Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,266 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 362,175
Pageviews Today: 844,996Threads Today: 347Posts Today: 8,856
01:00 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..

 
101stranger
Offer Upgrade

User ID: 75691221
United States
08/25/2021 10:37 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and a vaccine so safe you have to be forced by the government to take it!
"but you ain't got no legs Lt Dan"
ScrumpTheTexanModerator
Forum Administrator

08/25/2021 10:42 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
scrumpbump
I am a Christian.

Christian does not equal doormat or pushover

"I Have Sworn upon the Altar of God... Eternal Hostility against every form of Tyranny over the mind of man." -Thomas Jefferson, Sep. 23, 1800

MedinaD

The Election of Donald John Trump: [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]

For previous Newsletters, click 'Scrump's News Letters' @ [link to www.godlikeproductions.com]
Grove Street

User ID: 21983498
United States
08/25/2021 10:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
covid sluts still going to covid slut..


they love the action, the fake covid pandemic and the clampdown of the NWO on nation states, made them slut some more.

it was exciting they got tired of watching everybody loves raymond and will and grace..

they got some stuff to tell their normie friends

i survived a global pandemic

i survived lockdowns

i got injected with fetal parts and monkey stool cells to save grandma and little children

for all a bunch of bullshit with a 99.8% survival rate..

but don't tell them that,, they are heroes for the greater good

where did we hear that 'greater good' line before?

remind me


Last Edited by Grove Street on 08/25/2021 10:46 PM
Grove

And this is why we can't have nice things.
Blenderizer

User ID: 80562797
United States
08/25/2021 10:50 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
https://imgur.com/EYQer3u

Modeling reality
Tensei

User ID: 78551315
United States
08/25/2021 11:16 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and a vaccine so safe you have to be forced by the government to take it!
 Quoting: 101stranger


And a vaccine so effective and safe that you have to get vaccinated in order for everyone else's vaccine to work.

scratching
Do you know the difference between justice and punishment?

2+2=4
Bodhi Sita
Divided...for the chance of

User ID: 80792586
United States
08/25/2021 11:19 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
https://imgur.com/I855S37

Unless...

"The truth shall set you free, but first it will piss you off."

Res ipsa loquitur
REaliZe

User ID: 80781908
United States
08/25/2021 11:22 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
twilightzone
There's. A. H0le. In. The. Sky.
DeploraVision ™

User ID: 80743118
United States
08/25/2021 11:25 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and a vaccine so safe you have to be forced by the government to take it!
 Quoting: 101stranger


And a vaccine so effective and safe that you have to get vaccinated in order for everyone else's vaccine to work.

scratching
 Quoting: Tensei


fauciright
:miniparrot: :captain:
.
#NotMyPresident #DoNotComply #ARRESTFAUCI #ClotShot
.
Rev 16:2
The first angel went and poured out his bowl on the land, and ugly, festering sores broke out on the people who had the mark of the beast and worshiped its image.
Waffles

User ID: 62401603
United States
08/25/2021 11:25 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
and tested with a kit so reliable that it gives positive results with soft drinks or anything else you swab it with..
-------------------------------------
Thaelin

User ID: 80148108
United States
08/25/2021 11:34 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
You mean faulty tested to know if you have it. Just all depends on how many cycles it's done with.
DeplorableBean

User ID: 80163503
United States
08/25/2021 11:38 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and a vaccine so safe you have to be forced by the government to take it!
 Quoting: 101stranger


If not for MSM you'd never know it even existed. That's why the Amish are not effected, the don't have tell-a-vision.

bump
DeplorableBean
Nexus-9

User ID: 80784338
Germany
08/25/2021 11:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
 Quoting: Bodhi Sita


walken
"Fiery the Angels rose, & as they rose deep thunder roll'd
Around their shores: indignant burning with the fires of Orc" - William Blake, America a Prophecy
(...also misquoted in Blade Runner by Roy Batty)

"Tempus est optimus iudex" - "Time is the best judge"

"The very word "'secrecy'" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings." - John F. Kennedy, New York City, April 27, 1961
above/below

