Notes from an "alternate universe": The Revelation of the Real World

Thank you for your answers. He-man's sword and the sword of Godric Gryffindor seem to share quite a few similarities. Lots of clues to continue my research! I am assuming that crowns were/are meant to be something similar?

Are there any physical tools in our current times that can be seen as "swords"?

Quoting the original answer:

"The Divine Law is the manifestation of the Will of the Superior One which not only creates everything that exists within this universe but also maintains, nourishes, balances, energises and
renews it. It also reigns in other realms, including the realm you originally belong to."

Comment by me - According to Chaol, the Superior One could simply be me - the great version of myself.

(the "Revelations of an Elite Family Insider" thread seems to be written by an AOC. It hints to Chaol's main lessons. Worth a read. It has been deleted from this website but can be found in PDF easily).



I apologize for not quoting the following directly from your posts as it would take a long time to find them, but here goes:

Elsewhere in your threads you discussed the possibility of communicating with myself at other points in time to give a hint or lesson. However, because the perspective (and relationships within it) of the "future" version of myself is so different than the "past" version of myself, it would be impossible to give the lesson directly, and it would thus make more sense to pass the message in a different way that can relate more with the perspective of the "past self". It could be something as small as a passerby with a specific hat, or a smell that seems out of place.
I can't recall the exact page, but I'm pretty sure it was in the Q Metaphysics thread.

You also discussed whether it would make sense for the "future" version of myself who knows the winning lottery numbers to go back to a "past" self to reveal them. You argued that it might have been better to not give the numbers directly, but instead create a game that will help me find clues to figure things our on my own. I think this was in the thread "Revelations of an "alternate universe", return of the blue Kachina".

So to answer your question, I guess the benefit of finally discovering this would be to understand what my future/greater self is trying to tell me.

You choose to become what you choose to eat.

Curious... did you eat the skins of the animals, or around the head?
No. For reference, it has a different effect for different types of flesh. Fish does not affect my emotions and dreams that much, chicken I feel quite a bit, red meat has the strongest effect and thus I avoid it completely.

By your choice of words, am I right to assume that choosing how a certain type of food affects me is simply a matter of how I relate to it?

(And you also become the animal you're integrating with.)
What does this mean?

May I ask how you make sense of your past with your belief system?
If you are the author of your reality, I am wondering how you reconcile that with your past.
As technically it was chosen by you, or chosen unknowingly?
How did you work through that grief?
I'm sorry that you had to experience that.

Ah, crud. This made far too much sense.

Socks seems like a nice issue though.

Things do seem to backslide until you just accept you never needed to resolve it in the first place, I guess.

I just don't know what a "new" drama would look like, that would be beneficial and supportive to all. If everything is an aspect of "me", how much responsibly do I have to take, and ...

Oh right. All and none. Or rather, neither. Plus both.

Stupid imaginations are with you, Rh-Negative men of O- and B- types can father all types of blood including RH positive are you sure you really understand the points, guess not. Rothschilds problem is not their blood type it marrying and having child with to close of kin for to long, same thing happen to the Royal family and in France for sure and Darwin's family by the time Darwin did the same and had children they were sickly and their Genes were a mess. Like any and I don't consider mankind as animal except in having offspring's because it works this way with so called Pure bred animals, they become prone to sicknesses and physical problems it not blood type. I can say O- women have problems but not always have positive children, they don't have problems with the Negative children. If you find your husband is B- or O- negative and you are O- the problem is still a problem because they too can father positive children. There was a change before the flood and after but it just maybe something totally opposite from what you believe.

Here is another reminder O Rh-Negative is universal blood donors, anyone change be given their blood, the one thing that is different is this, they can not take RH positive blood because it would kill them. B negative is somewhat different but they have problems also, for sure, my husband was B- and he got blood from a positive by mistake and he was so ill it wasn't funny. I not positive he ever recovered because it does effect them horribly. So, why do you think a negative O blood is universal, there has to be a big connection to all mankind. It no a serpents for sure.

