| Users Online Now: 1,863 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 58,619 | |
| Pageviews Today: 77,138 | Threads Today: 24 | Posts Today: 306 |
| 12:35 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,863 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 58,619 | |
| Pageviews Today: 77,138 | Threads Today: 24 | Posts Today: 306 |
| 12:35 AM | ||
Your easily debunked lies discredit the entire vaccine resistance | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 76353454  United States06/11/2021 02:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lie #1: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 Covid-19 vaccines skipped animal trials Lie #2: Covid-19 vaccine killed the animals it was tested on Lie #3: Covid-19 vaccines alter your DNA Lie #4: Covid-19 vaccines make the subject magnetic Lie #5 The SM-102 lipid is hazardous 1. Didn't skip but seriously cut short. 2. Straw man. The MRNA vaccine technology didn't kill the animals but animals tested with MRNA vaccines died due to antibody enhancement. The vaccines created an immune response but upon further challenges to the disease, the animals died. They would not have if they didn't have the vaccine so it can be argued the vax killed them. It's much too early to know whether the covid vaccines produce complete immunity or not. 3. MRNA therapies can indeed alter your DNA. Scientists are currently working on various gene therapies based on this very principle. 4. In not sure what's going on with number 4 but where is you evidence that it's a lie? Seriously data to refute your baseless assertions that these are lies can be found with a simple google search. You made an assertion that these are lies so the onus is on you to prove as such. You used a quote saying you can't prove a negative but you made a provable claim (e.g. that these are lies ) so you must prove them as such. 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80386546 United States06/11/2021 02:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lie #1: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 Covid-19 vaccines skipped animal trials Lie #2: Covid-19 vaccine killed the animals it was tested on Lie #3: Covid-19 vaccines alter your DNA Lie #4: Covid-19 vaccines make the subject magnetic Lie #5 The SM-102 lipid is hazardous 1. Didn't skip but seriously cut short. 2. Straw man. The MRNA vaccine technology didn't kill the animals but animals tested with MRNA vaccines died due to antibody enhancement. The vaccines created an immune response but upon further challenges to the disease, the animals died. They would not have if they didn't have the vaccine so it can be argued the vax killed them. It's much too early to know whether the covid vaccines produce complete immunity or not. 3. MRNA therapies can indeed alter your DNA. Scientists are currently working on various gene therapies based on this very principle. 4. In not sure what's going on with number 4 but where is you evidence that it's a lie? Seriously data to refute your baseless assertions that these are lies can be found with a simple google search. You made an assertion that these are lies so the onus is on you to prove as such. You used a quote saying you can't prove a negative but you made a provable claim (e.g. that these are lies ) so you must prove them as such. 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Also notice how OP again tried to have it both ways saying that the mRNA vaxxine doesn’t alter the patient’s DNA because that would require an enzyme that he says has no proof is in the vax and then when you provide him with proof that SM-102 is a component of Luciferase which is an enzyme designed to alter your DNA! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80386546 United States06/11/2021 02:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76353454 1. Didn't skip but seriously cut short. 2. Straw man. The MRNA vaccine technology didn't kill the animals but animals tested with MRNA vaccines died due to antibody enhancement. The vaccines created an immune response but upon further challenges to the disease, the animals died. They would not have if they didn't have the vaccine so it can be argued the vax killed them. It's much too early to know whether the covid vaccines produce complete immunity or not. 3. MRNA therapies can indeed alter your DNA. Scientists are currently working on various gene therapies based on this very principle. 4. In not sure what's going on with number 4 but where is you evidence that it's a lie? Seriously data to refute your baseless assertions that these are lies can be found with a simple google search. You made an assertion that these are lies so the onus is on you to prove as such. You used a quote saying you can't prove a negative but you made a provable claim (e.g. that these are lies ) so you must prove them as such. 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Also notice how OP again tried to have it both ways saying that the mRNA vaxxine doesn’t alter the patient’s DNA because that would require an enzyme that he says has no proof is in the vax and then ignores when you provide him with proof that SM-102 is a component of Luciferase which is an enzyme designed to alter your DNA! |
