New Peer Reviewed Study shows the Vaccine kills 5x more than it saves in ages 65+

Safe and effective!

Best vaccine roll-out in human history. A totally new technology never used before on this scale. Blank inserts so no one knows WTF they have been injected in short of 'Trust the science' grifting slogans. Totally experimental so we use the entire human population like lab rats.

A vaccine so safe they needed to plan for the infodemic to control the anti-vax response in Event 201 (like they magically knew through a crystal ball the public may not like the vaccine for their simulated pandemic). And any evidence or opposition to the narrative is censored from people in that field, front-line nurses and doctors (because we all know they are just crazy tin-foil hat conspiracy tards).

That should solve the Social Security insolvency problem.

:money:

1.) this proves then if you don't have a comorbidity the vaccine risk/reward is significantly not in your favor at the very least.

2.) Its a fair assumption to make since its the only publicly available database and its against the law to file fraudulent VAERS reports. How convenient the only "reliable" reporting systems are private but the public one = Trash.

3.) The study conducted a parallel reporting system to VAERS and came to this conclusion. Even if the study is wrong by a factor or 10, that still puts it at only 10% are being reported. Its still a significant result that highlights how poor the system is at collected AE data and its significantly under reported.

4.) I guess you missed the PV video of medical professionals admitting that they aren't reporting adverse events to VAERS due to not wanting to spend 30 minutes filling it out.

The only thing Garbage here is your mind.

The vax kills infinitely more than it saves, when it saves NO ONE.

And 5X? That is the wrong number, you are far more likely to die than that.

Nice try shill. $3.50

Doctors are threatened NOT to report to VAERS.

The people on this site are mental, if you don't get the vaccine and get covid it's all thoughts and prayers, but if you get the vaccine you are automatically fucked and poisoned.Good luck on your ventilators losers

This is the Second Holocaust. And all vaxxed are co-offenders.

If you are under 65 you have a 99.9% survival rate…. Literally, wtf are you talking about. Talk about mental 🤦‍♂️

Bullshit. It saves no one.

99% survival rate for most people

5 STARS !!!

sounds like good science to me...by their standards!


we got some winners out there in the world in charge of science..

we might have iphones and shit...but science is so ass backwards at this point it's not even laughable

it's disgusting

and the public (including scientists) are so scientifically illiterate at this problem it is an actual danger to the continuation of our species..

it's that bad

Last Edited by Grove Street (revived) on 09/24/2021 10:30 AM

Full article here: [link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

DOWNLOAD THE WHOLE REPORT (PDF)

[link to www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (secure)]

The efficacy data of Comirnaty against circulating viral variants are highlighted in a very recent study in Israel which showed that the protection offered by the Pfizer inoculant against variant B.1.351 (first identified in South Africa) is lower. The results have not yet been submitted to the expertise of specialists. The study compared nearly 400 adults who were diagnosed with COVID-19
at least 14 days after receiving one or two doses of the inoculant to the same number of uninoculated people. It was found that B.1.351 represents approximately 1 % of the COVID-19 cases studied. But among patients who received two doses of inoculant, the prevalence rate of the variant was eight times higher than in those not inoculated - 5.4 % compared to 0.7 %. This suggests that Comirnaty is less effective against variant B.1.351, compared to the original variant and variant B.1.1.7.

I am a highly reshpected member of the Comirnaty.

Download the whole report. Its only a little over 1 mb.

Very informative. Over 20 pages of great info.

"All this analysis shows is that, at best, only about 1% of the number expected to die was reported, and because the number reported in VAERS included deaths from both groups, the fraction from each actual group of deaths could not be determined. Realistically, we may have to wait until mid2022, when the 2021 total deaths for each age group are finalized, to ascertain whether we can see increases in all-cause mortality that could have come from the inoculation-attributable deaths."

From the linked pdf

Vaccine tards read that quote slowly and let that sink in.

Carbon60

1.) All you are saying is None of the publicly available data can be relied on... We must trust the private data from the "experts". Despite showing a 20x difference in the expected rate to observed rate in myopericarditis in teenagers on one of their slides recently & The FDA "Approval" documents showing they will be studying this until 2025 (so they clearly don't know or have a definitive answer).

2.) Making people report more adverse events because of EUA doesn't mean the data being given isn't valid. You are assuming deaths which can be attributed to the vaccine aren't being left off the reports by doctors who worships vaccines. I dont think you understand how many doctors are truly ignorant outside of their CDC/Big Pharma pamphlets.

here is a twitter thread of german pathologists holding a press conference sharing their findings.
[link to twitter.com (secure)]

here is a viral facebook post with comments littered with thousands of people speaking out about vaccine injuries and their stories
[link to www.facebook.com (secure)]

If you are denying this vaccine isn't causing more harm than advertised then you simply have your head in the sand.