Last Edited by hankie on 03/01/2023 04:34 PM

If there is no such thing as evolution - humans springing from apes - where did the original humans come from? And when did they first ‘step foot’ on planet Earth? Meaning, what is our origin story? How old is humanity? Does it really matter in the end?



Fascinating! I’m a visual person and looked around for an image reflecting the above….this is what I found:

https://imgur.com/5KAPZc3

Having spent much time with a wee one these last months, I would say curiosity/play and tenacity. Children really do hold the key, don’t they? They are so much closer to the other side of life. The wonder and love.



I feel like for me it’s, “How I Learned to Love All of Me”

I’ve been going through some massive changes some I welcome, others I have to accept and make peace with. Compromises abound in my reality atm.

So, fluoride is toxic. What about hydroxyapatite? I would benefit from tooth remineralization, but some sources say that hydroxyapatite structures are seen in calcification of the pineal gland. Lots of differing information abound about it, though.

Op

What is your current outlook on the coming summer phase. How does the spring season affect it this time? Specifically, will there be sun-blocking potions with a new added twist? How about the allergies?

Please suggest a bad idea and a good idea about this.

Thanks

It sounds like a passive process is all ready happening for you, per the above.

You're doing "good things" (i.e., things that are more sustainable in your perspective) and that is enough for other things to take root. That you feel better, you know you're on the right track, or thereabouts.


I'll paste the introduction from the Neuronics website (now offline) here for the curious:

Imagine there was a new type of operating system that acted as a simple interface to the inner workings of your complex reality. With it, you could map out new perceptions and experiences in ways that you cannot now imagine.

Your mind is the key to how you experience and perceive reality. The most natural and effective method of interfacing with it isn't a drug or a piece of hardware but a protocol in your mind, just as we would use a language like English as a protocol to communicate with each other.

By 'action' I mean doing something productive. It does not mean physical action. All action is metaphysical, because what one perceives is not physical. (Perception is not physical, and neither is anything that is perceived. It can be interpreted so, however.)


Besides symbols (representations) there is Nothing.

What we call existence is just the interaction of symbols, as we cannot directly perceive reality.

When you, for example, climb a flight of stairs it is only 'happening' metaphysically. You can then interpret it physically, but that is not what it actually is, so to speak.

I hope this clarifies it some.

Thank you :) Yes, there is a pattern. However, I am just taking some intermittent breaks from preparing the next phase -- as I see it -- so I may soon 'switch' personas so I can focus more on it.

I just realised the above doesn't really make sense, but perhaps it will to some.


Could it be evidence of you not really having such a capacity?

For example, if you gathered 100 people in a room and said, "Raise your hand if you're a good person" could we say, with confidence, that most of the truly 'good people' have raised their hands? Or, perhaps, most of the ones who want to be good and/or feel insecure about their state?

It is difficult to define who we are because it is impossible to define who we are. We can, however, trick ourselves into thinking that we are something, for whatever reason. The definition can make us secure, but it doesn't mean it is true.

If someone calls you a name you think you are not, are you also that thing you do not wish to be? Are you happy to be reminded that you are also that thing, or do you think you would resist?


What would that tell you about reality?

What would that say about an Absolute who only knows of itself (or seems to) through the reflection of others who aren't really there, but seem to be?

How do "others" help us to self-regulate? How do we use them?

How would being stuck on an island, alone, change how we live versus being stuck in a relationship with someone you don't think you like? Would the point be to like and enjoy the other person, or to make use of the reflection and the opportunity to self-regulate?

These are deeper questions, to be sure, but what you're thinking about could be one example of the fundamental questions to be considered.


Try, "You don't need to know the answers"

I know that it takes away all of the fun. The pursuit of "things" is what keeps us going.

However... you could pursue without expectation. Perhaps there is no answer, only a pursuit that can change without you being aware. (Answers, too, are as flexible.)

