Is Novavax a safer vacccin than the mRNA ?

Only if you want moth DNA and wanted to be attracted to bright lights....

Hm. Not spike factory creator? Probably full of graphene oxide or some other sinister shit.

Novavax just pushed back their FDA Emergency Use filing by approx 1 month, again. Won’t make it out until Oct, at earliest. Also already planning for boosters in 2022.

[link to finance.yahoo.com (secure)]

just read that sweden ordered 2.2 million doses..

there is no safe vaccine

Probably best one if u are forced to get one. But I doubt it will be available in USA until 2022.

Thread: The Only non-mRNA USA vaccine hammered on all fronts - your only option now is mRNA

Last Edited by CharlieFoxtrot on 08/11/2021 01:59 PM

it does sound like it should be safer based on the core technology

Novavax i believe does not instruct your body or in any way cause your body to generate viral components, as does the mRNA vaccines and the viral vector vaccines, and the russian sputnik V which is a DNA vaccine

instead it provides those viral components directly

probably safer because much less risk of unexpected long term continuation of production of viral components, less likely the viral components would become incorportated into your cell walls which dr. hoffe speculates causes microscopic blood clots resulting in many of the adverse reaction symptoms

i still don't think it's worth it for me, i dont take a flu vaccine either

also one worries about other ingredients that might be harmful, preservatives, adjuvants

I also read that Novavax stopped funding. Don't remember where I read it. But Moderna is coming out with a booster shot by October or November.


.

dr. peter mccullough has said he thinks this one will be safer, you can google who he is

The CDC, Canadian Dept of Health, and other govt agencies have admitted the "virus" has never been isolated.

What exactly are they innoculating against?

Life

Sweden doesn’t need US FDA approval so could be. The Emergency Use was filed in India, Philippines & Indonesia per the linked article.

I do not want to take any vaccine, but if I am forced I want to take the least harmful and then I wonder if this is less than the others

The technology is not as new but it doesn't work as well either.


So a risk vs reward is the honest answer.

9mm much safer

For me it is about not being protected from the virus but not being harmed by the vaccine if I am forced to take it

Then I would get Nova if I felt like you do.



Don't say I am not fair.

This is what I want to hear. We must find what is least harmful because they will force us to take something. I have no idea what is dangerous or not but want to get information about what is least harmful

lol, no

I would like someone to explain what the possible danger is with this vaccine and also explain the difference between this vaccine and other approved vaccines

Curious about this one too. It's quite a coincidence that it's not available yet even though vaccine hesitant people might consider this shot. Does that mean it's not as harmful as the others?

Agree, they seem to market this as the vaccine for those who are hesitant. What's the catch?

You didn't even say please.

Why aren't you able to research the subject yourself?

This will get you started:

[link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]

[link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]

[link to www.cdc.gov (secure)]

[link to www.nebraskamed.com (secure)]

The only thing I'm interested in is what the danger is with this vaccine. If you need a please for this then it is no problem. I am totally uninterested in other vaccines because they are life threatening in my world. However, I still have not been able to get any explanation as to what is life threatening with this vaccine?

Yes.

It is a traditional vaccine.

Thats what makes all the current totalitarianism so transparently a grab for power.

From a public health point of view, this next vaccine comes out in a few months.

I guess this vaccine is safe then

For something that is 99.7% survivable? I'll pass.