Notes from an "alternate universe": The Revelation of the Real World

Yes, it has gotten out of control, like the Chaos in just about every aspect of society.

It's easy for complexity to increase, which is why we need mechanisms to limit complexity and growth so that Chaos can be managed better.


People ask through their behaviours and choices.

A lot of these changes gained momentum from the time of the Industrial Revolution (when people left the Old World behind en mass and embraced the New World). As the working and middle classes grew, so did the need for more consumable foods. Bread was intentionally whitened by flour enriched with chalk or potassium alum, cheese was tinted red by the use of lead oxide, and milk was thinned with all kinds of water to stretch profits (including pond water, which then necessitated the use of reconsitutive agents such as chalk dust, plaster dust, yellow lead, and so on).

The most popular preservative for milk (which was prone to rot) was formaldehyde.

It's just the nature of Chaos. Chaotic "solutions" cause more problems, just like we are seeing with technology today.

Weapons have intended uses, and there is little evidence to suggest that our food products are being used as weapons. What we have is ignorance, incompetence, and a system of monetary usury that leads to an inflation that causes people to change their reciprocal behaviours in a way that is damaging to society.


We have done that, as a society, from our choices.

The effects of increasing technologies in the products we use, the air, water, et c., is compounding.


Again, the same people that continue to use products that they know are harmful (ALL OF US) are the same people that manufacture, market, and sell products.

The ignorance is the same, but the scale is different.

How can we expect the people manufacturing products that we use to care about the long-term effect when most people do not care?

I would even say that a business that produces food cares more about following regulations than the average person does about eating healthy. People can work to change this if they wanted to.

We have strayed from our self-governing nature and diminished our ability to interpret reality, and now consider reality to be separate from our mind, so experience the consequences of the confused reality as a result.


Do you use any products or consume any foodstuffs that damage your pineal gland?

Yes, people care. But they also consider things in relation to other things.

"Yes, I use them but...."

You can have a very minimal pineal gland function and still have a nice, happy life. Your reality would be substantially different than someone else's that has a less inhibited pineal gland function.


People do not question why they do things, generally. Most people act and think by consensus: "I am doing this because other people I can relate to do it, and it seems to be okay." There are endless examples of this. This type of behaviour is good for some things (human survival) but could be detrimental in other ways.

It is easy to demonise people that work for those types of entities, but let me ask you this:

Do people have their own best interest at heart?

Perhaps people that do not have their own best interest at heart would have no idea how to keep the same interest of an entire population in mind.


By thinking of it differently.

Starting with realising that the people that 'control' (administer) things are not our enemies. Our desire for endless technological and economic 'advancement' is the enemy, and we can seek to change our own behaviour rather than thinking others are out to get us and we can do nothing about it.

People tend to act in their own self interest. Why would it be different for businesses run by people?

People tend to want to acquire resources for themselves and their loves ones. Why would we expect a business run by people to behave differently? It's the convoluted world we have made.

Families do not need to worry about competition. A parent can be abusive and the children and others in the family have little choice but to remain.

A business, on the other hand, generally needs to stay competitive. If you don't like a product or service, you can change. This regulates behaviour, so it tells us that if the average business was the size of a small family that its behaviour would be more healthy than a small family by itself whose internal politics and behaviours are little-regulated.

Which model is more sustainable? More scalable? I'm not suggesting families become businesses, of course, but that we can approach the problems with a more open mind to find real solutions instead of wanting to go to war with the very systems that billions depend on (and want to).

It is that which hardly anyone would want to see or realise. Layer 3 is what the Public would HATE to know and would hate others for telling them about.

It is that which I am trying to show you now :)


The Public are more in a position to change things than are the Elite, since they comprise most of the world's population and willingly hand over their own power and authority to 'Elites'.

Although most of the Elites are also members of the Public and have not assumed any authority from the Public, things would be better for humanity if people simply wanted it, asked for it, and worked towards it.

The problem is on both sides, yes, but it is not equal.

The Public, generally, do NOT want to see layer 3. It is too traumatic for them, I think. It is better to be ignored.

What is the hope? New generations who think differently.

