BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. | |
Logan Five User ID: 81223745 Germany 11/29/2021 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. Globalists putting on brown face again so you can't criticise their tyranny. Ever notice that this corporate fascist globalist state likes to hide behind black and brown people and use them as human shields. Apparently Jack Dorsey being a white dude is not a good shield to hide behind. People can criticise him without being called a racist. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81103215 Jack Dorsey hides behind his black wife's dress. You can see commie all through both of them, however. Last Edited by Logan Five on 11/29/2021 01:08 PM Deep Sleep Sandman. "Build Back Better" is a lie! There is no "renewal"! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 49545246 United States 11/29/2021 01:05 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. Any communication platform that bans free speech and free flow of ideas will die a natural death, as people gravitate away from it in favor of freedom to express ones ideas. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1889249 Most people don't like echo Chambers. Not when the federal reserve keeps propping it up with free money, just like the msm that no one watches yet they keep on livin. Yeah, but nobody is listening anymore, so let them squawk. Soon most of them will be dead from the clot shot |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79480936 France 11/29/2021 01:06 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79480936 that will fix it then there wont be any free speech left. Good thinking you dunce No, retard, he's right. Section 230 has been Big Tech's get out of jail free card for election meddling, political contributions without limit, and collusion with foreign Communist dictatorships. are we really going there again? You know who supports removing section 230? The left Biden Obama Clintons Bush At this point I kinda wish they pull the trigger on 230 then we all would have to sit back and watch what unfolds. Anyone who was in support of the move would be digitally burned at the stake. You would deserve it Bring it. I'd prefer a straight fight to all this sneaking around. /Solo You dont think we are getting a straight fight now? With a potus going on national tv saying anyone who doesnt want a jab is the enemy. A potus who is calling everyone white supremicists and announcing the creation of new gov departments to handle them? Thats a straight fight! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 5461667 United States 11/29/2021 01:07 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Logan Five User ID: 81223745 Germany 11/29/2021 01:10 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. ... Quoting: Logan Five No, retard, he's right. Section 230 has been Big Tech's get out of jail free card for election meddling, political contributions without limit, and collusion with foreign Communist dictatorships. are we really going there again? You know who supports removing section 230? The left Biden Obama Clintons Bush At this point I kinda wish they pull the trigger on 230 then we all would have to sit back and watch what unfolds. Anyone who was in support of the move would be digitally burned at the stake. You would deserve it Bring it. I'd prefer a straight fight to all this sneaking around. /Solo You dont think we are getting a straight fight now? With a potus going on national tv saying anyone who doesnt want a jab is the enemy. A potus who is calling everyone white supremicists and announcing the creation of new gov departments to handle them? Thats a straight fight! Yeah, you've got a point. Deep Sleep Sandman. "Build Back Better" is a lie! There is no "renewal"! |
Ritard User ID: 81035825 United States 11/29/2021 01:15 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81216628 Germany 11/29/2021 01:16 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Base12 User ID: 78222180 United States 11/29/2021 01:17 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. [link to youtu.be (secure)] Last Edited by Base12 on 11/29/2021 01:17 PM Visit my website... [link to www.mostholyplace.com] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79480936 France 11/29/2021 01:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79480936 are we really going there again? You know who supports removing section 230? The left Biden Obama Clintons Bush At this point I kinda wish they pull the trigger on 230 then we all would have to sit back and watch what unfolds. Anyone who was in support of the move would be digitally burned at the stake. You would deserve it Bring it. I'd prefer a straight fight to all this sneaking around. /Solo You dont think we are getting a straight fight now? With a potus going on national tv saying anyone who doesnt want a jab is the enemy. A potus who is calling everyone white supremicists and announcing the creation of new gov departments to handle them? Thats a straight fight! Yeah, you've got a point. Section 230 is a section of Title 47 of the United States Code enacted as part of the United States Communications Decency Act, that generally provides immunity for website platforms with respect to third-party content. At its core, Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by third-party users: No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80062619 United States 11/29/2021 01:19 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79134324 United States 11/29/2021 01:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80691639 United States 11/29/2021 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. Why the fuck do we care? There was life before Twitter and Facebook. Anyone remember Myspace? Hell, I had to go look up pre-Facebook social media just remember the damn name. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79480936 France 11/29/2021 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. You dont think we are getting a straight fight now? With a potus going on national tv saying anyone who doesnt want a jab is the enemy. A potus who is calling everyone white supremicists and announcing the creation of new gov departments to handle them? Thats a straight fight! Yeah, you've got a point. Section 230 is a section of Title 47 of the United States Code enacted as part of the United States Communications Decency Act, that generally provides immunity for website platforms with respect to third-party content. At its core, Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by third-party users: No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] If they took away section 230 everything that would be said on platform would be considered under law as if the platform itself made the allogations, or gave an opinion, provided the libel or slander. The natural reaction would be for platforms to make it so that every comment has to be approved by a moderator. They aren't going to take the risk of getting sued because someone said Clinton eats babies as an example. |
