Remote Viewers Confirm Negative Effects of Mass COVID Vaccination

[link to www.intuitiveunderground.com (secure)]

Forecast’s Abstract:

The legacy of the west’s attempted eradication of SARS-CoV-2 / COVID-19 and its variants by way of mass injection is one of failure. Its hallmarks: good PR and bad science, its signature: human injury. This initial probe / overview of the mass injection experiment’s outcome gives no indication that these so-called “vaccines” are effective in achieving their stated goal.

Inversely, our results indicate an abundance of negative human health effects, ranging from (potentially) debilitating to deadly. A number of wide-ranging symptoms were identified, including, but not necessarily limited to, vascular and cardiovascular disease, female reproductive issues, autoimmune disorders, and more. The precise scope and scale of the damage is indeterminate, but of great significance.

Results:
Below are the paraphrased results of each remote viewing session conducted in service of this project. All participants remained blind to the target at the time of the following session descriptions, where after final analysis was conducted (see Conclusions).

Note that results stemming from such an open-ended target may elicit a range of responses from individual remote viewers, some broad, some more narrow and defined, depending on what particular aspect(s) of the target are identified while in-session.



Viewer One:

There’s something wrong - there’s some sort of growth or something, a protuberance inside someone’s ventricle. There’s something else, too. There are toxins present - these remind me of nano-bots or something. There is toxicity in the bloodstream.

And there’s this idea…it’s like outpatient care…where some noted deficiency which I assume to be these issues I’ve identified, are being watched, observed. But there’s the idea of having to wait in line, like there’s a lineup where you have to wait for treatment or surgery.

This reminds me of a slaying - a purposeful killing in some way. I guess this is being done on purpose for some reason?

So you’ve got this idea of a heart with a bulge or growth, something like that. And it’s being watched or monitored in a kind of outpatient way. And there’s blood toxicity. Probably the two are related. There’s also the idea of using metals, maybe colloidal metals like copper and zinc, in removing the toxins that are causing this - and maybe even something mechanical, like a dialysis machine, something to help filter this stuff out of the bloodstream.

[link to www.intuitiveunderground.com (secure)]

Viewer Two:

My session is really kind of general, kind of broad. I would really have to explore each of these ideas more to get any real specifics out of the work here, but the general ideas that come up are: this target is some sort of an intervention. There’s the idea of having to resort to a roadmap leading to something that is conspicuous and fragile, but I don’t know exactly what that’s referring to at this point. There are some other important ideas here - we’ve got a sense of restlessness and a sense of morbidity. But I don’t know specifically what it means.

I’m sorry but I really can’t be any more specific about anything at this point. I’d have to explore each of these ideas individually to see exactly what they’re all about. Unfortunately that’s really all I can say with confidence without digging into it more [engaging in further RV session work].



Viewer Three*:

Overall, this is a centralization process where people are being led into a trap. There is large-scale victimization; people are injured, stressed-out and upset. There are a lot of negative emotions present, as well as a noted ‘dopey’ feeling. My emotional response to this target was VERY negative.

*-Note: this remote viewer also occupied the role of project manager, and was therefore aware of the nature of the target in this sole instance, negating the ability to adhere to standard blind protocol. This work was done concurrently, but independently from all other data collection efforts, and not revealed until the primary analysis of the data was completed.

Viewer Four:

So…there’s a lot going on here, and it’s a little bit confusing. The simplest way I can describe it, is that we are looking at a damaged human zygote and placenta material. It’s being used for examination and reference, like it’s in a lab or something. I get the idea that this one specific example is representative of something bigger.

The damage that’s caused…it looks like something foreign is introduced here. It’s some kind of a ‘spiky’ or ‘hooked’ little ball thing. It ‘shoots in’ and then it causes all these little micro-tears or fine shreds. This somehow brings about the creation of a bunch of little yellowish Y-shaped things [see Fig. 5] that reminds me of pus somehow - it’s like a massive ‘storm’ or a ‘brigade’.

And then there’s this idea of rejection, something being rejected or even ejected, like the ‘host’ is turning on itself somehow. It’s definitely some sort of a process gone wrong. And I get the impression that this was anticipated - not by everyone, but certainly by some.

