SpaceX CREW-2 Launches Friday Morning At 5:49 Eastern

Don't need to. I saw it myself. Keep telling yourself that I didn't.

You saw a rocket launch from a pad, that's all.
You have absolutely no evidence of where it went or where it is now, or if people were actually on it or not.

Nope. I saw the astronauts boarding it.

Also wrong.

Also wrong. In fact I may even film it later this weekend.

It's like you didn't read what you were responding to. I literally watched the astronauts boarding the rocket through my telescope. I have a few hundred gigabytes of raw video covering the entire process, they never left the rocket, they launched with it.

Last Edited by Astromut on 04/23/2021 02:01 PM

You guys are assholes and idiots.

That's exactly how I feel about some of you here

An intimate interview with Scott Kelly:

[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

A few months ago, Scott Kelly, American astronaut, gave an interview to an "irrelevant" journalist.

Although it has not been publicized, the intelligent depth of the answers, despite the understandable limitations to tell "everything he knows", is a testimony of remarkable value.

In a scant 28 minutes, Scott Kelly says more than he keeps quiet, and, keeps quiet more than he says.

I have only one phrase to describe this superlative human being: what a true moral example you are!

Greetings.

Laio

.

So what's your fucking deal? Did mommy not breast feed you enough?
Fucking attention seeking whore.

rockets cant reverse land vertically
at most all you're seeing is an empty rocket take off
Once over the horizon it crashes into the sea
the rest is CGI
why is it that every space x footage always has a big edit right in the middle--then they always cut-away to the control room or some reporter
why not show the whole flight uninterrupted--with drones & on-board cameras

Just ignore that person ... they are just Yanking The Chain so as to get responses.

NOBODY is really that dumb who is capable of posting here. (yes there are some people that dumb, but they tend to be so dumb that they can't post on the internet let alone make any sort of coherent post)

Wrong.


Completely false. I watched the astronauts board the vehicle, I've watched Falcon 9 and Falcon Heavy rockets launch, flip around, come back and land vertically.

Uninterrupted:

Scott Kelly has been on several missions, living on the ISS, for hundreds of days, with people from all the space agencies.

The few comments he has made about living with his Russian colleagues have always been discreet and protocol. The "good feeling" is the first requirement to be on the ISS: Scott Kelly has not had any bad feelings with a Russian cosmonaut; however, he has been aware that he could hear the shouting of two Russian guys who could not stand each other. So, in order for there to be harmony, when Kelly was there, he had to learn how to deal with people.

In all the interviews, Scott Kelly mentions Genady Padalka as the cosmonaut who has been in space the longest, and nothing else. A, Kornienko, as his brother from another mother. why?

Padalka was uploaded to the ISS, in order to have a professional, with unimpeachable experience, and, not, a bungler: USA has 100 astronauts ready to meet expectations; Russia, is content, with using 20 cosmonauts of the new generation.

This new generation of Russian cosmonauts will have to learn from Novitsky, Skripochka, Shkaplerov, Ivanishin. They are the remaining masters.

Of course, there will never be a cosmonaut missing: a guy who has not yet understood that speaking fluent English is a benefit for mother Russia. However, it is pathetic to hear a cosmonaut who does not know how to speak fluent English. Because, I assure you, there are enough professionals, who hear, everything you babble.

So, as Padalka says, to have something to do in space, you have to stop being an idiot, who gets paid 3 times more per year than the NASA manager. Because, the director of Roscosmos, and this is not propaganda, earns 3 times more than the director of NASA, who earns about 130000 dollars a year. Rogozdin is earning, about 340000 dollars a year, for, continuing, to, do, nothing.

Yes, we see them board the rocket, but notice only the top half of the walkway is open. What you don’t see is them slither back off like the snakes they are before launch. Nobody is on those rockets. The Challenger crew is alive and well. I don’t deny they launch shit into the air, but nothing goes to what they’ve convinced you space is.

What amount of failed pseudo humans.

Learn something and be humble before going to the other side.

It's not like they spin the tires in reverse.

Gravity brings them down. They just use less thrust then takeoff to prevent from crashing.

they aren’t planning on space travel at all. They have no need. They have everything they need right here – except immortality, of course. But all the hype about space travel is just marketing to siphon and steal more money. They have no plans for that – and they can’t do it anyway, because if they could then they already would be. They have all the financial resources it could possibly take, since they have ALL of them. They have all the materials, all the tech it would require…

…and yet, they cannot. They do not. We have no evidence that they have or will, and reams, nay mountains of evidence against this.

They COULD travel to Mars or Venus, but there’s absolutely zero reason to do so and you can’t survive on either of them, so the best you can hope for is an orbital station to sustain life. Maybe hollow out Phobos or Deimos and live inside – with almost no gravity.

It is vastly, vastly more profitable to TELL people you want to go to space and take their money to support a never-ending, fruitless cause. There’s no financial incentive to every go to another planet. None at all. It would only be vanity really, which I’m all about in this case and of course would jump at the chance to engineer something that COULD work, but there’s no food in space and no materials we need and no wealth at all. And on top of that, they still can’t build a single-stage-to-orbit or a spaceplane or anything else worth building, which is why they only give us CGI anymore. It’s way more profitable since it’s only pixels being manufactured, not results.

Do you think all the 1000s of satellite s orbiting earth are fake? If you believe they are real then how do they launch them? With slingshots?

Wrong. I would have seen them the moment they crawled off the access arm. The pad level is open air and I could see them all the way to the elevators.

You obviously can't read very well. Re read and show where satellites were mentioned. Although, I do have satellite radios in my vehicles and the signals are disrupted in the exact same locations on my daily commute. That is not possible, unless the satellites are in the exact same location.........

I take issue with you saying it is all CGI anymore. Because the same rockets taking satellite s to space are the same rockets taking people to space. It is not CGI. What is a spaceplane? There is not enough air in space for a plane. What's the point. They are all just rockets. Rockets fight weight. The less weight the less fuel needed. Why use a single stage rocket and waste more fuel? As for food and resources there are lots of resources. Mine asteroids and ship the products home. As for people truly living in space I think that is a long way away. Robotics and mining is the way to go but if Elon wants to live on Mars let him try. They are advancing the way for the rest of us even if we do not want to go to space.


As for satellites being in the same spot, have you heard about geostationary satellites? From your perspective they are mostly stationary.

Last Edited by Achduke7 on 04/24/2021 10:13 AM