I don't know much about the UK but food is Japan is not as healthy as one might think.

It is nearly impossible to find an organic grocery store, for example. The use of soy sauce is extremely common (and is mostly GMO, often containing MSG).

The rice is also toxic. When my ex-wife and I went grocery shopping I would often ask her to translate the ingredients on packages (when they were available, which wasn't often) and was shocked.

People in Japan generally do not care to eat healthy foods because they assume what they're eating is healthy by default. Food is also not properly labelled.

When we read that something is banned in one country but allowed in an other, we must think critically about this. As I discussed before, we can read that France and other European countries banned fluoride being put into water supplies (but it's added to salt.)

BHT is not banned in Japan (according to the Ministry of Health and Welfare Japan's List of Existing Food Additives.) It is used in foods as a preservative, just as it is in other countries. Again, YES, the technologies in foods have side effects. That is the nature of technology. But again, people do not care about the one food additive that does the most harm to the body: sugar.

People care about BHT in foods but don't seem to mind it being used in beauty products, which is far more damaging because (again) products applied to skin bypass the blood-brain barrier, whereas BHT in food does not.

Some products that contain it include:

Aveeno Baby Natural Protection Mineral Block Face Stick
Neutrogena Body Oil
CVS Beauty Bars Sensitive Skin
Neutrogena Liquid Facial Cleanser Fragrance-Free
Revlon ColorStay Bronzer for the Face
Loreal Hip High-Intensity Pigments
OLAY Daily Facials Deep Cleansing Cloths
Lubriderm Advanced Therapy Lotion Moisturizing Lotion

Something to think about.

Uh... can I answer this one later? :)

Primarily, it would be because of the number of people I would need to hire to help execute. I'm not interested in managing people.


Because of the value inherent in it.

Would you want a perfect life that has no conflict, problems, and so on? It is a big part of how we formulate our existence.


About 2.5% of views are after someone posts, so I would assume that about 90% who read do not post at all.

The only services that I use for posting are here and YouTube.

I am not concerned with reach, though I am interested in how people (other parts of me) respond. I'm not doing this for others specifically, but for myself first. If the interest was in reach, subscribers, followers, et c., then I would do it very differently. (And if I did that, it would have less value to me.)

The audience here and on YouTube is not the same, though some of the same people may come from here.


Why would it be late? Was there a deadline?


All that I care to tell is in the book that some of you have read, The Elite Inversion. I will be posting the PDF on the new website when I'm finished with it.


There would have been no benefit to talking about other projects. I don't really discuss them now, either. I'm generally a very private person because I prefer to talk with others about more important things.

However, I did mention how it works, briefly, in 2009/2010 and sometimes since then.


I've retired it. It's not pending.


My concern is with the nature of reality, of which many things play a part. It's not only about human consensus but the more metaphysical aspects.

Again, I briefly talked about it in 2009/2010.

But.. why would it matter?

Dramatic change, with your permission.

Graphic video warning...



I wish I could unsee it.

I have not seen any 'sex tapes' but I do know that it was produced for public consumption. It would appear that 'her mother' orchestrated that.

Could it have happened mostly organically?


It's very convoluted, but that's what happens as things become more complicated. We have only to choose differently, but that rests mostly on the Public who comprise most of the population.

Anything coming from the Elites would appear suspicious because of the number of disparate and often conflicting factors involved, like "ESG goals" and "COVID" and the silly carbon stuff. They do not act as one, fortunately or unfortunately.

I would welcome that.

I jest, I think.

Me too :)

I could use a little help getting out of my own way. Like a swift kick in the a$$!

Could you give some examples of this? Like what? How?

Is it really feasible for something like that to be developed and implemented successfully at this stage of the game?

How do you think the general population would respond to such things?

Wouldn’t the elites have to be the ones to implement this?

Walk me through this.

What’s one example of a real solution that would actually work that doesn’t involve taking on the very systems that we depend on?

Are you talking about working within these systems to change them - or outside of them? Building new ones or reshaping existing ones?

Again The Lorax, “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” If most don’t care, how does it ever change?

