(DR. STEFAN LANKA PHD) - THE FINAL REBUTTAL OF VIROLOGY

Holy shit!

You mean virologists have never bothered to determine whether torturing "UNINFECTED" tissue in a cell culture would produce the exact same cytopathic effect?

How the fuck can they call themselves scientists???

This is huge and needs to be pinned!

How have they been able to get away with this for so long?

for the most pertinent truth today

I'm finding this hard to believe.
Can a virologist or biologist chime in here and set the record straight? There's no way this can be true.

I watched some of the video and it seemed to make sense. Don't have time to watch the whole thing, but have a question.

Is she saying no viruses exist? Or that COV19 doesn't exist?

It applies to EVERY "virus".

"Viruses" only "appear" after "infected tissue" is tortured in a cell culture.

They can't see viruses under an electron microscope because they don't exist.

Persisting with "cell culture" fraud to prove the existence of viruses was the only way for virologists to continue the germ theory lie after the advent of the electron microscope exposed germ theory once and for all. The excuse that "viruses" were "too small" to view under light optical microscopes was no longer valid as electron microscopes see down to the atomic level.

so then what is rabies

Not caused by a virus.
Do you think acne is caused by a virus too?
Teenagers all seem to to get it so they
probably give each other the acne virus in school, right?
Same logic you're applying to rabies.

this article shows a supposed electron microscope picture of the rabies virus.

[link to www.bbc.com (secure)]

No evidence that the particle has been tested and meets Koch's Postulates so it's not. It's the same story with every virus - normal cells are passed off as viruses without proving that the particle causes the disease assigned to it.

if you google "electron microscope picture of rabies virus" a lot of pictures come up.

No evidence that the particle has been tested and meets Koch's Postulates so it's not. It's the same story with every virus - normal cells are passed off as viruses without proving that the particle causes the disease assigned to it.

[link to n.neurology.org (secure)]

"A veterinarian contracted rabies in the course of laboratory work with homogenates of rabid goat brain. Epidemiologic study determined a respiratory mode of transmission. After a fulminant encephalitic illness, formed rabies virions were identified in the synaptic zones of the olfactory glomeruli. Identification, isolation, experimental disease production, and tissue cytopathic effects of virus recovered from the brain fulfilled Koch's postulates in this unusual instance of virus disease of the nervous system."

Was the "rabies" particle purified and tested on a healthy subject causing the same symptoms?

Nope. Try again, shill.

NOT meeting the postulate doesn't mean, necessarily, that viruses don't exist.

It's a heck of a thing to bet the family's health on this when times comes to vax your new pet for rabies...

Why don't you read the study and tell us?

I did. No evidence this alleged "rabies" particle found in the vet was extracted, purified and used to infect another healthy human with it. Hence, it doesn't meet Koch's Postulates and your unscientific report proves nothing.

Yes, it does actually.
Until you prove your alleged "viral particle" is responsible for the claimed disease by infecting a healthy subject with it and producing the same symptoms then all you have is dogma, not empirical evidence.

Viruses either exist or don't. Postulates are just air coming out of people's mouths.

You did not have time to download the full PDF of the study.

That's right and they don't exist because the same cytopathic effect that was allegedly caused by adding "virus infected tissue" to Vero cell cultures is also observed by adding "uninfected tissue" - the control experiment virologists never perform because they knew they'd be exposed as frauds.

Proved in the experiment in the OP performed by Dr Lanka.

Any mother, from the olden days of chicken pox parties, knows that something real happened there.

This is how mothers made sure their children got their childhood diseases during childhood.

And not later when they would be more problematic.

Rabies is an ancient disease, known for thousands of years.

I'll give you that covid might not exist.

(shrugs)

So produce the paper that shows the extraction and purification of the "measles virus" and proof that infecting healthy subjects with this alleged "measles virus" with the virus consistently produced measles.

I'll save you the time - no such paper exists. Just like no such paper exists for the acne virus or the herpes virus.
Knock yourself out trying to prove me wrong though. I'm here all week.

would YOU candidate to be the healthy "candidate" for such test?

I am by no means a. Virologist , but in biology we learned a. Virus generally observed by negative staining techniques with electron microscopy.
It's kind of like a mold or cast you make and observe it's negative space.
There are many images of virus , by morphology etc.
one of the earliest was differentiating between small pox and chicken pox I think, or maybe measles , I cannot recall(25 years ago)
As far as your in vitro tests go, I would have to do some research to fully grasp what's being claimed.
I get it from a lay standpoint though.

I really love how people that thinks viruses don't exist aren't even capable of understanding what Dr. Lanka claims. Even the stupidity that "No viruses has been ever isolated" or "no virus has been ever seen in a micrograph".

Dr. Lanka claims that what is normally called viruses are structures created by the organism or affected tissue in response to stress. They have been called "exosomes". These can be isolated and be photographed.

I have never really agreed with Dr. Lanka's ideas. I think he is wrong, but at least he attempts to make a good case that viruses are a consequence and not a cause, and many fools don't even understand that.

I think is very probable that viruses indeed are created by the body in response to some stress, but once they are created, they are contagious, so in practice, the difference of the theory by Dr. Lanka doesn't really matter after the virus is originated, it can get other people sick. it could make a difference in the treatment, by avoiding the stress, which would be much cheaper.

Just do a search, viral negative stains.
I do not care what you call them, there are foreign particles, we have seen them by staining them.
I suppose there is some indirect proof in the study of endogenous genetic drift with retro virus

A yoke of fornication

HPV purified and negatively stained, electron microscope
[link to www.researchgate.net (secure)]

oh I forgot sorry, hpV is "not" a virus, according to OP
#sarcasm

[link to www.nope?q= (secure)] hpv+electron+microscope

[link to www.nope?q= (secure)] poliovirus+electron+microscope

[link to www.nope?q=virus+ (secure)] transmission+microscope

[link to www.cnet.com (secure)]

and so on...

/thread

Last Edited by sunwatcher on 06/28/2021 11:34 PM