it into age groups

amazingly she found that deaths in the older age range ALSO ere the same roughly as in prior years

WHY have we been hearing covid-19 is deadly for the elderly ? because elderly always die at higher rates than the young

id long ago seen stats showing the average age of death of covid-19 is about 78 yo in america, which is also the life expectancy ... makes perfect sense if there are no excess deaths due to covid-19 as Brand claims to have found

just for fun try posting this with links to twitter and facebook

Briand is a harpoon into the narrative

Have you seen what happened to our universities in the last 40 years?

Whoa! Anonymous Coward, no wonder you're wanting to remain anonymous! How rude is it to call someone names, particularly such a rude, nasty name. You should be ashamed, and ask Dr. Henry Walton's pardon.

For those that may spin the lack of deaths on less car crashes due to less travel, the front page of todays Wisconsin State Journal had news that Wisconsin has had MORE Deaths in automobile crashes this year of 2020 than past years.

More people dying in car crashes, everyone is dying from chinavirus, but the total deaths are normal? What Gives?


MAGA

Quoting myself to add link to local Madison news about INCREASED traffic deaths.

Link: [link to madison.com (secure)]

MAGA

From September

Thread: Is Anyone Tracking Obituaries? I Do NOT See an Increase in Deaths

Honestly one of the best overviews of this pandemic I have watched. Statistics on this and past pandemics/ epidemics...death rates...real data on ineffective ( or worse) lockdown policies...redefines this virus as no longer a pandemic but as now an “endemic with teeth” and on its way out ( except as a lingering endemic virus ) after this winter...making an after-the-major-event vaccine a “ bandaid”....escribes why PCR testing cycle produces ‘ casedemics’ and is a hysteria tool, uses science of past epidemics to explain the disappearance of “ flu”.

The last 1/3 of the interview is about metabolic dysfunction as a major or the major risk factor for covid mortality.

Nice, everyone is talking about it now.

A few days ago Johns Hopkins published a study saying corona is nbd. They then deleted it. Read it here in its entirety.
[link to notthebee.com (secure)]

Well shit, now the rabid libtards won't be able to blame all the COVID deaths on Trump anymore.

THANK YOU.
SAVED AS PDF

already done (FB). so far it's still there but a few other things i've posted have been labelled 'false information'.

Oh, I'm sure they will still blame Trump. The depths of their delusion knows no bounds. Trump could literally resuscitate a puppy dog on live TV and half this country would call him a demon for doing so.

Yeah, I'm noticing it being spread all over social media today. GOOD! It's time that we stop this nonsense.

Trump could cure cancer and they would cry that he put doctors out of jobs!
That’s my favorite version to use on people.

HE that calls someone an asshole ....

...is usually the REAL ASSHOLE.

Congratulations.... you dickface!

censorship it's all the rage for liberals. It's going to blow up in their face though...

they have the strongest aversion to good news.

they would prefer this to be the Black Death.


then all the power-grabbing executives orders would seem to make sense and be needed.

they need the cover

Covid is now a lame Flu. We know more about it. We can cure people faster. People who have O+ Blood Type have nothing to worry about.

Tell me more about O+

I hate to post this, but her data is at least partially flawed and therefore the removal is justified.
Here is why:

First she takes the numbers of COVID-deaths per week and then normalized it to 100%.
It means that for every week the bar has the same height, the 100%. Then you can compare the portions of the bars for each week, to see whether the percentage of deaths per age-groups have changed. That would represent a change of how the virus would effect different age-groups, which could indicate a mutation of the virus.


Her mistake is to mistakenly interpret the numbers of COVID-deaths per week as numbers of total deaths per week, and then wonder why there is no greater percentage of deaths within the elderly group.
That is scientific nonsense. You can hear her here at 14:30 :



This mistake led to the removal of the article, i think.
The removal is therefore justified.
I have not looked beyond the 18 minute mark, as it does not make sense for me to listen to such an incompetent presentation.
Her following data might be correct...

Had to add something...
I hate to post this, but her data is at least partially flawed and therefore the removal is justified.
Here is why:

First she takes the numbers of COVID-deaths per week and then normalized it to 100%.
It means that for every week the bar has the same height, the 100%. Then you can compare the portions of the bars for each week, to see whether the percentage of deaths per age-groups have changed. That would represent a change of how the virus would effect different age-groups, which could indicate a mutation of the virus.


Her mistake is to mistakenly interpret the numbers of COVID-deaths per week as numbers of total deaths per week, and then wonder why there is no greater percentage of deaths within the elderly group in March/April when the COVID-deaths increased.
That is scientific nonsense, as it has been normalized to 100% and the nature of the infection has not changed. You can hear her here at 14:30 :



This mistake led to the removal of the article, i think.
The removal is therefore justified.
I have not looked beyond the 18 minute mark, as it does not make sense for me to listen to such an incompetent presentation.
Her following data might be correct...

So why would JHU not point this out?

Somehow I doubt this was because of inaccuracy. There has always been something fishy about a deadly virus that needed unspecified comorbidities to kill..comorbidities which might lead to death without the virus, as if they wanted to fit some new deadly virus model on the all cause mortality numbers.And yes sure enough old people die more than young people. Would not it be a relief to know there really is not some deadly new virus roaming the world?? (but I wonder where I could publish that information??)

They simply rebranded “death” and “illness” as a scary new fake virus. And the world crumbled. It was that easy.