How do new generations begin to think differently when the conditions and systems seem to get more and more entrenched? Doesn’t all of this advancement in technology cloud one’s thinking more and more? From one generation to the next? And remove us from that which really matters?

I do like to hear you talk about hope though :)

Sure. As long as you answer it at some point. I’m curious to know in what types of foundations you put your time and resources in to. What you find relevant and applicable. Worthy, really.

Are Rh+ readers more inclined to manage people? And are they better suited for a 2 trillion dollar idea? Why present the extreme value of money that was essentially left on the table for your audience? If it doesn't even interest you, how could you even refer to it as a lazier version of yourself? - I am failing to see any inversion benefits or layers of understanding.



The journey into this "alternate universe" began many years ago, with readers being the authors of their own reality. Despite enduring drama, they have yet to reach the missing aspect of their narrative. Who here has a perfect life? Readers understand the production of social media, where individuals often try to present a perfect life on the surface. But are you insinuating that the drama in our lives reaches sub-"alternate universe" levels? And is the reason for percevied missing reality?



Are you willing to recommend today, in 2024, that if you mistakenly bought physical gold, you've been misled? Would you agree that it's better to sell your physical gold and use the money to invest in real estate with a mortgage, rather than waiting for physical gold to provide a significant return?



I suppose I need to finish that book.



If you announce that a pink elephant is on its way to the show, but then you present a Curious George instead, how do you think the audience will perceive your act?

Fortunately, I haven't studied the sex tape for research purposes either. Is there a body double involved? Or perhaps the camera angles aren't as invasive.

Why do I enjoy embracing the most mundane, cozy aspects of life to the fullest, perhaps even oversoaking? It has to be the relationship of my DNA. How do you convince me to take the plunge? Does it come with a California new home ownership free of a loan?

I’ve been thinking about my own logical progression from Layer 1 on. I spent my childhood comfortably in Layer 1. As I began to have more independent thought in my later teens, I began to be exposed to more of Layer 2. Surrounding myself with the Grateful Dead types exposed me to more and more alternate views on what was happening in reality. I dipped my toe in. And then I met my husband who was fully in the conspiracy realm.

I remember searching out William Cooper’s Behold a Pale Horse, which back then, was only carried in very few book stores. And then 9-11 happened. And I was fully steeped in Layer 2. The conspiracy realm. Which obviously 20+ years later, I’m still in. I found GLP @ 2006.

I’m ready for Layer 3 because I’m tired of Layer 2. To see the actual reality of things. Not as they’re presented in Layer 1 or Layer 2. As it actually is. To take my power back. To feel empowered to know how to actually do something about it all because for once, I can see it for what it is.

I’m used to feeling uncomfortable at this point. I’m uncomfortable with Layer 1. The ignorance. Also Layer 2. And it’s deception. But I’m ready for the real uncomfortableness that comes with seeing reality for more of what it is and the ultimate ways I deceive myself. Because it seems to me that this Layer 3 uncomfortableness gives way to something much more meaningful when it’s all said and done. I’m tired of Layer 2. And I couldn’t go back to Layer 1 even if I wanted to.

So even if Layer 3 is the realm that most don’t want to see. I do. But right now, I have a hard time seeing it for myself. Is this something that comes in tandem with a cleaner pineal gland?

If you were leaving tomorrow, what would be the major Layer 3 ‘truths’ you would impart to us? The ones that would help to break the mold? Cut the chains? (Besides sexual inversion)

Do you have a hack for me, for seeing past Layer 2 when looking at a particular event or situation? When looking at myself? The questions to ask - the process for thinking it through?

How do you not get stuck at Layer 2? To me, Layer 2 is a particular angle of thinking - way of seeing things.

How to train the brain for a new way of seeing and not fall back into old patterns and ways of thinking.

Can you spell it out for me as someone who’s in the process and wants to stay on the path? It’s so easy to fall back.

Considering your leaving soonish again, what would be your parting words regarding this?

Much appreciated

(I recognize this is what you have been doing for us all these years and I can definitely sense a big change in my thinking in the last 14 years. It ebbs and flows though)

Even if you would not like it?

Are you sure?