3.) not having a reporting requirement is what probably keeps those other vaccine numbers low.... just saying.

4.) it is happening. You just aren't paying attention. Many nurses and doctors out there speaking out stating as much.... but we cant listen to then cuz they are "loons"...

Don't you guys learn anything from movies?

First comes denial, then anger and rage, then acceptance.

Repairs DNA

[link to www.healthline.com (secure)]

More from page 10:

Two issues arise from these results. First, where is the data justifying inoculation for children, much less
most people under forty? It’s not found on Fig. 1, where the most vulnerable are almost exclusively the elderly with many comorbidities [83]. Yet, in the USA, Pfizer has been approved to inoculate children 12–17, and the goal is to accomplish this by the start of the school year in the Fall. As stated previously, there are plans to inoculate children as young as six months starting before the end of 2021. What is the rush for a group at essentially zero risks? Given that the inoculations were tested only for a few months, only very short-term adverse effects could be obtained. It is questionable how well even these short-term effects obtained from the clinical trials reflect the shortterm effects from the initial mass inoculation results reported in VAERS. Figs. 1 and 2 reflect only these very short-term results. A number of
researchers have suggested the possibility of severe longer-term autoimmune, Antibody-Dependent Enhancement, neurological, and other potentially serious effects, with lag periods ranging from months to years. If such effects do turn out to be real, the children are the ones who will have to bear the brunt of the suffering. There appear to be no benefits for the children and young adults from the inoculations and only Costs!

Testimony given by
Md’s to the us vaccine committee showed overall they are killing 2 to everyone they save and that is based on only 1% of
Doctors reporting negative side Effects


[link to theexpose.uk (secure)]

Everybody is ignoring the facts in this thing like they are intentionally murdering people

I foresee many possible problems arising from this rushed decision to vaccinate.

I’m going to disagree with your #2 point.
A requirement does not mean that they are reported. In fact, In some hospitals, reporting to VAERS is very discouraged, and in some cases, is verbally banned and accompanied by threats of termination.
How do I know this? I’m a nurse. I work in a hospital. AEs and deaths occurring within two weeks of the vax are not counted as within two weeks is not considered fully vaxxed because it has not taken effect.
Aside from that, doctors, PAs, NPs and nurses are discouraged from using VAERS due to hospital pressure. We are told that it cannot be from the vax, and obviously must be from an underlying condition. Even if a patient had an mri one month prior, is without issue, and then suddenly is admitted with abdominal pain, N/V, and on a subsequent mri, a 6cm tumor is found, is aggressive, and perplexed the doctors, it is certainly not the vax.
My point being, AEs are being underreported. We discuss this on the side.
We find it shocking that the hospital is engaging in this behavior. Residents are far more likely to talk to us about it. They are more idealistic, and chummy with nurses. They open up to us. They find it disturbing and are scared. They feel as though they can not talk to their attending due to fear of reprimand.
All VAERS reports are questioned by the higher ups. Non-physicians would rather not report than to deal with a “meeting”.
What we see is quite concerning. I’ve never seen so many under 50 admitted with cardiac, blood vessel or clotting disorders.
Since many doctors, nurses and CRNAs work multiple facilities, we hear stories from around the city. It’s the same. I don’t think it’s intentional depopulation, but something is not right.
No one wants to ask exactly why are so many nurses refusing? It’s not politics. Only the ignorant say it is. The MSM and the government are not being honest. What we see is not what they say it is. And we don’t make enough money to give in. They can’t buy our acquiescence.
I’ve been given a vax deadline. I’m close to walking away from my career. Many are.
TO BE CLEAR: we’re not all anti vax. But there damned sure isn’t enough safety data to make us want to take it. And studies funded by big pharma or the NIH are rife with conflicts of interest. Remember when studies and testimony from big tobacco was enough to say cigarettes are safe, regardless of what was happening?

You mean exactly how Covid deaths were being recorded?

1. There wasn't a single autopsy done in any of those cases proving 'covid' was the cause of death.

2. Vaers reports are done based on professional medical diagnosis and qualified personell. There is more evidence for vaccine damage than *covid' damage based on your first cognitively dissonant comment.

3. Straight liar. It was a HARVARD study, not sponsored by 'insurance'.

4. Another lie. Most medical practioners don't file anything. Those that do attempt to rule out other causes first.

Keep lying figgit it's all you got.