JeremiahJohnson User ID: 79391326 Switzerland 11/29/2021 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. https://twitter.com/_/status/1465351179538509826 [link to twitter.com (secure)] https://twitter.com/_/status/1465346996814983177 [link to twitter.com (secure)] 1984? Yeah right, man. That's a typo. Orwell is here now. He's livin' large. Jeremiah Johnson made his way into the mountains, bettin' on forgettin' all the troubles that he knew... |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79480936 France 11/29/2021 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79480936 You dont think we are getting a straight fight now? With a potus going on national tv saying anyone who doesnt want a jab is the enemy. A potus who is calling everyone white supremicists and announcing the creation of new gov departments to handle them? Thats a straight fight! Yeah, you've got a point. Section 230 is a section of Title 47 of the United States Code enacted as part of the United States Communications Decency Act, that generally provides immunity for website platforms with respect to third-party content. At its core, Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by third-party users: No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider. [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] If they took away section 230 everything that would be said on platform would be considered under law as if the platform itself made the allogations, or gave an opinion, provided the libel or slander. The natural reaction would be for platforms to make it so that every comment has to be approved by a moderator. They aren't going to take the risk of getting sued because someone said Clinton eats babies as an example. Or that Bidens son is crackhead who rapes kids as another example. You see what Im saying? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81103215 Canada 11/29/2021 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. It's only racists who don't make a distinction between muslims and extremists. And it's only extremists who don't distinguish between white people and racists. Muslims are not a race so I don't know what this guy is blathering on about. He is using the term racist incorrectly. He should of said only Bigots don't distinguish between Muslims and extremists. But I guess Bigot doesn't sound as a bad as calling someone a racist. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80411266 Netherlands 11/29/2021 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81133378 United States 11/29/2021 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. https://twitter.com/_/status/1465351179538509826 [link to twitter.com (secure)] https://twitter.com/_/status/1465346996814983177 [link to twitter.com (secure)] Another hunk of leftist dogshit, carrying on Dorsey's censorship to the next level. Communists are really disgusting weeds and enemies of humanity. They ALL belong in the ground. |
Fred Allen User ID: 33207797 United States 11/29/2021 01:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Eyeball Replacement User ID: 79903136 United States 11/29/2021 01:33 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
T2256 User ID: 80987710 United States 11/29/2021 01:38 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. https://twitter.com/_/status/1465351179538509826 [link to twitter.com (secure)] https://twitter.com/_/status/1465346996814983177 [link to twitter.com (secure)] How exactly are American Corporations not bound by US Law? T2256 Let freedom ring in your heart! Open all the doors! Stay tuned for more episodes of the TEOSIRNADU! I will teach the world incredible secrets. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 30444603 United States 11/29/2021 01:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Don Draper from Nantucket User ID: 80692948 United States 11/29/2021 01:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. ... Quoting: Logan Five No, retard, he's right. Section 230 has been Big Tech's get out of jail free card for election meddling, political contributions without limit, and collusion with foreign Communist dictatorships. are we really going there again? You know who supports removing section 230? The left Biden Obama Clintons Bush At this point I kinda wish they pull the trigger on 230 then we all would have to sit back and watch what unfolds. Anyone who was in support of the move would be digitally burned at the stake. You would deserve it Bring it. I'd prefer a straight fight to all this sneaking around. /Solo You dont think we are getting a straight fight now? With a potus going on national tv saying anyone who doesnt want a jab is the enemy. A potus who is calling everyone white supremicists and announcing the creation of new gov departments to handle them? Thats a straight fight! PLATA BITCHEZZZZZZ UPGRADE UNAVAILABLE The Rolling Stones said it best... "What's confusing you is the nature of my game" |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81103215 Canada 11/29/2021 01:43 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. The kicker is leftists like this new CEO already don't make the distinction between racists and white people. They label us all as racists no matter what even white babies are called racists and demonized as inferior to brown and black babies according to leftist ideology of Critical Race Theory which is nothing more than Marxist class struggled re-branded as race struggle where white people are the new bourgeoisie to be exterminated. White people are considered the new bad guys to be killed according to the Marxist left. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80733661 United States 11/29/2021 01:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Patriot_In_Waiting User ID: 80758058 United States 11/29/2021 01:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. Just like Sun Microsystem's CEO Scott McNealy in 1999: Quoting: Anonymous Coward 81212358 "You have zero privacy anyway…Get over it!” [link to www.beaconseniornews.com (secure)] Just a fact. Get over it. Free speech and privacy were of the Old Normal. Not applicable anymore. Maybe for everyone else in the world lol, but here in the United States We The People value our rights ! And won’t give them up for your stupid cold virus or anything else lol! Patriot_In_Waiting My name is patriot_in_waiting and I'm a GLPTARD If we get caught.....I'm deaf, and you don't speak English |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81317228 Hong Kong 11/29/2021 01:59 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77568799 United States 11/29/2021 02:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. it's not even an irony anymore that some Indian and P4ki go5tfck5rs are taking away your 1st amendment rights because the agenda is revealing in plain day openly infront of your eyes Quoting: Anonymous Coward 79787707 b0w down to your new m6latonin 6nriched mast5rs Yep, America Dems always going on about the pull starts,but always overlook them to further the push starts. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 80608675 Canada 11/29/2021 02:04 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 81137636 United States 11/29/2021 02:08 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: BREAKING: New Twitter CEO: "Our role is not to be bound by the First Amendment... focus less on thinking about free speech... times have changed. Any communication platform that bans free speech and free flow of ideas will die a natural death, as people gravitate away from it in favor of freedom to express ones ideas. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1889249 Most people don't like echo Chambers. that's false. The Internet has moved steadily towards censored echo chambers over the past twenty years. I've been online for 32 years and I watched it happen. People LOVE echo chambers, which is why almost all sites are echo chambers now. |