| Users Online Now: 2,331 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,378,910 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,982,138 | Threads Today: 546 | Posts Today: 10,581 |
| 04:09 PM | ||
| Users Online Now: 2,331 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 1,378,910 | |
| Pageviews Today: 1,982,138 | Threads Today: 546 | Posts Today: 10,581 |
| 04:09 PM | ||
This is how the bloodline elite control us | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79951205  Australia01/21/2021 01:36 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 66431041  United States01/21/2021 01:50 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 79951205 Australia01/21/2021 02:20 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77940234 United States01/21/2021 02:22 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79658816  United Kingdom01/21/2021 02:43 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This really isn't as big of a 'reveal' as you think. It's obvious that we are shaped by the media around us, just as we are shaped by our parents/peers etc. I currently work in lower budget media but have had a few decently paying jobs for bigger budget stuff. The producers can control the output of certain things in television or film which they don't think will hit right with the audience. This can usually come down to a certain scene being added or deleted, some dialogue being changed or in some cases - an actor being replaced for someone else. No doubt they have an executive control over some things in media, however they don't really control much shit other than small tweaks which they think will make the media more profitable to their target audience. It all really comes down to profitability. Television and film media almost always begins with a writer coming up with an idea/script/screenplay, pitching it to a production company and eventually selling it to them if things go well. The production company then hires a crew to film, including a director, who is usually the person in charge of how the film will look. Producers and execs are really just there to oversee that the film will be profitable for them and that the director or editor doesn't do some crazy shit. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 79951205 Australia01/21/2021 07:14 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This really isn't as big of a 'reveal' as you think. It's obvious that we are shaped by the media around us, just as we are shaped by our parents/peers etc. I currently work in lower budget media but have had a few decently paying jobs for bigger budget stuff. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79658816 The producers can control the output of certain things in television or film which they don't think will hit right with the audience. This can usually come down to a certain scene being added or deleted, some dialogue being changed or in some cases - an actor being replaced for someone else. No doubt they have an executive control over some things in media, however they don't really control much shit other than small tweaks which they think will make the media more profitable to their target audience. It all really comes down to profitability. Television and film media almost always begins with a writer coming up with an idea/script/screenplay, pitching it to a production company and eventually selling it to them if things go well. The production company then hires a crew to film, including a director, who is usually the person in charge of how the film will look. Producers and execs are really just there to oversee that the film will be profitable for them and that the director or editor doesn't do some crazy shit. Just because you work in that industry, doesn't mean you know anything about the machinations of those that control it. Don't mistake being a pawn for being a peer. The process you described of them taking out a scene or some dialogue is a hint of how this is done. There isn't daddy lizard king personally reviewing all the scripts to make sure everyone is adhering to it, the pawns will all do that themselves. Because this is a few generations in now, people like you that want to get into 'the movies' will construct these mental programs yourselves, based on the existing mental programming already active within your mind. 'They' direct what these films are about, 'family values' or 'archetypal stories' things you get taught in film school which you think are they way things are but really are the way we need to be programmed so we will respond to certain situations in a certain way. I don't mean to come off rude but your response is very similar to the sort of response you get from research assistants who are fresh out of their university indoctrination and will fall over themselves trying to tell you how 'science' works, when really they are nothing more than a glorified monkey themselves, having been given a compartmentalised task to complete while being ignorant of the greater endeavour. You are in that same situation. Thinking the director or writer or whoever has creative control is the illusion of freedom. They have creative control so long as their creativity is on brand with the underlying message that the controllers want introduced. Otherwise they are told to take their creativity and fuck off somewhere else while someone whose 'creativity' is more in line with the controller's message will be brought on board. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79658816 United Kingdom02/04/2021 08:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This really isn't as big of a 'reveal' as you think. It's obvious that we are shaped by the media around us, just as we are shaped by our parents/peers etc. I currently work in lower budget media but have had a few decently paying jobs for bigger budget stuff. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79658816 The producers can control the output of certain things in television or film which they don't think will hit right with the audience. This can usually come down to a certain scene being added or deleted, some dialogue being changed or in some cases - an actor being replaced for someone else. No doubt they have an executive control over some things in media, however they don't really control much shit other than small tweaks which they think will make the media more profitable to their target audience. It all really comes down to profitability. Television and film media almost always begins with a writer coming up with an idea/script/screenplay, pitching it to a production company and eventually selling it to them if things go well. The production company then hires a crew to film, including a director, who is usually the person in charge of how the film will look. Producers and execs are really just there to oversee that the film will be profitable for them and that the director or editor doesn't do some crazy shit. Just because you work in that industry, doesn't mean you know anything about the machinations of those that control it. Don't mistake being a pawn for being a peer. The process you described of them taking out a scene or some dialogue is a hint of how this is done. There isn't daddy lizard king personally reviewing all the scripts to make sure everyone is adhering to it, the pawns will all do that themselves. Because this is a few generations in now, people like you that want to get into 'the movies' will construct these mental programs yourselves, based on the existing mental programming already active within your mind. 'They' direct what these films are about, 'family values' or 'archetypal stories' things you get taught in film school which you think are they way things are but really are the way we need to be programmed so we will respond to certain situations in a certain way. I don't mean to come off rude but your response is very similar to the sort of response you get from research assistants who are fresh out of their university indoctrination and will fall over themselves trying to tell you how 'science' works, when really they are nothing more than a glorified monkey themselves, having been given a compartmentalised task to complete while being ignorant of the greater endeavour. You are in that same situation. Thinking the director or writer or whoever has creative control is the illusion of freedom. They have creative control so long as their creativity is on brand with the underlying message that the controllers want introduced. Otherwise they are told to take their creativity and fuck off somewhere else while someone whose 'creativity' is more in line with the controller's message will be brought on board. I'm definitely not some sort of superstar director but I have worked with some pretty famous people who would be considered within Hollywood elite and most of them seem pretty normal. Some of course let fame get to their heads and can act cunty. It's really not as secretive and secluded as you think. Usually after a day of shooting the full crew will go out for a meal and drinks, often times including some producers and their assistants. I have never heard talk about controlling society in some way or brainwashing or whatever. Pretty sure if there was some sort of secret conspiracy in film, companies wouldn't let their producers get drunk. I have heard all sorts of weird shit from crew and execs but its always just the same weird shit you'd hear from your workmates. I'm into film making because I think I have some pretty good ideas of films that I want to eventually make. To do that I ultimately need to make connections to finance my ideas so I'm just working my way through different jobs in the business to gain those connections. It's the same as any other wannabe director, we want our movies funded. Why do you think University is indoctrination? I honestly didn't learn much in University that I couldn't have on Youtube or something but it did help me work with pretty expensive equipment that I otherwise wouldn't have had the chance to. Also your 'creativity' thing is totally false. Our trade begins with our ability to be creative and think outside of the box. My comments about producers input into films has to do with them looking to make as much profit from the movie as possible. For example; cutting a sex scene so that the movie can be rated 'PG' instead of 'R' so that more people are able to view it in the cinema. Producers are hired by movie industries in order to cut costs and improve profits. They are a total pain in the ass to everyone involved in filmmaking but they are nowhere near creative enough to make creative decisions. Usually when the director has been told to alter their film - the director and editors will make a 'directors cut' usually not played in cinemas although made widely available. Your conspiracies are totally outlandish. Especially when there are already proven conspiracies about actors and staff being raped and abused for roles. Film companies skirting the law on taxes. And the many rumors of pedophilia that is still happening in Hollywood |
