Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,237 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 537,519
Pageviews Today: 1,474,821Threads Today: 914Posts Today: 17,651
09:40 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

 
We Who Watch.

User ID: 79047905
United States
02/22/2021 09:27 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
we are SO SCREWED
 Quoting: Tobie


thisss
There are over 7 billion people on the planet.
And I am one.
sparky10
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78344283
United States
02/22/2021 09:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
His wife Ginni endorsed the 1/6 protest, demanded an overturn of the election, and sent 'LOVE' to demonstrators. He's not dissented to any of that.

That's inexplicable.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78344283


Ginni Thomas, who once shared a meme alleging that liberal donor George Soros was involved in a conspiracy to launch a "silent coup" against Trump, apologized to Justice Thomas' staffers for her January 6 posts after the situation deteriorated into the riots that resulted in the deaths of five people.

"I owe you all an apology. I have likely imposed on you my lifetime passions," Thomas wrote the staff in emails. "My passions and beliefs are likely shared with the bulk of you, but certainly not all. And sometimes the smallest matters can divide loved ones for too long. Let's pledge to not let politics divide THIS family, and learn to speak more gently and knowingly across the divide."

[link to www.businessinsider.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78347240
United States
02/22/2021 09:40 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court is defending deep state control of US politics.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78435947


Its not a deep state. Its a police state. A leftist racist fascist one at that.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77996178
United States
02/22/2021 09:54 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
You people that are saying the supreme court has no jurisdiction are morons.

They have jurisdiction over everything.

That have the power to adjudicate the constitutionality of anything that's brought to them.

They make the final decision on whether a state's actions are constitutional or not.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78139144


Exactly.

The entire purpose of the Supreme Court is to see that the Rule of Law is followed and not simply made up as we go along.

If a state's election laws are not followed as written then that state has not followed the laws in place (Rule of Law) and must be held accountable.
WGON
"Get that idiot off the air!"

User ID: 79961010
United States
02/22/2021 09:59 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
https://imgur.com/a/JEZqlk3

"Luck is the residue of design."

"Through readiness and discipline, we are masters of our fate.
You might call that notion ironic. But trust me, you'll come around."

"It's like I told my last wife, I said Honey I never drive faster than I can see, and besides, it's all in the reflexes..."
4th iteration

User ID: 79824926
United States
02/22/2021 10:01 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
I live in a country I no longer have a say in

And I'm expected to Pay it's bills.
scary thoughts
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80078067
United States
02/22/2021 10:04 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
I live in a country I no longer have a say in

And I'm expected to Pay it's bills.
 Quoting: 4th iteration


NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION

SECOND AMENDMENT IS THE ONLY REMEDY FOR NO REDRESS OF GRIEVANCES
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77996178
United States
02/22/2021 10:05 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
His wife Ginni endorsed the 1/6 protest, demanded an overturn of the election, and sent 'LOVE' to demonstrators. He's not dissented to any of that.

That's inexplicable.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78344283


Ginni Thomas, who once shared a meme alleging that liberal donor George Soros was involved in a conspiracy to launch a "silent coup" against Trump, apologized to Justice Thomas' staffers for her January 6 posts after the situation deteriorated into the riots that resulted in the deaths of five people.

"I owe you all an apology. I have likely imposed on you my lifetime passions," Thomas wrote the staff in emails. "My passions and beliefs are likely shared with the bulk of you, but certainly not all. And sometimes the smallest matters can divide loved ones for too long. Let's pledge to not let politics divide THIS family, and learn to speak more gently and knowingly across the divide."

[link to www.businessinsider.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78344283


So if there is a sporting event and afterwards some fans go outside and do significant property damage and injuries, then are all fans of the team guilty?

There is no such thing as an unarmed "insurrection". That is an oxymoron and anyone claiming it is an insurrection is in fact a moron.

I did not vote unlike a lot of morons who did.

Trump has been nothing but a pressure valve holding back the explosive pressure of the populace.

If the politicians were honest in their evaluation then they would understand this fact. Instead they are psychopaths who are oblivious to the reality standing right in their faces.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78363501
United States
02/22/2021 10:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Amy Barrett made some kind of deal with DS, she is useless and I noticed the left didn't create any rukus during her nomination
 Quoting: KuvaszLove


She has a lot of kids to be threatened. I am sure they told her in no uncertain terms what would happen if she didn't go along.

I can't believe that we the American people are sitting around and letting this shit happen, there will be no future for our kids now and were fucking doing nothing about it
 Quoting: Reluctant energy


Sure. That's entirely possible. So then she can step the FUCK down, resign for "personal reasons" or whatever. Her GD kids aren't more important than our nation. If she can't do her job, she needs to quit. She's very religious...it's interesting to me that she doesn't think about the eternal consequences of her actions...
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73220497
United States
02/22/2021 10:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3...

hold the fuck up.. isnt this supposed to be a 3-6 court now? cOnSeRvAtIvE? fuck SCOTUS they are all in the pockets of the deep state.
Forever MAGA ><even

User ID: 79827759
United States
02/22/2021 10:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Totally explicable.

They're completely compromised, and are now nothing more than an invalid criminal/criminality-enabling dead and worthless 'institution'.
 Quoting: ScrumpTheTexan


Yes and we are screwed.we being Americans. We need help to get our Nationback
I reserve the right to declare my comments and posts as satire. Nothing I post should be considered or interpreted as advocacy for illegal activity. My comments are designed to inspire critical political thinking.
Otis B. Driftwood

User ID: 78542442
United States
02/22/2021 10:34 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3...

hold the fuck up.. isnt this supposed to be a 3-6 court now? cOnSeRvAtIvE? fuck SCOTUS they are all in the pockets of the deep state.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73220497


^^ my thoughts exactly ^^
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74984679
United States
02/22/2021 10:41 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
we are SO SCREWED
 Quoting: Tobie


:thisss:
 Quoting: We Who Watch.


I keep thinking that too.

Screwed screwed screwed.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 16213727
United States
02/22/2021 10:42 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Totally explicable.

They're completely compromised, and are now nothing more than an invalid criminal/criminality-enabling dead and worthless 'institution'.
 Quoting: ScrumpTheTexan




Gun Right are Next. WTF,Guess Barrett, Kavenaugh have flipped.
 Quoting: Deplorable Times



They both have young children. I am more apt to believe that they were both 'threatened'


.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 16213727


Threatened? how awful.

have the balls to report the threat and leave the Court, if you cannot rule independently of the "threats".

Cowardly of them to use their children as an excuse to rob us of fair elections -

if that is their "reason" for being foolish cowards.
 Quoting: beeches



good point.

.
Secretizer

User ID: 78467371
United States
02/22/2021 10:44 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Thomas and Alito will likely be the last of their kind.

I have zero trust in ACB, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

They are from a younger generation that has been throughly indoctrinated by leftism.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74984679
United States
02/22/2021 10:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
His wife Ginni endorsed the 1/6 protest, demanded an overturn of the election, and sent 'LOVE' to demonstrators. He's not dissented to any of that.

That's inexplicable.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78344283


Ginni Thomas, who once shared a meme alleging that liberal donor George Soros was involved in a conspiracy to launch a "silent coup" against Trump, apologized to Justice Thomas' staffers for her January 6 posts after the situation deteriorated into the riots that resulted in the deaths of five people.

"I owe you all an apology. I have likely imposed on you my lifetime passions," Thomas wrote the staff in emails. "My passions and beliefs are likely shared with the bulk of you, but certainly not all. And sometimes the smallest matters can divide loved ones for too long. Let's pledge to not let politics divide THIS family, and learn to speak more gently and knowingly across the divide."

[link to www.businessinsider.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78344283


So if there is a sporting event and afterwards some fans go outside and do significant property damage and injuries, then are all fans of the team guilty?

There is no such thing as an unarmed "insurrection". That is an oxymoron and anyone claiming it is an insurrection is in fact a moron.