YOU make the answers work. They're flexible because they're not important. We just assume that a story must have an ending or resolution.


Something cannot be known absolutely, so it's safe to say that nothing can be known. It all depends on perspective, anyway, so what could possibly be?

Forget about Truth or what is true. It cannot be perceived and is, thus, a waste of time. Try going with what is useful and without long-term harm to your perspective.

And, during those times, did you see your Self looking back at you?

It's funny how we can reflect our internal world outward.

If we wake up grumpy then are more likely to experience relevant things.

An eternal lesson that your reality is you :)

I suppose that if one were to assign a number of lifetimes to it, it would take over a thousand years' worth to learn it. One doesn't need to, of course, and perhaps that is why it takes so long!


If you could release control and authority over the Department of Socks, how might that be done?

What might happen when you try to wrest control of reality from the beings you're producing to illustrate who you are?

How could that aspect of you be moreso? Expressing who and what you really are?

Yes, same thing. They could be worn by anyone that could afford it. The metals, gems, patterns, et c., serve a purpose, similar to the design of cathedrals and other structures with spires and metal tops, stained-glass windows that programmed the pools of water below, and so much else. (Most of the metal crowns and spires have been removed from these structures, however.)

I have been thinking of doing a translation of the 'Holy Bible' to illustrate its original meaning. This effort would probably take a great number of years (though much of it is executing the Find and Replace function for words), but it would answer a tremendous amount of questions and make so much obvious.

1) The Bible (and all other religious texts before about 1300) are about how the human body and mind work and keeping it healthy in various ways. It explains the spheres (planets), sun, and everything else that make up human reality.

2) Cathedrals, abbeys, palaces, et c., are (were) about food and water. You'll find many abbeys, for example, built next to water sources. The 'Palace of Versailles' was not a place for royalty. The food and water was the royalty. It's amusing to think that people think such a large structure was built without a single bathroom. A residence for hundreds? Really? The 'extensive gardens' are not opulent, but well-designed farms.

3) Body armour, swords, crowns, et c., had nothing to do with war or nobility, though their function changed via other narratives as people became divorced from themselves and forgot who they were.



The atmospheric energy is quite different these days. We also, willingly, resist the sun and diminish its power through creams, chemicals in the sky, radio waves, and so on. There isn't much to amplify through the use of those simple tools. Some of us wear jewellery but now we're just picking up communications signals -- to our general detriment -- rather than amplifying atmospheric energy.

When you hear of certain entities wanting to 'block the sun' (a nexus point in our atmosphere), think of it in this context.

I see.

So, to respond to the question of, "What is the relationship between the Law you talk about and the Divine Law explained in the "Revelations of an elite family insider"?" there is no apparent relation.


The word "superior" would not be rational when describing such things. I doubt if we have ever used the term. One cannot be superior to one's Self.

You could say 'the great version' of yourself for some context, but it could also be said that a greater version of yourself cannot be had.

It is, now, the most perfect reflection of your Self that could possibly be, all things considered.


Possibly, but the AOC have very little understanding of reality and how it works. Their focus is media, technology, and industry, and the interest-powered wealth needed to assume authority over these things. What they have is a mis-understanding of reality, as a real understanding would reflect differently upon their actions.

If such a thread was deleted here, it was probably fake and meant to add credibility to it. (We are in the midst of massive psychological manipulation with this ... meant to keep people distracted from reality by serving them filth.)

A real thread is very unlikely to be deleted for its content. 'They' don't really care what people know. (Much of it is public, anyway.) They only care about what people DO about it. The great majority will do nothing, forever, so that is enough.


There would be no reason for your Self to do such a thing. It would serve no benefit, as there are no lessons to be had.

We each do what we need to do to maintain a sense of existence. If that -- through our constitution -- means figuring reality out or learning how to bake cakes, it's the same thing. The Self only cares about the sense of existing, not so much about how it goes about it.

