Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,143 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 468,007
Pageviews Today: 1,182,240Threads Today: 638Posts Today: 13,371
05:42 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'

 
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 62278649
United States
02/23/2021 12:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3...

hold the fuck up.. isnt this supposed to be a 3-6 court now? cOnSeRvAtIvE? fuck SCOTUS they are all in the pockets of the deep state.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73220497


SC caved to the threats and bailed.

Did now want to be killed or family attacked, for Trump.

Tune in next year, we will see how they do.
 Quoting: mlabors


For Trump! No motherfucker, it's for the survival of the country they swore an oath to!

gtfo5
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73656788
Slovakia
02/23/2021 12:17 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.

In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

[link to townhall.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Coastie Patriot


lol....why didnt Thomas dissent THEN???

You guys are so naive! Cant you see the fake legal jargon? Dissenting now is of NO use. If the SCOTUS wanted to revoke the elections it should have done in November-December when it was brought to court, NOT after the new government of Biden was sworn in on January 21. That case was a 9-0 defeat against Trump, in Biden's favor. Any revocation after that will cause a civil war.

Thomas also mentioned, the election result would not have changed.

In the Bush vs AL Gore case, the SCOTUS led by Protestant Rehnquist ruled in Bush's favor almost immediately, BEFORE the swearing-in, and all opposition was silenced.

They're throwing a red herring, to prevent Catholics being blamed. They know that people are onto them!


flip
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73656788


He did dissent then, you are reading it now.
 Quoting: mlabors


No he didnt dissent then, in the main Texas case. And postponing these other cases till AFTER the inauguration, without giving an injunction is another clever legal ploy, in favor of Biden and co.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 62278649
United States
02/23/2021 12:20 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


Yes, Kavanaugh was a Bush cronie as well as his wife, and from the very beginning I said Coney-Barret was a nut and not to be trusted. Sadly, President Trump chose poorly.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80021196


Unfortunately the POTUS can only pick who they think will get passed by the senate (swamp creatures).
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73656788
Slovakia
02/23/2021 12:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.

In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

[link to townhall.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Coastie Patriot


lol....why didnt Thomas dissent THEN???

You guys are so naive! Cant you see the fake legal jargon? Dissenting now is of NO use. If the SCOTUS wanted to revoke the elections it should have done in November-December when it was brought to court, NOT after the new government of Biden was sworn in on January 21. That case was a 9-0 defeat against Trump, in Biden's favor. Any revocation after that will cause a civil war.

Thomas also mentioned, the election result would not have changed.

In the Bush vs AL Gore case, the SCOTUS led by Protestant Rehnquist ruled in Bush's favor almost immediately, BEFORE the swearing-in, and all opposition was silenced.

They're throwing a red herring, to prevent Catholics being blamed. They know that people are onto them!


flip
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73656788



Menwhile the Supreme (Catholic) Court strikes again!


Supreme Court allows release of Trump tax returns to NY prosecutor

The Supreme Court cleared the way for a New York prosecutor to obtain former President Donald Trump's tax returns, dealing a massive loss to Trump who has fiercely fought to shield his financial papers from prosecutors.

The documents will be subject to grand jury secrecy rules that restrict their public release.

The ruling is a bitter loss for Trump, even if the tax records are shielded from public disclosure, after he consistently argued that the subpoena issued by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance was overbroad and issued in bad faith.

Monday's ruling was issued without comment or noted dissent.


[link to edition.cnn.com (secure)]


lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78124827


And THIS is the most serious of all. They're going after Trump personally with criminal cases, and the Catholic dominated SCOTUS is not going to help him. In fact they've cleared the way for his indictment and prosecution.


damned
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 62278649
United States
02/23/2021 12:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
We have officially planted the flag in Clown World. The rationale and quasi logic could only be achieved by lawyers. Let me see if I can follow it: To raise a suit ahead of the actual anticipated act would not give the plaintiff standing, because it has yet to take place. By waiting until after the transgression has transpired, the Doctrine of Latches kicks in and the case becomes a moot point as too much time has passed.
We could bring in teams of mathematicians and physicists to try and identify the exact point of inflection where the case goes from before standing to moot point, or we could bring in some nine year olds to call someone out for changing the rules in middle of the game just using horse sense.
Congratulations America, last one out hit the lights.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78372339


trump-HRYK
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79601172


Bro, we are 70 metres deep in clown world.

A transgender was woman of the year.

Men are the best female athletes.