Doctor Manhattan  User ID: 76885081 United States06/11/2021 02:54 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lie #1: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 Covid-19 vaccines skipped animal trials Lie #2: Covid-19 vaccine killed the animals it was tested on Lie #3: Covid-19 vaccines alter your DNA Lie #4: Covid-19 vaccines make the subject magnetic Lie #5 The SM-102 lipid is hazardous [link to www.caymanchem.com (secure)] Plain english directly from the manufacturer of the substance SM-102 Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure. You go with what you know vs belief, they tell you its good for you, believe us (don't look)...or research the chemical yourself...since you won't I did it for you. You'll still go with belief though, truth is foreign to you even though you understand english, just no ability (discernment) to connect the dots...your thoughts, beliefs are not your own. Keep shilling for Satan, you are doing his works by being BELIEF driven by the false narratives. Last Edited by The Holy Spirit on 06/11/2021 03:03 PM |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80386546 United States06/11/2021 03:02 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lie #1: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 Covid-19 vaccines skipped animal trials Lie #2: Covid-19 vaccine killed the animals it was tested on Lie #3: Covid-19 vaccines alter your DNA Lie #4: Covid-19 vaccines make the subject magnetic Lie #5 The SM-102 lipid is hazardous [link to www.caymanchem.com (secure)] Plain english directly from the manufacturer of the substance SM-102 Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure. You go with what you know vs belief, they tell you its good for you, believe us (don't look)...or research the chemical yourself...since you won't I did it for you. You'll still go with belief though, truth is foreign to you even though you understand english, just no comprehension. Keep shilling for Satan, you are doing his works by being BELIEF driven by the false narratives.  |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77928879 United States06/11/2021 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The CDC is a criminal scam operation of the globalist elite, to manipulate you 'tards. [link to conservativeplaylist.com (secure)] -over 100 million Americans have been “vaccinated” against COVID-19 Maximize New Cases with one standard, measure Vaccine effectiveness with a higher standard. -a Positive 40 Cycle PCR test = New COVID case -a Positive 40 Cycle PCR test != New COVID case if you have been vaccinated. The test must be 28 cycles or less for vaccinated people. -a Positive test = New COVID case, this includes asymptomatic cases (85% of all positive tests). - if you have been vaccinated, only a hospitalization or death is accepted as a vaccine failure. -using a CT above 35 was known to create a false positive rate of 97% Other countries are also manipulating data to boost COVID-19 vaccine efficacy and hide breakthrough cases. In the U.K., COVID-19 will only be listed as the cause of death if the patient actually died from an active case of COVID-19 and nothing else - In the Pre-Covid era, an 85 year old person who died of Pneumonia was listed as a Pneumonia death. - Post Covid era, if that person tested 'positive' with a 40 cycle PCR test, their cause of death 'Covid'. - If that person had been vaccinated, put a 28 cycle PCR test showed them Covid Positive, their cause of death would now be Pneumonia. The trick is in their reporting of what they call ‘breakthrough infections’ — that is people who are fully ‘vaccinated’ against SARS-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway. Essentially, COVID-19 has long been shown — to those willing to pay attention — to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors: 1.False-postive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value).2 2.Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of ‘Covid case,’ used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a ‘Covid19 case,’ even if they never experienced any symptoms. Had a CT of 28 been used all along, we would have had nowhere near the number of “cases” currently touted and the pandemic would have been declared over sometime in 2020. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80320576 United States06/11/2021 03:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lie #1: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 Covid-19 vaccines skipped animal trials Lie #2: Covid-19 vaccine killed the animals it was tested on Lie #3: Covid-19 vaccines alter your DNA Lie #4: Covid-19 vaccines make the subject magnetic Lie #5 The SM-102 lipid is hazardous 1. Didn't skip but seriously cut short. 2. Straw man. The MRNA vaccine technology didn't kill the animals but animals tested with MRNA vaccines died due to antibody enhancement. The vaccines created an immune response but upon further challenges to the disease, the animals died. They would not have if they didn't have the vaccine so it can be argued the vax killed them. It's much too early to know whether the covid vaccines produce complete immunity or not. 3. MRNA therapies can indeed alter your DNA. Scientists are currently working on various gene therapies based on this very principle. 4. In not sure what's going on with number 4 but where is you evidence that it's a lie? Seriously data to refute your baseless assertions that these are lies can be found with a simple google search. You made an assertion that these are lies so the onus is on you to prove as such. You used a quote saying you can't prove a negative but you made a provable claim (e.g. that these are lies ) so you must prove them as such. 