|
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
(DR. STEFAN LANKA PHD) - THE FINAL REBUTTAL OF VIROLOGY
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
NOT meeting the postulate doesn't mean, necessarily, that viruses don't exist.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80535276 Yes, it does actually. Until you prove your alleged "viral particle" is responsible for the claimed disease by infecting a healthy subject with it and producing the same symptoms then all you have is dogma, not empirical evidence. Viruses either exist or don't. Postulates are just air coming out of people's mouths. That's right and they don't exist because the same cytopathic effect that was allegedly caused by adding "virus infected tissue" to Vero cell cultures is also observed by adding "uninfected tissue" - the control experiment virologists never perform because they knew they'd be exposed as frauds. Proved in the experiment in the OP performed by Dr Lanka.
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for reporting:
|
