Five counties to vote on leaving Oregon, joining Idaho | |
3643297 User ID: 76832232 ![]() 03/14/2021 10:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Shithead Tyrone Slothrop User ID: 65942580 ![]() 03/14/2021 10:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Tree of Life User ID: 35479936 ![]() 03/14/2021 11:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 64698495 ![]() 03/14/2021 11:21 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | [link to www.sgtreport.com (secure)] Quoting: Don Draper from Nantucket On May 18, the Oregon counties of Baker, Grant, Lake, Malheur and Sherman will hold a special election to decide if they want to try to part ways with the Beaver State and join next-door Idaho. Move Oregon’s Border, also known as Greater Idaho, confirmed that an initiative aiming to absorb most of Oregon’s land mass into Idaho received enough signatures to reach the special election ballot in the aforementioned counties, meaning voters will soon have the opportunity to make their voices heard. In Baker County, population 16,000, organizers secured 630 signatures, which was enough to get the initiative on the ballot there. Similar signature numbers were achieved in the other counties. Back in November, voters in two counties approved measures requiring county commissioners to hold meetings about relocating the state’s borders. The other two counties defeated the measure. “Oregon is a powder keg because counties that belong in a ‘red’ state like Idaho are ruled by Portlanders,” complained Mike McCarter, president of Move Oregon’s Border, in a statement. The city of Ontario in Malheur County, which borders southern Idaho, is unlikely to end up supporting the initiative because if Greater Idaho were to ever become a reality, it would have to shut down all of its thriving cannabis businesses to comply with Idaho prohibition. In January alone, Ontario brought in $9.5 million in cannabis sales. Ontario, by the way, supplies cannabis to the greater Boise area, as all forms of the healing plant remain fully and totally illegal in Idaho. Ontario, population 11,080, now has more than half a dozen cannabis shops that are thriving due to all of the Idahoans who drive there to purchase goods. Right across the river from Ontario on the Idaho side is a town called Fruitland that has been struggling for years to pay for desperately needed infrastructure. Because Idaho tends to be very resistant to change, there is simply no money to be had in Fruitland to keep things properly maintained. Idaho hold the line. Keep your prohibition. People are looking for some place safe to move to but have a complete disconnect that drugs take down our young adults and communities, they literaly change people. George Soros is a huge investor in the Medical Marijuana movement he know drugs suck the life blood out of people. Keep the drug laws loosey goosey in Colorado, Seattle, and Portland and California and enjoy your social experiment. I hope Idaho says no to Oregon you should have fought the drug laws when you had a chance but now you are profiting from them. You are not invited. Just how I feel watching society decline. SAD but don't take me with you. ![]() |
Pilgrim001 User ID: 78018011 ![]() 03/14/2021 01:36 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
PatrikC325 User ID: 74508821 ![]() 03/14/2021 01:42 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Terrebonne User ID: 80131439 ![]() 03/14/2021 03:42 PM ![]() Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
ACME_MAN User ID: 24352866 ![]() 03/14/2021 04:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Has to be approved by the Congress. Unlikely to happen IMHO. Dedicated to the brave men who fought and laid down their lives on the beaches of Normandy and the plains of Europe . . . that their sacrifice was not in vain. [link to www.youtube.com (secure)] |
Gelatinous Mass User ID: 79735739 ![]() 03/14/2021 04:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Correction... WON'T happen. The move will result in changes to the makeup of the House of Representatives. Seats shifting, potentially a few more added, etc.. Then there are the federal and state-owned assets / infrastructure in the areas leaving. How will this change budgets, federal resource allocations, etc.. What about maintenance of roads and other newly acquired infrastructure? In summary, while the concept might look good in a 2-3 paragraph description in a mailer, or make for a fun thought experiment in a discussion panel, when you get into the nuts and bolts of such a move, it is a massive clusterfuck of problems. Ain't gonna happen. |
NotStarvingActress User ID: 79669555 ![]() 03/14/2021 04:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |