|
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
|
|
Message Subject
|
THIS is the REAL DOOM: Ai & Automation takeover 11+ Hour Global Conference Tells All!
|
|
Poster Handle
|
Anonymous Coward |
|
Post Content
|
...
I'm on board with you. A certain generation thinks computers are magical solutions to everything. The rest of us know that AI is only as "smart" as the person who programmed it.
The local police have been running some AI based policing program for the past 5 years here. In that time crime has gotten substantially worse to the point there are several murders a day now.
Quoting: Constant Parad0x Explain why Kasparov lost to AI in 1989 and no human has ever been able to beat AI at chess ever since. Explain how AI can basically see two or three days in advance now- according to the Pentagon. Explain how AI is already programming its own new AI entities now. Explain why the likes of Gates, Musk and Hawkings all warned that AI would overtake humans. The reality is humans are not the smartest beings in this domain. The arrogant ones were only seduced into believing we are. Ego and fear combine to form a dangerous atmosphere of denial. Chess only has a finite number of moves. Yes, they refined the Algo to the point it can consistently beat Kasparov. I fail to see how this translates to excelling in any other area besides chess. The fact that lifetime govies think AI is some 72 hour ahead crystal ball pretty much demonstrates the point I already made. What we have is a large, well developed decision tree that incorporates numerous pieces of data and predicts likely outcomes. However, it is still software and it does not "think." All the needs to happen is one single piece of unanticipated data creating an unhandled exception in the code and your AI either breaks or produces an incorrect prediction. The last data I saw on this said that given certain specific tasks they could increase the accuracy of predictions up to something like 80% accuracy. That still means 1 in 5 predictions is wrong and general purpose usage did significantly worse than that. Remember, at 50% accuracy you may as well flip a coin. Honestly, in many ways I feel like "AI" is a solution in search of a problem. The idea that we will just submit a bunch of random data into a giant all knowing central brain that will spit put solutions for all of mankind's ills sounds a lot like a 1960s scifi pipe dream to me. At this point I personally am only interested in facts and knowledge pieces coming together to explain what is happening to us and our world both technically and spiritually. The two go hand in hand when the full objective mind is put to the analysis of it. I'm not really interested in people's feelings and opinions. I know that most feelings and opinions now are rooted in fear, ego, and self comfort. Graphene, Ai, 5G, nanotech, forced shots, masks, swabs, depopulation, massive global economic destruction...are all FACTS- and they all happen to correlate. Previous repliers have posted more factual info to help with the cause. Have you even watched the video? Or are you just submitting some conjecture based on how you feel? It's a fair question. No, I'm not going to sit down and watch an 11 hour conference before responding. I did post factual info. AI is a giant decision tree that is only as good as the person who coded it. It really is that simple. I don't believe that imperfect minds are capable of writing a perfect Algo. Are you suggesting that AI is in fact written by a higher power or more advanced race? Most of what these companies call buzzword bingo AI are actually Indians in a cube farm overseas responding to queries the software doesn't handle. The more advanced software might be using neural networks to refine answers. It's still just spitting out what it's been programmed to. I don't care how many code paths you write in, the software still doesn't "think."
|
|
|
Please verify you're human:
|
|
|
Reason for copyright violation:
|
