Liquid crystal phases of tiny DNA molecules point up new scenario for first life on Earth | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 326650 United States 11/23/2007 12:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 330019 Australia 11/23/2007 12:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 110166 United States 11/23/2007 03:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Thanatos User ID: 324533 United States 11/23/2007 03:44 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
The Guy User ID: 330680 United States 11/23/2007 09:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Religous superstitious freakazoids aren't gonna like this. Quoting: ThanatosRelax. They aren't going to be able to understand a word of it :) Naw, I unnerstood it purdy good. This post just goes to show what a wonderful creation the human mind is. Yet another scenario has been found to show how life could have begun without divine intervention. Brilliant! But the only thing this proves is that short chains of RNA have the ability to self-assemble liquid crystal formations in a water solution. A lot of polymers can to that! It all comes down to worldviews and assumptions. Those who espouse evolution as the origin of life do so because they first assumed that a creator does not exist, and so are trying to find a way to explain our existence without a cause. Many ideas have been brought forward; many, like this one, very creative and well thought-out. But if you keep your mind closed, you only see the inside of your own head. This is true no matter which side of an issue you're on. It's good to be open-minded, just don't let your brain fall out. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 325894 United States 11/23/2007 11:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Six bases with a complementary segment. Now throw in a gaggle of high-tech gagetry to nudge the "irreducibly complex" organism toward "rod building" and ouila, self-replicating DNA or RNA. The fact is, this little experiment still cannot get beyond the irreducibly complex. You cannot take any one aspect and combine it with any other or even several others and still make it fly. It takes a perfect or near-perfect combination of elements along with perfect conditions (made perfect by the experimenters) to replicate (pun fully intended) what seems to happen in the real world. This, of course, is not even looking at it at the mitochondrial level. The complexity goes much deeper. The irreducible complexity argument simply cannot be bridged here. They have a minimum number of elements that must exist before they can even carry on with their experiment (not to mention the intricate and complex intervention done by the scientists.) I have to agree with The Guy. They are seeing only what they want to see and prove. They have actually MADE the case for creation. They cannot even create the original particles nor naturally allow them to come together in precisely the arrangement necessary for "growth". Of course, that will not stop them from trying. I love science. Science cannot prove or disprove spontaneous life by whatever form of reductionism they choose to use. They can never get to the "before" and are forever restrained to the "after". Nice try though. |