User ID: 67229503
United States
08/25/2021 11:46 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
LOLZ fucking ey the TRUTH IS WILD!


yoda

vodka5
above/below
Ben Band

User ID: 46037199
United States
08/25/2021 11:49 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
a disease so serious that when you get it,

they tell you to go home and take two ibuprofen and call me when you are about to die so we can collect from the government
Questioning369

User ID: 73501702
United States
08/25/2021 11:51 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
You mean faulty tested to know if you have it. Just all depends on how many cycles it's done with.
 Quoting: Thaelin


The cycles have nothing to do with whether or not someone is positive or not. It is simply the level of amplification, Mullis says so himself on video. PCR is only good for taking a little bit of something and making a whole lot of it, nothing more. PCR is for DNA, RT-PCR is for RNA, it was created during the AIDS scare because there was little genetic material to work with. Mullis also says if PCR was used as a 'test', you could find anything from anything, much like we have been seeing with the questionable positive results, such as from water, fruit, etc.

The whole narrative of number of cycles determining whether or not there is the possibility of false positives/negatives is simply another one of their ways to muddy the waters.

Amplification, not diagnosis. The man won the nobel prize for creating it, he should know what he is talking about. We should stop perpetuating the false narrative and instead make sure everyone we know knows who Kary Mullis is, what he said about HIS pcr test and what he thought about Fauci. Maybe then folks might realize why they are using something that is not even a test to perpetuate this fraud and crimes against humanity.

It is one of the cleanest pieces of evidence of that we have that this whole thing is a fraud, the HOW. If we continue with the notion that the test 'works' at certain cycle thresholds, we are only supporting their narrative.

Mullis deserves better and so do we.

Last Edited by Questioning369 on 08/26/2021 12:01 AM
Questioning369
Brussa-Stremsim

User ID: 79229108
United States
08/25/2021 11:52 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
I have been looking for images, like we see of bacteria, of Virus\Viruses\Virus'\Virii but cannot find any.

One was said to be a 'virus' or maybe even 'Covid 19' itself viewed through a microscope but that was disputed.

If anyone has images of a virus from any source please post a link.
Vaxxed Katipo

User ID: 80740247
New Zealand
08/25/2021 11:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and a vaccine so safe you have to be forced by the government to take it!
 Quoting: 101stranger


Or to put the second part another way, imagine being so stupid the govt has to force you to get vaccinated.
Ukraine? Russia? How the hell am I supposed to know who to support?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77485293
United Kingdom
08/25/2021 11:53 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
A virus so real it's never been isolated.
Miss_April

User ID: 80217267
United States
08/25/2021 11:56 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and a vaccine so safe you have to be forced by the government to take it!
 Quoting: 101stranger


And a vaccine so effective and safe that you have to get vaccinated in order for everyone else's vaccine to work.

scratching
 Quoting: Tensei


Thank God we have each other here so we can laugh at the absurdity of it all.
Romans 12:19

Never ignore your first instinct just because it isn't what you want to believe.

MAGA FOREVER!
thinking...
No bullshit

User ID: 78212432
United States
08/26/2021 02:23 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
You mean faulty tested to know if you have it. Just all depends on how many cycles it's done with.
 Quoting: Thaelin


The cycles have nothing to do with whether or not someone is positive or not. It is simply the level of amplification, Mullis says so himself on video. PCR is only good for taking a little bit of something and making a whole lot of it, nothing more. PCR is for DNA, RT-PCR is for RNA, it was created during the AIDS scare because there was little genetic material to work with. Mullis also says if PCR was used as a 'test', you could find anything from anything, much like we have been seeing with the questionable positive results, such as from water, fruit, etc.

The whole narrative of number of cycles determining whether or not there is the possibility of false positives/negatives is simply another one of their ways to muddy the waters.

Amplification, not diagnosis. The man won the nobel prize for creating it, he should know what he is talking about. We should stop perpetuating the false narrative and instead make sure everyone we know knows who Kary Mullis is, what he said about HIS pcr test and what he thought about Fauci. Maybe then folks might realize why they are using something that is not even a test to perpetuate this fraud and crimes against humanity.