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Can you provide links to actual proof that animals died upon reinfection? The full list of ingredients is available from each of the three manufacturers in the US. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80320576 United States06/11/2021 03:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76353454 1. Didn't skip but seriously cut short. 2. Straw man. The MRNA vaccine technology didn't kill the animals but animals tested with MRNA vaccines died due to antibody enhancement. The vaccines created an immune response but upon further challenges to the disease, the animals died. They would not have if they didn't have the vaccine so it can be argued the vax killed them. It's much too early to know whether the covid vaccines produce complete immunity or not. 3. MRNA therapies can indeed alter your DNA. Scientists are currently working on various gene therapies based on this very principle. 4. In not sure what's going on with number 4 but where is you evidence that it's a lie? Seriously data to refute your baseless assertions that these are lies can be found with a simple google search. You made an assertion that these are lies so the onus is on you to prove as such. You used a quote saying you can't prove a negative but you made a provable claim (e.g. that these are lies ) so you must prove them as such. 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Also notice how OP again tried to have it both ways saying that the mRNA vaxxine doesn’t alter the patient’s DNA because that would require an enzyme that he says has no proof is in the vax and then when you provide him with proof that SM-102 is a component of Luciferase which is an enzyme designed to alter your DNA! Reverse Transcriptase is the name of the enzyme that converts RNA sequences into DNA. Just like luciferase does not equal SM-102, luciferase does not equal RT. Two different enzymes. No proof that vaccines contain either. Luciferase does not modify dna. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80320576 United States06/11/2021 03:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lie #1: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 Covid-19 vaccines skipped animal trials Lie #2: Covid-19 vaccine killed the animals it was tested on Lie #3: Covid-19 vaccines alter your DNA Lie #4: Covid-19 vaccines make the subject magnetic Lie #5 The SM-102 lipid is hazardous [link to www.caymanchem.com (secure)] Plain english directly from the manufacturer of the substance SM-102 Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure. You go with what you know vs belief, they tell you its good for you, believe us (don't look)...or research the chemical yourself...since you won't I did it for you. You'll still go with belief though, truth is foreign to you even though you understand english, just no ability (discernment) to connect the dots...your thoughts, beliefs are not your own. Keep shilling for Satan, you are doing his works by being BELIEF driven by the false narratives. Those warnings are from a research only formulation that contain chloroform. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78914227 06/11/2021 03:37 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lie #1: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 Covid-19 vaccines skipped animal trials Lie #2: Covid-19 vaccine killed the animals it was tested on Lie #3: Covid-19 vaccines alter your DNA Lie #4: Covid-19 vaccines make the subject magnetic Lie #5 The SM-102 lipid is hazardous 1. Didn't skip but seriously cut short. 2. Straw man. The MRNA vaccine technology didn't kill the animals but animals tested with MRNA vaccines died due to antibody enhancement. The vaccines created an immune response but upon further challenges to the disease, the animals died. They would not have if they didn't have the vaccine so it can be argued the vax killed them. It's much too early to know whether the covid vaccines produce complete immunity or not. 3. MRNA therapies can indeed alter your DNA. Scientists are currently working on various gene therapies based on this very principle. 4. In not sure what's going on with number 4 but where is you evidence that it's a lie? Seriously data to refute your baseless assertions that these are lies can be found with a simple google search. You made an assertion that these are lies so the onus is on you to prove as such. You used a quote saying you can't prove a negative but you made a provable claim (e.g. that these are lies ) so you must prove them as such. 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Thank you! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75832246  South Africa06/11/2021 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78914227 06/11/2021 03:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76353454 1. Didn't skip but seriously cut short. 2. Straw man. The MRNA vaccine technology didn't kill the animals but animals tested with MRNA vaccines died due to antibody enhancement. The vaccines created an immune response but upon further challenges to the disease, the animals died. They would not have if they didn't have the vaccine so it can be argued the vax killed them. It's much too early to know whether the covid vaccines produce complete immunity or not. 3. MRNA therapies can indeed alter your DNA. Scientists are currently working on various gene therapies based on this very principle. 