Your reality is there to be useful to that end.


Not for the purpose of 'winning the lottery', but the sense of existence that might be produced from it, win or lose.

Sometimes you build an elaborate game for yourself that cannot be won, just to get your 'fix' of the exist-sense.


See above :)

In this way, you have complete freedom to build any narrative you want.

The only Truth cannot be perceived directly. Everything else can be considered a very serious game that is played for the above reason.


Our mind changes how we interpret things, so to speak, which can re-engineer our bodies to be able to process certain things differently than others.

For some, eating red meat could have a very beneficial effect, for example.

Go with what feels right for you, when your mind is clear. Clear your mind and your body will tell you what to eat.


If you eat chicken, for example, your biology will integrate with that of chicken-hood, like men who drink beer growing boobs and becoming more womanly. The effect is not as physically visible with most foods or drink, but the changes in biology (and mind) are still there.

Could you please re-phrase? I don't really understand the question.


The choices we would make consciously are very different than the choices we would pretend to know nothing about.

I think we would need a far greater sense for reality in order to make "good" choices that really benefit our reality. For me, it seems that the best choices are the ones we consciously resist making.


Thank you, but I'm not sure to which experience you are referring. My earlier experience was not a bad one at the time. I remember having a variety of mostly pleasant experiences. The rest were just interesting. My mother kept on truckin' during her sickness, and even volunteered at her church to direct a play. There was a time that she seemed quite ill and needed oxygen tanks, but I did not understand what 'dying' was or what it would be like for someone you love to no longer be around. Me coming to terms with it mostly involved changing my behaviour to be more like her, as I saw the effect her death had upon others. (People came from all over the world for her funeral, and for the first time I saw how highly regarded she was.) Her death was the beginning of my life, in many ways. It was then that I began to explore reality and make sense of the dreams and thoughts that I previously had. There was very little grief, but far more revelation.

All ways with me :)

But can you help me understand the relevance of your opening point about "fathering all types of blood" in relation to my post? My imagination does not seem to be able to reach that far.

Hello please advise on loser investments. Truth hertz. Thanks.

There are a few assumptions in this question which make my response somewhat difficult, but imagine that you fall asleep and find yourself in a dream where you are surrounded by people.

Where did those people come from?

They were all ready there, in a different form where they may not have even been 'people' as you think of it.

'Before' we are human in this form, we are metaphysical beings. We go through the same process every time we fall asleep and 'awaken' into an other body that was there all along.

Your mind produces the story and makes sense of it.


When humans have a different sense of time (because our focus is more metaphysical) a few thousand years ago, it could be said.

But again, reality is local. It is not distant in space or time. Reality begins now, in the Self.


No. The new narrative of evolution is more compelling, however. That's the one that we want to hear because it does a good job at removing us from the metaphysical life we are highly insecure about.

Even better!


I hope you are making the most out of whatever 'lessons' they may avail.

Perhaps, take a few weeks of healthy eating habits (AND drinking), have a consistent sleep schedule, clear your mind, consider that your experience is of your self, and the best course of action for you will come.

There is nothing that cannot be understood once the mind is clear.

I'm not sure. What do you think it should be?

How will you produce it, if you could?


Which has a more detrimental effect: a 'sun-blocking' potion, or someone thinking the same potion helps them?

Life is as you make it, so please tell me how the spring and summer should be if you were indifferent to it either way.

Hi. Could you please clarify your statement?

There is, perhaps often, more to be learned from losing than winning, so I'm not sure how you are defining it, or what types of things are being invested in.

Hello. You seek to learn. This confuses you about the words of those which seek to gain.

Good to know c: It seems my Self is giving myself little tests. Hm, that thought seems to have been productive



That clarifies very little, but that's hardly your fault c: a while ago you told me that it's a metaphysical language and you're sure I'll figure it out but, spoilers, I have yet not!