It is one of the cleanest pieces of evidence of that we have that this whole thing is a fraud, the HOW. If we continue with the notion that the test 'works' at certain cycle thresholds, we are only supporting their narrative.

Mullis deserves better and so do we.
 Quoting: Questioning369


Cycles are required for amplification. The more cycles, the more amplification:

The PCR process was originally developed to amplify short segments of a longer DNA molecule (Saiki et al. 1985). A typical amplification reaction includes target DNA, a thermostable DNA polymerase, two oligonucleotide primers, deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), reaction buffer and magnesium. Once assembled, the reaction is placed in a thermal cycler, an instrument that subjects the reaction to a series of different temperatures for set amounts of time. This series of temperature and time adjustments is referred to as one cycle of amplification. Each PCR cycle theoretically doubles the amount of targeted sequence (amplicon) in the reaction. Ten cycles theoretically multiply the amplicon by a factor of about one thousand; 20 cycles, by a factor of more than a million in a matter of hours.

[link to www.promega.com (secure)]
In his poem Human Pride, Marx admits that his aim is not to improve the world, reform or revolutionize it, but simply to ruin it and enjoy it being ruined:

With disdain I will throw my gauntlet full in the face of the world,
And see the collapse of this pygmy giant whose fall will not stifle my ardor.
Then will I wander godlike and victorious through the ruins of the world
And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator.

“Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking in the radio for the announcer.”

– Nasseim Haramein, Director of Research for the Resonance Project


Normalize every aberrant behavior, bring common all deviancy and let fly the reins of morality and reason, then welcome in that utopia that liberals embrace called communism, that which most Americans with but a shard of ethic would immediately recognize as evil.
 Quoting: judahbenhuer
thinking...
No bullshit

User ID: 78212432
United States
08/26/2021 02:27 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
A virus so deadly they have to put you in a medically induced coma with fentenyl and then intubate you in order to kill you.
In his poem Human Pride, Marx admits that his aim is not to improve the world, reform or revolutionize it, but simply to ruin it and enjoy it being ruined:

With disdain I will throw my gauntlet full in the face of the world,
And see the collapse of this pygmy giant whose fall will not stifle my ardor.
Then will I wander godlike and victorious through the ruins of the world
And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator.

“Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking in the radio for the announcer.”

– Nasseim Haramein, Director of Research for the Resonance Project


Normalize every aberrant behavior, bring common all deviancy and let fly the reins of morality and reason, then welcome in that utopia that liberals embrace called communism, that which most Americans with but a shard of ethic would immediately recognize as evil.
 Quoting: judahbenhuer
Questioning369

User ID: 73501702
United States
08/26/2021 02:31 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
You mean faulty tested to know if you have it. Just all depends on how many cycles it's done with.
 Quoting: Thaelin


The cycles have nothing to do with whether or not someone is positive or not. It is simply the level of amplification, Mullis says so himself on video. PCR is only good for taking a little bit of something and making a whole lot of it, nothing more. PCR is for DNA, RT-PCR is for RNA, it was created during the AIDS scare because there was little genetic material to work with. Mullis also says if PCR was used as a 'test', you could find anything from anything, much like we have been seeing with the questionable positive results, such as from water, fruit, etc.

The whole narrative of number of cycles determining whether or not there is the possibility of false positives/negatives is simply another one of their ways to muddy the waters.

Amplification, not diagnosis. The man won the nobel prize for creating it, he should know what he is talking about. We should stop perpetuating the false narrative and instead make sure everyone we know knows who Kary Mullis is, what he said about HIS pcr test and what he thought about Fauci. Maybe then folks might realize why they are using something that is not even a test to perpetuate this fraud and crimes against humanity.

It is one of the cleanest pieces of evidence of that we have that this whole thing is a fraud, the HOW. If we continue with the notion that the test 'works' at certain cycle thresholds, we are only supporting their narrative.

