Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,176 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 462,983
Pageviews Today: 1,166,930Threads Today: 624Posts Today: 13,161
05:31 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

 
Coastie Patriot
GLP'er For life

User ID: 78825402
United States
02/22/2021 05:51 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.

In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

[link to townhall.com (secure)]
Coastie Patriot
SIC SEMPER TYRRANIS

THE SAME PEOPLE WHO SAID NO GUNS BECAUSE OF POLICE NOW WANT TO DEFUND THE POLICE!!!!

Dr Thaddeus They
They don't really care whether the truth gets out, because the public no longer knows what's meant by "the truth."

Well, I mean, no one can tell the difference anymore between what's real and what's fake.

Anyway, the point is, I can tell you all of this, right out in the open, because it doesn't matter who knows about it. They won't know whether to believe it or not.-
X Files: Lost art of Forehead Sweat

A gun is a tool, Marion, no better or no worse than any other tool, an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.
-SHANE-

Jefferson Smith: You see, boys forget what their country means by just reading The Land of the Free in history books. Then they get to be men they forget even more. Liberty's too precious a thing to be buried in books, Miss Saunders. Men should hold it up in front of them every single day of their lives and say: I'm free to think and to speak. My ancestors couldn't, I can, and my children will. Boys ought to grow up remembering that . - MR Smith Goes To Washington-

to grow up remembering th

My oath to support and defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic has no expiration date!!!

Ten Bears : It's sad that governments are chiefed by the double tongues. There is iron in your words of death for all Comanche to see and so there is iron in your words of life. No signed paper can hold the iron. It must come from men. Outlaw Josey Wales
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78435947
United States
02/22/2021 05:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court is defending deep state control of US politics.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22191327
United States
02/22/2021 05:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72514297
United States
02/22/2021 06:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22191327
United States
02/22/2021 06:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there is no such thing as a national election. there are 50 different elections for 50 sovereign states.

its amazing you guys don't even try and understand. it also demonstrates that your ancestors did not build this system, for if they had, they'd explain to you what I just wrote.
Jalayaja

User ID: 79509950
02/22/2021 06:11 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
You can practically hear the anger in his statement. This guy knows what's up and how bad the long term ramifications are going to be.
ScrumpTheTexanModerator
Forum Administrator

02/22/2021 06:12 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Totally explicable.

They're completely compromised, and are now nothing more than an invalid criminal/criminality-enabling dead and worthless 'institution'.
I am a Christian.

Christian does not equal doormat or pushover

"I Have Sworn upon the Altar of God... Eternal Hostility against every form of Tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson, Sep. 23, 1800

MedinaD

The Election of Donald John Trump: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

For previous Newsletters, click 'Scrump's News Letters' @ [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
sssssteve

User ID: 79264718
United States
02/22/2021 06:13 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
You can practically hear the anger in his statement. This guy knows what's up and how bad the long term ramifications are going to be.
 Quoting: Jalayaja


yep
Tobie

User ID: 80074554
United States
02/22/2021 06:14 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
we are SO SCREWED
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73317706
United States
02/22/2021 06:15 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court is defending deep state control of US politics.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78435947


hesright
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 76679924
United States
02/22/2021 06:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Another win for team tard
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40624748
Canada
02/22/2021 06:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Looks like Scotus decided to take the Deep State plunge!

They failed an entire nation!

What a disgrace!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78435947
United States
02/22/2021 06:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there is no such thing as a national election. there are 50 different elections for 50 sovereign states.

its amazing you guys don't even try and understand. it also demonstrates that your ancestors did not build this system, for if they had, they'd explain to you what I just wrote.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


You're wrong. There are no SOVEREIGN states, and the US Supreme Court clearly has jurisdiction over Presidential elections.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79682605
United States
02/22/2021 06:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Rule of law is dead. Your literally have no vote anymore. The US you knew is gone. You are a terrorist in your own country. Get your head right and plan accordingly.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72514297
United States
02/22/2021 06:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there is no such thing as a national election. there are 50 different elections for 50 sovereign states.

its amazing you guys don't even try and understand. it also demonstrates that your ancestors did not build this system, for if they had, they'd explain to you what I just wrote.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


Still doesn't change the fact that several states violated their own voting laws to achieve a desired result which had a national impact. We can play semantics all day but that bowl of brown stuff you are eyeing while licking your lips in anticipation is not pudding. Just sayin.
1guynAz

User ID: 2229693
United States
02/22/2021 06:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Yup! I just read it myself---he's the only one I wouldn't

arrest for treason...so far.

