Bullet point synopsis :)

* Her husband had pneumonia for 7 days, he was taking Ivermectin but he needed higher dose. She suggests higher dose as she feels it would have mitigated their entire experience
* Went to hospital as he had low oxygen. Nurse tried to put mask on him which is stupid for someone who can't breathe. Nurse called security when she objected
* 'COVID' test is 40x magnifications that they did, which encompasses all flu/virus/cold etc., so of course it came back 'positive'. The false positive seemed intentional on the hospital's part (financial kickback motivation?). Hospital staff then treated him like he had the bubonic plague.
* X-rays showed white cloudy stuff on both sides of his lungs. 'COVID pneumonia' was the diagnosis, hospital couldn't explain it, it's pneumonia but they call it 'COVID pneumonia'. Normal pneumonia they give you oxygen, make sure you're stable, and send you home with advice to get plenty of fluids, rest, and chicken soup. The COVID pneumonia is so that they can be on a totally different road as far as hospital treatment, as the hospitals have made a policy change: it used to be where they put you on the high-flow oxygen and you're in a regular hospital room. Well now, you're sent to the ICU where they tell you it's going to be 7-10 days in the ICU, so now they can honestly say that the ICU's are 'full' and 'overflowing' and they have a whole track of medicines and everything else. (pumping up the numbers like they did last year too)
* X-rays showing pneumonia look very much the same, from years ago until now, but now they're calling it 'COVID pneumonia' probably for reasons that it would benefit the hospital financially
* They said that the next step for her husband would be a ventilator, she said 'no we don't do that'. Hospital gave her some static for that, also asked her if they both were vaccinated, she said no which also got an adverse reaction from the hospital staff. Hospital said if no ventilator they would be risking brain damage if the oxygen stayed low, but the woman and her husband still said no.
* Hospital staff said her hospital gown was infested was COVID, she replied why not my hair etc? Hospital staff didn't budge even when she used common sense to refute their position, and gave her a 'space suit from hell' to wear when around him, she retorted that she just spent weeks with him even sleeping with him while unvaccinated and didn't get sick so she saw no point, but suited up anyway in their hazmat suit.
* She had good doctors who consented to her request for intravenous high dose vitamin C. She felt this was unique in that many docs would not have advised or consented to this approach
* Intravenous zinc and vitamin D were included as well as the high dose vitamin C. The hospital first said "we don't do that, it's not protocol". The CDC sends hospitals documentation on what they need to do for protocol. It's not COVID that is killing people, it's the protocol (which is overtreatment and sending people to a ventilator too quickly). The death rate of ppl on ventilators is up to 70-80%. The hospital was talking about doing the ventilator from the moment she got in.
* They first started him on 500(mg? cc?) intravenous vitamin C but that is the dose for a child, so she had them increase it to an adult dose. High dose intravenous vitamin C can even cure some cancers she says.
* Vitamin C 10000mg-20000mg intravenous dosage per day, the 'insufficient data' study was using only 2400mg/day
* She strongly advises people to not only ask but demand these treatments in lieu of the standard CDC issued protocol. You are the patient, you have the right to demand what you see fit.
* She also asked for Budenoside, which Fauci doesn't recommend, but it's a steroid anti-inflammatory. Budenoside was originally called a 'silver bullet' but the establishment terminated the study because supposedly there were not enough people in the study. Of course there is no need for vaccines if you have effective non vax alternatives. The CDC etc. disavows vitamin D, Ivermectin etc. because of 'insufficient data', basically anything other than the vaccines that work.
* Her husband was doing fantastic within 35 hours, laughing talking eating dinner etc. Doctors were shocked and remarked that he was doing better than anybody else there. 3.5 days later her husband was released but could have been released earlier. He's been fine since.
* They had to consistently refuse the ventilator which they were predisposed to putting him on, they were committed to the CDC protocol and nothing else
* Hospital staff very skeptical that vitamin intravenous protocol would work, they were wrong
* People dying in hospitals because of the protocol of course would be blamed on 'killer COVID', not the protocol. Hospitals have plausible deniability this way.
Hospitals make big money from people being in the expensive ICU for as long as possible, plus gov't covid bucks for people being on ventilators
* No reason to over-treat and have 'covid' people in the ICU to begin with
* She suggests Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine first
* Her husband walked out of the hospital faster than anyone else, as a healthy man
* Docs and nurses not asking themselves why they're throwing people on ventilators so early
* CDC is trying to get you not to use things that can help in order to continuously push vaccines
* Share this information so we have a chance of changing future events
* Docs assume they're getting the latest information from the hospital administration, they don't read studies