Mullis deserves better and so do we.
 Quoting: Questioning369


Cycles are required for amplification. The more cycles, the more amplification:

The PCR process was originally developed to amplify short segments of a longer DNA molecule (Saiki et al. 1985). A typical amplification reaction includes target DNA, a thermostable DNA polymerase, two oligonucleotide primers, deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), reaction buffer and magnesium. Once assembled, the reaction is placed in a thermal cycler, an instrument that subjects the reaction to a series of different temperatures for set amounts of time. This series of temperature and time adjustments is referred to as one cycle of amplification. Each PCR cycle theoretically doubles the amount of targeted sequence (amplicon) in the reaction. Ten cycles theoretically multiply the amplicon by a factor of about one thousand; 20 cycles, by a factor of more than a million in a matter of hours.

[link to www.promega.com (secure)]
 Quoting: thinking...


Can you point out to me where this equates to diagnosis. my post was to point out PCR was only ever meant for amplification, not diagnosis. It is in the first two sentences of my post and what you posted supported that, was that your intention?
Questioning369
thinking...
No bullshit

User ID: 78212432
United States
08/26/2021 02:43 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
You mean faulty tested to know if you have it. Just all depends on how many cycles it's done with.
 Quoting: Thaelin


The cycles have nothing to do with whether or not someone is positive or not. It is simply the level of amplification, Mullis says so himself on video. PCR is only good for taking a little bit of something and making a whole lot of it, nothing more. PCR is for DNA, RT-PCR is for RNA, it was created during the AIDS scare because there was little genetic material to work with. Mullis also says if PCR was used as a 'test', you could find anything from anything, much like we have been seeing with the questionable positive results, such as from water, fruit, etc.

The whole narrative of number of cycles determining whether or not there is the possibility of false positives/negatives is simply another one of their ways to muddy the waters.

Amplification, not diagnosis. The man won the nobel prize for creating it, he should know what he is talking about. We should stop perpetuating the false narrative and instead make sure everyone we know knows who Kary Mullis is, what he said about HIS pcr test and what he thought about Fauci. Maybe then folks might realize why they are using something that is not even a test to perpetuate this fraud and crimes against humanity.

It is one of the cleanest pieces of evidence of that we have that this whole thing is a fraud, the HOW. If we continue with the notion that the test 'works' at certain cycle thresholds, we are only supporting their narrative.

Mullis deserves better and so do we.
 Quoting: Questioning369


Cycles are required for amplification. The more cycles, the more amplification:

The PCR process was originally developed to amplify short segments of a longer DNA molecule (Saiki et al. 1985). A typical amplification reaction includes target DNA, a thermostable DNA polymerase, two oligonucleotide primers, deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), reaction buffer and magnesium. Once assembled, the reaction is placed in a thermal cycler, an instrument that subjects the reaction to a series of different temperatures for set amounts of time. This series of temperature and time adjustments is referred to as one cycle of amplification. Each PCR cycle theoretically doubles the amount of targeted sequence (amplicon) in the reaction. Ten cycles theoretically multiply the amplicon by a factor of about one thousand; 20 cycles, by a factor of more than a million in a matter of hours.

[link to www.promega.com (secure)]
 Quoting: thinking...


Can you point out to me where this equates to diagnosis. my post was to point out PCR was only ever meant for amplification, not diagnosis. It is in the first two sentences of my post and what you posted supported that, was that your intention?
 Quoting: Questioning369


It does not equate to diagnosis. I didn't say it did. Only clearing up that cycles = amplification and amplification leads to false conclusions, per Kery Mullis.
In his poem Human Pride, Marx admits that his aim is not to improve the world, reform or revolutionize it, but simply to ruin it and enjoy it being ruined:

With disdain I will throw my gauntlet full in the face of the world,
And see the collapse of this pygmy giant whose fall will not stifle my ardor.
Then will I wander godlike and victorious through the ruins of the world
And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator.

“Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking in the radio for the announcer.”

– Nasseim Haramein, Director of Research for the Resonance Project


Normalize every aberrant behavior, bring common all deviancy and let fly the reins of morality and reason, then welcome in that utopia that liberals embrace called communism, that which most Americans with but a shard of ethic would immediately recognize as evil.
 Quoting: judahbenhuer
Questioning369

User ID: 73501702
United States
08/26/2021 02:50 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
...


