Job Sends Letter To All Employee's Must Be Vaccinated by May 15 (update)

Here's something to consider. Do you think many of these jobs requiring it have a plan if many of their employees decide to say no? Will they simply just replace them? If that's the plan then that tells you you are easily replaceable.

Then guess what. You only get one life. And one lifetime which you cannot replace. Is it worth it to just hand it over to a job that can just replace you with another worker just like that?

the differences between RRR (Relative Risk Reduction) and ARR (Absolute Risk Reduction). FDA guidelines for communicating evidence based risks and benefits to the public “Provide absolute risks, not just relative risks. Patients are unduly influenced when risk information is presented using a relative risk approach: this can result in supoptimal decisions. This an absolute risk format should be used”. ...
Did any of the vaccine trials release ARR? No. Omitting absolute risk reduction findings in reports of vaccine efficacy is an example of outcome reporting bias, which ignores unfavourable outcomes and misleads the public’s impression and scientific understanding of a treatments efficacy and benefits.
Pfizer reported RRR efficacy? 95%. Pfizer ARR? 0.7%.
Moderna efficacy? 94%.ARR? 1.1%

ARR of 1% examples: two groups of 100 people.
3 people in vaccinated group become infected (=3% or 3/100).
4 people in unvaccinated group become infected (=4% or 4/100).
The ARR is 1% (4%-3%).

Ow we should all know why they only reported the RRR of 95% efficacy...

Religious exemption or medical exemption.
All you need is a doctors note to get the medical exemption. If you suffer from allergies (example) or any other medical condition that puts you at risk for immune compromise, then you are eligible for the exemption in nearly all states, as I understand. Some states are more detailed, some aren't...

Make her say this:

"I will not get the vaccine - you will have to fire me. According to US law, no one can be discriminated, for not taking a vaccine. This is a law firm so I'm pretty sure you know this already".


Voila

Requiring any person to get an experimental shot, let alone an approved one, when the jab’s Absolute Risk Reduction is maximum 1% is INSANE.

Would you knowingly go out and take it knowing that the difference in the unvaccinated group and vaccinated group is 1%??????? Hell no

Know WHY they don’t report the absolute risk reduction rate!

Class Action Lawsuit under the Nuremberg Laws. It's that easy...

The vaccine is not FDA approved, she has legal standing, tell her to wait.

Also, ask your insurance company if they cover experimental gene therapy foul ups.

Lawyers are notorious for breaking the law and daring people to sue them. They are just horrible, horrible people.

And wear a recording device after she refuses the vax. As long as you are not recording confidential information then, then your convo is public domain. Most states, recording conversations is acceptable as long as 1 person knows and there are no laws prohibiting the use of a recording device. I beat a corrupt doctor in court this way and proved his corruption. Just sayin... check your state for legality

Y'all do realize that common GI issues like frequent heartburn, indigestion, GERDS, etc automatically make you Immune Compromised, right? If you take any meds for relief of those symptoms then your immune system is not fully functional. So, basically 60% of the US is already Medically Exempt and don't even realize it!

Didn't you see the Congressional hearings that showed how everyone that signed up for The Affordable Care Act gave away their HIPPA rights. After you signed it a hidden paragraph shows up stating that.

Sue them. Let them see how it feels for once.

No one, pretty much, reads the fine print.

Don't be surprised to see more workplace mass shootings and executions of bosses as they go for broke...

Lawyer up. You are on your way to wealthy retirement.

Yes what Xeven stated.

Fauci's is also one of many piece of shit soulless beast of the earth J** with Obama, and my Lord have an aeon anus horibilis jobs for these piece of shit angel of perditions.

Because, although they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened:

Professing to be wise, they became fools.

And changed the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles.

Because of this, God gave them up in the lusts of their heart, unto uncleanness: to dishonor their own bodies between themselves:

They changed the truth of God into a lie, and worshiped and served the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.