A 70 year old anti-malarial is dangerous.

Epstein killed himself.

Gates is a public health expert.

A cloth mask saves you from a pandemic so deadly you have to be tested to know you have it.

An Alzheimer's patient who didn't campaign won an election over an incumbent with miles-long rally lines.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77773358


^^^^FUCKING THIS^^^^
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 73589198
United States
02/23/2021 12:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Cocksuucker roberts and that cunt are traitors
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79853610
United States
02/23/2021 12:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Nobody cares about law no more, Clarence
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80079293
United States
02/23/2021 12:40 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.

In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

[link to townhall.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Coastie Patriot


lol....why didnt Thomas dissent THEN???

You guys are so naive! Cant you see the fake legal jargon? Dissenting now is of NO use. If the SCOTUS wanted to revoke the elections it should have done in November-December when it was brought to court, NOT after the new government of Biden was sworn in on January 21. That case was a 9-0 defeat against Trump, in Biden's favor. Any revocation after that will cause a civil war.

Thomas also mentioned, the election result would not have changed.

In the Bush vs AL Gore case, the SCOTUS led by Protestant Rehnquist ruled in Bush's favor almost immediately, BEFORE the swearing-in, and all opposition was silenced.

They're throwing a red herring, to prevent Catholics being blamed. They know that people are onto them!


flip
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73656788


He did dissent then, you are reading it now.
 Quoting: mlabors


No he didnt dissent then, in the main Texas case. And postponing these other cases till AFTER the inauguration, without giving an injunction is another clever legal ploy, in favor of Biden and co.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73656788


Yup! A great show put up by the Justices to hoodwink the people. Must have been scripted before! No use of pushing a case till after its too late, and then giving some lip-service

clappa
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80079293
United States
02/23/2021 12:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to reject the review of two 2020 Pennsylvania presidential election cases Monday, but Justices Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Clarence Thomas believe they should have been given hearings.

In his dissent Justice Thomas argued mass mail-in voting, which was conducted in Pennsylvania for the first time ahead of the 2020 presidential election in November, combined with election rules being rewritten last minute, makes the process prone to fraud and mistrust.

"The Constitution gives to each state legislature authority to determine the 'Manner' of federal elections...Yet both before and after the 2020 election, nonlegislative officials in various States took it upon themselves to set the rules instead. As a result, we received an unusually high number of petitions and emer- gency applications contesting those changes. The petitions here present a clear example. The Pennsylvania Legislature established an unambiguous deadline for receiving mail-in ballots: 8 p.m. on election day," Thomas wrote. "Dissatisfied, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court extended that deadline by three days. The court also ordered officials to count ballots received by the new deadline even if there was no evi- dence—such as a postmark—that the ballots were mailed by election day. That decision to rewrite the rules seems to have affected too few ballots to change the outcome of any federal election. But that may not be the case in the future. These cases provide us with an ideal opportunity to address just what authority nonlegislative officials have to set elec- tion rules, and to do so well before the next election cycle. The refusal to do so is inexplicable."

[link to townhall.com (secure)]
 Quoting: Coastie Patriot


lol....why didnt Thomas dissent THEN???

You guys are so naive! Cant you see the fake legal jargon? Dissenting now is of NO use. If the SCOTUS wanted to revoke the elections it should have done in November-December when it was brought to court, NOT after the new government of Biden was sworn in on January 21. That case was a 9-0 defeat against Trump, in Biden's favor. Any revocation after that will cause a civil war.

Thomas also mentioned, the election result would not have changed.

In the Bush vs AL Gore case, the SCOTUS led by Protestant Rehnquist ruled in Bush's favor almost immediately, BEFORE the swearing-in, and all opposition was silenced.

They're throwing a red herring, to prevent Catholics being blamed. They know that people are onto them!


flip
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73656788



Menwhile the Supreme (Catholic) Court strikes again!


Supreme Court allows release of Trump tax returns to NY prosecutor

The Supreme Court cleared the way for a New York prosecutor to obtain former President Donald Trump's tax returns, dealing a massive loss to Trump who has fiercely fought to shield his financial papers from prosecutors.

The documents will be subject to grand jury secrecy rules that restrict their public release.

The ruling is a bitter loss for Trump, even if the tax records are shielded from public disclosure, after he consistently argued that the subpoena issued by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance was overbroad and issued in bad faith.

Monday's ruling was issued without comment or noted dissent.