4. In not sure what's going on with number 4 but where is you evidence that it's a lie? Seriously data to refute your baseless assertions that these are lies can be found with a simple google search. You made an assertion that these are lies so the onus is on you to prove as such. You used a quote saying you can't prove a negative but you made a provable claim (e.g. that these are lies ) so you must prove them as such. 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Can you provide links to actual proof that animals died upon reinfection? The full list of ingredients is available from each of the three manufacturers in the US. Can you provide the ingredient list from the manufacture? Lol If you haven’t seen the list of ingredients, do you actually have any credibility to argue on the safety? Let me get this right, you’re arguing points about the experimental drug and you don’t even have a list of ingredients in the experimental drugs? What the actual fuck? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79983077 United States06/11/2021 03:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even when the world's top virologist who is a Nobel peace orze laureate tells you it is poison you still believe the MSM propaganda, wow Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45377146  Where is your response here OP? You have responded to many posts, why not this one?  Link to Luc Montagniers statement that the vaccine is a substance that is capable of causing the illness or death of a living organism when introduced or absorbed(poison)? Of course OP will call BS on everything anyone posts otherwise they'd have to admit what a fool they are for getting the jab! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78914227 06/11/2021 03:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 78914227 06/11/2021 03:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Even when the world's top virologist who is a Nobel peace orze laureate tells you it is poison you still believe the MSM propaganda, wow Quoting: Anonymous Coward 45377146 Where is your response here OP? You have responded to many posts, why not this one? Link to Luc Montagniers statement that the vaccine is a substance that is capable of causing the illness or death of a living organism when introduced or absorbed(poison)? Of course OP will call BS on everything anyone posts otherwise they'd have to admit what a fool they are for getting the jab! You can actually tell OP is an agent with this statement. He is asking for proof that the vaccination company is liable, when we know the vaccine company has a special clause removing liability. It’s the same argument about Trump and the election fraud. Pure gaslighting. Evil by ever definition. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80320576 United States06/11/2021 03:46 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Can you provide links to actual proof that animals died upon reinfection? The full list of ingredients is available from each of the three manufacturers in the US. Can you provide the ingredient list from the manufacture? Lol If you haven’t seen the list of ingredients, do you actually have any credibility to argue on the safety? Let me get this right, you’re arguing points about the experimental drug and you don’t even have a list of ingredients in the experimental drugs? What the actual fuck? Sure. Pfizer: [link to www.fda.gov (secure)] Moderna: [link to www.fda.gov (secure)] J&J: [link to www.fda.gov (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80154986 United States06/11/2021 03:47 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80386546 United States06/11/2021 04:09 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76353454 Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Can you provide links to actual proof that animals died upon reinfection? The full list of ingredients is available from each of the three manufacturers in the US. Can you provide the ingredient list from the manufacture? Lol If you haven’t seen the list of ingredients, do you actually have any credibility to argue on the safety? Let me get this right, you’re arguing points about the experimental drug and you don’t even have a list of ingredients in the experimental drugs? What the actual fuck? Sure. Pfizer: [link to www.fda.gov (secure)] Moderna: [link to www.fda.gov (secure)] J&J: [link to www.fda.gov (secure)] Now let’s see if you’re a bot or just a paid shill [link to www.labroots.com (secure)] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80223167 Liposomal particles are tiny bubble-like structures often consisting of phospholipids bilayers. Due to their biocompatibility, ability to entrap a variety of small and large molecules, and versatility to adopt a wide range of physicochemical and biological properties, liposomes are a popular carrier in biomedical science, capable of delivering anything from plasmid DNA for gene editing, to cytotoxic chemo-agents in cancer therapy. Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) can be produced by adding iron oxide to these lipid bubbles. They are not only a good contrast agent in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, but also a perfect vehicle to induce magnetic hyperthermia--a technique extensively used in oncology treatment. In a typical procedure, a colloid preparation made of nanoscale iron oxide compounds is injected directly to the vein that feed a tumor. The colloidal particles get heated up upon exposure to an alternating high-frequency magnetic field, which enables them to "bake" and eventually kill off cancerous tissues within the tumor. Thread: Scientists Developed Magnetic Nanoparticles that can Remotely Modulate Neural Circuits |
