An easy example of how absolute risk reduction rates should be always communicated:
Your absolute risk of dying from Ebola in the USA is so minuscule that it’s practically nil, 0%.
But big pharma can come along with its new Ebola vaccine and claim that’s its 95% effective against dying from Ebola.

The population that can no longer reason does not stop to ever consider that without that vaccine their risk of dying from Ebola is all but 0%. In other words, the absolute risk reduction to themselves by taking the vaccine is practically 0% as well, the benefit to themselves NOT BEING WORTH TAKING THE POTENTIAL HEALTH ADVERSE EFFECTS OF TAKING THE JAB.

This is important to remember when the gov and its media keep telling us that the benefits of taking the covid shots outweigh the risks?

Do they really?

Pfizer reported RRR efficacy? 95%.
Pfizer ARR? 0.7%.
Moderna efficacy? 94%.
Pfizer ARR? 1.1%

The red is the absolute risk reduction in developing symptomatic covid that the trial participants experienced? Is that low risk reduction worth it?