Not a single person is alive today that took a mRNA shot pre 2018. Not one single one

Oh, so you don't have any facts to support your bs lies? Figures.

Last Edited by Bullsh*t on 08/25/2021 09:38 PM

Uhhh... Chemotherapy is radiation injection and has been around since the 60s.

Show us that two week flattened curve? When will those results be in? 2 weeks? Or, 20 months?

You mean other than the leaky poultry vaccine that just about caused a meat bird apocalypse?

That one doesn't count because you say so?

Right. There were at least 3 studies that I can recall reading and they all had 100% mortality on re-exposure. Of course, all disappeared now.

the vaccinated people are playing with fire here..i would cut my losses and do a full on body detox if i had gotten the shot and clean it all out the best i could

sorry you got tricked..

hope you actually can clean that shit out of your body

there's still hope...so don't give up

Right on, Grove Street.

Yea they do actually.

Remember to put some of those green ones in a paper bag and a dark closet.

Unfortunately, the articles have been removed. If you do some fancy searching on here, I posted excerpts and data back in 2020, probably as an AC.

Oh, I think that a relative few do. I suspect those effects are just revealing themselves to everyone now.

Not only did google purge so did researchgate bioarxiv nature and hundreds of others.

If the evidence is still online anywhere it's unlisted to avoid being found by a search engine meaning if you don't know the direct link you won't ever get it.

Says a whole bunch about the honesty of the shitters demanding evidence they know has been scrubbed right?

If you go back in glp history to threads from late 2019 and Early 2020 we had all sorts of evidence on this stuff and it was trivial to find on Google or other search.

We haven't got worse at using computers, the enemy has gotten better at destroying and hiding Information.

To your contribution, I'll add Martin's SARS-CoV patent review list from his biz website, which has patent numbers, file and issue dates, brief description and assignee name indications. Scroll the the bottom of the page for a PDF link. The doc is an eight page list.

[link to www.m-cam.com (secure)]
.

Last Edited by TXP on 08/25/2021 09:52 PM

It exists only in your mind.

Fuck Google. If it's not part of the narrative or an item/service for sale, they don't provide shit in a search.

More crimes against humanity.

.

Last Edited by TXP on 08/25/2021 09:55 PM

I'm pretty sure I have them bookmarked somewhere but I will need to dig and I have thousand of bookmarks.

I read that it caused brian damage.

Thousands are dead, though

Agreed. I know at least one of them was on NIH pubmed but the last time I went to look at it it was no longer in the results.

To me, it speaks volumes about there being an agenda because if there wasn't one, no need to remove these studies from search engines.

Same crap with the historical CDC numbers that used to be right up on the front page of the site and keep getting buried and moved around the site. Although last I checked, they were still up but you had to dig for them.

You guys. Listen. It is totally normal for the government to use social media and all msm to censor any discussion and debate concerning a medical treatment. Oh yeah, and to monitor personal emails and censor those as well.

Sure there were multiple studies on how animals exposed to the MRNA shots all died when exposed to a virus. And sure, the government has done all they can to suppress those studies, and to call ANYONE WHO QUESTIONS THEM a looney conspiracy theorist. While they throttle VAERS and tell people we can't know if those numbers are true, even though VAERS was a good tool for years before this.

All of this is totally normal and if you don't believe me then you will be reported to the ministry of propaganda and disposed of. Nothing is wrong. Just believe.

And please folks if you haven't received the mar err uh vaccine go now and get it. It's safe and above all it's effective.

Surprised this one is still up, although it's not the one I was looking for, which was a study about medical mask use in public settings by NIH:

"Results: The rates of all infection outcomes were highest in the cloth mask arm, with the rate of ILI statistically significantly higher in the cloth mask arm (relative risk (RR)=13.00, 95% CI 1.69 to 100.07) compared with the medical mask arm. Cloth masks also had significantly higher rates of ILI compared with the control arm. An analysis by mask use showed ILI (RR=6.64, 95% CI 1.45 to 28.65) and laboratory-confirmed virus (RR=1.72, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.94) were significantly higher in the cloth masks group compared with the medical masks group. Penetration of cloth masks by particles was almost 97% and medical masks 44%."

[link to pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

[link to pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]
[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

Links to animal corona virus vaccine studies,

They aren't mRNA. However it isn't the vaccine that causes the problems. It's the type of immune response that the vaccine creates that causes the problem.

mRNA vaccines cause the same type of immune response as the ones that caused the Immune response dysfunction in the animal studies.
I mean this sincerely, I pray to God that I am wrong, and the experts I am following are wrong. My grandmother, aunt and several other people I love took the shot.

I just haven't had anyone show any evidence that the immune response will be different.

Trin did you see the WH, CDC, Pfizer, WHO, Moderan all are NOT requiring vaccines??

Zero, trick thread

I agree.

No,doesn't look like that's correct. I found nothing saying Shingrix is mRNA.

I feel the same way as you. Many people I know have taken the vax. I've been telling people to get the J&J, which is an old-school standard vax and not mRNA. I think since that type is more well known, it's less likely to have problems - likely no more than the flu shot.

I'm not a biologist, but my understanding of the problem is that ADE basically weakens the immune response because the vax has replaced the standard immune response. On subsequent infection with similar proteins, the body is then unable to properly respond without further supplementation, so successive infections end up being much worse because while the body's own immune response can tailor itself, the synthetic replacement is static and will not evolve. At least, that's the way I understand it.

So, with this rapidly evolving virus that has the same proteins, the vax works the first time you get exposed, but in subsequent generations the immune response is reduced instead of being enhanced. Thereby requiring additional vaccines to cover the new variants. Those who already had the first vax with no access to the new one will become much more severely ill than they would have been if they took no vax at all. So, even though the virus is getting weaker, for those without updated vaxes the effects will be even worse than the original.

There is a chance they will still survive it. Just that the studies I read the test subjects repeatedly died.

My understanding of the old vaxes is that they infect you with a cold with sequences attached that cause your body to produce it's own antibodies which will be effective against the infection. Over time, your body stops producing these antibodies when the infection is gone.

The mRNA stuff is actually modifying the blueprint of your immune cells causing them to produce antibodies with the specific programmed sequence and the body will continue to produce these indefinitely as the underlying genetic code has been permanently modified. The problem being that these spike proteins will continue to bind to receptors, possibly preventing updated sequences necessary for new variants from binding to those same receptors, rendering them ineffective.

Like I said, I'm not a biologist so if I got it wrong feel free to coorect/add.