| prorectum User ID: 75218720 United States06/11/2021 04:14 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80386546 United States06/11/2021 04:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Also notice how OP again tried to have it both ways saying that the mRNA vaxxine doesn’t alter the patient’s DNA because that would require an enzyme that he says has no proof is in the vax and then when you provide him with proof that SM-102 is a component of Luciferase which is an enzyme designed to alter your DNA! Reverse Transcriptase is the name of the enzyme that converts RNA sequences into DNA. Just like luciferase does not equal SM-102, luciferase does not equal RT. Two different enzymes. No proof that vaccines contain either. Luciferase does not modify dna. Again you play more games to put words into my mouth when I have clearly stated and presented links with evidence that SM-102 is merely one component among many that encompass this entire biometric system that you still won’t even acknowledge so I will post them again as a means to highlight how you refuse to even touch it still dozens of comments later Thread: Exposing Harvard's Chinese Agent And Nanoscientist Charles Lieber's "Virus Transmitters" Thread: Dr. Charles Lieber Coronavirus 5G his own study 2015 Thread: DR. CHARLES LIEBER- BUSTED BY SWORN TESTIMONY- CREATOR OF COVID19 [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] “It’s not what they say that will tell you the truth, it’s what they all refuse to even touch, on both sides of the aisle, that reveals this scripted reality” |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80386546 United States06/11/2021 04:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76353454 Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Also notice how OP again tried to have it both ways saying that the mRNA vaxxine doesn’t alter the patient’s DNA because that would require an enzyme that he says has no proof is in the vax and then when you provide him with proof that SM-102 is a component of Luciferase which is an enzyme designed to alter your DNA! Reverse Transcriptase is the name of the enzyme that converts RNA sequences into DNA. Just like luciferase does not equal SM-102, luciferase does not equal RT. Two different enzymes. No proof that vaccines contain either. Luciferase does not modify dna. Again you play more games to put words into my mouth when I have clearly stated and presented links with evidence that SM-102 is merely one component among many that encompass this entire biometric system that you still won’t even acknowledge so I will post them again as a means to highlight how you refuse to even touch it still dozens of comments later Thread: Exposing Harvard's Chinese Agent And Nanoscientist Charles Lieber's "Virus Transmitters" Thread: Dr. Charles Lieber Coronavirus 5G his own study 2015 Thread: DR. CHARLES LIEBER- BUSTED BY SWORN TESTIMONY- CREATOR OF COVID19 [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] “It’s not what they say that will tell you the truth, it’s what they all refuse to even touch, on both sides of the aisle, that reveals this scripted reality” Again GLP watch how this shill will not touch any of this because his narrative was designed to steer away from these irrefutable facts that he is either too embarrassed to admit his ignorance or he knows exactly where I am going with this which is why he cited my own link that corroborates the testing regarding Luciferase and SM-102 to conflate that I am asserting that SM-102 is Luciferase when it is merely just one component [link to www.labroots.com (secure)] Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80223167 Liposomal particles are tiny bubble-like structures often consisting of phospholipids bilayers. Due to their biocompatibility, ability to entrap a variety of small and large molecules, and versatility to adopt a wide range of physicochemical and biological properties, liposomes are a popular carrier in biomedical science, capable of delivering anything from plasmid DNA for gene editing, to cytotoxic chemo-agents in cancer therapy. Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) can be produced by adding iron oxide to these lipid bubbles. They are not only a good contrast agent in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans, but also a perfect vehicle to induce magnetic hyperthermia--a technique extensively used in oncology treatment. In a typical procedure, a colloid preparation made of nanoscale iron oxide compounds is injected directly to the vein that feed a tumor. The colloidal particles get heated up upon exposure to an alternating high-frequency magnetic field, which enables them to "bake" and eventually kill off cancerous tissues within the tumor. Thread: Scientists Developed Magnetic Nanoparticles that can Remotely Modulate Neural Circuits |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 74950944 United States06/11/2021 04:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1574153 United States06/11/2021 05:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76353454 1. Didn't skip but seriously cut short. 2. Straw man. The MRNA vaccine technology didn't kill the animals but animals tested with MRNA vaccines died due to antibody enhancement. The vaccines created an immune response but upon further challenges to the disease, the animals died. They would not have if they didn't have the vaccine so it can be argued the vax killed them. It's much too early to know whether the covid vaccines produce complete immunity or not. 3. MRNA therapies can indeed alter your DNA. Scientists are currently working on various gene therapies based on this very principle. 