[link to edition.cnn.com (secure)]


lmao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78124827


And THIS is the most serious of all. They're going after Trump personally with criminal cases, and the Catholic dominated SCOTUS is not going to help him. In fact they've cleared the way for his indictment and prosecution.


damned
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73656788


hah...so NO dissent at all. And its THE BIG ONE!!!

Looks like the Justices want to lock up Trump in jail, and throw away the key.

Obviously they dont want him interfering in Biden's nefarious plans for America.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 62278649
United States
02/23/2021 12:51 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
...


These were national elections. The states violated their own laws to achieve a desired result. Seems Trump's last 2 scotus picks were bad choices.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72514297


there is no such thing as a national election. there are 50 different elections for 50 sovereign states.

its amazing you guys don't even try and understand. it also demonstrates that your ancestors did not build this system, for if they had, they'd explain to you what I just wrote.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


You're wrong. There are no SOVEREIGN states, and the US Supreme Court clearly has jurisdiction over Presidential elections.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78435947


State sovereignty ended with the War of Northern Aggression eliminating the Republics in favor of the Federal System.
 Quoting: Nawt Mah Presdint A.C.Denizen


Ever wonder why the Confederate leaders were never tried for treason? Because it would shown light on the violation of states rights by the U.S. government, which is unconstitutional.
Isis One

User ID: 76795039
United States
02/23/2021 12:54 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Unless they know tribunals trump, hehehe, SC.
Spread the word, change the collective conscious......
THERE IS MORE THAN ENOUGH OF EVERYTHING TO GO AROUND

When you are undisciplined, the universe is extremely forgiving and when you are disciplined, the universe is extremely generous. Me

One doesn't discover new lands without consenting to lose sight, for a very long time, of the shore. Andre Gide
[link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Victor KrugerModerator
Forum Administrator

02/23/2021 01:23 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The Supreme Court ruled 6-3...

hold the fuck up.. isnt this supposed to be a 3-6 court now? cOnSeRvAtIvE? fuck SCOTUS they are all in the pockets of the deep state.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 73220497


SC caved to the threats and bailed.

Did now want to be killed or family attacked, for Trump.

Tune in next year, we will see how they do.
 Quoting: mlabors


For Trump! No motherfucker, it's for the survival of the country they swore an oath to!

gtfo5
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 62278649


THIS!!

Liberals are too stupid to understand what's at stake
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77779205
United States
02/23/2021 05:23 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
The United States is done! Everybody better prepare for what’s to come!
Coastie Patriot  (OP)
GLP'er For life

User ID: 78824679
United States
02/23/2021 10:57 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
Totally explicable.

They're completely compromised, and are now nothing more than an invalid criminal/criminality-enabling dead and worthless 'institution'.
 Quoting: ScrumpTheTexan


of course they are scrump but he has to keep up the appearance that they arent
Coastie Patriot
SIC SEMPER TYRRANIS

THE SAME PEOPLE WHO SAID NO GUNS BECAUSE OF POLICE NOW WANT TO DEFUND THE POLICE!!!!

Dr Thaddeus They
They don't really care whether the truth gets out, because the public no longer knows what's meant by "the truth."

Well, I mean, no one can tell the difference anymore between what's real and what's fake.

Anyway, the point is, I can tell you all of this, right out in the open, because it doesn't matter who knows about it. They won't know whether to believe it or not.-
X Files: Lost art of Forehead Sweat

A gun is a tool, Marion, no better or no worse than any other tool, an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.
-SHANE-

Jefferson Smith: You see, boys forget what their country means by just reading The Land of the Free in history books. Then they get to be men they forget even more. Liberty's too precious a thing to be buried in books, Miss Saunders. Men should hold it up in front of them every single day of their lives and say: I'm free to think and to speak. My ancestors couldn't, I can, and my children will. Boys ought to grow up remembering that . - MR Smith Goes To Washington-

to grow up remembering th

My oath to support and defend the constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic has no expiration date!!!

Ten Bears : It's sad that governments are chiefed by the double tongues. There is iron in your words of death for all Comanche to see and so there is iron in your words of life. No signed paper can hold the iron. It must come from men. Outlaw Josey Wales
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78914005
United States
02/23/2021 11:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Justice Thomas: SCOTUS Refusal to Hear Pennsylvania Election Cases Is 'Inexplicable'
the Supreme Court of the US has no Jurisdiction in States elections.

Thomas IS an idiot. Others have said it, now I know its true.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22191327


SCOTUS is the ONLY court with original jurisdiction over disputes between the States.





GLP