Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,183 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 911,229
Pageviews Today: 1,519,301Threads Today: 621Posts Today: 10,838
03:23 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

“The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study

 
USCG Popeye
Top Hat

User ID: 80529347
United States
06/25/2021 11:25 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
“The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
Here is the abstract:

Background: COVID-19 vaccines have had expedited reviews without sufficient safety data. We wanted to compare risks and benefits.

Method: We calculated the number needed to vaccinate (NNTV) from a large Israeli field study to prevent one death. We accessed the Adverse Drug Reactions (ADR) database of the European Medicines Agency and of the Dutch National Register (lareb.nl) to extract the number of cases reporting severe side effects and the number of cases with fatal side effects.

Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9,000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate. The number of cases experiencing adverse reactions has been reported to be 700 per 100,000 vaccinations. Currently, we see 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations, and the number of fatal side effects is at 4.11 per 100,000 vaccinations. For three deaths prevented by vaccination, we have to accept two inflicted by vaccination.

Conclusions: This lack of clear benefit should cause governments to rethink their vaccination policy.

The authors note this conclusion is based on the reported adverse reactions, whereas the true number of adverse reactions may be considerably more.

Finally, we note that from experience with reporting side effects from other drugs, only a small fraction of side effects is reported to adverse events databases. The median underreporting can be as high as 95%. Given this fact and the high number of serious side effects already reported, the current political trend to vaccinate children who are at very low risk of suffering from COVID-19 in the first place must be reconsidered.

They note that the “risks and benefits” of the vaccines are “on the same order of magnitude” and suggest: “Perhaps it might be necessary to dampen the enthusiasm by sober facts?”

The present assessment raises the question whether it would be necessary to rethink policies and use COVID-19 vaccines more sparingly and with some discretion only in those that are willing to accept the risk because they feel more at risk from the true infection than the mock infection. Perhaps it might be necessary to dampen the enthusiasm by sober facts? In our view, the EMA and national authorities should instigate a safety review into the safety database of COVID-19 vaccines and governments should carefully consider their policies in light of these data.

Ideally, independent scientists should carry out thorough case reviews of the very severe cases, so that there can be evidence-based recommendations on who is likely to benefit from a SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and who is in danger of suffering from side effects.

Currently, our estimates show that we have to accept four fatal and 16 serious side effects per 100,000 vaccinations in order to save the lives of 2–11 individuals per 100,000 vaccinations, placing risks and benefits on the same order of magnitude.

[link to lockdownsceptics.org (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79152287
United States
06/25/2021 11:28 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
bump
Kriegswichtiger Arbeiter

User ID: 73772085
Czechia
06/25/2021 11:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
Without accounting the nanobot-laced brians, early onset of Alzheimer's and that pesky hurdle of making through the next flu season w/o a meaningful immune system.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78935491
United States
06/25/2021 12:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]
They plan and just to genocide us!
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80518996
United States
06/25/2021 12:00 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
Actually those numbers are actually even more skewed to make the statistics more palatable for political consumption

More like 3 out of 5
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78044134
Mexico
06/25/2021 12:01 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
Ratio'ed
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78935491
United States
06/25/2021 12:12 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 80520205
United Kingdom
06/25/2021 12:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9,000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate

=200 to 700 people must get jabbed with zero benefit to themselves to benefit one person from getting infected

= 9000 to 50000 people must get jabbed (mean 16000) with zero benefit to themselves in order to save one life from covid

The hoodwinking of big pharma.
Doctor Manhattan

User ID: 80475127
United States
06/25/2021 12:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
And if you take no vaccines, you'll be just fine.

Taking a vaccine, a literal poison is like eating a tide pod and wondering why you're severely sick...don't eat the tide pod you'll be fine.

Vaccine = severe, lifetime impairment (if not death) once given enough doses, or if you're already immune compromised from other diseases...survived ciggarette addiction but have COPD? take a vaccine it will finish of the remainder of your lungs...etc

No vaccine = healthy

You don't need to take anything for an invisible imaginary virus called COVID, a relabeled flu.

Like the word conspiracy theorist being created by the CIA to deem truth insane, crazy...they repackage/relabel the flu into another label to make it more 'dangerous' to convince you that you need a vaccine to survive... when even their own fine print of the chemical (mRNA, SM-102) shows its devastating to every aspect of your body/organs and central nervous system.

Last Edited by The Holy Spirit on 06/25/2021 12:40 PM
Your Crazy Mom

User ID: 32381103
United States
06/25/2021 12:28 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
Absolute must pin.

Download the FREE PDF OF THE STUDY and save it to your hard drive.

It was just published June 2 and will probably be wiped soon.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 75327296
United States
06/25/2021 12:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
That’s so far. Longer term affects are not applied. The “Shot” will kill many more.
USCG Popeye  (OP)
Top Hat

User ID: 80533293
United States
06/26/2021 10:02 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9,000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate

=200 to 700 people must get jabbed with zero benefit to themselves to benefit one person from getting infected

= 9000 to 50000 people must get jabbed (mean 16000) with zero benefit to themselves in order to save one life from covid

The hoodwinking of big pharma.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80520205


Excellent!

Who doesn't love statistics?
USCG Popeye  (OP)
Top Hat

User ID: 80533293
United States
06/26/2021 10:03 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: “The Vaccines Kill Two People for Every Three Lives They Save”, Says Peer-Reviewed Vaccine Study
Result: The NNTV is between 200–700 to prevent one case of COVID-19 for the mRNA vaccine marketed by Pfizer, while the NNTV to prevent one death is between 9,000 and 50,000 (95% confidence interval), with 16,000 as a point estimate

=200 to 700 people must get jabbed with zero benefit to themselves to benefit one person from getting infected

= 9000 to 50000 people must get jabbed (mean 16000) with zero benefit to themselves in order to save one life from covid

The hoodwinking of big pharma.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80520205


Excellent!

Who doesn't love statistics?
 Quoting: USCG Popeye


Bump





GLP