This process, it’s all organic, but at the same time, it’s some sort of ‘dumb’ technology that’s in-use here (as opposed to so-called ‘smart-tech’). Regardless, it’s causing some irreversible problems. And that’s about it, that’s mainly what’s going on here, at least in as simple of terms as I can explain it - it’s pretty complicated, and I might even be conflating one or two things, but the general idea is clear enough, I think.

Conclusions:
Listed below are our conclusions, or what we have determined to be the end results of this mass human injection campaign. Note that it is not our goal to connect any of our findings to any pre-existing narrative, official or otherwise. As such, our final analysis and conclusions are presented independent of any other available information, save for the generally accepted open-source materials used for scientific and medical reference in compiling this report. In an attempt to remain as objective as possible, inferences and editorial commentary have been willfully kept to a conservative minimum.

By nature, the results borne of an open-ended target such as this are expected to be widely varied among participating viewers, with some focusing on a singular, narrower aspect of the whole, and others providing a broader perspective. This exercise has proven no different. Hence, it is likely that there is more to these circumstances that has not been positively identified through our successful, but limited probe. It is reasonable to assume, based on professional experience, that the items we have isolated represent a reliable overview of the greater situation.

Following are the preeminent historical characteristics of the currently ongoing mass-injection campaign as identified by our preliminary RV study, presented under 11 distinct categories, and in no particular order:

1. Blood Toxicity*

We have identified the occurrence of an unspecified vascular (blood-borne) disease or diseases. This appears to be in direct relation to the presence of lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) [see Fig. 1], the novel delivery system adopted for use in the novel mRNA injections, produced by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna, among others. LNPs are a synthetic delivery mechanism, designed to carry mRNA to its target destination, and facilitate its release, inducing an immune response. LNPs can consist of a variety of materials, although the most common at present seem to be polyethylene glycols (PEGs).

Theoretically, the LNPs should deliver their mRNA payload to the desired location, in this case, by anchoring themselves to the muscle at the injection site. Evidently that is not the situation, and it appears that at least some of these particles fail to anchor, finding their way into general circulation.

The precise frequency and consequence of occurrence is indeterminate, but significant.

2. Cardiovascular Disease*

We have identified the occurrence of an unspecified cardiovascular (heart) disease or diseases in association with the presence of some amount of an unidentified and freely circulating particulate. This could be the toxic LNP, or the spike protein (see 4. Organ Damage). Symptoms observed include some notable protrusion or swelling - possibly myocarditis / pericarditis - as well as lasting reparative damage, possibly as a result of inflammation [see Fig. 2].

The viewer was insistent that this condition is generally not fatal in isolation, presuming it is recognized and cared for in reasonable time.

The precise frequency and severity of occurrence is indeterminate, but significant, and will vary individually.

3. Female Reproduction*

We have identified the occurrence of a damaged and rejected zygote with placental material. The damage appears to include visible scarring / tearing [see Fig. 3]. The precise frequency of occurrence is indeterminate, but significant.

4. Organ Damage*

We have identified the occurrence of internal (inter-organ, and possibly veinous) micro-lacerations, described as a form of “shredding”. This appears to be the result of the presence of the SARS-CoV-2 associated spike protein [see Fig. 4], wherein its jagged protein shell lacerates any organic material it encounters. In isolation, this is unlikely an issue, however in abundance and over time, this will likely present symptomatically as inflammation, bleeding, clotting, scarring, or other forms of tissue and organ damage.

This may prove relative to - or even directly causal of - any of the aforementioned afflictions, particularly our unspecified vascular and cardiovascular disease(s) and the notable female fertility issue(s).

The precise frequency, severity, and ensuing complications of occurrence are indeterminate, but significant.

Last Edited by DiXie on 09/21/2021 10:18 AM

5. Cytokine Storm and Antibody-Dependant Enhancement*

We have identified the occurrence of a cytokine storm, in this case, a form of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).