I did not vote unlike a lot of morons who did.

Trump has been nothing but a pressure valve holding back the explosive pressure of the populace.

If the politicians were honest in their evaluation then they would understand this fact. Instead they are psychopaths who are oblivious to the reality standing right in their faces.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77996178


I can hardly believe so many on here still have faith in Trump.

Of course, this site censors information that would help them get there. So there's that. Wish I bookmarked that "True Face of Trump" video that someone posted, before some mod nuked the thread...
Nawt Mah Presdint A.C.Denizen

User ID: 79546140
United States
02/22/2021 10:48 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there is no such thing as a national election. there are 50 different elections for 50 sovereign states.

its amazing you guys don't even try and understand. it also demonstrates that your ancestors did not build this system, for if they had, they'd explain to you what I just wrote.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


You're wrong. There are no SOVEREIGN states, and the US Supreme Court clearly has jurisdiction over Presidential elections.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78435947


State sovereignty ended with the War of Northern Aggression eliminating the Republics in favor of the Federal System.
Blab gobble doodle blurb! You disgusting Cretin!
~
Shit Puppet Biden is Nawt Mah Presdint
Death to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei - Death to Iran
Death to Kim Jong-un - Death to Democratic People's Republic of Best Korea
Death to Xi Jinping - Death to People's Republic of China
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 74984679
United States
02/22/2021 10:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Thomas and Alito will likely be the last of their kind.

I have zero trust in ACB, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh.

They are from a younger generation that has been throughly indoctrinated by leftism.
 Quoting: Secretizer


Pretty sure Kav is a perv. He has the look.

ACB has the crazy eyes. Never trusted her either.

How Trump still has so many fooled I'll never understand.
Et Sano

User ID: 51034183
United States
02/22/2021 10:50 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.

In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

[link to townhall.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Coastie Patriot


John Roberts: Catholic

Joe Biden: Catholic

Mike Pence: Catholic

Bill Barr: Catholic

Jack Dorsey: Catholic

Shall I continue?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77022712
United States
02/22/2021 10:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Look at "Republican" Mitch McConnell who a few weeks ago stood before the Senate and stated President Trump was guilty of encouraging an insurrection of the Capitol and Congress.

McConnell knew full well that the evidence pointed to just the opposite of that. He knows full well that he and Pelosi encouraged law enforcement on January 6th to stand back and stand down. Why?

McConnell isn't a flaming liberal and his track record is admittedly somewhat right leaning. But something stinks in Denmark.

He is the epitome of the Deep State, an entity that's full of political ambiguities, a lot of cunning, loads of contradictions.

McConnell's rumored ties to business interests in PCC China (his wife, Elaine Chao, is suspicious---and may be more emotionally pro-Beijing than pro-Taiwan) and hints of homosexuality/pedophilia mark him as a case of "methinks he doth protest too much."
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79780865
Canada
02/22/2021 10:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.


 Quoting: Coastie Patriot


Wash out all the noise and pay attention to the above statement.

It's all that matters. That point. It's the smoking gun. It's the reason the Biden admin and US govt isn't legit.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79996662
United States
02/22/2021 10:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Does anyone ever get to higher levels without some black mail material?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79780865
Canada
02/22/2021 10:52 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.

In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

[link to townhall.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Coastie Patriot


John Roberts: Catholic

Joe Biden: Catholic

Mike Pence: Catholic

Bill Barr: Catholic

Jack Dorsey: Catholic

Shall I continue?
 Quoting: Et Sano


Idol1smoking1Idol1
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 53392648
United States
02/22/2021 11:36 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court is defending deep state control of US politics.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78435947


Well they have the dirt on Roberts and Epstines Island
been bribing him for ages

hard to tell what they have on the other justices
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73656788
Slovakia
02/22/2021 11:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.

In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

[link to townhall.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Coastie Patriot


lol....why didnt Thomas dissent THEN???