For their shameful. For their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural, which is unnatural.

Likewise also the men, giving up natural intercourse with women, were consumed with passion for one another, men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves the penalty of their error.

He does not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do those things which are not;

Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity, they are gossips,

back-biters, hateful to God, insolent, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, ungrateful,

foolish, without natural affection, implacable, unmerciful. - Romans 1:21-31 Vulgate Bible

[imgur] [link to i.imgur.com (secure)]
[imgur] [link to i.imgur.com (secure)]

He who knowing the righteous judgment of God, did not understand that they who do such things are worthy of death, they not only continue to do these very things, but they also that consent to them that do them. - Romans 1:32 Vulgate Bible

[imgur] [link to imgur.com (secure)]

Thread: So You Wanted To Know Who The Son Of Perdition Is? (Page 7)

Y y

THIS IS WHAT SHE DOES IN RESPONSE:
Tell them in professional but stern voice, she declines the ultimatum and it is against multiple Federal Laws to be pressured as citizen and employee to undergo a voluntary Experimental Injection that is NOT FDA APPROVED, it is only given EUA (Emergency Use Authorized) for temporary time period via FDA. It is completely voluntary and can not by Law be mandated by anyone, not even Military are required to take it.

Your daughter will have to inform them if purse this pressuring and threat of job loss will 100% result in Civil Rights complaint & investigation by US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Followed by potential Civil Lawsuit if retaliation or firing occurs because of asserting her employee and civil rights. As well as, she will report company to U.S. Department of Labor-OSHA for Unsafe Workplace. *I provided links to both below*

This Civll Rights Federal Law below is for every citizen (including students, employees, freelance, disabled, elderly, child)

Federal law 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3(e)(1)(A)(ii)(III) requires that the person to whom an EUA vaccine is administered be advised, ‘of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.’”

Under the Nuremberg Code, no one may be coerced to participate in a medical experiment. Consent of the individual is absolutely essential.

[link to www.osha.gov (secure)]
[link to www.eeoc.gov (secure)]
[link to childrenshealthdefense.org (secure)]

I'd be retaining an attorney! You can't make an employee take an experimental pharmaceutical!


This makes the employer responsible for any & all damages!

Plus, I'd quit. Who wants to work with an employer like this? Not me, not worth it! They are idiots!

Say no.

US is not subject to the Nuremberg code btw. They didn't sign on to be subjected to it.

1: She should tell them shes quitting if they are forcing this

2: She's suing them for voilating the 1996 Hippa law.

Your Rights Under HIPAA

This guidance remains in effect only to the extent that it is consistent with the court’s order in Ciox Health, LLC v. Azar, No. 18-cv-0040 (D.D.C. January 23, 2020), which may be found at [link to ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov (secure)] More information about the order is available at [link to www.hhs.gov (secure)] Any provision within this guidance that has been vacated by the Ciox Health decision is rescinded.
[link to www.hhs.gov (secure)]
Most of us believe that our medical and other health information is private and should be protected, and we want to know who has this information. The Privacy Rule, a Federal law, gives you rights over your health information and sets rules and limits on who can look at and receive your health information. The Privacy Rule applies to all forms of individuals' protected health information, whether electronic, written, or oral. The Security Rule is a Federal law that requires security for health information in electronic form.



Tell them to go pound sand.

HIPAA can become an issue if healthcare employers require proof that employees have received a COVID-19 vaccine, says Abbye Alexander, JD, partner with Kaufman Dolowich Voluck in Orlando.

Under HIPAA, immunization records are protected health information, Alexander notes. Therefore, whether an employee has received a COVID-19 vaccine may be disclosed only by a healthcare provider

(((if the employee has furnished the provider with their written authorization.)))

[link to www.reliasmedia.com (secure)]

Fuck them all lololol

Never submit to a death injection.

You will comply. Resistance is futile.

All companies will be forcing and enforcing vaccinations.

You are not strong enough to resist.