Case closed. "COVID 19" has never actually been isolated. The entire "pandemic" is based on computer sequencing/simulation

of course it has.

it might have been true at one point. but now it's been isolated.

if it hasn't then how are they doing this
[link to genxpro.net (secure)]

Ok. Cool. So then it should be easy peasy for you to provide a study confirming isolation within the terms provided above.

Nope

Give a listen

[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]

you're only ever going to get CGI as it's too small to optically see.


your request is impossible.

So we are supposedly in the biggest pandemic in recorded history, which has lead to entire countries being shit down, global vaccine campaign, decimation of numerous rights but it can not be demonstrated that this virus exists and can be transmitted in a lab without a computer?

Why is that?

I didn't ask to see it, I asked for confirmation that it exists and can be transmitted to humans.


Why is it "impossible" for this virus to be proven in a scientific experiment which can be replicated without using computer sequencing?

Are you thereby confirming that you can not counter that this virus has never been biologically isolated and all the
$¢ien¢e is based on computer modelling?

Just a few minutes ago you said of course it has been isolated. Well, show me.

Last Edited by Dr. Feelgood on 11/29/2021 08:20 PM

well, it gets even funnier when you realise the first primers release by the CDC were based on a random generation of previous sars/corona genetics.

Last Edited by notsofastmr on 11/29/2021 08:21 PM

It's genetic code has been isolate.

However, physically, it is impossible to isolate a virus outside of a cell.

Asking the hard questions!

we can in reverse prove that the genetic code results in an infectious virus when manufactured in a lab.

otherwise, we're just relying on what we're told.

Hi, I'm Lefty.

The vax caused me to get the right half of my body amputated.

Now I'm half the man I used to be

Yeah. I saw that video a few days ago and it I spired me to take another dive into this subject matter.


A LONG time ago, maybe a year ago I remember hearing about there being no isolated sample. I looked into it at that time, saw the (drosten?) rtPCR paper which said "no isolated sample was available at that time"


But that video reminded me, so I took another look. I have found numerous studies which claim they have isolated C19, but EVERY study I have seen has claimed this because they computer sequenced the supposed genome.

Ok. So there is a bunch of science based on a computer sequence, oddly most of it seems to be based on the genome sequence released by CHINA, which Moderna and all sorts of other scientists and companies seem to have no problem giving cart blanch trust to without any question.


So do we have an entire "pandemic" and everything that comes with it based entirely on a computer sequence?

Or can anyone show me biological proof?

Funny haha?

Or funny like "oh fuck they are trying to take over the world and kill a few billion people?



But until someone can convince me otherwise it is starting to look like this entire house of cards is in fact built upon a Chinese computer simulation
and extremely dodgy $¢ien¢e

Well, let's break that down.

we can in reverse prove that the genetic code results in ** ***** when manufactured in a lab.

I'm with you here. There is a code that results in something....


"Infectious virus"

I'm not convinced, but open to you proving this or pointing to where it has been proven.



I would say a lot of $¢ien¢e is being done and a Noah's Ark on steroids boatload of money is changing hands based on a computer sequence of the:

SPIKE PROTEIN

and mRNA which tricks or programs the human body to produce the spike protein (all throughout the entire body, specifically targeting certain body parts with more Ace2 receptors like the ovaries etc)


I believe I have read that the spike protein has been around for over a decade and may even be patented.


So I will agree that there is a computer generated code being used, which can be used to make something (spike protein) which is affecting humans.


Ignoring the sequenced part which is outside my initial terms, can you verify that whatever is produced by this computer generated code can in fact me TRANSMITTED either to a human or human to human?


I appreciate your replies, it feels like we may be getting somewhere with this.


I pose that all the science is based on computer sequenced data and until someone shows me otherwise NOT ON A BIOLOGICALLY ISOLATED "virus"

Do you disagree?

(And let's say for arguments sake that you could theoretically believe the virus is real, but what I see is that there is evidence only of $cience based on the computer generated code... Fair?
Agree or disagree?)



And to clarify, what I'm getting at, is could it be that there is no virus (or that 99 or so % of "covid" is merely rebranding other illnesses with PCR, and maybe there is some small amount of actual covid illness, perhaps even as the result of a gain of function leak or bio-weapon), just spike protein, and that everything is going on based on the ASSUMPTION that the ill effects seen are caused by a virus when they could be caused by something else, such as perhaps the spike protein? Or maybe the meds used such as remdeathsivir and that hospice medication they used and sent thru 4 years worth ina fee months?
(Just a possibility, I am not claiming this to be fact)


Could they have spent 2020 re-branding flu, bronchitis, upper respiratory infections as "covid 19" (they definitely did, but anyway, play along...) just to get everyone to BELIEVE for long enough to spread the SPIKE PROTEIN by way of the vaccines?



No matter how you slice it this is shady as fuck and the $¢ien¢e is dodgy at best and more likely outright corrupt?
Agree or disagree?

Last Edited by Dr. Feelgood on 11/29/2021 09:36 PM

Don't you know already?

They don't have to provide any evidence.

We're just supposed to blindly take the MSM's government's Fauci's and Bill Gates word on everything.

They would never ever lie to us.

They would never do such a thing as claim there's a pandemic when there isn't.

Even though it's never been isolated we're just supposed to take their word for it.