You guys are so naive! Cant you see the fake legal jargon? Dissenting now is of NO use. If the SCOTUS wanted to revoke the elections it should have done in November-December when it was brought to court, NOT after the new government of Biden was sworn in on January 21. That case was a 9-0 defeat against Trump, in Biden's favor. Any revocation after that will cause a civil war.

Thomas also mentioned, the election result would not have changed.

In the Bush vs AL Gore case, the SCOTUS led by Protestant Rehnquist ruled in Bush's favor almost immediately, BEFORE the swearing-in, and all opposition was silenced.

They're throwing a red herring, to prevent Catholics being blamed. They know that people are onto them!


flip
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78686355
02/22/2021 11:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
They don't flip. They get the horses head in their bed the night of their confirmation.

The theroy is when they get into these postions at the top and after being sworn in, they take a meeting, a meeting with a full blown Alpha Draconian shape shifting elite Reptilain. So now they know whose in charge. You would do as you're told as well. They can also semi hypnotize a person, and redheaded blue eyed people are more susceptible than others. That's very likley why ACB was chosen, she'll be more vulnerable, and her children will make her 100% vulnerable to threats and intimidation.

The whole sytem is a screen, a con, I don't belive any of it anymore.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78124827
United States
02/23/2021 12:02 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.

In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

[link to townhall.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Coastie Patriot


lol....why didnt Thomas dissent THEN???

You guys are so naive! Cant you see the fake legal jargon? Dissenting now is of NO use. If the SCOTUS wanted to revoke the elections it should have done in November-December when it was brought to court, NOT after the new government of Biden was sworn in on January 21. That case was a 9-0 defeat against Trump, in Biden's favor. Any revocation after that will cause a civil war.

Thomas also mentioned, the election result would not have changed.

In the Bush vs AL Gore case, the SCOTUS led by Protestant Rehnquist ruled in Bush's favor almost immediately, BEFORE the swearing-in, and all opposition was silenced.

They're throwing a red herring, to prevent Catholics being blamed. They know that people are onto them!


flip
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73656788



Menwhile the Supreme (Catholic) Court strikes again!


Supreme Court allows release of Trump tax returns to NY prosecutor

The Supreme Court cleared the way for a New York prosecutor to obtain former President Donald Trump's tax returns, dealing a massive loss to Trump who has fiercely fought to shield his financial papers from prosecutors.

The documents will be subject to grand jury secrecy rules that restrict their public release.

The ruling is a bitter loss for Trump, even if the tax records are shielded from public disclosure, after he consistently argued that the subpoena issued by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance was overbroad and issued in bad faith.

Monday's ruling was issued without comment or noted dissent.


[link to edition.cnn.com (secure)]


lmao
mlabors

User ID: 78224333
United States
02/23/2021 12:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3...

hold the fuck up.. isnt this supposed to be a 3-6 court now? cOnSeRvAtIvE? fuck SCOTUS they are all in the pockets of the deep state.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73220497


SC caved to the threats and bailed.

Did now want to be killed or family attacked, for Trump.

Tune in next year, we will see how they do.
mlabors

User ID: 78224333
United States
02/23/2021 12:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.

In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

[link to townhall.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Coastie Patriot


lol....why didnt Thomas dissent THEN???

You guys are so naive! Cant you see the fake legal jargon? Dissenting now is of NO use. If the SCOTUS wanted to revoke the elections it should have done in November-December when it was brought to court, NOT after the new government of Biden was sworn in on January 21. That case was a 9-0 defeat against Trump, in Biden's favor. Any revocation after that will cause a civil war.

Thomas also mentioned, the election result would not have changed.

In the Bush vs AL Gore case, the SCOTUS led by Protestant Rehnquist ruled in Bush's favor almost immediately, BEFORE the swearing-in, and all opposition was silenced.

They're throwing a red herring, to prevent Catholics being blamed. They know that people are onto them!


flip
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73656788


He did dissent then, you are reading it now.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 62278649
United States
02/23/2021 12:08 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Inexplicable is nonsense, we all know the reason. TREASON!





GLP