The cycles have nothing to do with whether or not someone is positive or not. It is simply the level of amplification, Mullis says so himself on video. PCR is only good for taking a little bit of something and making a whole lot of it, nothing more. PCR is for DNA, RT-PCR is for RNA, it was created during the AIDS scare because there was little genetic material to work with. Mullis also says if PCR was used as a 'test', you could find anything from anything, much like we have been seeing with the questionable positive results, such as from water, fruit, etc.

The whole narrative of number of cycles determining whether or not there is the possibility of false positives/negatives is simply another one of their ways to muddy the waters.

Amplification, not diagnosis. The man won the nobel prize for creating it, he should know what he is talking about. We should stop perpetuating the false narrative and instead make sure everyone we know knows who Kary Mullis is, what he said about HIS pcr test and what he thought about Fauci. Maybe then folks might realize why they are using something that is not even a test to perpetuate this fraud and crimes against humanity.

It is one of the cleanest pieces of evidence of that we have that this whole thing is a fraud, the HOW. If we continue with the notion that the test 'works' at certain cycle thresholds, we are only supporting their narrative.

Mullis deserves better and so do we.
 Quoting: Questioning369


Cycles are required for amplification. The more cycles, the more amplification:

The PCR process was originally developed to amplify short segments of a longer DNA molecule (Saiki et al. 1985). A typical amplification reaction includes target DNA, a thermostable DNA polymerase, two oligonucleotide primers, deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), reaction buffer and magnesium. Once assembled, the reaction is placed in a thermal cycler, an instrument that subjects the reaction to a series of different temperatures for set amounts of time. This series of temperature and time adjustments is referred to as one cycle of amplification. Each PCR cycle theoretically doubles the amount of targeted sequence (amplicon) in the reaction. Ten cycles theoretically multiply the amplicon by a factor of about one thousand; 20 cycles, by a factor of more than a million in a matter of hours.

[link to www.promega.com (secure)]
 Quoting: thinking...


Can you point out to me where this equates to diagnosis. my post was to point out PCR was only ever meant for amplification, not diagnosis. It is in the first two sentences of my post and what you posted supported that, was that your intention?
 Quoting: Questioning369


It does not equate to diagnosis. I didn't say it did. Only clearing up that cycles = amplification and amplification leads to false conclusions, per Kery Mullis.
 Quoting: thinking...


Gotcha. Which quite frankly is weird, as there really should not be any conclusions to be made if you are simply amplifying something. Even Kary himself then is muddying the water. I mean if you are amplifying to test after, then I can understand his statement because he also said that the same fragments of dna/rna can be found in many things. So in that case, pcr is still not the diagnostic test and should not be represented as such. Would this be your take on Kary's statement then too?

*just edited in the bolded

Last Edited by Questioning369 on 08/26/2021 03:13 AM
Questioning369
thinking...
No bullshit

User ID: 78212432
United States
08/26/2021 03:02 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
...


Cycles are required for amplification. The more cycles, the more amplification:

The PCR process was originally developed to amplify short segments of a longer DNA molecule (Saiki et al. 1985). A typical amplification reaction includes target DNA, a thermostable DNA polymerase, two oligonucleotide primers, deoxynucleotide triphosphates (dNTPs), reaction buffer and magnesium. Once assembled, the reaction is placed in a thermal cycler, an instrument that subjects the reaction to a series of different temperatures for set amounts of time. This series of temperature and time adjustments is referred to as one cycle of amplification. Each PCR cycle theoretically doubles the amount of targeted sequence (amplicon) in the reaction. Ten cycles theoretically multiply the amplicon by a factor of about one thousand; 20 cycles, by a factor of more than a million in a matter of hours.

[link to www.promega.com (secure)]
 Quoting: thinking...


Can you point out to me where this equates to diagnosis. my post was to point out PCR was only ever meant for amplification, not diagnosis. It is in the first two sentences of my post and what you posted supported that, was that your intention?
 Quoting: Questioning369


It does not equate to diagnosis. I didn't say it did. Only clearing up that cycles = amplification and amplification leads to false conclusions, per Kery Mullis.
 Quoting: thinking...


