There has been some peer reviewed studies done on the data available regarding vaccinated vs unvaccinated individuals. (Not COVID related, but relevant).

Pub Med (dot) gov link; [link to pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]
"Vaccination before 1 year of age was associated with increased odds of developmental delays (OR = 2.18, 95% CI 1.47-3.24), asthma ...(etc)"


2017 Mawson Study [link to drjockers.com (secure)]
"...there was an increase in chronic illness in the vaccinated group... an increase in allergic rhinitis and other allergies, eczema or atopic dermatitis, a learning disability, ADHD, ASD, neurodevelopmental disorder, and any chronic illness."

[link to elcolectivodeuno.wordpress.com (secure)]
"...high-antibody measles vaccine, which was withdrawn from the market after several randomized studies in West Africa showed that it interacted with the DPT (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis) vaccine and increased infant mortality by 33%.”

"The study ... showed ... a linear relationship between the number of vaccines ... and the rate of hospitalization and death. In addition, the younger the child was at the time of vaccination, the higher the rate of hospitalization and death. The hospitalization rate increased from 11% for 2 doses of vaccines to 23.5% for 8 doses of vaccines..." [link to elcolectivodeuno.wordpress.com (secure)]

But muuuuuuh "science" and "conspiracy stuff"

Pharmaceutical Industry will never fund a study for IF you should take a vaccine, because they already know the answer. They only fund studies for which ones or how many.

Calling the mrna shot a "vaccine" is a bit of a stretch considering they had to change the definition of vaccine twice so they could keep calling it that.

But the data supports a history of the vaccinated needing more medical treatment than unvaccinated.
Can't see why this particular shot(s) would be any different, if not worse.