ADE refers an autoimmune condition that enhances the virulence of a given pathogen - purportedly SARS-CoV-2, but seemingly, in fact, (at least inclusive of) its spike protein shell - causing the body’s immune system to become overstimulated, effectively turning one’s own immune system against oneself. Cytokine storm is a blanket term applied to the sudden increase of certain inflammation-inducing proteins in circulation - in this case, the apparent result of an autoimmune response involving, or triggered by, the presence of an endogenous (internally generated) antigen [see Fig. 5]. This process may also serve as the mechanism by which the previously described “damaged zygote with placental material” is rejected.

The precise frequency and severity of occurrence is indeterminate, but significant.

6. Mortality

The concept of mortality was directly and indirectly referenced extensively throughout the raw data collected in service of this project. The precise scope and scale is indeterminate, however it is expected to be historically significant.

A number of the conditions identified in this report appear to be generally survivable - if properly diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. This does not, however, exclude the possibility of other long-term debilitating effects or other physical limitations, such as strenuous bodily exertion, incurred as a result of any already extant and irreversible damage.

7. Foreknowledge

Session work indicates that certain individuals involved in this campaign - likely in the upper echelons of public and global health structures, and their counterparts and benefactors in the private sector - anticipated this outcome. Our data set contains numerous indicators of malfeasance, including one direct reference to the purposeful killing of humans.

Foreknowledge does not necessarily, however, imply nefarious intent (which must be determined on a case-by-case basis). Indeed, a number of highly qualified individuals have issued various warnings, while receiving virtually no support - or even acknowledgement - from the establishment scientific, political, and media class. Dr. Michael Yeadon (retired Pfizer VP and Chief Scientific Advisor), Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg (former chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe Health Committee), Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche (formerly employed by GAVI and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation), Dr. Robert Malone (inventor of mRNA vaccine technology), are just a few of the names repeatedly encountered in researching for this report, whose warnings remain unrecognized and unheeded.

The calibre of some of these individuals’ accomplishments alone should grant their concerns some attention and serious consideration by a plethora of authoritative regulatory bodies, but this seems not to be the case.

8. System Overload

Data indicates the necessity of having to “wait in line” to receive treatment, and an abundance of “outpatient care”. This indicates a systemic backlog of individuals requiring care, either as a result of a sudden influx of new patients, a scarcity of caretakers and caretaking facilities and supplies, or a combination of both.

Though not explicitly stated, it could be inferred that the occurrence of some of the previously noted conditions - in particular, but not limited to the presence of a freely circulating toxic lipid nanoparticle with accompanying organ damage could have some effect on reserve blood supplies, and on organ donor status candidacy.

9. Potential Remedies

Session work indicates that an external mechanical filtration process akin to kidney dialysis may prove helpful in alleviating some blood-borne disease related symptoms that may manifest.

Colloidal metals, such as copper and zinc, are also referenced as having some remedial or pro-immunological properties.

10. Emotional Impact

In remote viewing terms, any emotional data acquired in-session is sub-categorized as either objective (emotions associated with or experienced by the target) and subjective (the viewer’s personal and often spontaneous emotional response to the target). Consensus among project participants is that the sum of emotional data collected is overwhelmingly negative.

11. Outliers

One project participant, a student we are working with, presented the team with some seemingly anomalous, yet rather intriguing results. The viewer states that their session describes the act of somehow and for some reason harvesting the energy of humans, and specifically referencing the importance of sweat.

These results have been included in this report because a) the student has a solid track record, b) the data could be construed as thematically or perhaps metaphorically similar in its overarching concept to that of the project results as a whole, and c) for completion’s sake.

*Note: these numerous discrete human health problems identified describe, in singular-case terms, effects that are representative of, and will be experienced by a wider sample of the population.ted (see next section).

[link to www.intuitiveunderground.com (secure)]

I wish they stated the actual words/images used to create the target rather than sweeping generalization of the target.

That said, I find this interesting:

One project participant, a student we are working with, presented the team with some seemingly anomalous, yet rather intriguing results. The viewer states that their session describes the act of somehow and for some reason harvesting the energy of humans, and specifically referencing the importance of sweat.

These results have been included in this report because a) the student has a solid track record, b) the data could be construed as thematically or perhaps metaphorically similar in its overarching concept to that of the project results as a whole, and c) for completion’s sake.

Nice thread..bedtime reading

Burmp