Gotcha. Which quite frankly is weird, as there really should not be any conclusions to be made if you are simply amplifying something. Even Kary himself then is muddying the water. I mean if you are amplifying to test after, then I can understand his statement because he also said that fragments of dna/rna can be found in many things. So in that case, pcr is still not the diagnostic test and should not be represented as such. Would this be your take on Kary's statement then too?
 Quoting: Questioning369


It's been a long since I listened to him and I'd have to go back and hear it again. I think with DNA, a sample can be so small - complete but a very small amount - that that's where amplification becomes useful. IIRC, he also said that we all have fragments of stuff floating around in our bloodstream that is completely harmless (maybe normal process of elimination?) that these liars claim are pathogens, hence fraudulent diagnoses, as with HIV.
In his poem Human Pride, Marx admits that his aim is not to improve the world, reform or revolutionize it, but simply to ruin it and enjoy it being ruined:

With disdain I will throw my gauntlet full in the face of the world,
And see the collapse of this pygmy giant whose fall will not stifle my ardor.
Then will I wander godlike and victorious through the ruins of the world
And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator.

“Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking in the radio for the announcer.”

– Nasseim Haramein, Director of Research for the Resonance Project


Normalize every aberrant behavior, bring common all deviancy and let fly the reins of morality and reason, then welcome in that utopia that liberals embrace called communism, that which most Americans with but a shard of ethic would immediately recognize as evil.
 Quoting: judahbenhuer
Questioning369

User ID: 73501702
United States
08/26/2021 03:11 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
...


Can you point out to me where this equates to diagnosis. my post was to point out PCR was only ever meant for amplification, not diagnosis. It is in the first two sentences of my post and what you posted supported that, was that your intention?
 Quoting: Questioning369


It does not equate to diagnosis. I didn't say it did. Only clearing up that cycles = amplification and amplification leads to false conclusions, per Kery Mullis.
 Quoting: thinking...


Gotcha. Which quite frankly is weird, as there really should not be any conclusions to be made if you are simply amplifying something. Even Kary himself then is muddying the water. I mean if you are amplifying to test after, then I can understand his statement because he also said that fragments of dna/rna can be found in many things. So in that case, pcr is still not the diagnostic test and should not be represented as such. Would this be your take on Kary's statement then too?
 Quoting: Questioning369


It's been a long since I listened to him and I'd have to go back and hear it again. I think with DNA, a sample can be so small - complete but a very small amount - that that's where amplification becomes useful. IIRC, he also said that we all have fragments of stuff floating around in our bloodstream that is completely harmless (maybe normal process of elimination?) that these liars claim are pathogens, hence fraudulent diagnoses, as with HIV.
 Quoting: thinking...


My understanding is that by fragment is meaning a piece of the whole, not that it is a small quantity. A fragment of dna is not the whole genome, which would be needed to identify, say sars-cov2 from sars-cov1. A fragment of dna from either would not be able to identify either definitely because odds are good they would both contain the same fragment in their genome.

The reason to amplify fragments, from my understanding, was for research. They would have been utilizing known fragments of dna that were identifiable in the aids genome, however there was not enough of the dna to perform research. Hence the pcr, to amplify in quantity the small amount of fragments of aids dna into many more fragments of aids dna.

That is how I understood it.

Last Edited by Questioning369 on 08/26/2021 03:12 AM
Questioning369
7.62

User ID: 76342347
United States
08/26/2021 03:15 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
vrwc
“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” – “Who guards the guardians?”
thinking...
No bullshit

User ID: 78212432
United States
08/26/2021 03:33 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
...


It does not equate to diagnosis. I didn't say it did. Only clearing up that cycles = amplification and amplification leads to false conclusions, per Kery Mullis.
 Quoting: thinking...