It's like I get it but I don't get it. I suppose I don't know how to make/have Neuronic symbols interact with other representations, or what constitutes interaction between Neuronic symbols themselves (what it looks like).

I am not worried about it, though. I'm making lotion today!




Why is cannibalism bad? Is it bad? Using your definition of bad ofc



All riiiight, okay. I finally tried wheatgrass. What was stopping me (since you suggested that A While Ago) was thinking that I had to develop a home growing system and buy all the things and build it and make it aesthetically pleasing and that would be LOVELY, but was ultimately a distraction. My play style is planning, all ways has been. I always preferred staging my toys. When and why that shifted from staging the physical with whatever I had to staging thoughts, I don't know.

A while ago it was mentioned that perhaps I have a definition of planning that does not work for me, and I suppose that's because planning is synonymous with play for me. Not sure how to plan to get things done, though. It's right there, but I'll not look at it for now.

At any rate, doing the home system is something to do but I have to start somewhere. Wheatgrass does NOT blend very well, I may have to dry it. Or juice it. I don't have a juicer but I do have an oven

No testing is needed. Just reflections to support the sense of existence.


The somewhat simple explanation:

When you perceive something you are not perceiving the thing directly (because it does not really exist) but the relationships between the parts that make it up. (As you've seen me type many times.)

When you break down the parts that make up the parts you find 4 things. These 4 things are represented by the 4 symbols. These 4 things are how perspective work.

When you perceive something you are perceiving HOW you perceive rather than perceiving 'something'.

It is you doing the perceiving and it is you who 'chooses' what to perceive, by your focus on those relationships.


Are you asking whether or not physically harming others for your own sustenance is sustainable in your reality, or something else?


Are you sure that was me? I doubt if I've ever talked about wheatgrass, but perhaps I'm mistaken.


Would you say that you're more enthusiastic about planning something over doing it?

I did not make it explicit, my mistake.
What I am asking is, if you are the one choosing things, why did you choose that timeline of poverty, divorce, and death?
You did reveal that, in the process, it was mostly pleasant and there was more revelation than grief.
So your answer was that it was a necessary narrative structure to begin your life.

Still, I was wondering if you miss your family, or would want to have your mother back, that you could choose to have her back.
Where is your mother now, do you think? Do you want to see her again?
How do you find comfort in such brutal circumstances?
Why did she have to die? Why do the people we love die if we can choose otherwise?

How do people in this thread cope with such choices, being told they are the authors of their reality?
You say it may be because the choices we make consciously are very different than the choices we pretend to know nothing about and yet choose.
How do you integrate such grief into your belief system?

No one in this thread would find it easy to agree that they chose or are to blame for their loved ones passing.

It seems to me that "testing" is a very popular form of reflection, contemporary "Christians" like it very much. As I say, the thought was productive and that's all that matters. I know it's not needed but if it helps me do the things I know are "good" but don't necessarily want to do or stop the things I know are "bad" but do want to do, all right! C:




[Emphasis mine]

I (supposedly) understand about the four elements and how, roughly, they "work" together to "make" what ever perception, or that what ever perception is these four elements, it's the bold that seems to trip me up. It has since the Neurotics page with the "Pick Your Apple" section and "you can choose which aspect of something you want to experience by focusing on its neuronic set."

I suppose it's because I'm rather unsure about the initial "aspect" of the thing that I am defining. It seems whenever I try, I can see how what ever thing IS all of the elements and I have a difficult time identifying it's "strongest" or "actual" relationship to my center of Self, and that same "problem" is reflected when I go to define other aspects.

But in any event I'm unsure about what focus is supposed to look like. Both in general per the below and specifically with Neurotics. I understand what "focus" looks like, or is purported to look like, in other interpretations of reality manipulation, but I haven't put a finger on that with Neuronics.