Last Edited by The Builder on 03/09/2024 10:09 PM

I am.

I know the changes you’re talking about aren’t going to be easy. And probably in a direction I’ve never thought of and most likely won’t “like” but with what I’ve got going on ‘dramatic/drastic’ is probably what is needed.

It’s now or never for me. I feel it.

I feel I’ve been brought to the edge of the logical narrative of my choices and I’ve got to make a significant move. Maybe this would be the impetus.

For example, by Trump expressing her support for certain drugs that were developed when neither she nor most/all of her family drink, smoke, do drugs, or have inoculations.

An other example would be manufactured bubbles in different industries to curb growth. De-dollarisation, the theatre of war (to keep emotions more balanced within the respective countries) also come to mind.

This doesn't include all of the things that people do to manage it, which is far greater than what the Elite manage to do. A consciousness would sense this automatically.


These things tend to happen naturally, also, as we have an inherent sense for balance.

We're not really at a late stage in the game. We're well past a turning point.

It would be hard to believe, of course, if you interpret the world by what major media shows you. The world is very different than that.


I think you're still working under the assumption that the Elites control things. That's the most obvious assumption, yes, but it is not the reality.

There have been some experiments with our ability to sense when balances is needed but I cannot think of the names off-hand.

When someone comes up with a new system or method that solves a problem and works to implement it where it is needed. This has been done throughout history, time and time again.

Imagine all the people who complain about a particular system (for example, the banking system) but do not actually do anything about it. They could easily work together to come up with something that is more useful for them and solves one or more of the problems that they have. There may not be a need to work with the current system, depending on what it is.

This is how banking evolved, but you can almost guarantee that it was not the average Joe working with other members of the Public to solve the problems they had. This is unfortunate and something that continues to sadden me about the state of humanity when people do not understand the roles that the Public play and the role that the Elite play.

But generally-speaking, when there is a better (i.e., more useful) solution to a problem it is not difficult to implement. One must consider, though, the totality of the problem rather than how the problem manifests locally. It might be easy for someone to assume that a free energy device would solve a big problem, for example, but upon more critical thinking they may conclude that it may create far more problems than it solves.

By newer generations choosing differently.

It may not be obvious if one's worldview comes from media but a lot of young people are turning off internet and smartphone and going 'retro'.

The same as it happened, the same as it can un-happen.

I think successfully managing a group of people would require a somewhat deeper understanding of human psychology, a bit more patience than average, and perhaps intuition. I would think the Rh-positive population would have a more difficult time, especially being 'redpilled' about how a lot of humans really behave.


No.


It would be like leaving a stacked wallet next to a laptop on a busy cafe table in Dubai or Tokyo while I go to the bathroom. I am almost 100% sure no one would touch it with a 10-foot pole. But, if you really want to try it... it's there waiting for you :)


It interests me a great deal, but I do not mind sharing some of my ideas. They're not difficult to come up with, actually. It's only a few hours of my time for each, and most of that is spent on the efficiency of writing things down.

To which readers are you referring?


From what I understand, you're not looking for a significant return, just enough to buy a house with cash. Would that be about right?

I have never recommended buying gold, of course. I have only talked about there being different types of gold (paper and physical gold) and that the price of gold was determined mostly by the paper price, not the physical price (with the price of gold being far higher if it was only physical gold being traded). If I am mistaken, please let me know. I have often recommended real estate as a sound investment.

Anything with block chain is not an investment, either, and I have talked against buying bitcoin in past.

You may be referring to my statement, "I will return when the price of gold hits $21,000" or somesuch. That wasn't a recommendation, nor a prediction. I would not have provided that much information about what I was working on, such as 'digital gold' specifically.

However, I did talk briefly about a few projects I was working on to bring them from the metaphysical world that I interact(ed) with, to the physical world.


Here, I was referring to multi-tiered transaction fees that would serve as 'taxes' and where people could see the history of their money, and so on.

That was one of many projects, several of which I outlined in the book. (The one above is regarding block chain).

In this way it was to serve as a store of value that can be traded with others and used to amplify transactions rather than the investment vehicle it is today.