Space-Time "Curvature" induced by "Mass"

The whole point of the fraudulent Zi0-neest, Einstein's, Theory of Relativity, was to rubbish the work of Michelson and Morley.

Hence the ridiculous band-aid known as the Lorentz-Fitzgerald Contraction.

Plenty of true Natural Scientists called out Einstein for his absurd BS, at the time.

However, the powah of Z-ism shut them down.

Physics has been is a dark cul-de-sac, since then, when the (((Math Men))) took over.

Tesla Steinmetz Bump!

Is no-one innarested in this topic?

Don't you need them to believe it so they make it real for you?

Mass is the presence of matter. Space (incorrectly termed by those who thought space was free of matter) is actually full of matter in the form of plasma, not a privation. If there is very little of it, it is not visible but it is still there. Therefore space and time are both outdated concepts. But the fact that they are concepts gives them the ability to be merged and measured with and without the presence of matter. Whether or not we are able to measure them accurately is of no importance.

You a (((Math Man?)))

"Space" has no attributes. It cannot be "curved."

[link to www.goodreads.com (secure)]

Should have said, "properties", not "attributes."

My bad.

Space does not exist so it cannot be analyzed for the presence of or lack of properties.

it's based on the behavior of light and the distribution of energy I think. highly theoretical metaphorical.

Heartbeat and breathing are a concept?
OK tard.

When a car drives down the road at a certain speed, you can calculate the duration precisely as long as the speed is constant.

Should we relabel time as “change”

Quantumtards think that light is a stream of massless particles called "photons", that travel forever.

He probably should have said time is a construct instead of concept.

We perceive "Time" as change, so why not?

I'm really surprised to see a comment with this much knowledge on the subject on GLP. I can tell you have put some serious time into this subject.

"Construct measuring linear change" would be more accurate.

just out of curiosity, what would your explanation of light be? what words would you choose to describe it?

There is only the Aether, with its various pressure modalities.

Light is a co-axial circuit perturbation of the Aether.

See Ken Wheeler, aka "Theoria Apophasis", on YT.

The "electron" is not a particle. Its discoverer, JJ Thompson, called it a unit of dielectric capacitance, if I recall rightly.

A sphincter said what.

Light is a wave. Quantization is a mathematical problem, not a physical one.

Ken Wheeler ("Theoria Apophasis" on YT) says it best.

Light is a co-axial circuit created by Aether perturbation.

The "speed" of light is not a "speed" as we understand it.

It is the maximum rate of induction allowed by the hysteresis of the Aether.

I find Ken's take on Physics to be very interesting.

But, feel free to swallow Einstein's BS, if it makes you happy.

fair enough. it's definitely part of a system, in which everything is tied together, and to isolate one aspect, and ignore the entirety, is to limit the value of your conclusions.

electricity is definitely a key aspect, and we can learn a lot by thinking about it in this way. also dynamism is very interesting.

A "wave" is not a thing.

A "wave" is what something does.

Stop reifying concepts. It's what got us into the mess that "Physics" is, today.

I've been thinking about time a lot lately. I think time can be manipulated. Not sure about going back in time, but a slowing down, speeding up or "pause" of it seems possible to my 3lb brain. Think of an adrenaline dump. Time "seems" to literally nearly stop in many cases for some people. I can recall examples of that in my own life. Now whether that's an increase in neural activity running at speeds unsustainable for long making it appear to the viewer that time has slowed, I'm fine with that, because, it means we can figure out a way TO sustain it for longer, thereby slowing down our perception of time. Theoretically.

The reason the SHUT UP is that Einstein's predictions match obversions very accurately.

Same with Quantum Theory. Theory's predictions match measured experiments with extreme accuracy.

If either had major flaws, you're GPS / Cell phones would not work.

Ken Wheeler, a far greater Natural Scientist than I, says that electricity is a hybrid of dielectricity and magnetism.

I still don't quite understand what he's getting at, I will freely admit.

I think that the major malfuction of today's "Physics" is that the bastard, Einstein, mathematically (he never did physical experiments, or observations) hand-waved away the Aether.

Everything "Physics" is now the domain of theoretical mathematicians.

Hence the insane bullshit we are presented with, such as LIGO, and "Black holes."

You can verify quantum displacement from the double slit experiment with 3 pieces of mechanical pencil led and a laser pointer.

Not that I disagree with everything OP said.

I think they did all this to hide and make the acceptance of Plasma cosmology impossible, in order to hide that the earth and all planetary bodies are actually hollow.

.............and that there is an advanced civilisation existing there, whilst we in the cheap seats get wiped out every 12,000 yrs.

Sell-out scumbag traitors, like Hubble and Einstein fanboi, Eddington, worked to confirm the vile silliness of Special and General Relativity.