Like, okay now I have this Neuronic symbol. Do I write it in my journal 333 times 3x per day? Do I write it in blood on a mirror at 2:57am humming a specific note? Do I make it and then stop thinking about it? Exaggerations, illustrations of my uncertainty. I just don't know how to make a Neuronic symbols "work" or what to change in my interactions (physical or mental) in response to it.

Again, it's okay and I'm not so wrung up about it anymore. I certainly was a couple months ago, but the focus I can't seem to pin down seems to be on other things atm



I suppose that depends if perceiving someone dying irrespective of the manner in which they die all ways constitutes harm to your reality.

Killing people in order to eat them is obviously unsustainable, but people die all the time without having to kill them and I wonder if it's wrong (bad, unsustainable) to eat them if they pass not by your physical hand and (ideally) with them in life having been okay with the idea of being eaten after they die. Though I suppose it is you who "kills" them by interpreting them as dying, which is sort of why I ask.

Eating people seems to be more sustainable than filling them with chemicals and sticking them in the ground, at any rate. I'm personally a fan of the idea of composting the deceased to create fertile soil, waste not want not and all that. Would eating produce grown in such soil be cannibalism? Lol

The cannibalism question is hypothetical, I have no particular interest in eating human but the — more humorous than anything — logic is "if you are what you eat and you want to be human, why not eat human?"

I think consuming others physically represents a deep love, in the right context. The sacrament of the Eucharist implies as much (though I get that THAT is representative).





Indeed c:



Oh, yes, definitely.

But, there's at least two types of plans. There are the plans that I do for fun (even though I end up very frustrated because I didn't understand, for a long time, that I was doing them for fun and not results; the confusion caused a lot of pain) that don't tend to go anywhere in the physical, and whatever happens before I actually do something.

Taking the wheatgrass growing example, I have affection for thinking about what the shelves should look like and how I need to space out planting in order to have a harvest cycle, where to put the shelves, what materials to get to build them, etc. But this planning fulfills the relationship of the "thing" and so I never follow through as I don't feel a need to. Again, this has caused a lot of pain since I do want the thing and couldn't understand why I couldn't enact the plan.

But then there's "plans" that DO happen, like planning to go to school or work. Those often don't go to "plan" either, as in I don't wake up with as much time as is needed to get everything done beforehand, for example, and I end up feeling rushed or stressed but I do get to school or work so the "plan" is — more or less successfully — reflected physically. This sort of plan is not defined for me and as of right now I do not know how to codify or streamline it.

It seems of late I'm getting better with my play planning translating to physical, as I said I'm making lotion today. I've been play-planning that for months (the supplies arrive today after having ordered them last Saturday). I've been planning having a particular diet structure for a while, also a couple months at this point probably. I have started to incorporate it now.

So, there's movement in the direction of plans translating into physical representation, but I'm sure there are ways to facilitate the shift.

It's baby steps, though. In that they are small steps in some respects, but are also unstable lurches into the unknown, not knowing what I'm doing. Perhaps someday I'll learn to walk!

A Dream Within a Dream
By Edgar Allan Poe 1809–1849

Take this kiss upon the brow!
And, in parting from you now,
Thus much let me avow —
You are not wrong, who deem
That my days have been a dream;
Yet if hope has flown away
In a night, or in a day
In a vision, or in none,
Is it therefore the less gone?
All that we see or seem
Is but a dream within a dream.

I stand amid the roar
Of a surf-tormented shore,
And I hold within my hand
Grains of the golden sand —
How few! yet how they creep
Through my fingers to the deep,
While I weep — while I weep!
O God! Can I not grasp
Them with a tighter clasp?
O God! can I not save
One from the pitiless wave?
Is all that we see or seem
But a dream within a dream?

Has anyone else noticed an increase in the amount of lucid dreams they're having?

I have been experiencing lucid dreams every night since the 21st of December. They are increasing in duration and vividness as well. Last night I had the most profound dream of my life. I'm going to detail them as a way of helping myself organize my thoughts as well as share insights gained with anyone interested in the subject.

