Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 2,121 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,445,014
Pageviews Today: 2,410,138Threads Today: 967Posts Today: 17,226
10:29 PM


Back to Forum
Back to Forum
Back to Thread
Back to Thread
REPORT COPYRIGHT VIOLATION IN REPLY
Message Subject FOR CORONACOASTER: COVID-19 News, Info, Discussion /// Tracking the Spread of the Virus and its Effects
Poster Handle S-man
Post Content
Just for info...

On the thread: Thread: Fauci emails FOIA'd .. Unredacted. THEY KNEW about Furin Cleavage Site and HIV Inserts & let vax-makers add them! we have (I think) the one and only Charles Rixey here at GLP! He released the DEFUSE proposal, and has clockwork knowledge of the timelines and malfeasance of Fauci et al.

He touches on some new technology that Fauci REJECTED and likely, according to Kevin McCairn, would have had an impact bigger than Fusion Inhibitors / Ivm etc.


Some of his thoughts:
Alright, now that I'm 'official' with a profile to this message board I randomly came upon...

I want to state for the record that I can speak with authority on these Fauci/FCS/Vax/Cover-up pieces of evidence, lol - I discovered and was the first to piece together several parts of this story.

I'll go ahead and hopefully clarify some of the various points I've seen in this thread:

1) Dr. Fauci/NIAID knew about the Furin Cleavage Site [FCS] by 1/13/2020, which is when his VRC finished their vax prototype sequence and forwarded it to Moderna. In various publications and in the timeline on the NIAID's own website, they explicitly state that they'd made the decision to retain the FCS by that date.

2) This means that Fauci knew that 2019-nCoV was HIGHLY pathogenic - 7 days before China even announced that they'd confirmed human-to-human transmission. He didn't say anything about this to warn the public in the 3 weeks before the 2/1 teleconference.

3) After the 2/1 & 2/3 teleconferences, ALL of the assembled scientists and public health officials, including the future pandemic advisors for the US, UK, Germany and the Netherlands, remained silent about the existence of the FCS, despite publishing 33 papers/articles in the following six weeks.

4) In other words, they lied to the world, which allowed the virus to spread and put medical personnel in major danger, not fully understanding the risks as they cared for their patients.

5) The decision to retain the FCS was a BIG deal - it was the first time that the VRC/Pfizer/etc. had ever done so, and they were already dealing with brand new technology as a result of their mRNA platform. I went through nearly 40 vaccine prototypes within published papers on PubMed, and I can confirm that they knew exactly what they were doing when they made such a bizarre choice
 Quoting: Rixey





I endorse these tweets, lol.

The livestream linked above is where I explain what these latest docs mean.

The bottom line is that Fauci already knew about the FCS, because the decision to keep it was made 3 weeks earlier - on 1/13/2020, not after the teleconference.

Let that sink in - he knew it was highly transmissible a week before China even announced that it was H2H transmissible at all.

He then hid that for 3 weeks, and then the world's leading public health experts hid it for another 6 weeks, thus ALLOWING the virus to spread w/out warning drs.
 Quoting: Rixey 84809711


I can confirm that I am, in fact, myself. Or maybe not, lol. I have no idea if there's even a way to login to this board. I don't even know exactly what this is or how I found it, but I'll run with it.

1) It is me; we are still staying with my in-laws, and I'm trying to get engaged with the investigation efforts here in DC.

2) God's taken much better care of me over the years than I deserve, lol, so I have no complaints there.

3) Ironically, I didn't get to rest during that road trip because I was working in crunch time on a project for RFK Jr.

4) The tech he referred to is one of many things that Fauci REJECTED over the course of the pandemic. In terms of overall profundity, I'd say it's much bigger than fusion inhibitors. I've refrained from going into details about that subject because of the need to protect my sources. I can assure you that they and probably I will be able to testify under oath about it.

Bottom line is that we need to spread that stream and the related documents around as widely as possible, because it represents a compilation of mostly facts, not just circumstantial evidence.

Speaking of... [link to www.researchgate.net (secure)]
 Quoting: Rixey 84809711
 
Please verify you're human:




Reason for copyright violation:







GLP