"but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas
believe they should have been given hearings..."

I stand corrected. These 3 I would not arrest for treason...


.
.
.

Last Edited by 1guynAz on 02/22/2021 06:19 PM
Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves - George Gordon Byron
Ntg567

User ID: 71014558
United States
02/22/2021 06:21 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there is no such thing as a national election. there are 50 different elections for 50 sovereign states.

its amazing you guys don't even try and understand. it also demonstrates that your ancestors did not build this system, for if they had, they'd explain to you what I just wrote.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


If there’s no such thing as a national election then why do we have the FEDERAL election commission? One would think you would need that for a national election no? The national election is the electoral college, every state goes in with their results from their state election and casts their electoral votes for their desired candidate. Ya dope.

Last Edited by Ntg567 on 02/22/2021 06:22 PM
Trust no one, question everything
N
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40624748
Canada
02/22/2021 06:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
He knows its fixed.

I pray he continues to get the word out!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22191327
United States
02/22/2021 06:22 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there is no such thing as a national election. there are 50 different elections for 50 sovereign states.

its amazing you guys don't even try and understand. it also demonstrates that your ancestors did not build this system, for if they had, they'd explain to you what I just wrote.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


Still doesn't change the fact that several states violated their own voting laws to achieve a desired result which had a national impact. We can play semantics all day but that bowl of brown stuff you are eyeing while licking your lips in anticipation is not pudding. Just sayin.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there are no semantics. SCOTUS has No Jurisdiction.

One State has No Jurisdiction over another State and is in no position to determine the legality of its elections.

Quite true and straight forward and unambiguous.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72799356
United States
02/22/2021 06:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
It is easy to explain. Roberts is blackmailed. The other 2 were bribed with suitcases full of cash $$$$. Deep State dirty tricks.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22191327
United States
02/22/2021 06:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there is no such thing as a national election. there are 50 different elections for 50 sovereign states.

its amazing you guys don't even try and understand. it also demonstrates that your ancestors did not build this system, for if they had, they'd explain to you what I just wrote.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


If there’s no such thing as a federal election then why do we have the FEDERAL election commission. The federal election is the electoral college, every state goes in with their results from their state election and casts their electoral votes for their desired candidate. Ya dope.
 Quoting: Ntg567


Federal Election Commission, created 1975, is a perversion. Created by someone who thinks and believes as you do. Oddly enough created within a year of the near overthrow of the US Government in 1974, after Nixon resigned.

Sovereign States and their residents created the Federal System by signing the Treaty called the Constitution of the United States.

The Federal government does't decide anything regarding who goes to or stays in Washington. the idea that it does is a perversion.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22191327
United States
02/22/2021 06:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
He knows its fixed.

I pray he continues to get the word out!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 40624748


i know something about Justice Thomas and his people.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78372339
United States
02/22/2021 06:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
We have officially planted the flag in Clown World. The rationale and quasi logic could only be achieved by lawyers. Let me see if I can follow it: To raise a suit ahead of the actual anticipated act would not give the plaintiff standing, because it has yet to take place. By waiting until after the transgression has transpired, the Doctrine of Latches kicks in and the case becomes a moot point as too much time has passed.
We could bring in teams of mathematicians and physicists to try and identify the exact point of inflection where the case goes from before standing to moot point, or we could bring in some nine year olds to call someone out for changing the rules in middle of the game just using horse sense.
Congratulations America, last one out hit the lights.
Butterfly girl

User ID: 77081323
United States
02/22/2021 06:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Banana republic with rigged elections, corrupt courts, politicians, and impotent military
Disgusting.
To everything there is a season, and a time to every purpose under heaven... A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74546445
United States
02/22/2021 06:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Justice Thomas is a great American. If our military doesn't step in, you know we truly have become a banana republic.
Ntg567

User ID: 71014558
United States
02/22/2021 06:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
...