Gotcha. Which quite frankly is weird, as there really should not be any conclusions to be made if you are simply amplifying something. Even Kary himself then is muddying the water. I mean if you are amplifying to test after, then I can understand his statement because he also said that fragments of dna/rna can be found in many things. So in that case, pcr is still not the diagnostic test and should not be represented as such. Would this be your take on Kary's statement then too?
 Quoting: Questioning369


It's been a long since I listened to him and I'd have to go back and hear it again. I think with DNA, a sample can be so small - complete but a very small amount - that that's where amplification becomes useful. IIRC, he also said that we all have fragments of stuff floating around in our bloodstream that is completely harmless (maybe normal process of elimination?) that these liars claim are pathogens, hence fraudulent diagnoses, as with HIV.
 Quoting: thinking...


My understanding is that by fragment is meaning a piece of the whole, not that it is a small quantity. A fragment of dna is not the whole genome, which would be needed to identify, say sars-cov2 from sars-cov1. A fragment of dna from either would not be able to identify either definitely because odds are good they would both contain the same fragment in their genome.

The reason to amplify fragments, from my understanding, was for research. They would have been utilizing known fragments of dna that were identifiable in the aids genome, however there was not enough of the dna to perform research. Hence the pcr, to amplify in quantity the small amount of fragments of aids dna into many more fragments of aids dna.

That is how I understood it.
 Quoting: Questioning369


You could be right. I don't know why he developed the technology. Research for sure, since he was a researcher, but what prompted it and what if a particular kind of research, I don't know. Possibly, as you said, fragments and possibly samples whole but too small in quantity, as happens in stuff like forensics or anthropology. I'd be curious to know more about it.

One thing I DO know is that no SARS CoV2 or SARS or MERS even exists. None have ever been isolated, purified or replicated. Andrew Kaufman said what they were claiming was SARS CoV2 were really exosomes, which are normal things expelled by cells as in taking out the trash. That reminded me of Kery Mullis talking about bits of stuff, inside everyone, that are normal and harmless.

I'd also like to know more about Kery's death because the timing with the scamdemic seems awfully convenient for the psychopaths behind all this.
In his poem Human Pride, Marx admits that his aim is not to improve the world, reform or revolutionize it, but simply to ruin it and enjoy it being ruined:

With disdain I will throw my gauntlet full in the face of the world,
And see the collapse of this pygmy giant whose fall will not stifle my ardor.
Then will I wander godlike and victorious through the ruins of the world
And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator.

“Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking in the radio for the announcer.”

– Nasseim Haramein, Director of Research for the Resonance Project


Normalize every aberrant behavior, bring common all deviancy and let fly the reins of morality and reason, then welcome in that utopia that liberals embrace called communism, that which most Americans with but a shard of ethic would immediately recognize as evil.
 Quoting: judahbenhuer
Grove Street

User ID: 21983498
United States
08/26/2021 03:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
and imagine so many humans so stupid at least 50% that believed the lies and enabled the NWO to carry out their plans

that above is the scariest part

i don't even blame the elite anymore much..

i blame the idiots who fell for their bullshit..

it's sad..

they brought us all down so low because of their stupidity..

and they were in the way of us removing the elite.

and we've been telling them for decades..but they didn't care..they had professional sports, TV, all kinds of bullshit distractions and always marginalized the truth because they had their fingers in their ears going LA LA LA..

and now look at where we are at

happy now sheep ???

you made this more difficult than it needed to be

thanks a fucking lot for nothing

but don't be confused..just stay out of the godammned way next time OKAY

go back to your life but stay the fuck out of the way this time

Last Edited by Grove Street on 08/26/2021 03:46 AM
Grove

And this is why we can't have nice things.
thinking...
No bullshit

User ID: 78212432
United States
08/26/2021 04:02 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
and imagine so many humans so stupid at least 50% that believed the lies and enabled the NWO to carry out their plans

that above is the scariest part

i don't even blame the elite anymore much..

i blame the idiots who fell for their bullshit..

it's sad..

they brought us all down so low because of their stupidity..

and they were in the way of us removing the elite.

and we've been telling them for decades..but they didn't care..they had professional sports, TV, all kinds of bullshit distractions and always marginalized the truth because they had their fingers in their ears going LA LA LA..

and now look at where we are at

happy now sheep ???

