CHAUVIN Juror Went to BLM RALLY and WORE this SHIRT "GET YOUR KNEE OFF OUR NECKS"

It is looking increasing likely and absolutely not. Maybe he committed a crime, maybe assault or manslaughter, but it was 50:50 (at best) whether Floyd died of asphyxiation or heart attack, nothing compelling to suggest he suffocated to death besides his words of "I can't breathe" which he began uttering BEFORE he was 'positionally asphyxiated' (he also adapted it from "I can't choke" as an excuse for claustrophobia, and continued complaining he was claustrophobic while being 'cruelly' pinned to the ground). Once you remove that from the equation, there is no compelling reason to favor asphyxiation over heart attack, and reasonable doubt should have been awarded to Chauvin, but the jurors came with a preplanned motive as evidence by their desire (according to this juror) to end deliberations 20 minutes in.

Wouldn't surprise me if there were more perjurers on that jury protected from online researchers by their anonymity, undoubtedly cleansing their social media as we speak.

The more important question is how can he get a fair trial the second time around. He can't. The world has now heard his excuse. The media has declared him guilty. They have twisted polls to say the majority support the verdict (the first poll amassed those who chose he was guilty of murder with those who chose he was guilty of 'negligence' into the one category to claim the public vastly supported the verdict of guilty of murder and manslaughter, the poll actually showed more than half thought he was guilty of manslaughter or less. Since then more polls have come out without an exploration of the question of what people felt he was guilty of, so that may be deception, or it may be evidence that they are swaying the public with their initial deception). Chances of a fair trial NOW are reduced compared with before, IMO.

Last Edited by GooPile on 05/04/2021 10:10 AM

Have read some arguments from the left that it was near unanimous, his vote doesn't matter much anyway and should not constitute grounds for dismissing the verdict. But this juror is also on the record as having swayed the 1 hold out. LOL, whoops. That's 2 jurors who could have returned a different result, and who knows how many more frauds there were among the remaining 10.

Brandon Mitchell was one of 12 jurors who convicted Minneapolis cop Derek Chauvin of the second-degree murder of George Floyd last month

Mitchell, a 31-year-old black man, was photographed on social media attending an August 28 protest in Washington, DC at which Floyd's relatives spoke

Mitchell is seen in the photograph wearing a t-shirt with a picture of Martin Luther King Jr and the words 'GET YOUR KNEE OFF OUR NECKS' and 'BLM'

He is also wearing a baseball cap embossed with Black Lives Matter

Mitchell acknowledged being at the event and that his uncle posted the photo, but claims he doesn't recall wearing or owning the shirt or cap

Mitchell said he answered 'no' to two questions about demonstrations on the questionnaire sent out before jury selection

Legal experts say the revelation will likely be brought up on appeal by Chauvin's attorney, Eric Nelson, who will argue his client was denied impartial jury

https://imgur.com/a/lnS9c8Z

Mitchell, 31, acknowledged being at the event and that his uncle posted the photo, but said he doesn't recall wearing or owning the shirt.

Mitchell was one of 12 jurors who convicted Chauvin of second- and third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter.

Mitchell, the first juror to go public, spoke to several media outlets last week..

[link to www.dailymail.co.uk (secure)]

Its crazy that these people were not investigated to be on that jury.

Talk about prejudgement or what?

If they have absolute proof, then surely no one can deny, that he was not giving a fair trial.

Let's hope the BLM Juror swore under penalty of perjury that he didn't attend the BLM riot that he DID attend.

PERJURY?

I don't believe the man got a fair trial at all. He certainly should not have received Murder in this trial.

I feel black people are far too bias at this point to be on a white mans Jury.

A fair trial? That wasn't going to happen. The black jurors had probably already decided before the trial started that he was guilty, and it took 9 hours of deliberations to convince the cowardly White jurors to convict.

I could see Chauvin being guilty of manslaughter. He stayed kneeling on top of Floyd even after the guy had passed out and was unresponsive.

The trial was an example of Jury Nullification. Granted, they weren't exonerating someone but it was clearly the People flexing their powers given by the state.

All of you bootlickers crying about this are part of the problem. The few of you might want the current police state to continue for whatever reason, but it is very obvious the rest of us are ready for change.

Nope, they won't overturn anything they don't want the animals to riot

No and yes.

So what if he liked?

Black Lies don't Matter.

I'm white, and I decided well before the trial that Chauvin was guilty of murder after watching the video. I really didn't need someone like Dr. Tobin to explain to me that he died as a result of the knee on neck, although the description itself was brutal in its vivid descrption of Floyd's agonizing last moments and added clarity to why Floyd did what he did as he lay dying.

Race is irrelevant.

He shouldn't been on the Jury... The shirt and hat over rules his being equal... He was a ringer, and the lawyers didn't do there jobs weeding him out.

Verdict has reason to be Overturned in time.

If it had been a BLM rioter kneeing on a white person's neck until they died, you'd all be screaming bloody murder at the top of your lungs.

Admit it.

And he didn't disclose this during jury selection...what an asshole...arrest this guy for jury fraud and put him in a jail cell

Was the white person a criminal or not?

It matters because us white people wash our hands of white criminals, not turn them into martyrs.

All the complaints about black jurors are hilarious. Black people have been complaining since the inception of this country that they can't get a fair trial because of all WHITE juries, and now you're pissed off because the jury basically reflected the actual racial composition of the locality in which the crime was committed?

Lol. Gonna be a rough next century for ya.

Wrong, Floyd committed suicide and Floyd's passenger that took the 5th assisted in his suicide.

What difference does it make if he's a criminal or not? So if you're a "criminal," that makes you fair game to be murdered?

I'm thinking trial = psy op and this is just various bits of gaslighting to rub it in the faces of people actually concerned with the abject decay of society.

Lol not even the defense counsel came up with crazy shit like that.

:ohlook:

Jesus fuck it's been a year now. One thug killed another thug. Let it go.

More than fair. If he had gotten what he deserved he'd have gotten the death penalty.

One juror cant convict him, and this juror admitted before the trial he had a favorable opinion of BLM.

3 of them admitted they did. If you had automatically excluded anyone that did it would have been racially profiling the fucking jury basically

Not without proof his actions killed him, because that's the law. I don't convict on wishful thinking. The prosectuions experts opined based largely on discredited claims of "I can't breathe" (discredited because he was saying it long before Chauvin had his knee on him). They didn't provide proof. The defenses expert opined based on some proof (heart disease, including clogged arteries, and the effect of drugs which may all contributed to a cumalative effect).

But one black officer did kill someone. He killed a 35 year old unarmed woman with a gun. Without warning. With police in the back. The gun was responsible for her death. The officer: not even named. No BLM people fighting for her rights. No mass protests by white people across the country, including looting and burning. A bullet killed her, unquestionably. You have convicted a man on a theory to as much as 40 years in prison.

He lied on his questionnaire, as well as his jury Prosecutor/Defender jury interview before selection, absolutely a tainted juror.

They did try to say carbon monoxide killed him

I never got their strategy, wasn't it Chauvin holding down his face a foot away from the exhaust pipe?

Are they claiming Chauvin gassed him humanely?