Science dude DESTROYS flat earth retards with facts

"Perfesser" Dave is a NASA shill and a fucking liar.

He has been debunked many times by FE researchers and shown for the fucking dipshit that he is.

Like Sci Man Dan and the rest,

All ignorant, paid shills who read a script.

another fucking MORON

another moron

you dumb motherfuckers are too stupid to understand basic science or physics.

The flat earth concept is just as back as thinking the earth is the center of the universe, you are like a bunch of dumbasses like in the middleages yet we're in the 21st century, oh the irony!

Dave even shows a slope function describing the duning kruger effect on these MORONS. lol

you do know the whole flat earth thing is a joke right??

who is the joke being played on?

every single one of these dumb asses fails to understand physics on a planetary scale.

surely someone can fly around the equator and find out if they
come back to where they started from.

around the world flights have already happened

Flat earth is not a legitimate argument. It's a psyop meant to ensare morons in order to make the entire conspiracy theory community look nuts. Notice when flat earth came to the forefront? When all the dirt on Obama and Hillary was being exposed and populist candidates were rising to power. Just in time for a "pandemic" and the distribution of experimental vaccines while globalists are seizing power around the world. That's pretty good timing.

"flat earth" is a psy-op. Even engaging in such a discussion "flat or round" is a loss, waste of time and you've been conned... Im out.

Water cannot and will not curve.

Water always finds its level

You can test to see just how flat water is

End of argument. Earth is flat. Explain how water suddenly magically curves around and sticks to a ball that is supposed to be spinning at over 1000 mph

I have done that here so many times on different accounts for years...
I might actually watch this video. A man after my own heart maybe

I typically refuse to watch any flat derp video .......pro or con.
Don't need to
But this one sounds somewhat interesting.


Well I watched a summary
I guess it was so long, because derpers just drone on with retarded talking points, and well it can be funny in a sad sort of way.
He could have just made it ten minutes and focused on the lack of a working model( day and night, seasons)
You really don't need to go deeper than that, and can illustrate the point with a map and a ruler

Last Edited by Sisyphusrock on 10/20/2021 10:24 AM

op, you're so dumb it's embarrassing.

you actually posted that vid? oh dear...

“Gravity”

Strong enough to hold 1.5 quintillion tons of water to the earth, but light enough to allow birds to fly…



You people make up science to back you stupid floating balls theory and you expect people with a brain to believe it…

bullshit.

you fail to understand you're utterly gullible, that's why you believe the globe earth bollocks.

this.

but globers are too lazy to do the research job.
they are too comfortable with youtube providing them promoted info and suppresses the dozens of high quality debunks to wannabe prof dave's lies.

Correct. Globesters are pretty hopeless. Even when they do "experiments" (which almost none do) they're always dodgy AF and rigged to deliver the result they want.

FE researchers do masses of physical experiments and meticulous observations, and have found exactly ZERO curvature or motion of the Earth.

Lmao..hahaha ok new award for dumbest fucking post on GLP .

obviously the bird can produce enough upward force to counter act gravity.

The same force is working on a bird or a water droplet . You need to review basic Newtonian physics

Last Edited by Sisyphusrock on 10/20/2021 10:33 AM

Freemason Newton formulated his Theory of Universal Gravitation (mass attracting mass) simply as a way to make heliocentrism work.

It has never been demonstrated, anywhere (the so-called Cavendish Experiment was a fabrication and has never been successfully replicated under stringent laboratory conditions.)

Yeah that’s it…

I'm confused,

1....are you attacking the ontological origins of competing gravity models ..

2....or the justification in believing the force exists , and the accuracy of predictions we can use Newtonian equations for ?


Or are you just a typical derper wasting everyone's time ?


If you don't think gravity exists , go jump off a building and contemplate the epistemological justifications , as the ground rushes toward you.

Last Edited by Sisyphusrock on 10/20/2021 10:42 AM

Newton was the guy who died from ingesting mercury?

Yeah, let’s trust him…

What do you know.... no direct answer...

Just some lame ass well poisoning detraction from the point.

If you are a troll , you suck at your job..
If you are this stupid, may god have mercy on your soul

It’s not worth arguing with a brainwashed idiot

Go get your booster…

He also lost all his money in the South Sea Bubble blow-up, if I recall.

Or, one of those Bubbles they had in the 1700s.

OR.

You are incapable of arguing anything resembling a point.


Just look at your lame attempts at avoiding a direct question.
It was even a yes or no question .
Polarized .
Ontology or epistemology .

You can't even answer that .

Or to give you the most generous euphemism I can conceive:
You are the laziest/ incapable ( whichever is greater ) Troll in existence , and are refusing to

Last Edited by Sisyphusrock on 10/20/2021 10:58 AM