you made this more difficult than it needed to be

thanks a fucking lot for nothing

but don't be confused..just stay out of the godammned way next time OKAY

go back to your life but stay the fuck out of the way this time
 Quoting: Grove Street


The minions are just as guilty as their father below and I blame them, too. They chose their path and have no one to blame but themselves. Truth isn't something that ever interested them; only their own desires, driven by greed, fear, ego, envy, desire to control and just plain malice. Fuck every last one of them.
In his poem Human Pride, Marx admits that his aim is not to improve the world, reform or revolutionize it, but simply to ruin it and enjoy it being ruined:

With disdain I will throw my gauntlet full in the face of the world,
And see the collapse of this pygmy giant whose fall will not stifle my ardor.
Then will I wander godlike and victorious through the ruins of the world
And, giving my words an active force, I will feel equal to the Creator.

“Looking for consciousness in the brain is like looking in the radio for the announcer.”

– Nasseim Haramein, Director of Research for the Resonance Project


Normalize every aberrant behavior, bring common all deviancy and let fly the reins of morality and reason, then welcome in that utopia that liberals embrace called communism, that which most Americans with but a shard of ethic would immediately recognize as evil.
 Quoting: judahbenhuer
Questioning369

User ID: 73385279
United States
08/26/2021 11:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: Imagine a virus so deadly you have to be medically tested to find out you have it and …..
...


Gotcha. Which quite frankly is weird, as there really should not be any conclusions to be made if you are simply amplifying something. Even Kary himself then is muddying the water. I mean if you are amplifying to test after, then I can understand his statement because he also said that fragments of dna/rna can be found in many things. So in that case, pcr is still not the diagnostic test and should not be represented as such. Would this be your take on Kary's statement then too?
 Quoting: Questioning369


It's been a long since I listened to him and I'd have to go back and hear it again. I think with DNA, a sample can be so small - complete but a very small amount - that that's where amplification becomes useful. IIRC, he also said that we all have fragments of stuff floating around in our bloodstream that is completely harmless (maybe normal process of elimination?) that these liars claim are pathogens, hence fraudulent diagnoses, as with HIV.
 Quoting: thinking...


My understanding is that by fragment is meaning a piece of the whole, not that it is a small quantity. A fragment of dna is not the whole genome, which would be needed to identify, say sars-cov2 from sars-cov1. A fragment of dna from either would not be able to identify either definitely because odds are good they would both contain the same fragment in their genome.

The reason to amplify fragments, from my understanding, was for research. They would have been utilizing known fragments of dna that were identifiable in the aids genome, however there was not enough of the dna to perform research. Hence the pcr, to amplify in quantity the small amount of fragments of aids dna into many more fragments of aids dna.

That is how I understood it.
 Quoting: Questioning369


You could be right. I don't know why he developed the technology. Research for sure, since he was a researcher, but what prompted it and what if a particular kind of research, I don't know. Possibly, as you said, fragments and possibly samples whole but too small in quantity, as happens in stuff like forensics or anthropology. I'd be curious to know more about it.

One thing I DO know is that no SARS CoV2 or SARS or MERS even exists. None have ever been isolated, purified or replicated. Andrew Kaufman said what they were claiming was SARS CoV2 were really exosomes, which are normal things expelled by cells as in taking out the trash. That reminded me of Kery Mullis talking about bits of stuff, inside everyone, that are normal and harmless.

I'd also like to know more about Kery's death because the timing with the scamdemic seems awfully convenient for the psychopaths behind all this.
 Quoting: thinking...


Yes, I have seen that information as well, it is a very interesting topic, one that merits more research. Unfortunately, taking the exosome theory to a normie has the potential for them from completely dismissing any information you may bring with them. It may get you a 'nutter' designation with them, whether it is warranted or not.

Which is why I think the PCR and Mullis is such a strong bit of information. This information is still out there and can be presented that it would be very hard to deny. It also answers the question, HOW this scamdemic might be pulled off, which may encourage them to consider additional information.

Which really should be our goal, when given the opportunity to share information that may make them question their perceived TV based reality, it needs to be air-tight and a home run. I think Mullis and PCR are as close to that as we have at this point.
Questioning369





GLP