Even though there's no test for any of these variants and even though tests for the original Covid have been proven inaccurate and unreliable we're just supposed to believe everything they say.

Wait did I just say that Covid has never been isolated, that the tests are inaccurate and unreliable and there's no test for the variants.

I guess I must be crazy, maybe even a terrorist for saying that.

You must be crazy too OP.
For saying Covid has never been isolated, and suggesting it doesn't actually exist.
In fact you may even be a terrorist.

That's basically how these brainwashed sheep think.

How is this thread not pinned?

Well, I gave it a lin request.

Let's hope it gets it.

It definitely gets a 5* from me.

you're right, how much of the narrative are we willing to believe to begin with.

we havn't seen much deaths due to flu/covid with our own eyes, we've seen plenty of people murdered in the nursing homes with medazolam and murdered in the hospitals with remdesivir, though. which account entirely for the increase i deaths above average and we have vaccines filling in the gaps in deaths.

there could be absolutely no virus at all and the vaccine doesn't even have any spike proteins producing payloads in the modified virus or lipid carriers.

i don't know exactly what part of these we can begin to confirm is even real.

in some way of making a start to this.

can we establish some self evident truths and see where that leads us.


my offering is that it's self evident there is a genetic sequence that is being matched on the rapid home test kits. (not PCR). sometimes there is a positive, sometimes there is a negative.

which means there is an agent that is present and not present.

are we in agreement on this first principle?

[link to wwwnc.cdc.gov (secure)]

"We isolated virus from nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal specimens from this patient"

Too many inconsistencies. They are lying. It does not exist.

Thank you!

Medazolam, thank you, that was the other one I couldn't recall the name of.

Well, it would seem we are on the same page for the most part, particularly on the important stuff.


Thanks for the constructive dialogue.
You are far more knowledgeable than most.


I feel like maybe 80-99% of people just refuse to actually examine the information available and blindly trust their doc or Facebook or their TV because that is easier than reading something that might be a little complicated and require some thought. And those who are behind this charade we're banking on that laziness/stupidity and cashing in big time on their bet. The vast majority would prefer to be comfortable and ignorant than to put any effort into being informed.


You are among the few that think for themselves and I commend you for that.

Nope.

Used monkey and cow cells, then sequenced it with a computer.


You fail.



Thanks for playing.




Whole-Genome Sequencing
We designed 37 pairs of nested PCRs spanning the genome on the basis of the coronavirus reference sequence (GenBank accession no. NC045512). We extracted nucleic acid from isolates and amplified by using the 37 individual nested PCRs. We used positive PCR amplicons individually for subsequent Sanger sequencing and also pooled them for library preparation by using a ligation sequencing kit (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, [link to nanoporetech.comExternal (secure)] Link), subsequently for Oxford Nanopore MinION sequencing. We generated consensus nanopore sequences by using Minimap version 2.17 ( [link to github.comExternal (secure)] Link) and Samtools version 1.9 ( [link to www.htslib.orgExternal] Link). We generated consensus sequences by Sanger sequencing from both directions by using Sequencher version 5.4.6 ( [link to www.genecodes.comExternal (secure)] Link), and further confirmed them by using consensus sequences generated from nanopore sequencing.

I'm not well researched on the rapid home tests, maybe someone else can chime in.


As far as the PCR tests (still the most common test last time I checked) they check 37-40 gene pairs, and viruses are supposedly 30,000 - 40,000 gene pairs. Also the very short sequence that is checked matches over 90 normally occuring genomic segments from the human body and many other naturally occuring material including numerous other viruses or illnesses.


So it seems to me like the PCR test, was chosen INTENTIONALLY for it's ability to generate false positives (particularly with higher replications) as they knew they could ramp up testing and raise replications thresholds to create cases as needed to push the narrative, or even lower if needed to keep things believable. You would be hard pressed to find a better plandemic tool.




If you can provide a source on the rapid test method I will read it and get back to you.



Based on PCR I do not believe that there has to be the presence of an actual "covid 19" entity, which seems to be what you are proposing if I am interpreting you correctly. I'm curious if the rapid test method offers some way of verifying that, now that you mention it though.



I find it very curious that this is happening with a Corona virus as it is known there are hundreds, maybe thousands of them so if a test can test for Corona virus then a certain count of people will test positive, even in the absence of a new "novel corona virus" aka "covid 19."

Last Edited by Dr. Feelgood on 11/29/2021 11:43 PM

good question, op

this should be left up on the board for a few months until we have a satisfactory answer

and especially if the answer is no

.

I'd like to know. I don't have any huge social media to bring this discussion to the forefront of our society, but I have been watching this whole thing closely since about Christmas 2019.

If I had to bet, my money is on this entire thing having been based on PCR false positives and a computer sequenced imaginary "virus" with propaganda and politics steering the big retarded ship.

Someone bet big that humankind is dumb enough to fall for it without ever even having to prove the big bad scary thing even exists and here we are.


If anyone would like to prove me wrong, feel free.

I'm not even convinced it's a virus at all.

Nah it hasn’t been isolated. They made a soup in a Petri dish and claimed that there must be a virus as cells started dying. Then they plucked out a few proteins and ran a computer simulation to fill in the blanks. John Rappoport has a blog that covers this extensively.

[link to www.bitchute.com (secure)]