4. In not sure what's going on with number 4 but where is you evidence that it's a lie? Seriously data to refute your baseless assertions that these are lies can be found with a simple google search. You made an assertion that these are lies so the onus is on you to prove as such. You used a quote saying you can't prove a negative but you made a provable claim (e.g. that these are lies ) so you must prove them as such. 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Can you provide links to actual proof that animals died upon reinfection? The full list of ingredients is available from each of the three manufacturers in the US. Here, how bout this one. [link to pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)] ADE/ERG is a real concern and the idea that animals haven't died when challenged after being innoculated with a hastily developed vaccine is not even taken up for debate. The question is, "did people lie about the covid-19 vaccine?" - your assertion. I still haven't seen any proof that people willfully told a falsehood ( and that is something you could definitely proof ) - burden of proof is on you since you said people are lying. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 1574153 United States06/11/2021 05:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76353454 Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Can you provide links to actual proof that animals died upon reinfection? The full list of ingredients is available from each of the three manufacturers in the US. Can you provide the ingredient list from the manufacture? Lol If you haven’t seen the list of ingredients, do you actually have any credibility to argue on the safety? Let me get this right, you’re arguing points about the experimental drug and you don’t even have a list of ingredients in the experimental drugs? What the actual fuck? Sure. Pfizer: [link to www.fda.gov (secure)] Moderna: [link to www.fda.gov (secure)] J&J: [link to www.fda.gov (secure)] LOL, THESE ARE THE SAME 7 PAGE DOCUMENTS THAT I TOLD YOU ABOUT! I WANT TO SEE THE PACKAGE INSERTS. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80386546 United States06/11/2021 05:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Notice GLP how OP doesn’t even want to touch the topic of GENE MODIFICATION which is what the first two letters of GMO stand for to which Trump wrote an executive order legalizing GMO for Bayer-Monsanto which ties back to Bill Gates as you will see in the links below that OP is still ignoring because they lead right back to the free government Trump vax which our government funded all 5 but OP doesn’t want you to focus on the others because then he would have to explain why a few require two shots! Thread: Exposing Harvard's Chinese Agent And Nanoscientist Charles Lieber's "Virus Transmitters" Thread: Dr. Charles Lieber Coronavirus 5G his own study 2015 Thread: DR. CHARLES LIEBER- BUSTED BY SWORN TESTIMONY- CREATOR OF COVID19 Thread: WTF! Bill Gates Depopulation Plans Caught On Camera MONSANTO, FOOD RIOTS, EUGENICS, VACCINES. Video Inside. (Page 5) From 2018 under the Trump Administration: Thread: BREAKING: US Justice Department Approves Merger Of German Pharmaceutical Giant Bayer And Monsanto [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] “It’s not what they say that will tell you the truth, it’s what they all refuse to even touch, on both sides of the aisle, that reveals this scripted reality” |
| Doctor Manhattan User ID: 80475127 United States06/11/2021 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lie #1: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 Covid-19 vaccines skipped animal trials Lie #2: Covid-19 vaccine killed the animals it was tested on Lie #3: Covid-19 vaccines alter your DNA Lie #4: Covid-19 vaccines make the subject magnetic Lie #5 The SM-102 lipid is hazardous [link to www.caymanchem.com (secure)] Plain english directly from the manufacturer of the substance SM-102 Causes damage to the central nervous system, the kidneys, the liver and the respiratory system through prolonged or repeated exposure. You go with what you know vs belief, they tell you its good for you, believe us (don't look)...or research the chemical yourself...since you won't I did it for you. You'll still go with belief though, truth is foreign to you even though you understand english, just no ability (discernment) to connect the dots...your thoughts, beliefs are not your own. Keep shilling for Satan, you are doing his works by being BELIEF driven by the false narratives. Those warnings are from a research only formulation that contain chloroform. Cognitive dissonance is your forte. |