I should make a note that I never use a journal to record my dreams. However, last night my experience was so utterly moving I had to get out of bed, rush to find a pen and pad, and frantically write down all the details. I am very glad I did because the notes I took have kept the images and sounds fresh in my memory.

Those of you who are familiar with lucid dreaming know the phenomenon is often associated with sleep paralysis. Sleep paralysis can be very terrifying for those who are unfamiliar with the experience and is often associated with events such as supposed alien abductions, ghost sightings, demonic attacks, and so on. Essentially the individual is commonly surrounded by darkness and is held down under a crushing weight. There may be a great deal of static or whooshing noises including voices which can at times be threatening. All in all it makes for a difficult and frightfully memorable moment.

Now, I can finally explain the dream I had that was so meaningful to me:

My lucid dream had transitioned into the black void of sleep paralysis. It is darkness blacker than black. However, instead of being a victim to it, I was it's master. In this moment I was not 'I' in the sense of my waking self. I was pure-will and consciousness with all ego removed. I was the true-self.

The familiar crushing weight was instead a heavy wind that I walked against. The void tried to suck me in, sinking me in the murky dark, however my intent was sharp and I willed solid ground on which to tread forward. I was pure intent trying to push myself through the boundaries of consciousness to the other side. I am convinced the lucid dream is a gateway.

While pushing forward the following words speak from the heart of my soul:

"I am no longer frightened by the gatekeepers I have created to make myself afraid of reaching this point. I am traveling in my own mind and I am the imagination of myself! I am moving forward with intent, willpower, and absolute control."

I kept moving on through the dark maelstrom. There was no fear. I was literally the mind of God traversing nothingness, not in the sense of the vacuum of space, but absolute unrelated dimension. (If that makes any sense at all.)

To this consciousness, all is a dream. I could understand clearly that I was asleep. However, I knew for absolute certain that the same is true in waking life. I knew my goal was an experience beyond the consciousness I have known. I would never see anyone I knew in life again but it was of absolutely no consequence. The entire 'real world' was but fragments of memory created by my imagination. I was going to be born anew to an unimaginable existence. I was less than an inch away, but space wasn't important in this void, I knew I was right on the limit. At the turning point of never going back to what I was before.

And then I woke up. My body was tingling and I felt like I had electricity coursing through every single nerve. Additionally, I was overwhelmed with a feeling that a massive boundary had been broken through.

I am still shaken by last night. I have never in my life experienced such a crisp and clear moment of consciousness. Who I am as a person was not relevant whatsoever. I just was. All was truth and there was now deception in this 'place'. I literally knew I was the mind of God attempting to do something amazing. Furthermore, I cannot help but carry over the notion of existing within the thought-process of God into my waking reality. Could this all be just a giant dream and we are all pretending to be individuals? For most of you out there that may sound absurd. To me, at this moment, that premise is an absolute certainty.


I had another lucid dream. I was in a room filled with people. They were all talking and going about their business. Then I realized I was dreaming. I stood up and formally addressed the crowd of the following:

"None of you are real. Right now I am dreaming and you're all characters in that dream."

Of course they didn't believe me one bit. I performed a miracle to be a bit more convincing. At this they began to panic and become upset. We were truly in a dream together.

To ease the pain of being an imaginary character I then created $3,000,000.00 USD in the blink of an eye for each and every individual in the room. This made all my dream characters very happy.


Looking back at the dream now I laugh because it is quite silly. However, what is most striking to me about the experience is the fact that I ignored the possibility that I too was just a character in the dream. I wasn't anymore real than any other in the illusory crowd.

I maintain the stance that you and I are both God swimming in the most complicated and exhausting illusion ever created. In addition we created this thing and it can be beaten.

Thread: Incredible Lucid Dreams since 12/21/2012

How everything intersects in what the Builder says and information from other sources... (although we ourselves are the source of everything.... horror!!!)

This film also echoes the thoughts of the Builder.