Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,138 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,003,219
Pageviews Today: 1,672,580Threads Today: 674Posts Today: 12,044
04:37 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT ABUSIVE REPLY
Message Subject The XRP Investor Thread
Poster Handle Anonymous Coward
Post Content
XRP is a shill token generated and circulated by Ripple Labs Inc.

They alone control the ledger, maintain the 100 billion tokens, and “promise” to release an additional 1 billion tokens each month. And it costs them nothing to generate; just typing a number.

It is completely centralized and not a true crypto-coin by any proper definition.

Disclaimer: Of course I own some. I also own Federal Reserve Notes. But that doesn’t make either any good.
 Quoting: REaliZe


If Ripple went down this moment, XRP would still exist. They only own 8% of the validator nodes so they Cannot make sweeping decisions for the whole ledger. More than half is in escrow too.

Even if it's not a true crypto in the sense, it's inevitable to me that's where this is all heading towards. Yo me it's either get with the program or get lost behind. This IMO is the last chance if generational wealth in our lifetime of this nature.

As far as being centralized goes, there's this. I highly recommend everyone read the entire article because it's loaded with goodness.

[link to galgitron.net]

The XRP network architecture started centralized, just like Bitcoin started centralized. Because of the way that XRP decentralizes, it took a while longer than Bitcoin did to fully decentralize, but XRP is now completely decentralized, and not within Ripple's ability to coerce, censor, or modify. In fact, if Ripple went out of business today, XRP will continue unabated. This is a fact.

Then there's the malicious attempt to smear the confidence-shaking negative word 'centralized' to describe Ripple's XRP holdings instead of using the proper term, 'concentrated', intentionally commingling terms to sow confusion and unwarranted concern. All companies have assets. You wouldn't refer to Microsoft's assets as centralized, or Apple's, or Warren Buffet's.. Why should Ripple be held to a different standard simply because their assets are crypto? It's senseless and a sensationalist attempt to foment bad connotations onto an innocent fact.

It's a bit outdated (still says XRP is not quite decentralized, but it is now), but this blog smashes the centralized FUD to bits.
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for reporting:







GLP