| Anonymous Coward (OP) User ID: 80320576 United States06/11/2021 05:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 1) Correct. 2) That is a myth. There is no documented evidence of this anywhere. 3) It's possible only with an enzyme that there is no evidence of in any of the vaccines. 4) Fair enough. Nobody knows anything outside their own existence. I've done my due diligence have you? Obviously you didn't do your due diligence quite well enough. I literally pulled up dozens of studies showing that your answer to 2 is not correct. They may have used adenoviruses instead of a lipid shell to deliver them to the cell but the outcome was still the same. Death upon reinfection. It's not a myth and would suggest you look up sars 2003 ferret study outcomes. As for 3, you're correct that you need an enzyme, but to say it's a lie would be to say you know what's in the vaccines. Since they aren't sharing that information, how can you call that a lie? If anything it's an unprovable claim right now. Seriously go to cdc and pull down the 7 pages document of "ingredients" and you will find that it doesn't contain them. If you want lies then I'll give you some. 1. The vaccine is safe. Safe is defined as free from any harm. If the vaccine is safe then it can't have side effects that might cause harm. Since these all have possible side effects that could cause harm they can't be defined as safe. 2. The vaccine is better than naturally occurring immunity that comes from infection. There is absolutely no scientist proof to back up that claim. Actually new studies suggest the opposite to be true. Yet why are they mandating everyone get the shot? It's about control not about science. 3. The vaccine is effective. How do you know the shot you got had its intended effects? I've had plenty of experience of patients not sero-converting and being completely vulnerable to a disease that they were vaccinated against. Heck, my own daughter has never seroconverted to the chicken pox vaccine and she's completely vulnerable even though the paper she has from the state says she's safe. Can you provide links to actual proof that animals died upon reinfection? The full list of ingredients is available from each of the three manufacturers in the US. Here, how bout this one. [link to pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)] ADE/ERG is a real concern and the idea that animals haven't died when challenged after being innoculated with a hastily developed vaccine is not even taken up for debate. The question is, "did people lie about the covid-19 vaccine?" - your assertion. I still haven't seen any proof that people willfully told a falsehood ( and that is something you could definitely proof ) - burden of proof is on you since you said people are lying. Different virus, different vaccine technology. Are most of the people repeating incorrect information doing so with an intent to deceive? Probably not. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 75680893 United States06/11/2021 05:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Lie #1: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80320576 Covid-19 vaccines skipped animal trials Lie #2: Covid-19 vaccine killed the animals it was tested on Lie #3: Covid-19 vaccines alter your DNA Lie #4: Covid-19 vaccines make the subject magnetic Lie #5 The SM-102 lipid is hazardous We'll find out in a year....but I won't be a test pig for big pharma. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80386546 United States06/11/2021 05:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Notice GLP how OP doesn’t even want to touch the topic of GENE MODIFICATION which is what the first two letters of GMO stand for to which Trump wrote an executive order legalizing GMO for Bayer-Monsanto which ties back to Bill Gates as you will see in the links below that OP is still ignoring because they lead right back to the free government Trump vax which our government funded all 5 but OP doesn’t want you to focus on the others because then he would have to explain why a few require two shots! Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80386546 Thread: Exposing Harvard's Chinese Agent And Nanoscientist Charles Lieber's "Virus Transmitters" Thread: Dr. Charles Lieber Coronavirus 5G his own study 2015 Thread: DR. CHARLES LIEBER- BUSTED BY SWORN TESTIMONY- CREATOR OF COVID19 Thread: WTF! Bill Gates Depopulation Plans Caught On Camera MONSANTO, FOOD RIOTS, EUGENICS, VACCINES. Video Inside. (Page 5) From 2018 under the Trump Administration: Thread: BREAKING: US Justice Department Approves Merger Of German Pharmaceutical Giant Bayer And Monsanto [link to www.godlikeproductions.com] “It’s not what they say that will tell you the truth, it’s what they all refuse to even touch, on both sides of the aisle, that reveals this scripted reality” Nothing to see here folks, just move along now and get in line, bend over for your free government Trump vax! When was the last time the government gave away something for free especially before 9/11? Thread: Jeff Bezos hosted an extravagant after-party for a secret club whose members wear gold medals, and it was attended by Ivanka Trump and Bill Gates (Page 7) Thread: WTF! The CDC is on the payroll of Bill Gates, Bloomberg, FACEBOOK, Merck, Amazon, Bayer, Vaccine Makers, and more! Thread: Bill Gates Dodges Questions on Why He Owns 500,000 Shares of Monsanto Thread: Wikileaks Exposes Unholy Alliance of US Government Bill Gates and Monsanto Thread: Bill Gates, Monsanto, and eugenics: How one of the world's wealthiest men is actively promoting a corporate takeover of global agriculture Thread: Bill Gates, Monsanto, and Blackwater Thread: Erik Prince, Trump supporter and founder of Blackwater, jumped into the COVID-19 business with a deal to distribute an experimental vaccine Thread: Erik Prince ...BLACKWATER....Busted In Illegal Libya Gun-Running Scheme That Included 'Assassination For Hire' Thread: Colorado: CIA deploys Blackwater operative Gregg Smith to run against Lauren Boebert |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80143143 United States06/11/2021 05:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