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there is no such thing as a national election. there are 50 different elections for 50 sovereign states.

its amazing you guys don't even try and understand. it also demonstrates that your ancestors did not build this system, for if they had, they'd explain to you what I just wrote.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


If there’s no such thing as a federal election then why do we have the FEDERAL election commission. The federal election is the electoral college, every state goes in with their results from their state election and casts their electoral votes for their desired candidate. Ya dope.
 Quoting: Ntg567


Federal Election Commission, created 1975, is a perversion. Created by someone who thinks and believes as you do. Oddly enough created within a year of the near overthrow of the US Government in 1974, after Nixon resigned.

Sovereign States and their residents created the Federal System by signing the Treaty called the Constitution of the United States.

The Federal government does't decide anything regarding who goes to or stays in Washington. the idea that it does is a perversion.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


You’re right the federal government doesn’t decide they just facilitate the means for conducting the national election, the states decide who stays in Washington in the national election ie the electoral college.

Last Edited by Ntg567 on 02/22/2021 06:30 PM
Trust no one, question everything
N
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 40624748
Canada
02/22/2021 06:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Stinks to high heaven!

They know the law was broken and did NOTHING!

All I can say is DISGRACEFUL!

Shame on them for letting down the entire nation!

They have single handedly destroyed any confidence I ever had in the United States justice system and caused irrepairable damage to the election process which could last for decades.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80069539
United States
02/22/2021 06:31 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
WINDOW DRESSING
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72539137
United States
02/22/2021 06:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
...


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there is no such thing as a national election. there are 50 different elections for 50 sovereign states.

its amazing you guys don't even try and understand. it also demonstrates that your ancestors did not build this system, for if they had, they'd explain to you what I just wrote.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


Still doesn't change the fact that several states violated their own voting laws to achieve a desired result which had a national impact. We can play semantics all day but that bowl of brown stuff you are eyeing while licking your lips in anticipation is not pudding. Just sayin.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there are no semantics. SCOTUS has No Jurisdiction.

One State has No Jurisdiction over another State and is in no position to determine the legality of its elections.

Quite true and straight forward and unambiguous.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


You mean these United sovereign States? Sovereignty does not imply that 6 states can disregard their own Constitution at the peril of the other 44 states that chose to adhere to the law. The states were expected to act in union, which they did not. The scotus is more concerned with appeasing the City of London, the Vatican, and Brussels than performing their domestic duties.
Deplorable Times

User ID: 58813480
United States
02/22/2021 06:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Totally explicable.

They're completely compromised, and are now nothing more than an invalid criminal/criminality-enabling dead and worthless 'institution'.
 Quoting: ScrumpTheTexan




Gun Right are Next. WTF,Guess Barrett, Kavenaugh have flipped.
"I believe in the United States of America as a Government of the people, by the people, for the people; whose just powers are derived from the consent of the governed; a democracy in a republic; a sovereign nation of many sovereign states; a perfect union one and inseparable; established upon those principles of freedom, equality, justice and humanity for which American patriots sacrificed their lives and fortunes. I therefore believe it is my duty to my country to love it; to support its Constitution; to obey it laws; to respect its flag; and to defend it against all enemies." -William Page
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77422090
Germany
02/22/2021 06:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Totally explicable.

They're completely compromised, and are now nothing more than an invalid criminal/criminality-enabling dead and worthless 'institution'.
 Quoting: ScrumpTheTexan


And even Trump's SCOTUS people are in on it...





GLP